Abstract
We design two-qubit quantum gates by coupling two Transmon qubits with a capacitor and study the time-dependent dynamics of the qubit–qubit interaction for different inter-qubit interaction strengths in the presence of quantum noise. Particularly, we focus on three famous quantum gates, iSWAP, bSWAP, and CNOT. In this study, we investigate different types of noises, such as emission, absorption, and dephasing. Two-qubit gates, iSWAP and bSWAP, are modeled by direct variable coupling between two Transmon qubits. In addition, we construct the CNOT gate, using three qubits, where the two qubits are used for inputs and outputs, and the middle qubit acts as a tunable coupler between the two qubits. The middle qubit is needed for energy conservation; we called it a garbage bit, since we do not use it in logical operations. For the two input/output coupled qubits, direct variable capacitor coupling is also used. In view of the coupled Lindblad master equations, we study the time-dependent dynamics of our proposed quantum models. A significant impact of emission/absorption quantum noise can be seen on iSWAP, bSWAP, and CNOT gates, as compared to dephasing noise. Additionally, we also discuss the generation of entanglement for different scenarios with and without noises.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
P. J. J. O’Malley, J. Kelly, R. Barends, et al., Phys. Rev. Appl., 3, 044009 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.3.044009
C. Song, K. Xu, W. Liu, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, 180511 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.180511
J. S. Otterbach, R. Manenti, N. Alidoust, et al., Unsupervised machine learning on a hybrid quantum computer, arXiv: 1712.05771 (2017).
BH. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, et al., Nature, 551, 579 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24622
J. Zhang, G. Pagano, P. W. Hess, et al., Nature, 551, 601 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24654
M. Abid, A. Ayoub, and J. Akram, Physica B Condens. Matter, 640, 414079 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2022.414079
M. Viteau, J. Radogostowicz, and M. Bason, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 060402 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.060402
J. Preskill, Quantum, 2, 79 (2018); https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79
P. Sidorov, M. Aksenov, I. Zalivako, et al., Coherent effects contribution to a fast gate fidelity in ion quantum computer, arXiv: 2112.06220 (2021).
E. Onac, F. Balestro, L. W. van Beveren, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 176601 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.176601
S. Gustavsson, M. Studer, R. Leturcq, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 206804 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.206804
G. A. Alvarez, E. P. Danieli, P. R. Levstein, et al., J. Chem. Phys., 124, 194507 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2193518
B. Hensen, W. Wei Huang, C.-H. Yang, et al., Nat. Nanotechnol., 15, 13 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0587-7
R. Barends, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, et al., Nature, 508, 500 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13171
M. W. Johnson, M. H. Amin, S. Gildert, et al., Nature, 473, 194 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10012
E. Knill, D. Leibfried, R. Reichle, et al., Phys. Rev. A, 77, 012307 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.012307
L. DiCarlo, M. D. Reed, L. Sun, et al., Nature, 467, 574 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09416
S. Sheldon, L. S. Bishop, E. Magesan, et al., Phys. Rev. A, 93, 012301 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.012301
S. H. Sureshbabu, M. Sajjan, S. Oh, et al., J. Chem. Inf. Model., 61, 2667 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00294
L. K. Joshi, A. Elben, A. Vikram, et al., Phys. Rev. X, 12, 011018 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011018
D.-R. W. Yost, M. E. Schwartz, J. Mallek, et al., NPJ Quantum Inf., 6, 1 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2020.2994862
M. H. Devoret, J. M. Martinis, and H. Michel, “Implementing qubits with superconducting integrated circuits,” in: H. O. Everitt (Ed.), Experimental Aspects of Quantum Computing, Springer, Boston, MA (2005), pp. 163–203; https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27732-3 12
P. W. Shor, Phys. Rev. A, 52, R2493 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.52.R2493
M. H. Devoret and R. J. Schoelkopf, Science, 339, 1169 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231930
V. Kaushal, B. Lekitsch, A. Stahl, et al., AVS Quantum Sci., 2, 014101 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1116/1.5126186
J. Akram, Ann. Phys., 2200511 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.202200511
J. Akram and F. Saif, J. Russ. Laser Res., 29, 538 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-008-9045-y
J. R. West, D. A. Lidar, B. H. Fong, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 230503 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.230503
E. Zahedinejad, J. Ghosh, and B. C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. Appl., 6, 054005 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.054005
T. Wang, Z. Zhang, L. Xiang, et al., New J. Phys., 20, 065003 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aac9e7
S. Li, J. Xue, T. Chen, et al., Adv. Quantum Technol., 4, 2000140 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202000140
A. Ayoub and J. Akram, Physica C Supercond., 591, 1353977 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2021.1353977
F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, et al., Nature, 574, 505 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5
Y. Xu, J. Chu, J. Yuan, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 125, 240503 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.240503
Y. Sung, L. Ding, J. Braumuller, et al., Phys. Rev. X, 11, 021058 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021058
F. Yan, P. Krantz, Y. Sung, et al., Phys. Rev. Appl., 10, 054062 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.054062
J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, et al., Phys. Rev. A, 76, 042319 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319
R. Bialczak, M. Ansmann, M. Hofheinz, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 060501 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.060501
M. Roth, M. Ganzhorn, N. Moll, et al., Phys. Rev. A, 96, 062323 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.062323
S. Richer, “Perturbative Analysis of Two-Qubit Gates on Transmon Gubits”, Ph.D. Theses, RWTH Aachen University (2013); URL: www.quantuminfo.physik.rwth-aachen.de/global/showdocument.asp?id=aaaaaaaaaajiobd
F. Yan, P. Krantz, Y. Sung, et al., Phys. Rev. Appl., 10, 054062 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.054062
X. Li, T. Cai, H. Yan, et al., Phys. Rev. Appl., 14, 024070 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.024070
H. Lagemann, D. Willsch, M. Willsch, et al., Phys. Rev. A, 106, 022615 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.022615
P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, et al., Appl. Phys. Rev., 6, 021318 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5089550
S. Kwon, A. Tomonaga, G. Lakshmi Bhai, et al., J. Appl. Phys., 129, 041102 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0029735
B. W. Shore and P. L. Knight, J. Mod. Opt., 40, 1195 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349314551321
D. Manzano, AIP Adv., 10, 025106 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5115323
M. Cattaneo, G. L. Giorgi, S. Maniscalco, et al., New J. Phys., 21, 113045 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab54ac
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, J., Akram, J. Noise-Tolerant Superconducting Gates with High Fidelity. J Russ Laser Res 44, 135–147 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-023-10116-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-023-10116-y