- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:08, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Brianna Bragg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable pornographic actress. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Contested proposed deletion. The claim that she's been in over 100 films hasn't been substantiated by a reliable source. Claritas § 08:08, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BIO. The article has very little content (a comment on her breasts and a list of five extremely non-notable films). If the subject becomes notable in the future, recreate with a proper article. Johnuniq (talk) 08:31, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per above. No realiable sources to establish that the subject fulfils GNG/PORNBIO notability criteria. EuroPride (talk) 15:18, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails PORNBIO and general notability guidelines. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 15:48, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.