>>4380344
>backpedaling
Leicope

>>4380350
I still stand by my statement so where's the backpedalling?

>>4380344
>foreigner humor
Do you have Germanic ancestry by chance?

>>4379932
fun fact
there is no "chroma" noise
it doesn't exist

you just have noise
noise is noise
and guess what?
noise is noise

yeah you heard me
noise is noise
so noise is just noise and what does that even MEAN????

well noise is just that

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>4380164
gimbal handle has a thumb joystick to control the desired position
gimbal holds and stabilized that orientation with gimbal magic when not thumbing the stick

this is why he isn't 2 hands on the stills cam
he's fingering the gimbal in real-time
this is true dual wielding

>>4382093
>Small lens
>smaller camera.

I'm sure you do, big boy.

More what?

Pffff a micro four thirds with a 50mm f0.7 would blow this away. inb4 foolframe cope.

t. Becky

>>4381993
don’t project your hrt fetish + weight means less than size and sony has better, smaller lenses in every category except super shit ff budget lenses

>>4382039
Ask your mom.

>>4382043
>noooo weight doesn't matter
>noooo sony has smaller lenses if i just exclude canon's smaller lenses
Holy cope.

>>4382039
Laowa make a probe macro lens, it even has a built in light

>>4382091
I'm looking more for something fish-eye and something to stretch the walls.
I saw that lens before I think the slow mo guys did a video on it or some other youtuber, not exactly what I'm looking for.

>>4382138
It was fake and Sony still has awful skin tones

>>4382140

doesnt matter if its true or not, as an image to market somebody in an election its incredible. What photo did Kamila have that comes within 100th of the power of this image?

File: sony color science .jpg (367 KB, 1012x2045)

367 KB JPG

>>4382138

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>4380429
There is some dude from Germany claiming he developed some hardware addons that let you achieve Technicolor style colors on most digital cameras.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL1CFb0b0bI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bNrFBo81mE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHAMvfZUxI0

>>4382071
Seems a bit snake-oily to me. He isn't giving any details that I can find.

>>4382077
Probably because patent pending

>>4382077
All I know he is making that claim for quite a few years now and he had a horror movie made using his method of filming.

>>4382071
>>4382137
>>4382087
>>4382077
Man this is the best emulation I've seen by far. Someone has to figure this out

>>4382119
Do they really break apart just by touching it?

>>4382135
I don't care what you do, in fact if you keep inflating the prices of shit cars, I can buy all the good ones.
>I spend my cash on camera gear
"I'm a one dimensional human, and a gearfag"
Weird thing to admit but ok ill take your word for it.

/p/ has fucking shittier opinions on cars than it does on cameras my god

>>4382143
By repeatedly scraping at it with a sharp object or a fingernail.

>>4382148
The seal on the Sony crumbles straight away just by touching it from normal use.

>>4381032
canon dropped 2 cameras with ai noise reduction and sony's market share shot up

lmao

>>4380999
Trips woodboxbro btfos the rest of the thread

>>4380859
Every generation has its peaks after which nothing improves. mirrorless just hit most of its peaks very early because professional videographers are driving the market hard and professional photographers are still using older shit.

>DSLR peaking for photo
nikon d750, d850
canon 5div, 5ds r
pentax k-1 mk1

>Mirrorless peaking for photo
sony a7cii - best travel/hobby camera
sony a7rv - best high resolution full frame camera
canon r6ii, r5 mk1 - best all around professional cameras
nikon zf - best prosumer camera, best for adapting manual lenses

>what mirrorless still has to achieve

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>4381032
Viewfinder brightness was a solved issue until light was siphoned off for autofocus systems.
I've decided I would rather have shitty or no autofocus than a viewfinder that's dark and has no split prism/microprism.

I've spend less than €1k on my total gear in about 5 years of shooting.
Unlike your dinosaur click clacker I can also resell it instantly for the same amount.

>>4382118
Bro's at the petting zoo while I'm out here producing powerful works of art.

>>4381879

They do though, I browse quite a few photography forums and also flickr alot. I am always struck by how much people here photograph the corners of buildings.
Its like the users of /p get subliminally trained to see building corners by browsing all the photos of building corners and then ending up taking photos of corners of buildings themselves.

its just a strange cycle.

Trust me on this, I own digital cameras and film cameras, they BOTH suck at metering.

You need a stand alone hand held meter. I have not adjusted or moved an exposure slider ever since I started using it, its just always right.

Only problem is stuff like if you want to shoot clouds in the sky, you just have to remind your brain, a cloud should be brighter than middle grey, so go 1 stop brighter than the meter says.

But for anything involving people the meter is incredible, same with landscapes. Its just perfect every single time.

Film is just a huge crutch. Literally take some semi blurry shot of a house/car/street and the chemicals will do the rest.

OP here, I think I figured out part of the problem. Since I moved to aps-c digital, all my floating aperture lenses are now effectively f/5-f/8 and so there is a lot more DOF than I want/am used too. I will try to get my hands on an f/2.8 zoom or maybe a few fast primes and see if that helps.

File: R0000133.jpg (3.72 MB, 4850x3310)

3.72 MB JPG

>>4382126
Looking good Ken

I added 3D soda

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	RICOH GR IIIx HDF
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:11:05 21:26:52
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	640
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	26.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4850
Image Height	3310
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: R0000133_01.jpg (2.59 MB, 4850x3310)

2.59 MB JPG

Landon Speers here

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	RICOH GR IIIx HDF
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:11:05 21:32:54
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	640
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	26.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4850
Image Height	3310
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: Fixd.jpg (668 KB, 2250x1500)

668 KB JPG

>>4382028
>There is no focal point. The photo has zero content
Fixed that for you.

File: 4chanraw_gaveitagom8.jpg (745 KB, 1907x1271)

745 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	RICOH GR IIIx HDF
Camera Software	RICOH GR IIIx HDF Ver. 1.41
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1907
Image Height	1271
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2024:11:03 14:52:12
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	640
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	26.00 mm
Image Width	1907
Image Height	1271
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

>>4382132
finally a good photo

File: 20241031_0011.jpg (2.92 MB, 6203x6005)

2.92 MB JPG

>>4381170
why no

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:31 16:45:23
Exposure Time	1/8 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	64
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6203
Image Height	6005
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4381179
are you the anon who took pics of this event last year?

>>4381179
Low shutter speed = more chance to miss focus, like in this one.

File: 20241020_0010.jpg (1.99 MB, 5812x5475)

1.99 MB JPG

>>4381186
yep but these are from this year
>>4381190
true, but I am just using the OM5 to scan film lmao. There are 6x6

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:20 20:07:25
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	64
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5812
Image Height	5475
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 36A5B4A2-2CA6-4DEE-84C2-D(...).jpg (268 KB, 828x817)

268 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	828
Image Height	1792
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4382070
metering is autistic
there are no good ways to trust it
they meter off JPEG rendering in the camera so white balance affects metering when it shouldn't

you have retards (not really all, but most of them are) who try metering in a custom 1.00 1.00 1.00 coefficient WB to let them properly ETTR (look up uniwb) but even that's not foolproof or really effective

do you have severe autism?
do you want to trial end error your way out of this pitfall of suffering andi misery while battling other people's autism (manufacturer not giving you a proper meter) in the process? if so, trial and error is the way to go... but you'll never really figure it out unless you are a fucking autismo supreme capable of figuring out cryptic bullshit the manufacturer is hiding from you

besides that I'd say just shoot more and get comfortable for ballpark guesses then for shots where proper eposure matters, switch to exposure bracketing mode and just do some shots at different exposures and pick what turns out best
unfortunately the manufacturers have made simple metering impossible so you're fighting an uphill battle of nonsense

but bracketing is a nearly guaranteed way to ensure you're getting at least one shot in perfect exposure

>>4382079
I feared as much.

A few weeks ago I got some shots that turned out really well, but the entire time I was taking them I was cursing my camera and retaking nearly every shot with an offset exposure, and I'm pretty sure I only got vaguely in the ballpark because of the aforementioned fake highlight ceiling guessing game.

For now, since the process of trial and error was not enjoyable at all in the moment, I'm going to try going back to film.
Just cleaned up an AE-1P, and I think I'm really going to enjoy metering for the shadows and having every shot come out correctly exposed for a change! Just need to fix my jammed Praktica MTL50 and a Zorki 4 and if it goes well maybe I will throw my impossible to expose correctly digital kit in the bin and just accept that photography is a pay-per-shot activity.

>>4382082
P.S. I hope my return to film will justify my new appreciation for how film swallows overexposure instead of punishing you for trying to get your exposure correct.

>>4382079
Lol. On sony set zebras to custom level 106 with the standard color profile and they correspond exactly to the raw data. Oh what, your camera doesnt do custom zebras in stills? Only jpeg histogram? hahaha!

>>4382082
Skill issue!

https://www.instagram.com/odlphotographe/

>>4375578
fresh account will give you temporary boost of views/likes/follows to hook you up, so if you have empty account with one photo that you created 3 years ago, don't use it, make a new one. Instagram only pushes reels so if you publish photos only and starting just now (you don't have follower base from 'good ol' days') then after initial 'love bombing' you will be buried by algo and will get like 3 likes a week and some follows from bot accounts. Meta is there to make money, indirectly to use your content and directly to make you pay for engagement so if you're not paying for advertising your acc there you will not get much views unless you post rage bait, skin or stupid shit like 'not washing your hair for month daily vlog'. Other shit like 'posting frequently', 'making 6 stories a day', 'using description instead of tags' simply doesn't work. Comments, shares and saves get your stats up, but from genuine users, you will not boost it from the same IP or with 10 accounts created on 1 email address. Boosting companies will with good probability get your account banned, Meta only allows them to advertise on their platforms because well pecunia non olet, but once you start using them you sooner or later will get banned (temporary or perm).
TL;DR you have to pay for advertisement if you want to make some non-rookie numbers on your instagram

>>4375499
Why did you delete your account, anon?

>>4378337
Not him but do you know if editing the caption, like adding hash tags I missed, is negatively impacting my posts?

File: ig_preview.jpg (907 KB, 960x960)

907 KB JPG

>>4339181
https://www.instagram.com/gran.tourism/

Snapshitter, in square no less

>>4382065
The film has plenty of resolution when not behind a shit lens. I have an Instax 200 and "infinity" is actually 20-30 feet, and the close is 3 or so feet.

When taken at exactly those distances, the photos can be sharp. All other distances - blurry shit.

I just want a decent camera for it that isn't 800 currencies, but I'll probably relent and get the mint rangefinder eventually.

>>4382081
>The film has plenty of resolution when not behind a shit lens
No. It is fine for looking in person but if you scan and enlarge it you'll see there is no more detail than you can see with the naked eye. I modified an instax mini to take very sharp mamiya press lens and there is basically no difference in resolution or sharpness vs the stock lens. Only really good for bokehwhoring.
>When taken at exactly those distances, the photos can be sharp. All other distances - blurry shit.
Honestly skill issue, just position your subjects at the sharp distances.
It would be cool if fuji made 4x5 or larger instax for taking serious pictures. The colors are really great. But since they only make itty bitty film I just use it for what it is, a fun toy and not something worth optimizing quality.

File: 1acia_polaroid2.jpg (919 KB, 1390x1639)

919 KB JPG

>>4382099
Bullshit. Instax film is fine, it just has a lot less stops of dynamic range. Use a light meter and a grey card, light everything evenly around the middle grey. Here is a shot using an adapted RZ67 Pro ii and the legendary Sekor 110mm lens. Turned out so nice and painterly. Even the Instax minis are capable of producing great images for a toy if you know how to control light, I will post some examples next that I had in the last recent photo thread.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 25.11 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1365
Image Height	1609
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	480 dpi
Vertical Resolution	480 dpi
Image Created	2024:09:02 16:38:40
Image Width	1365
Image Height	1609
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1390
Image Height	1639

File: polaroids (5)_web - Copy.jpg (724 KB, 911x1417)

724 KB JPG

Instax mini camera

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4376
Image Height	6814
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:17 19:31:02
Image Width	4376
Image Height	6814
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	911
Image Height	1417

File: polaroids_web_ - Copy.jpg (871 KB, 913x1417)

871 KB JPG

Another Instax Mini. Looks fine considering it has a cheap plastic lens.
>>4382099
You just need a proper adapter from somewhere like Brooklyn film co to scan properly and get decent documentation. Then in photoshop to adjust the contrast, sharpness and and color shifts to mirror the original. Never looks as good as the physical print by still is workable.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4390
Image Height	6814
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:22 16:57:55
Image Width	4390
Image Height	6814
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	913
Image Height	1417

>>4381875
>if he likes it, it's probably a scam
By trial and error he gets into correct suppositions: Nikon has the best bodies along with Canon, Sony has the best AF, Cosina the best optics if you don't mind manual focus, Olympus best colours SOOC, sharpness is overrated.

>>4381958
>the colors in his videos are awful. it looks like everyone has a rash
It's Canada and he has a piss poor diet so his face always looks odd
>filmed through a car window.
The dumbass always puts a mist filter on everything but that's not that bad anyways, he uses it way too strong tho.

>>4381817
Not having this debate with you again, retard. You were completely btfo'd the first 5 times. Come back when you have samples to back up your claims.

>>4381767
>picks a genre where phones struggle
>"hurr phones no good"

>>4381817
This is a scientific fact that any sane person knows true.

>>4381817
200mp? Try 750mp