8000 [inductor] Fix inputs with existing offsets by jansel · Pull Request #108168 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[inductor] Fix inputs with existing offsets #108168

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jansel
Copy link
Contributor
@jansel jansel commented Aug 29, 2023

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

This cherrypicks the reinterpret_tensor change from #102625 in order to fix a subtle correctness bug when the graph inputs already have a storage_offset set.

The view change also fixes some issues with quantized models in torchbench.

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @Xia-Weiwen @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @peterbell10 @ipiszy @ngimel @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @aakhundov

@pytorch-bot
Copy link
pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 29, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/108168

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ No Failures, 2 Pending

As of commit f91e91e with merge base 6648880 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@jansel jansel added topic: not user facing topic category ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request labels Aug 29, 2023
@jansel jansel requested a review from desertfire August 29, 2023 17:34
This cherrypicks the reinterpret_tensor change from #102625 in order to fix a subtle correctness bug when the graph inputs already have a storage_offset set.

The view change also fixes some issues with quantized models in torchbench.



cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx peterbell10 ipiszy ngimel yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 aakhundov

[ghstack-poisoned]
@jansel
Copy link
Contributor Author
jansel commented Aug 29, 2023

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

jansel added a commit to jansel/pytorch that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2023
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/jansel/168/head branch September 2, 2023 14:23
atalman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2023
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2023
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2023
This reverts commit 2c87ef3.

ghstack-source-id: 58dcef8
Pull Request resolved: #109465
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0