Understanding Preferences for Coastal Climate Change Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review
<p>Article identification and screening.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Years of publication for the perceptions of coastal adaptation articles identified in the review.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Geographic distribution of case studies on perceptions of coastal adaptation. Grey scale represents the number of case studies in each country.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>Bar graphs display the frequency count each category of adaptation was studied in each region.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>The frequency of coastal adaptation strategies studied.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>How often each coastal adaptation strategy was recorded as the top preference, relative to the number of cases studying that strategy (expressed as % of cases studying x strategy).</p> "> Figure 7
<p>Sentiment toward adaptation strategies (as a percentage of applicable cases that studied the strategy).</p> "> Figure 8
<p>The frequency each influencing factor was studied across applicable case studies (n = 104).</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Coastal Climate Change Adaptation
1.2. State of the Research on Societal Preferences for Coastal Adaptation
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Trends in Coastal Adaptation Studies
3.2. Coastal Adaptation Options
3.3. Preferences for Coastal Adaptation
Temporal Considerations
3.4. Research Gaps
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Inclusion Criteria | Exclusion Criteria |
---|---|
Timeframe 2007–2020 | Published outside timeframe |
Available through Scopus or WoS | Not available through Scopus or WoS |
Peer-reviewed journal articles | Books, conference papers, grey literature |
English language | Not English |
Must pertain to coastal impacts the coastal impacts selected for this study and adaptation these impacts (e.g., not just perceptions of impact risk) | Agricultural adaptation studies (i.e., not coastal) Coastal adaptation that refers to offshore coastal ecosystems (e.g., fisheries) |
Must pertain to adaptation | Mitigation focused papers |
Must explicitly mention perceptions/opinions of coastal adaptation and/or reasons for these perceptions | Biophysical adaptation (e.g., species’ adaptation) Focused solely on perception of climate change or perception of impacts |
General public perceptions (i.e., residents, Indigenous communities, etc.) | Articles that do not include public perceptions (e.g., only decision-makers) |
Adaptation at a regional/local scale (i.e., not household actions) | Focus on household adaptation actions |
Preference/opinion or adaptation strategy | Actual uptake of adaptation actions, or the intention to adapt |
Empirical method (i.e., no literature reviews) | Literature reviews or other non-empirical work |
Focus on the outcomes/actual actions of adaptation | Focus on the process of adaptation (e.g., preference for governance structure) |
Appendix B
Title 1 | Name | Definition | Examples |
---|---|---|---|
Hard Protection | Engineered defences | Any physical, engineered structure, both onshore and off-shore. Could also refer to ‘hard protection’ generally (e.g., authors do not specify) |
|
Hold the line | An approach whereby the current defences are maintained or upgraded to maintain the current line of defence |
| |
Soft Protection | Sediment-based | Soft structures such as beach and shore nourishment |
|
Ecological | Nature-based solution, focused on the conservation or restoration of coastal ecosystems |
| |
Soft protection (other) | Refers to ‘soft protection’ generally (i.e., the authors do not specify) |
| |
Accommodate | Social mechanisms | Includes economic and/or social measures |
|
Regulations and codes | The laws, rules, and regulations that encourage adaptation, reduce risk, or build capacity |
| |
Physical accommodation | Accommodation that involves physically changing conditions |
| |
Accommodation (other) | Refers to accommodation generally (i.e., the authors do not specify), or other less common accommodation options |
| |
Retreat | Development restrictions | Refers to restrictions on or prohibiting new development in at-risk areas |
|
Managed retreat | Residential abandonment and rezoning of existing hazard prone areas |
| |
Managed realignment 1 | Setting back the line of active defences to a new line. Doing so promotes creation of intertidal habitat |
| |
Retreat (other) | Refers to retreat generally (i.e., authors do not specify) |
| |
No Action | No action 2 | Refers to no active intervention |
|
Wait and see | No active intervention due to uncertainty of risks and impacts. Possible action in the future |
|
References
- Wong, P.P.; Losada, I.J.; Gattuso, J.P.; Hinkel, J.; Khattabi, A.; McInnes, K.L.; Saito, Y.; Sallenger, A. Coastal Systems and Low-Lying Areas. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, And Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 361–409. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, S.; Nicholls, R.J.; Hanson, S.; Brundrit, G.; Dearing, J.A.; Dickson, M.E.; Gallop, S.L.; Gao, S.; Haigh, I.D.; Hinkel, J.; et al. Shifting perspectives on coastal impacts and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014, 4, 752–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibbs, M.T. Why is coastal retreat so hard to implement? Understanding the political risk of coastal adaptation pathways. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2016, 130, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Few, R.; Brown, K.; Tompkins, E.L. Public participation and climate change adaptation: Avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Clim. Policy 2007, 7, 46–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wise, R.M.; Fazey, I.; Smith, M.S.; Park, S.E.; Eakin, H.C.; Van Garderen, E.A.; Campbell, B. Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 28, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barnett, J.; Graham, S.; Mortreux, C.; Fincher, R.; Waters, E.; Hurlimann, A. A local coastal adaptation pathway. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014, 4, 1103–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, A. Using boundary objects to stimulate transformational thinking: Storm resilience for the Port of Providence, Rhode Island (USA). Sustain. Sci. 2017, 12, 477–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bowden, V.; Nyberg, D.; Wright, C. Planning for the past: Local temporality and the construction of denial in climate change adaptation. Glob. Environ. Chang.-Hum. Policy Dimens. 2019, 57, 101939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moser, S.C. Communicating adaptation to climate change: The art and science of public engagement when climate change comes home. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.-Clim. Chang. 2014, 5, 337–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waters, E.; Barnett, J.; Puleston, A. Contrasting perspectives on barriers to adaptation in Australian climate change policy. Clim. Chang. 2014, 124, 691–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tompkins, E.L.; Few, R.; Brown, K. Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: Incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 88, 1580–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Owusu-Daaku, K.N. (Mal)Adaptation opportunism: When other interests take over stated or intended climate change adaptation objectives (and their unintended effects). Local Environ. 2018, 23, 934–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephens, S.H.; DeLorme, D.E.; Hagen, S.C. Coastal stakeholders’ perceptions of sea level rise adaptation planning in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Environ. Manag. 2020, 66, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graham, S.; Barnett, J.; Fincher, R.; Hurlimann, A.; Mortreux, C.; Waters, E. The social values at risk from sea-level rise. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2013, 41, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moser, S.C.; Pike, C. Community engagement on adaptation: Meeting a growing capacity need. Urban. Clim. 2015, 14, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biesbroek, G.R.; Klostermann, J.E.; Termeer, C.J.; Kabat, P. On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2013, 13, 1119–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexander, K.S.; Ryan, A.; Measham, T.G. Managed retreat of coastal communities: Understanding responses to projected sea level rise. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2012, 55, 409–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adger, W.N.; Dessai, S.; Goulden, M.; Hulme, M.; Lorenzoni, I.; Nelson, D.R.; Naess, L.O.; Wolf, J.; Wreford, A. Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim. Chang. 2009, 93, 335–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broto, V.C.; Boyd, E.; Ensor, J. Participatory urban planning for climate change adaptation in coastal cities: Lessons from a pilot experience in Maputo, Mozambique. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2015, 13, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pearce, T.D.; Rodríguez, E.H.; Fawcett, D.; Ford, J.D. How is Australia adapting to climate change based on a systematic review? Sustainability 2018, 10, 3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Smit, B.; Burton, I.; Klein, R.J.; Wandel, J. An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Clim. Chang. 2000, 45, 223–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dronkers, M.J.; Misdorp, R.; Schroder, P.C.; Carey, J.J.; Spradley, J.R.; Vallianos, L.; Titus, J.G.; Butler, L.W.; Ries, K.L.; Gilbert, J.T.E.; et al. Coastal Zone Management; Gilbert, J., Vellinga, P., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Doberstein, B.; Fitzgibbons, J.; Mitchell, C. Protect, accommodate, retreat or avoid (PARA): Canadian community options for flood disaster risk reduction and flood resilience. Nat. Hazards 2019, 98, 31–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schliephack, J.; Dickinson, J.E. Tourists’ representations of coastal managed realignment as a climate change adaptation strategy. Tour. Manag. 2017, 59, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oppenheimer, M.; Glavovic, B.; Hinkel, J.; van de Wal, R.; Magnan, A.K.; Abd-Elgawad, A.; Cai, R.; Cifuentes-Jara, M.; Deconto, R.M.; Ghosh, T.; et al. Sea Level Rise and Implications for Low-Lying Islands, Coasts and Communities. In IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate; Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D.C., Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E., Mintenbeck, K., Alegría, A., Nicolai, M., Okem, A., et al., Eds.; CATIE: Turrialba, Costa Rica, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Thomsen, D.C.; Smith, T.F.; Keys, N. Adaptation or manipulation? Unpacking climate change response strategies. Ecol. Soc. 2012, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fletcher, C.; Taylor, B.; Rambaldi, A.; Harman, B.; Heyenga, S.; Ganegodage, R.; Lipkin, F.; McAllister, R. Costs and Coasts: An Empirical Assessment of Physical and Institutional Climate Adaptation Pathways; National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility: Gold Coast, Australia, 2013; Available online: https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2013-05/apo-nid34006.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2021).
- Pauliet, S.; Zölch, T.; Hansen, R.; Randrup, T.B.; van den Bosch, C.K. Nature-based solutions and climate change—Four shades of green. In Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas; Kabisch, N., Korn, H., Stadler, J., Bonn, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Narayan, S.; Beck, M.W.; Reguero, B.G.; Losada, I.J.; Van Wesenbeeck, B.; Pontee, N.; Sanchirico, J.N.; Ingram, J.C.; Lange, G.M.; Burks-Copes, K.A. The effectiveness, costs and coastal protection benefits of natural and nature-based defences. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Depietri, Y.; McPhearson, T. Integrating the grey, green, and blue in cities: Nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation and risk reduction. In Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas; Kabisch, N., Korn, H., Stadler, J., Bonn, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Mangoyana, R.B.; Thomsen, D.C.; Smith, T.F.; Preston, B.L.; Heinz, S.; Maloney, M.; Withycombe, G.; Armstrong, I. Literature Review of Adaptation to Climate Change in the Coastal Zone; Australian Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency: Canberra, Australia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Klein, R.J.; Nicholls, R.J.; Ragoonaden, S.; Capobianco, M.; Aston, J.; Buckley, E.N. Technological options for adaptation to climate change in coastal zones. J. Coast. Res. 2001, 17, 531–543. [Google Scholar]
- Hino, M.; Field, C.B.; Mach, K.J. Managed retreat as a response to natural hazard risk. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, N.; Koukoulas, S.; Clark, J.R.; Evangelinos, K.Ι.; Dimitrakopoulos, P.G.; Eftihidou, M.O.; Koliou, A.; Mpalaska, M.; Papanikolaou, S.; Stathi, G.; et al. Social capital and citizen perceptions of coastal management for tackling climate change impacts in Greece. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2014, 14, 1083–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinay, L.; Carter, R.W. Climate change adaptation options for coastal communities and local governments. Climate 2020, 8, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mortreux, C.; Barnett, J. Adaptive capacity: Exploring the research frontier. WIREs Clim. Chang. 2017, 8, e467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.S.; Zwickle, A.; Bruskotter, J.T.; Wilson, R. The perceived psychological distance of climate change impacts and its influence on support for adaptation policy. Environ. Sci. Policy 2017, 73, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hugel, S.; Davies, A.R. Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.-Clim. Chang. 2020, 11, e645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yusuf, J.-E.; St. John, B., III; Covi, M.; Nicula, J.G. Engaging Stakeholders in planning for sea level rise and resilience. J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ. 2018, 164, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mimura, N.; Pulwarty, R.S.; Minh Duc, D.; Elshinnawy, I.; Hiza Redsteer, M.; Huang, H.; Ndi Nkem, J.; Sanchez Rodriguez, R.A. Adaptation Planning and Implementation. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 869–898. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, A.L.; Dessai, S.; de Bruin, W.B. Public perception of climate risk and adaptation in the UK: A review of the literature. Clim. Risk Manag. 2014, 4, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McMichael, C.; Katonivualiku, M.; Powell, T. Planned relocation and everyday agency in low-lying coastal villages in Fiji. Geogr. J. 2019, 185, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicholls, R.J.; Wong, P.P.; Burkett, V.; Codignotto, J.; Hay, J.; McLean, R.; Ragoonaden, S.; Woodroffe, C.D. Coastal systems and low-lying areas. In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Paulutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J., Hanson, C.E., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 315–356. [Google Scholar]
- Leiserowitz, A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim. Chang. 2006, 77, 45–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stadelmann-Steffen, I.; Eder, C. Public opinion in policy contexts. A comparative analysis of domestic energy policies and individual policy preferences in Europe. Int. Political Sci. Rev. 2021, 1, 78–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buys, L.; Miller, E.; van Megen, K. Conceptualising climate change in rural Australia: Community perceptions, attitudes and (in)actions. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2012, 12, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mutaqin, D.J. Determinants of farmers’ decisions on risk coping strategies in rural West Java. Climate 2019, 7, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ndamani, F.; Watanabe, T. Farmers’ perceptions about adaptation practices to climate change and barriers to adaptation: A micro-level study in Ghana. Water 2015, 7, 4593–4604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pischke, E.C.; Mesa-Jurado, M.A.; Eastmond, A.; Abrams, J.; Halvorsen, K.E. Community perceptions of socioecological stressors and risk-reducing strategies in Tabasco, Mexico. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 2018, 8, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopkins, D. The sustainability of climate change adaptation strategies in New Zealand’s ski industry: A range of stakeholder perceptions. J. Sustain. Tour. 2013, 22, 107–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adie, B.A. Place attachment and post-disaster decision-making in a second home context: A conceptual framework. Curr. Issues Tour. 2020, 23, 1205–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attems, M.S.; Schlögl, M.; Thaler, T.; Rauter, M.; Fuchs, S. Risk communication and adaptive behaviour in flood-prone areas of Austria: A Qmethodology study on opinions of affected homeowners. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beyerl, K.; Mieg, H.A.; Weber, E. Comparing perceived effects of climate-related environmental change and adaptation strategies for the pacific small island states of Tuvalu, Samoa, and Tonga. Isl. Stud. J. 2018, 13, 25–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botzen, W.J.W.; Aerts, J.C.J.H.; Van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. Individual preferences for reducing flood risk to near zero through elevation. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2013, 18, 229–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bichard, E.; Kazmierczak, A. Are homeowners willing to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change? Clim. Chang. 2012, 112, 633–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Neumann, B.; Vafeidis, A.T.; Zimmermann, J.; Nicholls, R.J. Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding—A global assessment. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Berrang-Ford, L.; Pearce, T.; Ford, J.D. Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2015, 15, 755–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Robinson, S.A. Climate change adaptation in SIDS: A systematic review of the literature pre and post the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. WIREs Clim. Chang. 2020, 11, e653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petticrew, M.; Roberts, H. Why do we need systematic reviews? In Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide; Blackwell Publishing: Mason, MA, USA, 2006; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009, 339, b2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Petticrew, M.; Roberts, H. What Sorts of Studies Do I Include in the Review? Deciding on the Review’s Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria in Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide; Blackwell Publishing: Mason, MA, USA, 2006; pp. 57–78. [Google Scholar]
- Ceccato, L.; Giannini, V.; Giupponi, C. Participatory assessment of adaptation strategies to flood risk in the Upper Brahmaputra and Danube river basins. Environ. Sci. Policy 2011, 14, 1163–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noble, I.R.; Huq, S.; Anokhin, Y.A.; Carmin, J.; Goudou, D.; Lansigan, F.P.; Osman-Elasha, B.; Villamizar, A. Adaptation needs and options. In Climate Change 2014 Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 833–868. [Google Scholar]
- Andersen, J.H.; Conley, D.J. Eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems: Towards better understanding and management strategies. Hydrobiologia 2009, 629, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brondizio, E.S.; Moran, E.F. Human dimensions of climate change: The vulnerability of small farmers in the Amazon. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2008, 363, 1803–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Porthin, M.; Rosqvist, T.; Perrels, A.; Molarius, R. Multi-criteria decision analysis in adaptation decision-making: A flood case study in Finland. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2013, 13, 1171–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petticrew, M.; Roberts, H. Synthesizing the evidence. In Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide; Blackwell Publishing: Mason, MA, USA, 2006; pp. 164–214. [Google Scholar]
- Corbin, J.; Strauss, A. Basics of Qualitative Research, 4th ed.; Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory; SAGE Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Lewins, A.; Silver, C. Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Bassett, T.J.; Fogelman, C. Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum 2013, 48, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friesinger, S.; Bernatchez, P. Perceptions of Gulf of St. Lawrence coastal communities confronting environmental change: Hazards and adaptation, Quebec, Canada. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2010, 53, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akerlof, K.; Merrill, J.; Yusuf, J.E.; Covi, M.; Rohring, E. Key beliefs and attitudes for sea-level rise policy. Coast. Manag. 2019, 47, 406–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersson-Skold, Y.; Thorsson, S.; Rayner, D.; Lindberg, F.; Janhäll, S.; Jonsson, A.; Moback, U.; Bergman, R.; Granberg, M. An integrated method for assessing climate-related risks and adaptation alternatives in urban areas. Clim. Risk Manag. 2015, 7, 31–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fatoric, S.; Morén-Alegret, R.; Kasimis, C. Exploring climate change effects in Euro-Mediterranean protected coastal wetlands: The cases of Aiguamolls de l’Emporda, Spain and Kotychi-Strofylia, Greece. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2014, 21, 346–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liski, A.H.; Ambros, P.; Metzger, M.J.; Nicholas, K.A.; Wilson, A.M.W.; Krause, T. Governance and stakeholder perspectives of managed re-alignment: Adapting to sea level rise in the Inner Forth estuary, Scotland. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2019, 19, 2231–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quinn, T.; Bousquet, F.; Guerbois, C.; Heider, L.; Brown, K. How local water and waterbody meanings shape flood risk perception and risk management preferences. Sustain. Sci. 2019, 14, 565–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schmidt, L.; Delicado, A.; Gomes, C.; Granjo, P.; Guerreiro, S.; Horta, A.; Mourato, J.; Prista, P.; Saraiva, T.; Truninger, M.; et al. Change in the way we live and plan the coast: Stakeholders discussions on future scenarios and adaptation strategies. J. Coast. Res. 2013, 65, 1033–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schneider, P.; Glavovic, B.; Farrelly, T. So close yet so far apart: Contrasting climate change perceptions in two “neighboring” coastal communities on aotearoa New Zealand’s coromandel peninsula. Environments 2017, 4, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sherren, K.; Loik, L.; Debner, J.A. Climate adaptation in ‘new world’ cultural landscapes: The case of Bay of Fundy agricultural dykelands (Nova Scotia, Canada). Land Use Policy 2016, 51, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luís, S.; Loik, L.; Debner, J.A. Is it all about awareness? The normalization of coastal risk. J. Risk Res. 2016, 51, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saroar, M.M.; Routray, J.K. In situ adaptation against sea level rise (SLR) in Bangladesh: Does awareness matter? Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag. 2010, 2, 321–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J.; Peng, B. Should we leave? Attitudes towards relocation in response to sea level rise. Water 2017, 9, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fischer, A.; Glenk, K. One model fits all? On the moderating role of emotional engagement and confusion in the elicitation of preferences for climate change adaptation policies. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70, 1178–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apine, L. Residents’ attitude towards possible adaptation measures to the sea coast erosion in Latvia. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag. 2011, 3, 238–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazart, C.; Trouillet, R.; Rey-Valette, H.; Lautrédou-Audouy, N. Improving relocation acceptability by improving information and governance quality/results from a survey conducted in France. Clim. Chang. 2020, 160, 157–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mustelin, J.; Klein, R.G.; Assaid, B.; Sitari, T.; Khamis, M.; Mzee, A.; Haji, T. Understanding current and future vulnerability in coastal settings: Community perceptions and preferences for adaptation in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Popul. Environ. 2010, 31, 371–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Scally, J.; Wescott, G. Perceptions of climate change and adaptation responses in a local community: The Barwon Estuary Complex, Victoria. Aust. Geogr. 2011, 42, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rittelmeyer, P. Socio-cultural perceptions of flood risk and management of a levee system: Applying the Q methodology in the California Delta. Geoforum 2020, 111, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Neill, S.J.; Graham, S. (En)visioning place-based adaptation to sea-level rise. Geo-Geogr. Environ. 2016, 3, e00028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- de la Vega-Leinert, A.C.; Stoll-Kleemann, S.; Wegener, E. Managed Realignment (MR) along the Eastern German Baltic Sea: A catalyst for conflict or for a coastal zone management consensus. J. Coast. Res. 2018, 34, 586–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, N.; Clark, J.R. Social capital and the public acceptability of climate change adaptation policies: A case study in Romney Marsh, UK. Clim. Chang. 2014, 123, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lo, A.Y. The right to doubt: Climate-change scepticism and asserted rights to private property. Environ. Politics 2014, 23, 549–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aragón-Duran, E.; Lizarralde, G.; González-Camacho, G.; Olivera-Ranero, A.; Bornstein, L.; Herazo, B.; Labbé, D. The language of risk and the risk of language: Mismatches in risk response in Cuban coastal villages. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020, 50, 101712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buchanan, M.K.; Oppenheimer, M.; Parris, A. Values, bias, and stressors affect intentions to adapt to coastal flood risk: A case study from New York City. Weather. Clim. Soc. 2019, 11, 809–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buchori, I.; Pramitasari, A.; Sugiri, A.; Maryono, M.; Basuki, Y.; Sejati, A.W. Adaptation to coastal flooding and inundation: Mitigations and migration pattern in Semarang City, Indonesia. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2018, 163, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dachary-Bernard, J.; Rey-Valette, H. Preferences among coastal and inland residents relating to managed retreat: Influence of risk perception in acceptability of relocation strategies. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 232, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamero, M.L.; Onuki, M.; Esteban, M.; Billones-Sensano, X.K.; Tan, N.; Nellas, A.; Takagi, H.; Thao, N.D.; Valenzuela, V.P. Small-island communities in the Philippines prefer local measures to relocation in response to sea-level rise. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quinn, T.; Bousquet, F.; Guerbois, C.; Sougrati, E.; Tabutaud, M. The dynamic relationship between sense of place and risk perception in landscapes of mobility. Ecol. Soc. 2018, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rey-Valette, H.; Robert, S.; Rulleau, B. Resistance to relocation in flood-vulnerable coastal areas: A proposed composite index. Clim. Policy 2019, 19, 206–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, T.K.; Chang, Y.J.; Chang, I.C.; Yu, T.Y. A pro-environmental behavior model for investigating the roles of social norm, risk perception, and place attachment on adaptation strategies of climate change. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 25178–25189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bijlsma, L.; Ehler, C.N.; Klein, R.J.T.; Kulshrestha, S.M.; McLean, R.F.; Mimura, N.; Nicholls, R.J.; Nurse, L.A.; Nieto, H.P.; Stakhiv, E.Z.; et al. Coastal zones and small islands. In Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analysis; Watson, R.T., Zinyowera, M.C., Moss, R.H., Dokken, D.J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Button, C.; Harvey, N. Vulnerability and adaptation to climate change on the South Australian coast: A coastal community perspective. Trans. R. Soc. South. Aust. 2015, 139, 38–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bukvic, A.; Zhu, H.; Lavoie, R.; Becker, A. The role of proximity to waterfront in residents’ relocation decision-making post-Hurricane Sandy. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2018, 154, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narayan, S.; Esteban, M.; Albert, S.; Jamero, M.L.; Crichton, R.; Heck, N.; Goby, G.; Jupiter, S. Local adaptation responses to coastal hazards in small island communities: Insights from 4 Pacific nations. Environ. Sci. Policy 2020, 104, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikder, A.H.M.K.; Mozumder, P. Risk Perceptions and adaptation to climate change and sea-level rise: Insights from general public opinion survey in Florida. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2020, 146, 04019081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goeldner-Gianella, L.; Bertrand, F.; Oiry, A.; Grancher, D. Depolderisation policy against coastal flooding and social acceptability on the French Atlantic coast: The case of the Arcachon Bay. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2015, 116, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weisner, E.; Schernewski, G. Adaptation to climate change: A combined coastal protection and re-alignment scheme in a Baltic tourism region. J. Coast. Res. 2013, 65, 1963–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schernewski, G.; Schumacher, J.; Weisner, E.; Donges, L. A combined coastal protection, realignment and wetland restoration scheme in the southern Baltic: Planning process, public information and participation. J. Coast. Conserv. 2018, 22, 533–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhar, T.K.; Khirfan, L. Community-based adaptation through ecological design: Lessons from Negril, Jamaica. J. Urban. Des. 2016, 21, 234–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glenk, K.; Fischer, A. Insurance, prevention or just wait and see? Public preferences for water management strategies in the context of climate change. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 2279–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loos, J.R.; Rogers, S.H. Understanding stakeholder preferences for flood adaptation alternatives with natural capital implications. Ecol. Soc. 2016, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Onat, Y.; Francis, O.P.; Kim, K. Vulnerability assessment and adaptation to sea level rise in high-wave environments: A case study on O’ahu, Hawai’i. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2018, 157, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratter, B.; Hennig, A. Challenges for shared responsibility—Political and social framing of coastal protection transformation in the Maldives. Erde 2019, 150, 169–183. [Google Scholar]
- Morris, R.L.; Konlechner, T.M.; Ghisalberti, M.; Swearer, S.E. From grey to green: Efficacy of eco-engineering solutions for nature-based coastal defence. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 1827–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jopp, R.; Mair, J.; DeLacy, T.; Fluker, M. Climate Change Adaptation: Destination Management and the Green Tourist. Tour. Plan. Dev. 2015, 12, 300–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milman, A.; Warner, B.P.; Chapman, D.A.; Short Gianotti, A.G. Identifying and quantifying landowner perspectives on integrated flood risk management. J. Flood Risk Manag. 2018, 11, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wilson, R.S.; Herziger, A.; Hamilton, M.; Brooks, J.S. From incremental to transformative adaptation in individual responses to climate-exacerbated hazards. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2020, 10, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlton, J.S.; Mase, A.S.; Knutson, C.L.; Lemos, M.C.; Haigh, T.; Todey, D.P.; Prokopy, L.S. The effects of extreme drought on climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and adaptation attitudes. Clim. Chang. 2016, 135, 211–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grothmann, T.; Patt, A. Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2005, 15, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lujala, P.; Lein, H.; Rød, J.K. Climate change, natural hazards, and risk perception: The role of proximity and personal experience. Local Environ. 2015, 20, 489–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, Y.-J. Relationships among environmental attitudes, risk perceptions, and coping behavior: A case study of four environmentally sensitive townships in Yunlin County, Taiwan. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wolff, K.; Larsen, S.; Øgaard, T. How to define and measure risk perceptions. Ann. Tour. Res. 2019, 79, 102759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Connor, R.E.; Bard, R.J.; Fisher, A. Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal. 1999, 19, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rulleau, B.; Rey-Valette, H.; Hérivaux, C. Valuing welfare impacts of climate change in coastal areas: A French case study. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2015, 58, 482–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shao, W.; Xian, S.; Lin, N.; Small, M.J. A sequential model to link contextual risk, perception and public support for flood adaptation policy. Water Res. 2017, 122, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merrill, S.; Kartez, J.; Langbehn, K.; Muller-Karger, F.; Reynolds, C.J. Who should pay for climate adaptation? Public attitudes and the financing of flood protection in Florida. Environ. Values 2018, 27, 535–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, M.; Pidgeon, N.; Whitmarsh, L.; Ballinger, R. Mental models of sea-level change: A mixed methods analysis on the Severn Estuary, UK. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2015, 33, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peters, E.; PSlovic, P. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1996, 26, 1427–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Treuer, G.; Broad, K.; Meyer, R. Using simulations to forecast homeowner response to sea level rise in South Florida: Will they stay or will they go? Glob. Environ. Chang. 2018, 48, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewicka, M. Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? J. Environ. Psychol. 2011, 31, 207–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manzo, L.; Devine-Wright, P. Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods, and Applications; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Stokols, D.; Shumaker, S.A. People in places: A transactional view of settings. In Cognition Social Behaviour and the Environment; Harvey, J.H., Ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Graham, S.; Barnett, J.; Fincher, R.; Mortreux, C.; Hurlimann, A. Towards fair local outcomes in adaptation to sea-level rise. Clim. Chang. 2015, 130, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rulleau, B.; Rey-Valette, H.; Clément, V. Impact of justice and solidarity variables on the acceptability of managed realignment. Clim. Policy 2017, 17, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tasantab, J.C.; Gajendran, T.; Von Meding, J.; Maund, K. Perceptions and deeply held beliefs about responsibility for flood risk adaptation in Accra Ghana. Int. J. Disaster Resil. Built Environ. 2020, 11, 631–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sovacool, B.K. Perceptions of climate change risks and resilient island planning in the Maldives. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2012, 17, 731–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poumadere, M.; Bertoldo, R.; Idier, D.; Mallet, C.; Oliveros, C.; Robin, M. Coastal vulnerabilities under the deliberation of stakeholders: The case of two French sandy beaches. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2015, 105, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Codjoe, S.N.A.; Issah, A.D. Cultural dimension and adaptation to floods in a coastal settlement and a savannah community in Ghana. GeoJournal 2016, 81, 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Everett, G.; Lamond, J.; Morzillo, A.T.; Chan, F.K.S.; Matsler, A.M. Sustainable drainage systems: Helping people live with water. Proc. Inst. Civil. Eng. Water Manag. 2016, 169, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stojanov, R.; Duží, B.; Kelman, I.; Němec, D.; Procházka, D. Local perceptions of climate change impacts and migration patterns in Male, Maldives. Geogr. J. 2017, 183, 370–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zander, K.K.; Petheram, L.; Garnett, S.T. Stay or leave? Potential climate change adaptation strategies among Aboriginal people in coastal communities in northern Australia. Nat. Hazards 2013, 67, 591–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dasgupta, S.; Laplante, B.; Meisner, C.; Wheeler, D.; Yan, J. The impact of sea level rise on developing countries: A comparative analysis. Clim. Chang. 2009, 93, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mallette, A.; Smith, T.F.; Elrick-Barr, C.; Blythe, J.; Plummer, R. Understanding Preferences for Coastal Climate Change Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158594
Mallette A, Smith TF, Elrick-Barr C, Blythe J, Plummer R. Understanding Preferences for Coastal Climate Change Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. 2021; 13(15):8594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158594
Chicago/Turabian StyleMallette, Angela, Timothy F. Smith, Carmen Elrick-Barr, Jessica Blythe, and Ryan Plummer. 2021. "Understanding Preferences for Coastal Climate Change Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review" Sustainability 13, no. 15: 8594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158594