8000 [3.8] bpo-40025: Require _generate_next_value_ to be defined before members (GH-19098) by miss-islington · Pull Request #19763 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

[3.8] bpo-40025: Require _generate_next_value_ to be defined before members (GH-19098) #19763

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2020
Merged

[3.8] bpo-40025: Require _generate_next_value_ to be defined before members (GH-19098) #19763

merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor
@miss-islington miss-islington commented Apr 28, 2020 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

require _generate_next_value_ to be defined before members
(cherry picked from commit d9a43e2)

Co-authored-by: Ethan Onstott storm@stormprograms.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue40025

@abbyonstott @miss-islington
bpo-40025: Require _generate_next_value_ to be defined before members (…
4b53ffd 
…pythonGH-19098)

require `_generate_next_value_` to be defined before members
(cherry picked from commit d9a43e2)

Co-authored-by: Ethan Onstott <storm@stormprograms.com>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Apr 28, 2020
Merged
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ethanonstott and @ethanfurman: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

2 similar comments
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ethanonstott and @ethanfurman: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ethanonstott and @ethanfurman: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@csabella csabella requested a review from ethanfurman May 22, 2020 22:26
@csabella
Copy link
Contributor

@ethanfurman, is this just waiting on the approval to complete the backport? Thanks!

@ethanfurman ethanfurman merged commit b5ecbf0 into python:3.8 May 27, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-d9a43e2-3.8 branch May 27, 2020 20:12
@ethanfurman ethanfurman self-assigned this May 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ethanfurman ethanfurman Awaiting requested review from ethanfurman

Assignees

@ethanfurman ethanfurman

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@miss-islington @csabella @ethanfurman @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot @abbyonstott
0