8000 [Part 3e] Propagate policyTags to ReportNameUtils callers via reportAttributes by leshniak · Pull Request #83897 · Expensify/App · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[Part 3e] Propagate policyTags to ReportNameUtils callers via reportAttributes#83897

Merged
tgolen merged 7 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:extract-remove-onyx-connect-reportnameutils-callers-policytags
Mar 11, 2026
Merged

[Part 3e] Propagate policyTags to ReportNameUtils callers via reportAttributes#83897
tgolen merged 7 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:extract-remove-onyx-connect-reportnameutils-callers-policytags

Conversation

@leshniak
Copy link
Contributor
@leshniak leshniak commented Mar 2, 2026

Explanation of Change

After #83930 made computeChatThreadReportName accept policyTags, this PR wires the actual data in. The reportAttributes OnyxDerived computation now subscribes to POLICY_TAGS and resolves the correct PolicyTagLists entry per report before calling getComputedReportName.

  • reportAttributes.ts adds ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.POLICY_TAGS subscription, extracts per-report tags, and passes them to getComputedReportName
  • ReportNameUtils.ts removes the policyForMovingExpensesID fallback no longer needed once real tags are provided
  • OnyxDerivedTest updated to verify policyTags are correctly threaded through

This PR is part of the work split from #75562.

Fixed Issues

$#66336
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Open the app and navigate to a report that involves a modified expense
  2. Verify the report name/subtitle displays correctly
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A — pure refactor, no network calls added or removed.

QA Steps

N/A — no user-visible behavior change. This is a pure internal refactor that passes data as function parameters instead of reading it from a module-level Onyx subscription.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - 8000 URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

N/A — no UI changes

Android: mWeb Chrome

N/A — no UI changes

iOS: Native

N/A — no UI changes

iOS: mWeb Safari

N/A — no UI changes

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

N/A — no UI changes

@codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...bs/actions/OnyxDerived/configs/reportAttributes.ts 95.65% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 73 files with indirect coverage changes

@leshniak leshniak changed the title Extract remove onyx connect reportnameutils callers policytags [Part 3e] Propagate policyTags to ReportNameUtils derived callers Mar 2, 2026
@leshniak leshniak changed the title [Part 3e] Propagate policyTags to ReportNameUtils derived callers [No QA] Propagate policyTags to ReportNameUtils derived callers via OnyxDerived reportAttributes Mar 2, 2026
@leshniak leshniak changed the title [No QA] Propagate policyTags to ReportNameUtils derived callers via OnyxDerived reportAttributes Propagate policyTags to ReportNameUtils derived callers via OnyxDerived reportAttributes Mar 2, 2026
@leshniak leshniak force-pushed the extract-remove-onyx-connect-reportnameutils-callers-policytags branch from 752eb2f to f4eae2c Compare March 3, 2026 13:16
@leshniak leshniak force-pushed the extract-remove-onyx-connect-reportnameutils-callers-policytags branch 2 times, most recently from 17ad391 to 0e55971 Compare March 3, 2026 16:44
@leshniak leshniak changed the title Propagate policyTags to ReportNameUtils derived callers via OnyxDerived reportAttributes [Part 2b] Propagate policyTags to ReportNameUtils callers via reportAttributes Mar 3, 2026
@leshniak leshniak changed the title [Part 2b] Propagate policyTags to ReportNameUtils callers via reportAttributes [Part 3e] Propagate policyTags to ReportNameUtils callers via reportAttributes Mar 4, 2026
@leshniak leshniak marked this pull request as ready for review March 4, 2026 16:06
@leshniak leshniak requested review from a team as code owners March 4, 2026 16:06
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and parasharrajat and removed request for a team March 4, 2026 16:07
@melvin-bot
Copy link
melvin-bot bot commented Mar 4, 2026

@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor
@JmillsExpensify JmillsExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No product review is required on this one.

leshniak and others added 6 commits March 5, 2026 20:50
Keep ReportNameUtils backward compatible while enabling the temporary modified-expense formatter when policy tags are available, and add unit coverage for the tagged thread-name flow.

Made-with: Cursor
Address the no-unused-vars lint error introduced by the temporary policyTags parameter and keep the extraction branch passing repository lint/prettier checks.

Made-with: Cursor
Pass the required currentUserLogin argument to getForReportActionTemp so the extraction branch passes repository typecheck, lint, and prettier checks.

Made-with: Cursor
The parameter is reserved for the upcoming caller-propagation step and
intentionally unused yet. Replace the redundant early-return guard with
an explicit eslint-disable comment to make that intent clear.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ion and pass policy through computeChatThreadReportName

- Remove _policyTags from computeReportNameBasedOnReportAction; the function
  handles SUBMITTED/HOLD/IOU actions, none of which use policy tags. The
  modified-expense path lives entirely in computeChatThreadReportName.
- Add policy param to computeChatThreadReportName and forward it to
  getForReportActionTemp so policy-admin MCC checks can run correctly.
- Pass reportPolicy from computeReportName into computeChatThreadReportName.
- Add comment explaining the currentUserLogin empty-string limitation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…yTags to computeReportName

Wire POLICY_TAGS into the reportAttributes OnyxDerived config so per-report
policy tags are available at derivation time and forwarded to computeReportName.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@leshniak leshniak force-pushed the extract-remove-onyx-connect-reportnameutils-callers-policytags branch 2 times, most recently from 612067a to 0e55971 Compare March 5, 2026 19:54
Copy link
Member
@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
07.03.2026_15.49.28_REC.mp4

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from danieldoglas March 7, 2026 10:21
@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

cc: @tgolen for review. @tgolen Can you please reassign yourself to the issue instead @danieldoglas So that you get tagged to all upcoming PRs.

tgolen
tgolen previously approved these changes Mar 9, 2026
@leshniak leshniak dismissed tgolen’s stale review March 9, 2026 19:16

The merge-base changed after approval.

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor
tgolen commented Mar 9, 2026

@leshniak Can you please try updating your branch from main to fix this issue?

image

@leshniak
Copy link
Contributor Author
leshniak commented Mar 9, 2026

@leshniak Can you please try updating your branch from main to fix this issue?

image

I'll start with it tomorrow.

…callers-policytags

Resolve conflicts adapting to upstream refactoring of computeReportName to
object params (ComputeReportName type) and addition of currentUserLogin.

- computeReportName now uses object destructuring; allPolicyTags wired in
- computeChatThreadReportName now receives currentUserLogin from params
- reportAttributes.ts passes allPolicyTags in the new object call syntax
- Test updated to use upstream's object-param call signature

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@leshniak leshniak force-pushed the extract-remove-onyx-connect-reportnameutils-callers-policytags branch from 0e55971 to d1025b4 Compare March 10, 2026 16:35
@leshniak
< 4D24 span class="Button-label"> Copy link
Contributor Author

@tgolen the branch is updated.

@tgolen tgolen merged commit 89a127c into Expensify:main Mar 11, 2026
29 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @tgolen has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 9.3.36-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.3.36-10 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

0