-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
Add CloudFormation Lambda Version Provisioned Concurrency #12594
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
joe4dev
merged 5 commits into
master
from
add-cloudformation-lambda-version-provisioned-concurrency
May 8, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
52dd2ec
Add provisioned concurrency support for Lambda version CloudFormation…
joe4dev 9f7c77e
Fix qualifier and handle error case for function alias CF resource
joe4dev e524a3e
Clarify comment about deleting provisioned concurrency
joe4dev 685e4e7
Use alias name directly instead of parsing from ARN
joe4dev b6ce157
Validate actual provisioned concurrency behavior in alias CloudFormat…
joe4dev File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
q: do we still need this assertion of we are snapshotting the result?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The assertion is not strictly when it comes to AWS<->LS parity. However, we commonly clarify the intention for Lambda invokes (see Lambda test suite) because it's too/so easy to overlook a snapshot update, which contains a failing Lambda response (happened twice here).