8000 inductor_config_logging: Don't drop keys by c00w · Pull Request #144700 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

inductor_config_logging: Don't drop keys #144700

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

c00w
Copy link
Contributor
@c00w c00w commented Jan 13, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

This bit me while I was trying to debug some trace issues.
In general this config is already quite large when dumping, so adding
more fields doesn't make it significantly worse.

Also a number of the items we are type checking for (except the test
configs), don't even show up. Primarily this will help us when debugging
rocm, halide, and trace configs.

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @chenyang78 @kadeng @chauhang @amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
c00w added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
This bit me while I was trying to debug some trace issues.
In general this config is already quite large when dumping, so adding
more fields doesn't make it significantly worse.

Also a number of the items we are type checking for (except the test
configs), don't even show up. Primarily this will help us when debugging
rocm, halide, and trace configs.

ghstack-source-id: bf25ac5
Pull Request resolved: #144700
Copy link
pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 13, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/144700

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 7061d4f with merge base caf6039 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@c00w c00w requested review from masnesral and ezyang January 13, 2025 18:56
@c00w c00w added the topic: not user facing topic category label Jan 13, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
c00w added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
This bit me while I was trying to debug some trace issues.
In general this config is already quite large when dumping, so adding
more fields doesn't make it significantly worse.

Also a number of the items we are type checking for (except the test
configs), don't even show up. Primarily this will help us when debugging
rocm, halide, and trace configs.

ghstack-source-id: eca2e08
Pull Request resolved: #144700
@c00w c00w requested a review from jamesjwu January 13, 2025 23:28
[ghstack-poisoned]
c00w added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
This bit me while I was trying to debug some trace issues.
In general this config is already quite large when dumping, so adding
more fields doesn't make it significantly worse.

Also a number of the items we are type checking for (except the test
configs), don't even show up. Primarily this will help us when debugging
rocm, halide, and trace configs.

ghstack-source-id: ff5779a
Pull Request resolved: #144700
This bit me while I was trying to debug some trace issues.
In general this config is already quite large when dumping, so adding
more fields doesn't make it significantly worse.

Also a number of the items we are type checking for (except the test
configs), don't even show up. Primarily this will help us when debugging
rocm, halide, and trace configs.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
c00w added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2025
This bit me while I was trying to debug some trace issues.
In general this config is already quite large when dumping, so adding
more fields doesn't make it significantly worse.

Also a number of the items we are type checking for (except the test
configs), don't even show up. Primarily this will help us when debugging
rocm, halide, and trace configs.

ghstack-source-id: 7716612
Pull Request resolved: #144700
This bit me while I was trying to debug some trace issues.
In general this config is already quite large when dumping, so adding
more fields doesn't make it significantly worse.

Also a number of the items we are type checking for (except the test
configs), don't even show up. Primarily this will help us when debugging
rocm, halide, and trace configs.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
c00w added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
This bit me while I was trying to debug some trace issues.
In general this config is already quite large when dumping, so adding
more fields doesn't make it significantly worse.

Also a number of the items we are type checking for (except the test
configs), don't even show up. Primarily this will help us when debugging
rocm, halide, and trace configs.

ghstack-source-id: bf8a1a7
Pull Request resolved: #144700
@c00w
Copy link
Contributor Author
c00w commented Jan 22, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Jan 22, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 22, 2025 01:32 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 22, 2025 01:32 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 22, 2025 01:32 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 22, 2025 01:32 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 22, 2025 01:32 Inactive
c00w added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2025
This bit me while I was trying to debug some trace issues.
In general this config is already quite large when dumping, so adding
more fields doesn't make it significantly worse.

Also a number of the items we are type checking for (except the test
configs), don't even show up. Primarily this will help us when debugging
rocm, halide, and trace configs.

ghstack-source-id: f17ca2d
Pull Request resolved: #144700
@c00w
Copy link
Contributor Author
c00w commented Jan 23, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 23, 2025 21:25 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 23, 2025 21:25 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 23, 2025 21:25 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 23, 2025 21:25 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 23, 2025 21:25 Inactive
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

This bit me while I was trying to debug some trace issues.
In general this config is already quite large when dumping, so adding
more fields doesn't make it significantly worse.

Also a number of the items we are type checking for (except the test
configs), don't even show up. Primarily this will help us when debugging
rocm, halide, and trace configs.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
c00w added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2025
This bit me while I was trying to debug some trace issues.
In general this config is already quite large when dumping, so adding
more fields doesn't make it significantly worse.

Also a number of the items we are type checking for (except the test
configs), don't even show up. Primarily this will help us when debugging
rocm, halide, and trace configs.

ghstack-source-id: 35f54d7
Pull Request resolved: #144700
@c00w
Copy link
Contributor Author
c00w commented Jan 25, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 25, 2025 01:18 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 25, 2025 01:18 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 25, 2025 01:21 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 25, 2025 01:21 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 25, 2025 01:21 Inactive
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

The merge job was canceled or timed out. This most often happen if two merge requests were issued for the same PR, or if merge job was waiting for more than 6 hours for tests to finish. In later case, please do not hesitate to reissue the merge command
For more information see pytorch-bot wiki.

@c00w
Copy link
Contributor Author
c00w commented Jan 27, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit to pytorch/benchmark that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
Summary:
This bit me while I was trying to debug some trace issues.
In general this config is already quite large when dumping, so adding
more fields doesn't make it significantly worse.

Also a number of the items we are type checking for (except the test
configs), don't even show up. Primarily this will help us when debugging
rocm, halide, and trace configs.

X-link: pytorch/pytorch#144700
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang

Reviewed By: ZainRizvi

Differential Revision: D68746502

fbshipit-source-id: d441bb6e39d8e5d38ee1386ebcca5f4ad00c896b
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/c00w/25/head branch February 28, 2025 02:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0