Wikidata:Requests for permissions/RfA/2022

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
withdrawn by candidate [1] —MisterSynergy (talk) 15:04, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MRCKH

[edit]

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 9 January 2022 15:03 (UTC)

Hello! Since Wikidata can need a few more admins, I would like to offer my help as an administrator. I am active as an translation administrator since July 2020 and as an rollbacker since March 2021. I am already active in fighting vandalism, so it would be helpful to have these additional tools to semi-protect pages, block vandals, or delete nonsense. If you decide to grant me admin rights, I would like to work on requests at WD:AN and to help out with the backlog at WD:RFD. Besides my activity here on Wikidata I am a member of the Ombuds Commission. Thank you for considering this request. Best regards --MRCKH (talk) 15:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

[edit]
  1.  Support. Lemlifaspa (talk) 01:34, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Speedy reject. As much as I would like more active admins you are far too inexperienced. BrokenSegue (talk) 03:42, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Speedy close -- MdsShakil (talk) 04:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Closed as successful. --Lymantria (talk) 17:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MSGJ

[edit]

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 20 January 2022 17:45 (UTC)

Hello everyone. I'm Martin and I would be happy to help out further. I added my first statement to an item in Jan 2015, and I have made 30,000+ edits altogther. I have been a property creator since June 2015, and have created 30 properties. I am involved with WikiProject Lighthouses and have done quite a lot of work with integrating Wikidata into Wikipedia infoboxes. I intend to help out at Properties for deletion and Requests for deletions — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

[edit]
  1.  Support —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support Mahir256 (talk) 20:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support --Epìdosis 21:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 23:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support thanks for volunteering.-BRP ever 00:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Rschen7754 02:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support. —Hasley+ 03:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Ruy (talk) 00:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support - Premeditated (talk) 10:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support Mike Peel (talk) 12:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support --Rzuwig► 12:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support ミラP@Miraclepine 00:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support Fralambert (talk) 03:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support --Erokhin (talk) 07:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support --Alaa :)..! 09:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Weak support Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 17:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support Tol (talk | contribs) @ 03:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support --Gymnicus (talk) 07:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

{{#babel:en|ja-2}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Non-bureaucrat snowclose as  Not done. Mahir256 (talk) 14:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

wipa0404

[edit]

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 13 February 2022 01:10 (UTC)

Blurb... (a short statement why you (or this person) should be an admin...) Your signature's timestamp for a self-nom is when the candidacy starts. For non-self-noms, the candidate should "accept" with a short statement and sign it... that timestamp is when the candidacy starts... Once this is done please transclude your candidacy on the relevant request for permissions page. --Wipa0404 (talk) 01:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

[edit]
  1.  Oppose User has fewer than 30 edits here, many of which have been reverted. From Hill To Shore (talk) 06:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Test completed.  Oppose --Wolverène (talk) 08:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Oppose --Ameisenigel (talk) 10:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Oppose Bloked on MediaWiki wiki. Rzuwig► 13:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Closing as unsuccessful--Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ikkingjinnammebetinke

[edit]

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 7 March 2022 13:33 (UTC)

Hello, i am Markus. I am mostly adding aliases to Wikidata items, and i sometimes create new, or merge existing items. When spotting vandalism, i undo it.

The reason for asking administrator permissions is that I frequently stumble on (the same) Wikidata item for which i want to add an alias, only to realize i have been there before and the page is fully protected. That page is protected for a good reason as it is a current event and prone to vandalism.

--Ikkingjinnammebetinke (talk) 13:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

[edit]
  1.  Oppose Mbch331 (talk) 15:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC) - Requesting Admin privileges to add aliases/labels to fully protected pages is in my view not a good reason to get those rights[reply]
  2.  Oppose You can ask for an edit to a protected page. Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 15:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Oppose you have 3 Wikidata namespace edits and 2 of those are for making this request. BrokenSegue (talk) 15:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Huh, i don't understand. I have thousands of wikidata edits over the last two years. Ikkingjinnammebetinke (talk) 16:03, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    When we say "Wikidata namespace", we are talking about pages prefixed with "Wikidata:" - for example, this page. Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 03:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Oppose Fully agree, feel free to use edit requests for the six fully protected items here. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Alright, i get the idea. I will look for edit requests. Thanks! Ikkingjinnammebetinke (talk) 16:03, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Oppose Maybe next time. Ruy (talk) 17:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Oppose IMO insufficient number of edits in Wikidata. --Nw520 (talk) 18:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Oppose per Sjoerddebruin --Ameisenigel (talk) 21:12, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Oppose does not present a valid need, edit requests can be used --DannyS712 (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support is a valid need, as we lack admins handling protected edit requests. --- Jura 09:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Oppose --Rzuwig► 13:39, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Oppose আরও অভিজ্ঞতা অর্জন করার পর আসুন, ভবিষ্যতের জন্য শুভকামনা রইলো। MdsShakil (talk) 17:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12. I don't object to any rationale for adminship that would require access to admin tools, even just the ability to edit protected pages. But given how expansive the toolset is, I would like to see more experience broadly across Wikidata and in admin areas before supporting. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 06:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    How could we address the underlying problem? Maybe an approach would be to ask the admins opposing adminship for this reason to do the protected edit requests. --- Jura 13:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I think most of the requests in Category:Wikidata protected edit requests are for pages that aren't fully protected (in fact many are totally unprotected pages). BrokenSegue (talk) 23:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Anything in MediaWiki talk namespace should be obviously be one.
    As the discussion here is about edit requests for fully protected pages, you are saying that admins don't deal with them as they can't find them? Maybe we need a separate category then. --- Jura 08:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Consolation support -- of course requesting the adminship just for editing the protected pages is not the reason enough. --Wolverène (talk) 06:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Oppose --Gymnicus (talk) 22:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Oppose You are not experienced enough at the moment. Yahya (talk) 09:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Closed as successful --Lymantria (talk) 13:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stang

[edit]

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 14 April 2022 12:18 (UTC)

Hi, this is Stang, and actually this RfA is suggested by someone. I mainly do RC patrol here to rollback unexplained removal, hoax and meaningless content addition, and report them to AN if it is a clear vandalizer or continue their action after warned. I also propose deletion for items useless or lack of notability. Besides, I answered some tickets in our VRT queue as a agent. Maybe my edit count is a bit low (~4K) but I don't think it is a big problem. I would mainly focus on the two aforementioned parts (and of course block those bad guys and LTAs) to speed up the process if I get the mop, and would like to help with Chinese-speaking user for aspects they don't really familiar with as a Mandarin native speaker.

For transparency: this user is affected by a recent office action. --Stang 12:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

[edit]
  1.  Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support, a trusted user. --Wolverène (talk) 07:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support Another Chinese-speaking sysop would be good. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 17:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support --EN-Jungwon 18:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support --Okkn (talk) 07:31, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support since I suggested it. BrokenSegue (talk) 22:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support No concerns other than the WMF-side stuff. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support Tol (talk | contribs) @ 02:42, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support --Rzuwig► 10:50, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support ArthurPSmith (talk) 15:04, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 15:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support Prahlad balaji 15:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support--Prince ovy (talk) 16:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --Emu (talk) 16:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support --Rschen7754 18:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support -Premeditated (talk) 07:55, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support --Alaa :)..! 18:58, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support Yahya (talk) 17:38, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support a trusted user and a Chinese speaker. We need more admins who speaks other languages than English. Pamputt (talk) 21:38, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 05:12, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • Thanks for your great work on anti-vandalism here. I'm wondering what do you think you would do differently in your Wikidata work as an admin relative to what you are doing now. You could go ahead and delete not-notable items yourself, but getting deletions reviewed by at least one other person seems like a good approach (not that it is a policy for Wikidata). Are there other administrative actions, such as blocking users and IP ranges, protecting pages, etc., that you would feel comfortable taking? ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • For deletion, some sites have policies that require admins not to (speedy) delete a page unless it is tagged by others with speedy-related template. Such policy does not exist at here, and IMO I will not take admin action if I am hesitate or not sure to do so. For blocking, if I am not pretty sure I will discuss with others, put it on AN etc., and will leave proper notice and clarification if a block is kind of controversial. Stang 19:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well I do support this adminship, would it be better to inform the foundation since your rights on zh.wp were removed by them? --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:19, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Closed as successful. Note that the current projected use may result in losing adminship due to inactivity, as editing protected pages is usually not counted. Additional admin bot tasks may solve this. --Lymantria (talk) 18:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pi admin bot

[edit]

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 20 April 2022 17:58 (UTC)

I've been operating Pi bot since 2017, and it has made nearly 7 million edits on Wikidata so far. The latest task I've coded up, Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/Pi bot 25, is designed to maintain Wikidata:Properties for deletion - and to simultaneously update Template:Watchlist summary/PFD. Which was all looking good and working fine for semi-automated test edits under my (admin) account, until I realised the template is admin-protected. Asking how to handle this at the administrators noticeboard favoured setting up an admin bot (over reducing protection of the template) - hence this request. The admin account needs to be separate from Pi bot's normal account for safety reasons, and it will be run in a separate directory on the Raspberry Pi. My main concern with proposing this admin bot is that just updating an admin-protected page might not be sufficient justification for having an admin bot account, but I expect it will only be a matter of time before I'll request to add more admin bot tasks to this account. For additional background, please see my user page, and my RfP. Thanks. --Mike Peel (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

[edit]
  1.  Support —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:07, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 18:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support Pamputt (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support --Emu (talk) 19:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support --Epìdosis 19:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support Ruy (talk) 21:05, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support --Okkn (talk) 04:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support --Rzuwig► 16:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:24, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Sure thing,  Support! Bencemac (talk) 11:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support Yahya (talk) 20:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Seems the best way to handle this. Thanks for taking care of these routine tasks! ArthurPSmith (talk) 15:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support Prahlad balaji 15:26, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support Prince ovy (talk) 16:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Closed as successful--Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Estopedist1

[edit]

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 21 August 2022 12:36 (UTC)

It seems that there is lack of administrators in Wikidata. Hence, I would like to be a Wikidata administrator. I have done over one million edits in different Wikiprojects. Trust and expertise are guaranteed. When being an administrator I will focus mostly on maintenance, e.g. checking of recent changes (via pltools.toolforge.org/rech), new items, new talk pages, and Category:Wikidata:Deletion. Dealing with these topics, administator’s rights would be very helpful. --Estopedist1 (talk) 12:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

[edit]
  1.  Support --Emu (talk) 15:03, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 08:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support Seems good to me. ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 17:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support --Epìdosis 18:08, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support Sure. Mahir256 (talk) 23:50, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Gymnicus (talk) 20:17, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support --Wolverène (talk) 05:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support --A.Savin (talk) 10:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Stryn (talk) 13:38, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support MdsShakil (talk) 11:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 17:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support ミラP@Miraclepine 15:04, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support --Fralambert (talk) 16:27, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Warm thanks to everyone!

Nota bene!: because at the moment (until 23 August) I am residing outside my home country, then I don't use my account until 23 August. Not using my account because Two-factor authentication with WinAuth may need my mobile phone number. So for security sake, granting my adminship may be prolonged until 24 August.--Estopedist1 (talk) 07:45, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Closed as  Not done; the user has been globally locked in the meantime. Mahir256 (talk) 00:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leonaardog

[edit]

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 3 October 2022 21:30 (UTC)

I would like to request the rights of the item remover on Wikidata. I'm currently active on ptwiki, but I've always been interested in Commons. Never had any copyright infringement issues, none of my uploads were deleted (there is a deletion request currently, but it's not due to copyright, it's due to a high quality version of a logo available after my upload). All items I indicated for spam deletion have been deleted. As such, I believe I am "[...] familiar with Wikidata's general policy [...] With takedown rights, I will also be focusing on wIkidata in addition to ptwiki to help reduce the huge backlog in Category:License review needed, especially needed. I'm also open to any questions. Thank you! — Leonaardog (talk) 17:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

[edit]
  1.  Oppose Sorry, but you are just active since four months here and have a bit more than 1,000 edits. That seems to be not enough experience --Ameisenigel (talk) 06:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Oppose You're mostly talking about commons and not why you need the rights on Wikidata. They're 2 different projects. Mbch331 (talk) 08:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Oppose I'm not able to understand the request. Do you want to be an admin here or on a different project. If here, I don't see any merit around; you've just got 1.2k edits here and it is not enough. ─ The Aafī (talk) 12:57, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Closed as successful--Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wd-Ryan

[edit]

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 10 October 2022 17:38 (UTC)

If you don't recognize me, I recently (a few days ago) changed my username from AntisocialRyan. A few people have told me that I am fit to be administrator, so I decided to try for it. I've been editing Wikidata nonstop for about 2 years now, and have a good understanding of most parts of Wikidata, especially the rules that need to be enforced. A list of my major contributions, of which I have over 44,000, can be found on my userpage. --wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 17:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

[edit]
  1.  Support. good interactions. BrokenSegue (talk) 18:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support --Emu (talk) 19:28, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support maybe a bit early after rollback and property creator, but I see no reason to oppose --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:16, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support ---MisterSynergy (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support --Estopedist1 (talk) 11:29, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --Syunsyunminmin (talk) 12:09, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Lockal (talk) 09:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 13:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support. --Wolverène (talk) 04:13, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Happy to support — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:53, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --Alaa :)..! 19:38, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --Gymnicus (talk) 18:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --EN-Jungwon 12:12, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support - Premeditated (talk) 12:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:38, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support --Tmv (talk) 09:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Closed as successful --Lymantria (talk) 16:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ChristianKl 2

[edit]

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 4 December 2022 17:22 (UTC)

Trusted user who previously was overwhelmingly made a administrator. Rights were taken away due to inactivity but looking at xtools they are much more active this year. --BrokenSegue (talk) 17:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

[edit]
  1.  Support -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 17:42, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support - Mbch331 (talk) 21:21, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support --Okkn (talk) 22:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support - Premeditated (talk) 23:06, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support - Syunsyunminmin (talk) 06:02, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 10:03, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Rzuwig► 10:14, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support. Hakan·IST 13:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support --Alaa :)..! 15:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Vicarage (talk) 15:46, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support Trusted user. Pamputt (talk) 16:14, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --Okami (talk) 16:37, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Sure - thanks! ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:46, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --Epìdosis 16:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support --Nw520 (talk) 18:14, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support Definitely. Andrew Gray (talk) 19:02, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support –– Yahya (talk) 09:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support -- Ajraddatz (talk) 17:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support — Toghrul R (t) 08:47, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support Emu (talk) 10:10, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support Dajasj (talk) 18:06, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support --Saroj Uprety (talk) 20:09, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support ミラP@Miraclepine 22:09, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support Ruy (talk) 22:46, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support --MdsShakil (talk) 15:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 17:20, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Oppose For not adhering to fundamental guidelines, such as limiting length of descriptions (see [2]). --EncycloPetey (talk) 22:06, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support can be trusted with the tools --DannyS712 (talk) 00:54, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support --Wolverène (talk) 22:48, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  31.  Support -- Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 11:31, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  32.  Support --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 11:34, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/RfA/2022&oldid=1923835232"