10000 GH-98388: Add tests for happy eyeballs and its internal workings by twisteroidambassador · Pull Request #98389 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

GH-98388: Add tests for happy eyeballs and its internal workings #98389

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from
+195 −0
Closed

GH-98388: Add tests for happy eyeballs and its internal workings #98389

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
d8b4492
Add tests for happy eyeballs and its internal workings.
twisteroidambassador Oct 18, 2022
34a8f6f
Correct typo in filename.
twisteroidambassador Oct 18, 2022
c0e179e
Improve readability for _interleave_addrinfos tests.
twisteroidambassador Oct 18, 2022
8270e69
Rename _interleave_addrinfos tests to match the method being tested.
twisteroidambassador Oct 18, 2022
afb6abf
Made test_simultaneous_success_fail fail more consistently (I hope).
twisteroidambassador Oct 18, 2022
513f7f9
Replace `wait_for` with `wait`.
twisteroidambassador Oct 19, 2022
079eec8
Delete staggered.py
arhadthedev Apr 26, 2023
ec144fb
Merge branch 'main' into happy_eyeballs_checkup
arhadthedev Apr 26, 2023
5ec7d65
Restore staggered.py from `main` branch
arhadthedev Apr 26, 2023
4e9f06a
Address patchcheck report
arhadthedev Apr 26, 2023
62387d6
Merge branch 'main' into happy_eyeballs_checkup
gvanrossum May 23, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
Improve readability for _interleave_addrinfos tests.
  • Loading branch information
@twisteroidambassador
twisteroidambassador committed Oct 18, 2022
commit c0e179e8c648b2f5217c911682e92dbe3e2e905e
59 changes: 14 additions & 45 deletions Lib/test/test_asyncio/test_base_events.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -146,55 +146,24 @@ def test_ipaddr_info_no_inet_pton(self, m_socket):
socket.IPPROTO_TCP))

def test_interleave_ipaddrs(self):
addrinfos = [
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::1', 1)),
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::2', 2)),
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::3', 3)),
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::4', 4)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.1', 5)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.2', 6)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.3', 7)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.4', 8)),
]
SIX_A = (socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::1', 1))
SIX_B = (socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::2', 2))
SIX_C = (socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::3', 3))
SIX_D = (socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::4', 4))
FOUR_A = (socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.1', 5))
FOUR_B = (socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.2', 6))
FOUR_C = (socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.3', 7))
FOUR_D = (socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.4', 8))

self.assertEqual(
[
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::1', 1)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.1', 5)),
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::2', 2)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.2', 6)),
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::3', 3)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.3', 7)),
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::4', 4)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.4', 8)),
],
base_events._interleave_addrinfos(addrinfos)
)
addrinfos = [SIX_A, SIX_B, SIX_C, SIX_D, FOUR_A, FOUR_B, FOUR_C, FOUR_D]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be a more thorough test if we mixed up the order a bit, e.g. like this?

Suggested change
addrinfos = [SIX_A, SIX_B, SIX_C, SIX_D, FOUR_A, FOUR_B, FOUR_C, FOUR_D]
addrinfos = [SIX_A, SIX_B, SIX_C, FOUR_A, FOUR_B, FOUR_C, FOUR_D, SIX_D]

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM @gvanrossum.

expected = [SIX_A, FOUR_A, SIX_B, FOUR_B, SIX_C, FOUR_C, SIX_D, FOUR_D]

def test_interleave_ipaddrs_first_address_family_count(self):
addrinfos = [
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::1', 1)),
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::2', 2)),
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::3', 3)),
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::4', 4)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.1', 5)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.2', 6)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.3', 7)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.4', 8)),
]
self.assertEqual(expected, base_events._interleave_addrinfos(addrinfos))

expected_fafc_2 = [SIX_A, SIX_B, FOUR_A, SIX_C, FOUR_B, SIX_D, FOUR_C, FOUR_D]
self.assertEqual(
[
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::1', 1)),
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::2', 2)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.1', 5)),
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::3', 3)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.2', 6)),
(socket.AF_INET6, 0, 0, '', ('2001:db8::4', 4)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.3', 7)),
(socket.AF_INET, 0, 0, '', ('192.0.2.4', 8)),
],
base_events._interleave_addrinfos(addrinfos, 2)
expected_fafc_2,
base_events._interleave_addrinfos(addrinfos, first_address_family_count=2),
)


Expand Down
0