Abstract
There is now a growing literature emphasizing the critical importance of social variables in the formulation of coastal management policies seeking to tackle climate change impacts. This paper focuses on the role of social capital, which is increasingly identified as having a significant role in climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies. We focus on public perceptions of the social costs and benefits arising from two management options (managed retreat/realignment and hold-the-line), the resulting level of policy acceptability, and how this acceptability is mediated by social capital parameters within coastal communities. These issues are examined by means of a quantitative social survey implemented in Romney Marsh (east Sussex/Kent, UK), an area facing significant impacts from climate change. We tested two models through path analysis with latent structures. The first correlates respondents’ perceived costs and benefits with the level of public acceptability of the two policy options. In the second model, we introduce social capital variables, investigating the impacts on perceived social costs and benefits of the policy options, and the overall effect on the level of public acceptability. Our findings demonstrate: (1) perceived social costs and benefits of proposed policy options influence the level of public acceptability of these policies; (2) these social costs and benefits are connected with the level of public acceptability; and (3) specific social capital parameters (i.e. social trust, institutional trust, social networks and social reciprocity) influence perceived policy costs and benefits, and also have a significant impact on the level of public acceptability of proposed policy options.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geog 79:387–404
Apine L (2011) Residents’ attitude towards possible adaptation measures to the sea coast erosion in Latvia. Int J Climate Change Strat Manag 3:238–249
Arbuckle JL (2006) Amos 7.0 user’s guide. SPSS, Chicago
Clark JRA, Clarke R (2011) Local sustainability initiatives in English National Parks: what role for adaptive governance? Land Use Policy 28:314–324
Clark JRA, Jones A (1999) From policy insider to policy outcast? Comité des Organisations Professionnelles Agricoles, EU policymaking, and the EU’s ‘agri-environment’ regulation. Environ Plann C 17:637–654
Clark JRA, Semmahasak C (2013) Evaluating adaptive governance approaches to sustainable water management in north-west Thailand. Environ Manage 51:882–896
Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Cvetkovich G, Winter PL (2003) Trust and social representations of the management of threatened and endangered species. Environ Behav 35:286–307
Danish Ministry of the Environment (2006) Report to the EU commission concerning the implementation of the council and parliament recommendation of 30 May 2002 on integrated coastal zone management (2002/413/EF)
De Groot JIM, Schuitema G (2012) How to make the unpopular popular? Policy characteristics, social norms and the acceptability of environmental policies. Environ Sci Policy 19–20:100–107
Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) (2004) Making space for water developing a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management in England. London
Environment Agency (2011) Planning for the future, Folkestone to cliff end flood and erosion management strategy, Approved strategy update
French PW (2004) The changing nature of, and approaches to, UK coastal management at the start of the twenty-first century. Geogr J 170:116–125
Graham JW, Schafer JL (1999) On the performance of multiple imputation for multivariate data with small sample size. In: Hoyle R (ed) Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis. WGI Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Jones A, Clark J (1997) Driving forces behind European land use change: an overview. The user needs for more harmonized land use information at the national and EU level. Report on the CLAUDE 24–31.
Jones N (2010) Investigating the influence of social costs and benefits of environmental policies through social capital theory. Policy Sci 43:229–244
Jones N, Clark JRA, Panteli M, Proikaki M, Dimitrakopoulos PG (2012) Local social capital and the acceptance of Protected Area policies: an empirical study of two Ramsar river delta ecosystems in northern Greece. J Environ Manage 96:55–63
Jones N, Clark JRA (2013) Social capital and climate change mitigation in coastal areas: a review of the current debates and identification of future research directions. Ocean Coasta Manage 80:12–19
Council KC (2007) Flood risk management in Kent, Select Committee report. Kent County Council, Maidstone
Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery and values. Climatic Change 77:45–72
Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environ Chang 17:445–459
Milligan J, O’Riordan T, Nicholson-Cole SA, Watkinson AR (2009) Nature conservation for future sustainable shorelines: lessons from seeking to involve the public. Land Use Policy 26:203–213
Myatt LB, Scrimshaw MD, Lester JN (2003a) Public perceptions and attitudes towards a forthcoming managed realignment scheme: Freiston Shore, Lincolnshire, UK. Ocean Coasta Manage 46:565–582
Myatt LB, Scrimshaw MD, Lester JN (2003b) Public perceptions and attitudes towards an established managed realignment scheme: Orplands, Essex, UK. J Environ Manage 68:173–181
Myatt-Bell LB, Scrimshaw MD, Lester JN, Poots JS (2002) Public perception of managed realignment: Brancaster West Marsh, North Norfolk, UK. Mar Policy 26:45–57
Narayan D, Cassidy MF (2001) A dimensional approach to measuring social capital: development and validation of a social capital inventory. Curr Sociol 49:59–102
Niven RJ, Bardsley DK (2013) Planned retreat as a management response to coastal risk: a case study from the Fleurieu Peninsula, South Australia. Reg Environ Change 13:193–209
Ostrom E (2009) A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Policy Research Working Paper 5095, The World Bank
Pretty J (2003) Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302:1912–1914
Putnam R (2000) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York
Roca E, Villares M (2012) Public perceptions of managed realignment strategies: the case study of the Ebro Delta in the Mediterranean basin. Ocean Coasta Manage 60:38–47
Rubin DB (1996) Multiple imputation after 18+ Years. J Am Stat Assoc 91:473–489
Rupp S, Nicholls RJ (2002) Managed realignment of coastal flood defences: A comparison between England and Germany. Proceedings of “Dealing with Flood Risk” An interdisciplinary seminar of the regional implications of modern flood management, Bob van Kappel (ed.), Delft Hydraulics
Wagner CL, Fernandez-Gimenez ME (2008) Does community-based collaborative resource management increase social capital? Soc Natur Resour 21:324–344
Wolf J, Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, Abrahamson V, Raine R (2010) Social capital, individual responses to heat waves and climate change adaptation: an empirical study of two UK cities. Global Environ Chang 20:44–52
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the European Union’s FPVII Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship programme, contract number 273361, held at the University of Birmingham.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PDF 73 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, N., Clark, J.R.A. Social capital and the public acceptability of climate change adaptation policies: a case study in Romney Marsh, UK. Climatic Change 123, 133–145 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1049-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1049-0