Abstract
In this study of optimal organizational performance, we explore how the extent of interactions, both within and among other organizations, affects group performance and stability in a stochastic environment. We have refined a modeling framework (Kauffman and Johnsen's NKC model) so that group size and connections among groups (externalities) can be finely tuned. The search for improved group configurations is modeled as a random walk on a space of possible configurations whereby agents in a group periodically have the opportunity to accept or reject random changes in their characteristics. By controlling which groups have external connections with which other groups, and the magnitude of such connections, we can manipulate the topology of the problem—the web of interactions within and between groups. We present numerical results showing that optimal group size relates to the magnitude of externalities and the accumulated number of random trials. Our main result suggests that for short periods with few trials, large organizations perform best, while for longer time horizons, the advantage accrues to small sized groups with a small number of externalities. However, over these long time horizons, as the extent of external connections increases, modest increases in group size enhances their performance. Under all circumstances, organizations that perform best in the long run fall into a regime of largely stable responses to perturbations, which however, borders on a region of instability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Acs, Z. and D. Audretsch (1998), “Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis,” American Economic Review, 78, 678–690.
Argote, L. and D. Epple (1990), “Learning Curves in Manufacturing,” Science, 247, 920–924.
Arrow, K. (1974), The Limits of Organization. W.W. Norton and Company, Inc., New York.
Auerswald, P., S. Kauffman, J. Lobo and K. Shell (2000), “The Production Recipes Approach to Modeling Technological Innovation: An Application to Learning by Doing,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 24, 389–450.
Bailey, M.N., E.J. Bartelsman and J. Haltiwanger (1994), “Downsizing and Productivity Growth: Myth or Reality?” Center for Economic Studies Discussion paper 94-4. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.
Bartlett, C.A. and S. Ghoshal (1993), “Beyond the M-Form: Towards a Managerial Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 14, 23–46.
Beinhocker, E.D. (1999), “Robust Adaptive Strategies,” Sloan Management Review, 40, 95–106.
Caolvo, G. and S. Wellisz (1978), “Supervision, Loss of Control, and the Optimal Size of the Firm,” Journal of Political Economy, 87, 943–952.
Chandler, A.D. Jr. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Chandler, A.D. Jr. (1990), Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Coase, R.H. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, 4, 386–405.
Collins, J.C. and J.I. Porras (1997), Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. Harper Business, New York.
Cyert, R.M. and J.G. March (1992), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Blackwell, Cambridge.
Davis, S., J. Haltiwanger and S. Schuh (1996), Job Creation and Destruction. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Dutton, J.M. and A. Thomas (1984), “Treating Progress Functions as a Managerial Opportunity,” Academy of Management Review, 9, 235–247.
Hannan, M. and G. Carroll (1992), Dynamics of Organizational Populations. Oxford University Press, New York.
Hansen, J. (1992), “Innovation, Firm Size, and Firm Age,” Small Business Economics, 1, 37–44.
Herriott, S.R., D.A. Levinthal and J.G. March (1985), “Learning from Experience in Organizations,” American Economic Review, 75, 298–302.
Hodgson, G.M. (1988), Economics and Institutions. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Jensen, M. and W. Meckling (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Kauffman, S.A. (1993), Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
Kauffman, S.A. (1995), “Escaping the Red Queen Effect,” The McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 119–129.
Kauffman, S.A. and S. Johnsen (1991), “Coevolution to the Edge of Chaos: Coupled Fitness Landscapes, Poised States, and Coevolutionary Avalances,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 149, 467–505.
Kauffman, S., J. Lobo and W. Macready (2000), “Optimal Search on a Technology Landscape,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43, 141–166.
Keren, M. and D. Levhari (1983), “The Internal Organization of the Firm and the Shape of Average Costs,” Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 474–486.
Klepper, S. and E. Graddy (1990), “The Evolution of New Industries and the Determinants of Market Structure,” Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 24–44.
Levinthal, D.A. (1997), “Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes,” Management Science, 43, 934–950.
Levinthal, D.A. and J.G. March (1981), “A Model of Adaptive Organizational Search,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2, 307–333.
Loasby, B. (1991), Equilibrium and Evolution. Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Macready, W.G. and D.H. Wolpert (1998), “Bandit Problems and the Exploration—Exploitation Tradeoff,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2, 2–22.
Marschak, J. and R. Radner (1972), Economic Theory of Teams. Yale University Press, New Haven.
McKelvey, B. (1994), “Evolution and Organization Science,” in J. Baumand and J. Singh (Eds.) Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 314–326.
McKelvey, B. (1999), “Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes,” Organizational Science, 10, 294–321.
March, J.G. (1991), “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,” Organization Science, 2, 71–87.
Mood, A.M., F.A. Graybill and D.C. Boes (1974), Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Morgan, G. (1997), Images of Organization. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Nelson, R. (1961), “Uncertainty, Learning and the Economics of Parallel Research and Development Efforts,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 43, 351–364.
Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Penrose, E. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Reiter, S. and G.R. Sherman (1962), “Allocating Indivisible Resources Affording External Economies of Diseconomies,” International Economic Review, 3, 108–135.
Reiter, S. and G.R. Sherman (1965), “Discrete Optimizing,” SIAM Journal, 13, 864–889.
Rivkin, J. (2000) “Imitation of Complex Strategies,” Management Science, 46, 824–844.
Rosenberg, N. (1994), Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics and History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Scarf, H.E. (1981a), “Production Sets with Indivisibilities Part I: Generalities,” Econometrica, 49, 1–32.
Scarf, H.E. (1981b), “Production Sets with Indivisibilities Part II: The Case with Two Activities,” Econometrica, 49, 395–423.
Scarf, H.E. (1994), “The Allocation of Resources in the Presence of Indivisibilities,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 111–128.
Schamalense, R. (1989), “Inter-Industry Studies of Structure and Economic Performance,” in R. Schamalensee and R. Willig (Eds.) Handbook of Industrial Organization. North Holland, New York, pp. 951–1009.
Stadler, P.F. (1995), “Towards a Theory of Landscapes,” Social Systems Research InstituteWorking Paper Number 9506. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Sutton, J. (1997), “Gilbrat's Legacy,” Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 40–59.
Tsai, W. and S. Ghoshal (1998), “Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks,” Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464–476.
Williamson, O.E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levitan, B., Lobo, J., Schuler, R. et al. Evolution of Organizational Performance and Stability in a Stochastic Environment. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 8, 281–313 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025416617948
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025416617948