User talk:Alandmanson

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alandmanson!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Alandmanson!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Oats cover crop.jpg was uncategorized on 5 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:2004 0609 Italian ryegrass cover crop.jpg was uncategorized on 5 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Syncordulia gracilis Yellow Presba 2013 02 26 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

SVGs

Blausen 0864 ToothDecay

Hi, I saw that you recently opposed my nomination of a decaying tooth for Quality Image status on the basis that it was "too small". While I am glad the image finally got reviewed, I am wondering if you are familiar with SVG image formatting (?). This image is a vector graphic, which means it can be scaled to any size without loss of image quality (unlike a photograph). Such files are meant to be memory-efficient (small file size) while still highly detailed and (hopefully) informative. Anyhow, just wanted to check— I myself only discovered SVGs while trying to illustrate a teletherapy capsule several years ago, and it was an eye-opening experience! KDS4444 (talk) 12:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bradypodion melanocephalum 0306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Azuragrion nigridorsum 2016 10 08 12 08 22 5631.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Colotis eris 2011 12 16 13 31 Mkhuze.jpg

Hi Alan. I'm not sure which colitis butterfly you have photographed, but I'm pretty sure it's not colotis eris. Check out the three dot pattern and the upper wing markings you can see through the wing underside. Best wishes, Charles

well we can't argue with THE expert! Thanks for checking. My 'bible' is Mark Williams' BUTTERFLIES AND SKIPPERS OF THE AFROTROPICAL REGION, but he doesn't illustrate the female forms at all. Charles (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paragomphus cognatus, rock hooktail 33119-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Impressive quality. I don't see the URL in the nomination; I guess it was removed? -- Ikan Kekek 17:13, 23 April 2017 (UTC)  Comment Yep, I removed it since it corrupted the code and made the text of the nom not showing up. --W.carter 18:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karoo Scrub-Robin 2017 03 24 1598.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crombec, Long-billed Alan Manson 2009 10 03 10 29 42 07548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebra 2013 10 06 1274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice shot. Charlesjsharp 12:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Troublesome coding

Hi! Just wanted to explain why I altered your post on QIC CR. Some characters corrupts the code if they are placed inside the double brackets ({{}}). One of them is the =. I have replaced your equations such as "1816×1635px = 2.97MP" with "1816×1635px equals 2.97MP" so that the whole box and all the text will be dislpayed properly. Hope you don't mind. --cart-Talk 11:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC) Thanks! I could not work out what the problem was --Alandmanson (talk) 11:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harpagomantis tricolor 2017 05 01 6363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harpagomantis tricolor 2017 05 01 6346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White Rhino 2013 10 05 0438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments slightly over-exposed. Charlesjsharp 12:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)  reworked --Alandmanson 08:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC) Good now. Charlesjsharp 09:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karoo scrub robin 2017 03 24 1625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dwarf mongoose 2014 04 29 4153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - May - Mammals/Winners

	Photo Challenge Winner
	Congratulations! Your picture Zebra 2013 10 06 1274.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Mammals, in May 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 15:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campicoloides bifasciatus 2017 06 17 15 18 43 9253.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 14:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campicoloides bifasciatus 2017 06 17 15 18 39 9252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 14:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thamnolaea cinnamomeiventris 2016 10 10 11 25 50 7732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thamnolaea cinnamomeiventris 2016 10 10 11 24 51 7674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 20:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cercotrichas leucophrys 2016 10 11 12 04 18 8926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO. --Peulle 14:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! African veined white 2017 07 02 0194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Shankar Raman 04:21, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harrier African Marsh 2013 08 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - albeit with a slightly wide left crop. --Peulle 20:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red-winged Starling 2014 02 23 6113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, sharp enough I think. --Peulle 20:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red-winged Starling 2017 07 08 0571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 22:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cape cormorant 2011 07 10 03481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 17:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Firefinch African 2017 07 02 11 45 37 0106c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality -- Spurzem 16:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cape cormorant 2011 07 10 03481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:43, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southern masked weaver 2011 10 12 3390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 16:34, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Disa chrysostachya 2016 01 02 4349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Beautiful rythm. --MirandaAdramin 19:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spectacled weaver 2011 07 12 04161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Secretarybird 2011 11 27 5815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grasshopper 2017 07 02 0352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 19:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grasshopper 2017 07 02 0382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. This is the better one. --Peulle 19:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grasshopper 2017 07 02 0442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swarthy sprite 2015 10 10 4841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andropadus importunus 2016 10 08 4975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Shankar Raman 01:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Satyrium hallackii subsp. ocellatum 2016 01 18 0346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spectacled weaver 2011 07 14 04924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spectacled Weaver 2011 10 12 3300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Male pink-throated twinspot 2014 10 19 0374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:06, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pink-throated twinspot (Hypargos margaritatus) 2014 10 19 0188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Azuragrion nigridorsum 2016 10 08 12 08 22 5631.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Azuragrion nigridorsum 2016 10 08 12 08 22 5631.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue waxbill 2012 10 08 6421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common Waxbill 2015 01 18 2316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 13:32, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common Waxbill 2015 01 18 2104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little egret 2017 07 14 2113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 12:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little egret 2017 07 14 2173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:22, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little egret 2017 07 14 2381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little egret 2017 07 14 2409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:48, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ground woodpecker 2013 10 23 1928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Shankar Raman 13:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ground woodpecker 2013 10 23 1969.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Shankar Raman 13:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ground woodpecker 2017 02 06 3172c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swee waxbill 2008 05 18 08 42 33 5796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Shankar Raman 14:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Zebra 2013 10 06 1274.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zebra 2013 10 06 1274.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yellowjack 2014 03 01 6686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anax imperator 2015 11 23 6807.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anax imperator 2015 11 23 6807.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Little Egret 2013 05 12 9241d.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Little Egret 2013 05 12 9241d.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

"Field by crop" categories

Hi Alan,

I would like to inform you, that I've switched the South African crop categories from you to the standard scheme: Category:Fields in South Africa by crop

I hope you can get along with it. Additionally I've created Category:Cedara Research Station.

I think generally that we need more agricultural experts at Wikipedia!

Best Regards, ISIL-KP (talk) 22:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

On the whole, I have no problem with your moves - however, I did not feel that pictures of single plants or leaves fitted a "fields" category Alandmanson (talk) 12:10, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Better?--ISIL-KP (talk) 10:32, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Cool - Thanks! --Alandmanson (talk) 11:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cape vulture 2017 08 23 5935.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cape vulture 2017 08 23 5935.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Next Wiki Science Competition

Hi, I am contacting all active commons users I can find more interested in the management of pictures related to scientific topics. If you have time could you take a look in Commons:Village_pump#Upcoming_Wiki_Science_Competition. Thank you.--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:18, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - August - Panning/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Southern ground hornbill 2015 11 26 8461b.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Panning, in August 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 01:53, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Agriocnemis falcifera 2017 10 22 1465.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agriocnemis falcifera 2017 10 22 1465.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

POTY 2017

Hi, congratulations for having one of your pictures in the 2017 POTY contest! I noticed that you edited it to remove a spot, but in the process the image was enlarged and the EXIF info was lost. I'd humbly suggest that the original size be kept, as well as the EXIF info. If I may suggest yet another improvement, there's a small white dot right above the hair on the insect's back, and another one on the picture's lower right corner that could also be photoshopped. Kind regards, —capmo (talk) 15:07, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Jumping spiders

I created a category: Vicirionessa mustela, and found that one of the spiders may not belong to the same species as the other three. Or perhaps it does, I'm no expert on them. JMK (talk) 20:40, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

I'm no expert either, but apparently the black one is a male and the others are females. Alandmanson (talk) 12:45, 13 August 2024 (UTC)