-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.2k
gh-81488: Add recursive wording for issubclass #92087
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This probably can't be cleanly backported to 3.9 due to the reference to Union types. Are you interested in doing a manual backport to 3.9 (if it's merged), or shall we leave 3.9? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've no idea what's going on with the CI failures, but this LGTM
Sure, I can do a manual backport, |
Thanks @slateny for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9, 3.10. |
GH-92101 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
Sorry, @slateny and @JelleZijlstra, I could not cleanly backport this to |
@slateny leaving the 3.9 backport to you. Thanks for your many docs improvements! |
…onGH-92087). (cherry picked from commit 1066ecb) Co-authored-by: slateny <46876382+slateny@users.noreply.github.com>
GH-92131 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
…onGH-92087) (python#92131) (cherry picked from commit 1066ecb) Co-authored-by: slateny <46876382+slateny@users.noreply.github.com>
#81488