GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS
Assistant Professor Ceren DOĞRU
Constitution
Constitution
Separation of Powers
         Separation of Powers
• The term "trias politica" or "separation of
  powers" was coined by Charles-Louis de
  Secondat, baron de La Brède et de
  Montesquieu, an 18th century French social
  and political philosopher.
• His publication, Spirit of the Laws , is
  considered one of the great works in the
  history of political theory
          Separation of Powers
• Under his model, the political authority of the
  state is divided into legislative, executive and
  judicial powers
• He asserted that, to most effectively promote
  liberty, these three powers must be separate
  and acting independently
         Separation of Powers
• Separation of powers, therefore, refers to the
  division of government responsibilities into
  distinct branches to limit any one branch from
  exercising the core functions of another.
• The intent is to prevent the concentration of
  power and provide for checks and balances.
• What is government?
           Types of Goverments
• There are many different forms of government but really
  just eight apply to us today.
1) Absolute Monarchy (absolutism)
2) Limited Monarchy (Constitutional Monarchy)
3) Representative Democracy
4) Direct democracy
5) Dictatorship
6) Oligarchy
7) Totalitarianism
8) Theocracy
Goverments of Today
   Government Systems
Democracy   Separation of Powers
                   Democracy
• The term appeared in the 5th century BC in Greek city
  states, notably Classical athens, to mean “rule of the
  people”, in contrast to aristocracy meaning rule of an
  elite
• Aristotle defines democracy: the poor will have more
  power than the rich, because there are more of them,
  and the will of the majority is supreme.
• In dictionary definition: Democracy is a system of
  government in which state power is vested in the people
  or the general population of a state
                 Democracy
• In the phrase of Abraham Lincoln, democracy is a
  government of the people, by the people, and for
  the people.
• Freedom and democracy are often used
  interchangeably, but the two are not synonymous.
• Democracy is indeed a set of ideas and principles
  about freedom, but it also consists of a set of
  practices and procedures that have been molded
  through a long, often tortuous history.
                 Democracy
• In short, democracy is the institutionalization
  of freedom. For this reason, it is possible to
  identify the time-tested fundamentals of
  constitutional government, human rights, and
  equality before the law that any society must
  possess to be properly called democratic.
Democracy has two basic categories
    Direct         Representative
   Democracies      Democracies
           Direct Democracy
• Ancient Athens, the world's first democracy,
  managed to practice direct democracy with an
  assembly that may have numbered as many as
  5,000 to 6,000 persons--perhaps the
  maximum number that can physically gather
  in one place and practice direct democracy.
             Direct Democracy
• In a direct democracy, all citizens, without the
  intermediary of elected or appointed officials, can
  participate in making public decisions
• Such a system is clearly only practical with
  relatively small numbers of people--in a
  community organization or tribal council, for
  example, or the local unit of a labor union, where
  members can meet in a single room to discuss
  issues and arrive at decisions by consensus or
  majority vote.
  Advantages of Direct Democracy
• Gives equal weight to all votes, unlike a representative
  system where the varying sizes of constituencies
  mean that votes do not all have equal value.
• Encourages popular participation in politics by
  expecting people to take their duties as citizens
  seriously
• Removes the need for trusted representatives, as
  people can take responsibility for their own decisions.
• Develops a sense of community and encourages
  genuine debate
Disadvantages of Direct Democracy
• Impractical in a large, heavily populated modern state
  where decision-making is complicated.
• Many people will not want to-or feel qualified to- take
  part in decision-making, so political activists decide
  what happens.
• Open to manipulation by the cleverest and most
  articulate speakers, who will persuade people to
  support their viewpoint.
• Will of the majority is not mediated by parliamentary
  institutions, so minority viewpoints are disregarded.
       Representative Democracy
• In the political science literature, representative
  democracy is generally identified with liberal democracy,
  in spite of the fact that the term covers a plurality of
  different institutional designs-parliamentary and
  presidential systems, constitutional monarchies,
  authoritarian regimes, centralized and federal states, one
  or more chamber parliaments and a diversity of electoral
  systems
• Political scientist Dahl captured the essentials of the
  liberal democratic system of government by noting the
  eight key guarantees.
           Dahl’s eight guarantees
•   freedom of association,
•   freedom of expression,
•   the right to vote,
•   broad citizen eligibility for public office,
•   the right to political leaders to compete for support,
•   alternative sources of information,
•   free and fair elections,
•   institutions that make government policies depend
    on voted an other forms of citizen preferences.
  Represantative(Indirect) Democracy
• Modern society, with its size and complexity,
  offers few opportunities for direct democracy.
• Today, the most common form of democracy,
  whether for a town of 50,000 or nations of 50
  million, is representative democracy, in which
  citizens elect officials to make political
  decisions, formulate laws, and administer
  programs for the public good.
      Represantative Democracy
• How such officials are elected can vary
  enormously. On the national level, for
  example, legislators can be chosen from
  districts that each elect a single
  representative.
• Alternatively, under a system of proportional
  representation, each political party is
  represented in the legislature according to its
  percentage of the total vote nationwide
    Advantages of Rep. Democracy
• The only practical system in a large modern state, where issues
  are complex and often need rapid response (e.g. deployment
  of troops).
• Politicians form parties, bringing coherence and giving people a
  real choice of representative. Pressure groups form to
  represent different interests, promoting debate and
  encouraging pluralist democracy.
• Reduces chances of minority rights being overridden by
  "tyranny of the majority”.
• Elections allow people to hold representatives to account.
• Politicians are (in theory) better informed than the average
  citizen about the many issues on which they must take a view.
 Disadvantages of Rep. Democracy
• May lead to reduced participation as people choose to hand
  responsibility to politicians.
• Parties and pressure groups are often run by elites pursuing
  their own agendas, not truly representing the people.
• Minorities may still find themselves underrepresented as
  politicians are more likely to follow the views of the majority to
  secure election.
• Politicians are skillful in avoiding accountability, especially as
  general elections are five years apart in the UK.
• Politicians may be corrupt and incompetent, may betray
  election promises or put loyalty to their party before
  responsibility to the electorate.
                Majority Rule and Minority Rights
Majoritarian Democracy              Pluralist Democracy
  Çoğunlukçu Demokrasi                    Çoğulcu Demokrasi