[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online July 8, 2016

Modelling of bone fracture healing: influence of gap size and angiogenesis into bioresorbable bone substitute

Abstract

The complex process of bone fracture healing is driven by a set of mechanobiological and biochemical factors. In the present paper, a mathematical model of the angiogenesis effect on bioresorbable bone graft healing is proposed. The synthesis of bone tissue and resorption of bone and bone substitute material are stimulated by adjacent strain energy, and in the meantime regulated by a set of geometry and biochemical factors. The most important new elements included in formulation of this model are the effect of sufficient and insufficient nutrients supply, dependence of actor cell number on pore surface, and dependence of sensor cell number on bone mass.
The proposed mathematical formulation was implemented in FEM software COMSOL. A simple example was selected to perform numerical simulations in order to check the effect of gap size and nutrients diffusion rate on healing process. Values of selected parameters introduced in the proposed model were estimated on the basis of experimental results reported in the literature. Agreement between the results of numerical simulations and experimental studies was observed.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Webb JCJ, Tricker J. A review of fracture healing. Curr Orthop 2000; 14: 457–463.
2. Doblaré M, García J, Gomez MJR. Modelling bone tissue fracture and healing: a review. Eng Fract Mech 2004; 71(13): 1809–1840.
3. Claes LE, Wilke HJ, Augat P, et al. Effect of dynamization on gap healing of diaphyseal fractures under external fixation. Clin Biomech 1995; 10(5): 247–234.
4. Claes L, Eckert-Hübner K, Augat P. The effect of mechanical stability on local vascularization and tissue differentiation in callus healing. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 1099–1105.
5. Claes L, Eckert-Hübner K, Augat P. The fracture gap size influences the local vascularization and tissue differentiation in callus healing. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2003; 388(5): 316–322.
6. Mavčiv̌ B, Antolič V. Optimal mechanical environment of the healing bone fracture/osteotomy. Int Orthop 2012; 36(4): 689–695.
7. Lu C, Saless N, Wang X, et al. The role of oxygen during fracture healing. Bone 2013; 52(1): 220–229.
8. Nicolaije C, Koedam M, van Leeuwen JP. Decreased oxygen tension lowers reactive oxygen species and apoptosis and inhibits osteoblast matrix mineralization through changes in early osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Physiol 2012; 227(4): 1309–1318.
9. Geiger F, Bertram H, Berger I, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor gene-activated matrix (vegf165-gam) enhances osteogenesis and angiogenesis in large segmental bone defects. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20(11): 2028–2035.
10. Eckardt H, Ding M, Lind M, et al. Recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor enhances bone healing in an experimental nonunion model. Bone Joint J 2005; 87(10): 1434–1438.
11. Kuboki Y, Jin Q, Kikuchi M, et al. Geometry of artificial ecm: sizes of pores controlling phenotype expression in bmp-induced osteogenesis and chondrogenesis. Connect Tissue Res 2002; 43: 529–534.
12. Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R, Søballe K. Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces. J Biomech 1997; 30(6): 539–548.
13. Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ, Li G, et al. Biomechanical model to simulate tissue differentiation and bone regeneration: Application to fracture healing. Med Biol Eng Comput 2002; 40(1): 14–21.
14. Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ. A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. J Biomech 2002; 35(9): 1163–1171.
15. Carter DR, Giori NJ, Helms JA. Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 355S: S41–S55.
16. Claes L, Heigele CA. Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. J Biomech 1999; 32(3): 255–266.
17. Ament C, Hofer EP. A fuzzy logic model of fracture healing. J Biomech 2000; 33(8): 961–968.
18. Gómez-Benito M, García-Aznar JM, Kuiper JH, et al. Influence of fracture gap size on the pattern of long bone healing: a computational study. J Theor Biol 2005; 235(1): 105–119.
19. García-Aznar JM, Kuiper JH, Gómez-Benito M, et al. Computational simulation of fracture healing: Influence of interfragmentary movement on the callus growth. J Biomech 2007; 40(7): 1467–1476.
20. Chen G, Niemeyer F, Wehner T, et al. Simulation of the nutrient supply in fracture healing. Journal of Biomechanics 2009; 42(5): 2575–2583.
21. Bassom AP, Ilchmann A, Voss H. Oxygen diffusion in tissue preparations with michaelis-menten kinetics. J Theor Biol 1997; 185(1): 119–127.
22. Geris L, Sloten JV, Oosterwyck HV. Mathematical modeling of fracture healing: coupling between mechanics, angiogenesis and osteogenesis. In: 4th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering, Antwerp, Belgium, 23–27 November 2008, vol. 22, pp.2651–2654. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
23. Carlier A, van Gastel N, Geris L, et al. Size does matter an integrative in vivo-in silico approach for the treatment of critical size bone defects. PLoS Comput Biol 2014; 10(11): e1003888.
24. Carlier A, Geris L, van Gastel N, et al. Oxygen as a critical determinant of bone fracture healing – a multiscale model. J Theor Biol 2015; 365: 247–264.
25. Checa S, Prendergast PJ. A mechanobiological model for tissue differentiation that includes angiogenesis. Ann Biomed Eng 2009; 37(1): 129–145.
26. Pérez MA, Prendergast PJ. Random-walk models of cell dispersal included in mechanobiological simulations of tissue differentiation. J Biomech 2007; 40(10): 2244–2253.
27. Lekszycki T, dell’Isola F. A mixture model with evolving mass densities for describing synthesis and resorption phenomena in bones reconstructed with bio-resorbable materials. J Appl Math Mech 2012; 92(6): 426–444.
28. Giorgio I, Andreaus U, Scerrato D, et al. A visco-poroelastic model of functional adaptation in bones reconstructed with bio-resorbable materials. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. Epub ahead of print 30 January 2016.
29. Lu Y, Lekszycki T. Modeling of an initial stage of bone fracture healing. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 2015; 27(4–5): 851–859.
30. COMSOL Multiphysics® v. 5.1. www.comsol.com. COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
31. Buenzli PR. Osteocytes as a record of bone formation dynamics a mathematical model of osteocyte generation in bone matrix. J Biomech 2014; 364: 418–427.
32. Andreaus U, Giorgio I, Lekszycki T. A 2-d continuum model of a mixture of bone tissue and bio-resorbable material for simulating mass density redistribution under load slowly variable in time. Z Angew Math Mech 2014; 94(12): 978–1000.
33. Mullender MG, Huiskes R. Proposal for the regulatory mechanism of Wolff’s law. J Orthop Res 1995; 13(4): 503–512.
34. Lekszycki T. Modelling of bone adaptation based on an optimal response hypothesis. Meccanica 2002; 37(4-5): 343–354.
35. dell’Isola F, Andreaus U, Placidi L. At the origins and in the vanguard of peridynamics, non-local and higher-gradient continuum mechanics: An underestimated and still topical contribution of Gabrio Piola. Math Mech Solids 2015; 20(8): 887–928.
36. Zahm AM, Bucaro MA, Ayyaswamy PS. Numerical modeling of oxygen distributions in cortical and cancellous bone: oxygen availability governs osteonal and trabecular dimensions. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2010; 299(5): C922–C929.
37. Claes L, Augat P, Suger G, et al. Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing. J Orthop Res 1997; 15(4): 577–584.
38. Goodship AE, Kenwright J. The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. Bone Joint J 1985; 67(4): 650–655.
39. Brey EM, Mcintire LV, Johnston CM, et al. Three-dimensional, quantitative analysis of desmin and smooth muscle alpha actin expression during angiogenesis. Ann Biomed Eng 2004; 32(8): 1100–1107.
40. Marx RE. Platelet-rich plasma: evidence to support its use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62(4): 489–496.
41. Marx RE, Calson ER, Eichstaedt RM, et al. Platelet-rich plasma: Growth factor enhancement for bone grafts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 1998; 85(6): 638–646.
42. Kanakarisa NK, Calorib GM, Verdonkc R, et al. Application of bmp-7 to tibial non-unions: A three-year multicenter experience. Injury 2008; 39(Suppl2): S83–S90.
43. Wheeler DL, Lane JM, Seim HB, et al. Allogeneic mesenchymal progenitor cells for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in sheep. Spine J 2014; 14(3): 435–444.
44. Eckardt H, Ding M, Lind M, et al. Recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor enhances bone healing in an experimental nonunion model. Bone Joint J 2014; 87(10): 1434–1438.
45. Cazzani A, Malagu M, Turco E. Isogeometric analysis: a powerful numerical tool for the elastic analysis of historical masonry arches. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 2016; 28(1–2): 139–156.
46. Cazzani A, Marcello M, Turco E, et al. Constitutive models for strongly curved beams in the frame of isogeometric analysis. Math Mech Solids 2016; 21(2): 182–209.
47. Cecchi A, Rizzi NL. Heterogeneous elastic solids: a mixed homogenization-rigidification technique. Int J Solids Struct 2001; 38(1): 29–36.
48. Grillo A, Guaily A, Giverso C, et al. Non-linear model for compression tests on articular cartilageJ Biomech Eng 2015; 137(7): 071004-1–071004-8.
49. Tomic A, Grillo A, Federico S. Poroelastic materials reinforced by statistically oriented fibres – numerical implementation and application to articular cartilage. IMA J Appl Math 2014; 79(5): 1027–1059.
50. dell’Isola F, Romano A. A phenomenological approach to phase transition in classical field theory. Int J Eng Sci 1987; 25(11–12): 1469–1475.
51. dell’Isola F, Romano A. On the derivation of thermomechanical balance equations for continuous systems with a nonmaterial interface. Int J Eng Sci 1987; 25(11–12): 1459–1468.
52. dell’Isola F, Batra R. Saint-Venant’s problem for porous linear elastic materials. J Elast 1997; 41(1): 73–81.
53. dell’Isola F, Hutter K. What are the dominant thermomechanical processes in the basal sediment layer of large ice sheets? Proc R Soc London A 1998; 454(1972): 1169–1195.
54. dell’Isola F, Guarascio M, Hutter K. A variational approach for the deformation of a saturated porous solid. a second-gradient theory extending terzaghi’s effective stress principle. Arch Appl Mech 2000; 70(5): 323–337.
55. Cuomo M, Nicolosi A. A poroplastic model for hygro-chemo-mechanical damage of concrete. computational modelling of concrete structures. In: Computational modelling of concrete structures Conference, EURO-C, Mayrhofen, Austria, 2006, pp.533–542. Leiden: Taylor & Francis/Balkema.
56. Luongo A. Perturbation methods for nonlinear autonomous discrete-time dynamical systems. Nonlinear Dyn 1996; 4(6): 317–331.
57. Luongo A, Egidio AD, Paolone A. Multiscale analysis of defective multiple-hopf bifurcations. Comput Struct 2004; 82(31–32): 2705–2722.
58. Evdokymov N, Altenbach H, Eremeyev VA. Collapse criteria of foam cells under various loading. PAMM 2011; 11(1): 365–366.
59. AminPour H, Rizzi N. A one-dimensional continuum with microstructure for single-wall carbon nanotubes bifurcation analysis. Math Mech Solids 2015; 21(2): 365–366.
60. Rizzi NL, Varano V, Gabriele S. Initial postbuckling behavior of thin-walled frames under mode interaction. Thin Wall Struct 2013; 68: 124–134.
61. dell’Isola F, Giorgio I, Pawlikowski M, et al. Large deformations of planar extensible beams and pantographic lattices: Heuristic homogenisation, experimental and numerical examples of equilibrium. Proc R Soc London A 2016; 472(2158): 1–23.
62. Greco L, Impollonia N, Cuomo M. A procedure for the static analysis of cable structures following elastic catenary theory. Int J Solids Struct 2014; 51(7–8): 1521–1533.
63. Placidi L, Andreaus U, Giorgio I. Identification of two-dimensional pantographic structure via a linear d4 orthotropic second gradient elastic model. J Eng Math. Epub ahead of print 12 May 2016.
64. Placidi L, Hutter K. An anisotropic flow law for incompressible polycrystalline materials. Z Angew Math Phys 2005; 57(1): 160–181.
65. Placidi L, Greve R, Seddik H, et al. Continuum-mechanical, anisotropic flow model, based on an anisotropic flow enhancement factor. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 2010; 22(3): 221–237.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: July 8, 2016
Issue published: October 2017

Keywords

  1. Bone fracture
  2. tissue
  3. bone substitute
  4. modelling
  5. FEM
  6. computer simulation

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2016.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yanfei Lu
Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
Tomasz Lekszycki
Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
International Research Center M&MOCS ’Mathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems’, Italy
Medical University of Warsaw, Poland

Notes

Tomasz Lekszycki, Warsaw University of Technology, st. Narbutta 85, 02–524, Warsaw, Poland. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 380

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 33 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 22

  1. Computational Modeling of Bone Fracture Healing Under Different Initia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Functional adaptation of bone mechanical properties using a diffusive ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Influence of implant base material on secondary bone healing: an ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A model for the bio-mechanical stimulus in bone remodelling as a diffu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. A Proposal for a Novel Formulation Based on the Hyperbolic Cattaneo’s ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Optimal time-dependent levels of weight-bearing for bone fracture heal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. In-depth gaze at the astonishing mechanical behavior of bone: A review...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Asymptotics and numerical analysis for enzymatic auxiliary reactions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Bio-Inspired Design of a Porous Resorbable Scaffold for Bone Reconstru...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. A Mathematical Model for Bone Cell Population Dynamics of Fracture Hea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Determination of metamaterial parameters by means of a homogenization ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. A review of recent developments in mathematical modeling of bone remod...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  13. On mechanically driven biological stimulus for bone remodeling as a di...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Computational modeling of human bone fracture healing affected by diff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. A probabilistic-based approach for computational simulation of bone fr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Anelastic reorganisation of fibre-reinforced biological tissues
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Mechanoregulation of Bone Remodeling and Healing as Inspiration for Se...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. A model for bone mechanics and remodeling including cell populations d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. A Diffusion Model for Stimulus Propagation in Remodeling Bone Tissues
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. An asymptotic homogenization approach to the microstructural evolution...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Euromech 579 Arpino 3–8 April 2017: Generalized and microstructured co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Formulation of an effective growth response of trabecular bone based o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

IOM3 members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

IOM3 members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.