[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

DNA amounts of roses (Rosa L.) and their use in attributing ploidy levels

  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aims of the investigation were to characterise variability among the DNA amounts of roses and assess the predictability of ploidy levels from DNA amounts. Chromosome numbers in the genus Rosa range from 2n = 2x = 14 to 2n = 8x = 56 and aneuploidy is rare. Published 2C DNA amounts range from 0.78 pg in R. xanthina Lindl. and R. sericea Lindl. (2n = 2x = 14) to 2.91 pg in R. canina L. (2n = 5x = 35). In this investigation, DNA amounts were estimated by flow cytometry of leaf nuclei stained with propidium iodide, using Petroselinum crispum (2C DNA amount = 4.46 pg) as the internal calibration standard. Ploidy levels based on DNA amounts (DNA ploidy) were assigned by comparing their DNA amounts with published DNA amounts and identifying peaks and intervening discontinuities in frequency distributions of DNA amounts. 2C DNA amounts ranged from 0.83 pg in R. ecae (2x = 2x = 14) to 3.99 pg in R. acicularis (2n = 8x = 56). Differences in the 1Cx-values (2C DNA amount/ploidy values) were found among the taxonomic sections of Rosa. Ploidy levels could be confidently assigned to most species and cultivars, but the ploidy of some specimens in the section Caninae was uncertain for reasons attributed to genomic diversity and aneuploidy. Cytochimerism was detected in three cultivars of R. × alba. DNA ploidy was determined in 384 specimens representing 74 species and 5 horticultural classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akasaka M, Ueda Y, Koba T (2003) Karyotype analysis of wild rose species belonging to septets B, C and D by molecular cytogenetic method. Breed Sci 53:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allum JF, Bringloe DH, Roberts AV (2007) Chromosome doubling in a Rosa rugosa Thunb. hybrid by exposure of in vitro nodes to oryzalin: the effects of node length, oryzalin concentration and exposure time. Plant Cell Rep 26:1977–1984. doi:10.1007/s00299-007-0411-y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brumme H, Gladis Th (2006) Vorarbeiten zur Inventarisierung pflanzengenetischer Ressourcen in Deutschland—Die Wildrosen (Gattung Rosa L.) im Europa-Rosarium Sangerhausen. In: Europa-Rosarium Sangerhausen (ed) Wildrosenverzeichnis, 5th edn. Möbius, Artern, pp 64–106

  • Brumme H, Gladis Th (2007) Vorarbeiten zur Inventarisierung pflanzengenetischer Ressourcen in Deutschland—Die Wildrosen (Gattung Rosa L.) im Europa-Rosarium Sangerhausen, nach ihrer Verwandtschaft geordnet, 6th edn. http://rosarium-verein.de/cmsupload/Wildrosenverzeichnis.pdf, http://www.das-rosen-netzwerk.de/index.php?seite=drn_wrers

  • Cairns T (ed) (2003) Modern roses XI. Academic, San Diego

  • Cave MS (ed) (1958–1960) Index to plant chromosome numbers 1956–1959 series. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

  • Crane YM, Byrne DH (2003) Karyology. In: Roberts AV, Debener T, Gudin S (eds) Encyclopedia of rose science. Elsevier/Academic, London, pp 267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington CD, Wylie AP (1955) Chromosome atlas of flowering plants, 2nd edn. Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (2007) Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 2:2223–2244. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.310

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt P, Johnson DE (eds) (2006) Index to plant chromosome numbers 2001–2003. Missouri Botanic Garden, St Louis

  • Greilhuber J (1988) ‘Self-tanning’—a new and important source of stoichiometric error in cytophotometric determination of nuclear DNA content in plants. Plant Syst Evol 158:87–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysák MA, Bennett MD (2005) The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‚genome size and ‚c-value to describe nuclear DNA contents. Ann Bot 95:255–260. doi:10.1093/aob/mci019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gudin S (2000) Rose: genetics and breeding. Plant Breed Rev 17:159–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson L, Boyd A, Johnson MAT, Bennett MD (2005) First nuclear DNA C-values for 18 Eudicot families. Ann Bot 96:1315–1320. doi:10.1093/aob/mci283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim KY, Werlemark G, Matyasek R, Bringloe JB, Sieber V, El Mokadem H, Meynet J, Hemming J, Leitch AR, Roberts AV (2005) Evolutionary implications of permanent odd polyploidy in the stable sexual, pentaploid of Rosa canina L. Heredity 94:501–506. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Missouri Botanic Garden (1978–2000) Index to plant chromosome numbers. http://mobot.mobot.org/W3T/search/ipcn.html

  • Moore RJ (ed) (1970–1974) Index to plant chromosome numbers 1968–1972 series. Bohn and Scheltema for the International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature, Utrecht

  • Ornduff R (ed) (1967–1969) Index to plant chromosome numbers 1965–1967 series. Bohn and Scheltema for the International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature, Utrecht

  • Ornduff R (ed) (1977) Index to plant chromosome numbers 1973–1974 series. Bohn and Scheltema for the International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature, Utrecht

  • Roberts AV (1977) Relationships between species in the genus Rosa section Pimpinellifoliae. Bot J Linn Soc 74:309–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts AV (2007) The use of bead beating to prepare suspensions of nuclei for flow cytometry from fresh leaves, herbarium leaves, petals and pollen. Cytometry A 71A:1039–1044. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rolfe FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. WH Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Suda J, Krahulcova A, Travnicek P, Krahulec F (2006) Ploidy level versus DNA ploidy level: an appeal for consistent terminology. Taxon 55:447–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GS (1994) The Graham Stuart Thomas rose book. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Werlemark G (2003) Inheritance in the dog rose. In: Roberts AV, Debener T, Gudin S (eds) Encyclopedia of rose science. Elsevier/Academic, London, pp 292–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie AP (1954) The history of garden roses. J Roy Hortic Soc 79:555–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie AP (1955a) The history of garden roses. Part 2. J Roy Hortic Soc 80:8–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie AP (1955b) The history of garden roses. Part 3. J Roy Hortic Soc 80:77–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokoya K, Roberts AV, Mottley J, Lewis R, Brandham PE (2000) Nuclear DNA amounts in roses. Ann Bot 85:557–561. doi:10.1006/ambo.1999

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This report is based on a pilot project, which was supported by funds of the German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection but the responsibility for the content of the publication rests with the authors. We thank the town of Sangerhausen and the foundation Europa-Rosarium Sangerhausen in the Association of German Rose Friends (Gesellschaft Deutscher Rosenfreunde e. V.) for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Roberts.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Rose.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

MOESM1 [INSERT CAPTION HERE] (DOC 716 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, A.V., Gladis, T. & Brumme, H. DNA amounts of roses (Rosa L.) and their use in attributing ploidy levels. Plant Cell Rep 28, 61–71 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-008-0615-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-008-0615-9

Keywords

Navigation