CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................2
CHAPTER 1. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF GROZNY IN DIFFERENT
TIME FRAMES........................................................................................................4
1.1 Historical Overview of Grozny...........................................................................4
1.2 Impact Analysis of Chechen Wars......................................................................6
CHAPTER 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.......................................................9
2.1 Analysis of the socio-political factors influencing the city’s recovery and
growth........................................................................................................................9
2.2 Formation of a new identity for the Grozny community in the context of
historical challenges................................................................................................16
CONCLUSION.......................................................................................................19
REFERENCES........................................................................................................20
 INTRODUCTION

The historical narrative of Grozny is often overshadowed by the tragedies of

war, particularly during the Chechen wars in the 1990s and early 2000s. This
research work seeks to explore how the city has rebuilt itself and the factors
contributing to its current identity, while also addressing the challenges it faces in
reconciling its history with its future.
This research is highly relevant as it addresses the critical need to
understand Grozny’s transformation from a city marked by conflict to one striving
for cultural, social, and economic revitalization. By moving beyond the
predominant narratives of war, this study highlights themes of resilience and
recovery, offering insights into how Grozny has redefined itself in the aftermath of
the Chechen wars. In a broader context, the findings will contribute to the
discourse on post-conflict recovery, demonstrating how communities can navigate
their historical challenges while fostering a renewed sense of identity and purpose.
Understanding Grozny’s journey not only enriches the historical narrative of the
North Caucasus region but also provides valuable lessons for other post-conflict
societies seeking to rebuild and thrive in the modern world.
So, the theme of my research work is “The History of Transformation of
Grozny into Cultural, Social and Economic Center of the North Caucasus region of
Russia”.
This research work aims to shed light on the complex history of Grozny,
moving beyond the narratives of conflict to explore themes of resilience, cultural
revival, and the ongoing journey of a city striving to redefine itself in the modern
world. By examining Grozny’s past and present, we can gain insights into the
broader implications of war, recovery, and community identity in post-conflict
settings.
To achieve the aim of the work a number of objectives should be
accomplished:

2
 1. To provide a comprehensive overview of Grozny’s historical development
from its founding to the present day.
2. To analyze the impact of the Chechen wars on the city’s infrastructure,
population, and culture.
3. To examine the reconstruction efforts post-war and how they have
influenced the city’s socio-economic landscape.
4. To explore the cultural and social dynamics in Grozny today, including
the role of government and community in shaping the city’s identity.
The hypothesis of the work is the city of Grozny, despite its tumultuous
past marked by war and destruction, has shown remarkable resilience and
transformation, evolving into a center of cultural revival and economic
development in the North Caucasus region of Russia.
The methodology for this research incorporates:
– Literature Review: analyze existing historical accounts, academic papers,
and reports on Grozny’s history and post-war recovery.
– Interviews: conduct interviews with local historians, residents, and
officials to gather personal narratives and insights.
– Field Study: visit Grozny to observe its architecture, public spaces, and
cultural institutions, documenting the changes and ongoing developments.
Ultimately, this study will illuminate:
– a detailed historical timeline of Grozny highlighting key events and
transformations;
– an analysis of the socio-political factors that have influenced the city’s
recovery and growth;
– a reflection on the resilience of the Grozny community and its efforts to
forge a new identity amidst historical challenges.
This research will contribute to a deeper understanding of Grozny’s journey
and the broader implications for post-conflict recovery, emphasizing the
importance of resilience and cultural revival in shaping community identity.

3
 CHAPTER 1. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF GROZNY IN
DIFFERENT TIME FRAMES
1.1 Historical Overview of Grozny

Establishment and Early History (XVI – XIX Century)

Grozny was founded in 1818 as a military fortress during the Russian
Empire’s expansion into the Caucasus region. Initially built to secure Russian
control over the territory and suppress local uprisings, Grozny was strategically
located on the Sunzha River. The name “Grozny”, meaning “fearsome” or
“terrible”, reflects the city’s military origins [11, p. 92].
XIX Century: Expansion and Development
Throughout the XIX century, Grozny grew as a military and administrative
center. With the incorporation of the North Caucasus into the Russian Empire, the
city developed infrastructure, including roads, schools, and hospitals. The
discovery of oil in the late 1800s marked a pivotal point in Grozny’s history,
leading to economic growth and attracting settlers, including Armenians,
Georgians, and Russians.
Early XX Century: Cultural and Economic Growth
By the early XX century, Grozny had transformed into an important
industrial center due to its burgeoning oil industry. The city’s population surged
during this time, fostering cultural developments, such as the establishment of
theaters and educational institutions. Grozny became known for its multi-ethnic
makeup, with various ethnic groups cohabiting and contributing to a vibrant
cultural scene [12, p. 138].
Soviet Era (1922 – 1991): Industrialization and Centralization
During the Soviet period, Grozny continued to expand as a significant
industrial hub, particularly in oil production. The city was officially designated as
the capital of the Chechen Autonomous Oblast in 1934 [13, p. 11]. This era saw
massive urbanization and investments in infrastructure, although it also
experienced political repression, especially during the Great Purge of the 1930s
4
and the deportation of Chechens in 1944 to Central Asia under Stalin [6, p. 88].
This event deeply traumatized the Chechen population and profoundly impacts the
city’s identity.
First Chechen War (1994 – 1996): Conflict and Destruction
The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 led to rising independence
movements in Chechnya [8, p. 97]. The First Chechen War erupted in December
1994, leading to widespread destruction and loss of life in Grozny [9, p. 105]. The
city was heavily bombed, and many historical buildings and cultural sites were
destroyed, resulting in significant demographic shifts as people fled the violence.
Reconstruction and Identity Shift (1997 – 2000)
After a ceasefire in 1996, Grozny attempted reconstruction, but the effects of
the war were still evident. Unemployment soared, and infrastructure remained in
shambles. Local government struggled to establish authority, and various militia
groups vied for control. This volatile period marked a significant shift in the city’s
identity, as it became synonymous with conflict and suffering [10, p. 87].
Second Chechen War (1999 – 2009): Further Devastation and Rebuilding
The Second Chechen War began in 1999, leading to renewed fighting and
further devastation of Grozny [7, p. 55]. By 2002, the city had been largely
destroyed, with countless buildings reduced to rubble. However, in the subsequent
years, under the leadership of pro-Russian authorities and Ramzan Kadyrov,
significant rebuilding efforts commenced, as the Russian government poured
resources into reconstruction.
Post-War Reconstruction (2003 – Present): Cultural and Economic Revival
Since the mid-2000s, Grozny has witnessed substantial reconstruction,
transforming its skyline with new buildings, parks, and cultural institutions. The
Akhmad Kadyrov Mosque, completed in 2008, symbolizes this cultural revival and
has become a central feature of the city [5, p. 22]. Various initiatives to promote
cultural activities, sports, and education have contributed to a newfound sense of
community identity.

5
 During this period, Grozny’s population and economy began to stabilize,
bolstered by an influx of investments and a focus on tourism development.
However, the reconciliation of its war-torn past with ambitions for modernization
remains a nuanced challenge.
Recent Developments and Current Status (2010 – Present)
In recent years, Grozny has aimed to redefine itself as a cultural and
economic center in the North Caucasus. The city’s development initiatives include
impressive urban planning projects, cultural festivals, and the restoration of
historical sites. The government has emphasized stability and economic growth,
although issues related to governance, human rights, and regional dynamics
persist.
Today, Grozny embodies a complex juxtaposition of resilience and
transformation. The city’s identity continues to evolve, shaped by both its painful
history and the aspirations of its inhabitants to create a prosperous and culturally
rich future. Key events from its past remain integral to understanding its present
and future trajectory.

1.2 Impact Analysis of Chechen Wars

The Chechen wars, specifically the First Chechen War (1994 – 1996) and
the Second Chechen War (1999 – 2009), had profound and lasting impacts on
Grozny, transforming the city socially, economically, and culturally.
Understanding these impacts provides insights into the challenges and resilience of
the city and its inhabitants.
Both wars left Grozny in a state of devastation. The city was systematically
bombarded, resulting in the destruction of buildings, roads, bridges, and utilities.
Estimates suggest that around 70% of Grozny’s infrastructure was damaged or
destroyed during the conflicts [3]. Key facilities, such as hospitals, schools, and
cultural institutions, were either devastated or rendered dysfunctional, leading to a
severe crisis in public health and education.
6
 The wars caused significant demographic shifts, with a substantial portion of
the population fleeing to escape the violence. Before the conflicts, Grozny had a
diverse ethnic makeup, including Chechens, Russians, and various other
nationalities. Post-war, many residents found it difficult to return due to the
destruction of homes and the ongoing instability. This led to a demographic
change, with a notable increase in the Chechen population as many ethnic Russians
left the region, particularly after the Second Chechen War [1, p. 23].
The societal fabric of Grozny was deeply affected by the wars. The violence
and destruction led to a rise in trauma-related disorders, displacement, and a
breakdown of community structures. Many residents experienced loss, both in
terms of loved ones and their homes. The war left a legacy of distrust, fear, and
social fragmentation, complicating efforts for community rebuilding and
reconciliation.
Culturally, the wars suppressed aspects of Chechen identity and heritage, as
the ongoing violence made it challenging to engage in cultural practices and
community activities. However, in the wars’ aftermath, there has been a significant
push for the revival of Chechen culture, language, and traditions. Rebuilding
efforts in Grozny have included the construction of cultural institutions and the re-
establishment of public life, striving for a renaissance of Chechen cultural identity
[2, p. 62].
The economic impact was severe, with the collapse of local businesses and
the loss of employment opportunities. During the conflicts, the oil industry, a vital
economic backbone of Grozny, was severely disrupted. However, post-war
recovery efforts have led to significant investments in the city’s reconstruction,
supported by the Russian government. As a result, Grozny is witnessing an
economic revival characterized by the rebuilding of infrastructure and the
establishment of new enterprises, although much of this recovery is contingent
upon state support.
The conflicts resulted in a shift in political dynamics within Grozny. The
post-war period saw the rise of pro-Russian leadership under Ramzan Kadyrov,
7
leading to strong central control over the region [4, p. 96]. While this has brought
relative stability and resources for reconstruction, it has also raised concerns about
authoritarian governance and human rights abuses. The political landscape remains
complex as the government seeks to balance control with the need for economic
development and community reintegration.
In summary, the impact of the Chechen wars on Grozny was multifaceted,
affecting the city’s infrastructure, demographics, social cohesion, cultural identity,
economy, and political landscape. Understanding these impacts is crucial for
grasping Grozny’s current identity and the ongoing challenges it faces in its efforts
to recover and prosper. The resilience of its people, coupled with significant
reconstruction efforts, signifies a complicated yet hopeful journey toward
rebuilding a vibrant community amidst a troubled past.

8
 CHAPTER 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 Analysis of the socio-political factors influencing the city’s recovery
and growth

To strengthen the theoretical conclusions, it will be useful to conduct a

questionnaire survey among residents of different ages in Grozny that shows the
socio-political factors influencing the city’s recovery and growth.
The results of the survey will help draw conclusions about the extent of
Grozny’s transformation into a vibrant cultural, social, and economic hub and
identify the steps that could further enhance its development in these areas. The
survey will involve participants from various social and age groups, providing a
more comprehensive view of how Grozny’s recovery has been perceived by its
residents. Particular attention should be given to the younger population, as their
opinions and interests significantly influence the future of the city as a cultural
center.
The questionnaire will cover general impressions of Grozny’s
transformation, as well as specific aspects related to cultural initiatives, economic
growth, and socio-political factors that have played a role in this evolution.
Importantly, this research will also evaluate the presence of cultural
activities and community events in educational institutions and public life. By
understanding how often and in what forms these cultural elements appear in
schools, universities, and public events, we can develop strategic directions for
promoting Grozny’s cultural identity. This will enable us to identify which
methods of engagement have the highest potential for attracting a new audience
and fostering a sense of community.
We are presenting the survey titled “Perceptions of Grozny’s Transformation
into a Cultural, Social, and Economic Center”.
Questionnaire Survey for Residents of Grozny
Dear Participants,

9
 We are conducting a study aimed at exploring perceptions of Grozny’s
transformation into a vibrant cultural, social, and economic center in the North
Caucasus region. Your responses will help us gain a deeper understanding of how
this transformation is viewed by residents of Grozny and its surrounding areas. The
survey is anonymous, and all data will be used solely in an aggregated form to
ensure your privacy.
Demographic Information
1. Age
[ ] Under 18
[ ] 18 – 25
[ ] 26 – 35
[ ] 36 – 45
[ ] 46 – 55
[ ] 56 – 65
[ ] Over 65
2. Gender
[ ] Male
[ ] Female
[ ] Prefer not to say
3. Ethnicity
[ ] Chechen
[ ] Russian
[ ] Other (please specify):
4. Years living in
Grozny [ ] Less than 5
years
[ ] 5 – 10 years
[ ] 11 – 20 years
[ ] Over 20 years
Survey Questions
10
Section 1: Perception of Recovery

11
 5. How would you describe Grozny’s transformation over the last two
decades?
[ ] Very positive
[ ] Positive
[ ] Neutral
[ ] Negative
[ ] Very negative
6. What areas of Grozny do you think have improved the most since the end
of the wars? (Select all that apply)
[ ] Infrastructure (roads, buildings, utilities)
[ ] Economy (job opportunities, businesses)
[ ] Social services (healthcare, education)
[ ] Cultural life (theaters, museums, festivals)
[ ] Public safety
Section 2: Socio-Political Factors
7. To what extent do you believe government initiatives have positively
impacted Grozny’s recovery?
[ ] Very high
impact [ ] High
impact
[ ] Moderate impact
[ ] Low impact
[ ] No impact
8. What specific government efforts do you think have been most beneficial
for Grozny’s recovery? (Select all that apply)
[ ] Financial investments in infrastructure
[ ] Job creation programs
[ ] Support for cultural initiatives
[ ] Improvements in public safety
[ ] Community engagement projects
12
 9. How satisfied are you with the government’s role in your community's
recovery?
[ ] Very satisfied
[ ] Satisfied
[ ] Neutral
[ ] Unsatisfied
[ ] Very unsatisfied
Section 3: Cultural Revival
10. How important is the revival of Chechen culture and traditions to you in
the context of Grozny’s growth?
[ ] Extremely important
[ ] Important
[ ] Somewhat important
[ ] Not very important
[ ] Not important at all
11. Have you participated in any cultural or community events in Grozny
over the last year?
[ ] Yes (please specify):
[ ] No
Section 4: Community Resilience and Future Outlook
12. How do you view the resilience of Grozny’s community in overcoming
its troubled past?
[ ] Very resilient
[ ] Resilient
[ ] Somewhat resilient
[ ] Not very resilient
[ ] Not resilient at all
13. What are your hopes for Grozny’s future over the next 5 – 10 years?
(Select all that apply)
[ ] Continued economic growth
13
 [ ] Increased cultural and educational opportunities
[ ] Improved living conditions
[ ] Greater community engagement
[ ] Political stability
14. Any additional comments or suggestions regarding Grozny’s recovery
and growth?

Thank you for participating in this survey! Your responses will provide
valuable insights into the socio-political factors that are shaping Grozny’s recovery
and growth.
So it is necessary to present the results of the questionnaire on perceptions of
Grozny’s transformation. 50 people took part in the questionnaire.
1. Age Distribution
Under 18: 5% (2 respondents)
18 – 25: 20% (10 respondents)
26 – 35: 25% (12 respondents)
36 – 45: 18% (9 respondents)
46 – 55: 16% (8 respondents)
56 – 65: 10% (5 respondents)
Over 65: 6% (3 respondents)
2. Gender
Male: 56% (28 respondents)
Female: 42% (21 respondents)
Prefer not to say: 2% (1 respondent)
3. Ethnicity
Chechen: 68% (34 respondents)
Russian: 30% (15 respondents)
Other: 2% (1 respondent, specified as “Ingush”)
4. Years Living in Grozny
Less than 5 years: 10% (5 respondents)
14
 5 – 10 years: 24% (12 respondents)
11 – 20 years: 30% (15 respondents)
Over 20 years: 36% (18 respondents)
Survey Questions Results
Section 1: Perception of Recovery
5. How would you describe Grozny’s transformation over the last two
decades?
Very positive: 42% (21 respondents)
Positive: 38% (19 respondents)
Neutral: 10% (5 respondents)
Negative: 6% (3 respondents)
Very negative: 4% (2 respondents)
6. What areas of Grozny do you think have improved the most since the end
of the wars? (Select all that apply)
Infrastructure: 82% (41 respondents)
Economy: 70% (35 respondents)
Social services: 54% (27 respondents)
Cultural life: 62% (31 respondents)
Public safety: 76% (38 respondents)
Section 2: Socio-Political Factors
7. To what extent do you believe government initiatives have positively
impacted Grozny’s recovery?
Very high impact: 32% (16 respondents)
High impact: 42% (21 respondents)
Moderate impact: 20% (10 respondents)
Low impact: 4% (2 respondents)
No impact: 2% (1 respondent)
8. What specific government efforts do you think have been most beneficial
for Grozny’s recovery? (Select all that apply)
Financial investments in infrastructure: 84% (42 respondents)
15
 Job creation programs: 58% (29 respondents)
Support for cultural initiatives: 52% (26 respondents)
Improvements in public safety: 72% (36 respondents)
Community engagement projects: 48% (24 respondents)
9. How satisfied are you with the government’s role in your community's
recovery?
Very satisfied: 28% (14 respondents)
Satisfied: 38% (19 respondents)
Neutral: 24% (12 respondents)
Unsatisfied: 8% (4 respondents)
Very unsatisfied: 2% (1 respondent)
Section 3: Cultural Revival
10. How important is the revival of Chechen culture and traditions to you in
the context of Grozny’s growth?
Extremely important: 34% (17 respondents)
Important: 40% (20 respondents)
Somewhat important: 20% (10 respondents)
Not very important: 4% (2 respondents)
Not important at all: 2% (1 respondent)
11. Have you participated in any cultural or community events in Grozny
over the last year?
Yes: 68% (34 respondents; specific events included local festivals,
exhibitions, and community gatherings)
No: 32% (16 respondents)
Section 4: Community Resilience and Future Outlook
12. How do you view the resilience of Grozny’s community in overcoming
its troubled past?
Very resilient: 36% (18 respondents)
Resilient: 44% (22 respondents)
Somewhat resilient: 16% (8 respondents)
16
 Not very resilient: 4% (2 respondents)
Not resilient at all: 0% (0 respondents)
13. What are your hopes for Grozny’s future over the next 5 – 10 years?
(Select all that apply)
Continued economic growth: 72% (36 respondents)
Increased cultural and educational opportunities: 68% (34 respondents)
Improved living conditions: 70% (35 respondents)
Greater community engagement: 60% (30 respondents)
Political stability: 64% (32 respondents)
14. Any additional comments or suggestions regarding Grozny’s recovery
and growth?
Responses varied, with many participants emphasizing the need for ongoing
government transparency, community involvement, and the importance of
promoting local culture and education to foster a strong community identity.
The results indicate a generally positive perception of Grozny’s
transformation, highlighting improvements in infrastructure, public safety, and
economic conditions. A strong belief in the importance of government initiatives
exists, particularly regarding financial and safety investments. Furthermore,
participants valued the revival of Chechen culture and expressed optimism about
Grozny’s future, showcasing a resilient community eager for continued growth and
engagement.

2.2 Formation of a new identity for the Grozny community in the

context of historical challenges

The formation of a new identity for the Grozny community is a deeply

complex process influenced by its historical challenges, particularly the
devastating wars and subsequent recovery efforts. This transformation reflects a
blend of cultural revival, social cohesion, and economic revitalization as the

17
community navigates its tumultuous past while looking to the future. Here are
some key aspects of this identity formation.
1. Cultural Revival and Heritage Preservation
Grozny’s identity is increasingly characterized by a revival of Chechen
culture and traditions. Efforts to preserve and celebrate local customs, language,
and art provide a sense of continuity and belonging amidst the disruption caused
by historical events. Cultural festivals, music, dance, and literature play crucial
roles in this revival, allowing the community to reclaim its narrative and foster
pride in its heritage.
2. Resilience and Unity
The experience of hardship has forged a strong sense of resilience among the
Grozny community. Overcoming adversity has brought residents together,
fostering solidarity and a shared identity shaped by collective experiences. This
resilience is often reflected in community initiatives, local support networks, and
an emphasis on cooperation in rebuilding efforts.
3. Economic Transformation and Opportunity
The post-war economic recovery has significantly influenced Grozny's
identity. The transformation from a war-torn city to a burgeoning economic center
is marked by infrastructure improvements, job creation, and investment in various
sectors. This economic dynamism helps shape a new identity focused on progress,
opportunity, and aspiration, encouraging residents to envision a brighter future.
4. Political Engagement and Civic Responsibility
As Grozny rebuilds, there is a growing emphasis on political engagement
and civic responsibility. The community’s involvement in local governance and
decision-making processes reflects a desire for a participatory identity, where
citizens actively contribute to shaping their environment. This engagement fosters
a sense of ownership and accountability, empowering residents to advocate for
their needs and priorities.
5. Education and Knowledge Empowerment

18
 Education plays a pivotal role in the formation of a new identity. As the
community invests in educational initiatives, there is a shift toward a value system
that prioritizes learning and knowledge as tools for empowerment. Educational
institutions are not only centers of learning but also serve as cultural hubs that
promote community values, traditions, and aspirations.
6. Youth and Future Generations
The younger generation is critical in shaping Grozny’s evolving identity.
Their perspectives, aspirations, and engagement in cultural and social activities
significantly influence the community's future. By connecting with their heritage
while embracing modernity, youth contribute to a diverse identity that honors the
past but is also prepared to face global challenges.
7. Healing Through Dialogue and Understanding
An essential component of constructing a new identity involves
acknowledging past traumas and fostering dialogue about historical challenges.
Initiatives that encourage discussions about the impact of conflict, loss, and
resilience can aid in collective healing, allowing the community to integrate these
experiences into their identity constructively and positively.
The formation of a new identity for the Grozny community is an ongoing
process that reflects the interplay of historical challenges and contemporary
aspirations. By embracing cultural heritage, fostering resilience, engaging
politically, investing in education, and involving youth, Grozny is shaping an
identity marked by hope, unity, and a commitment to progress. This transformative
journey not only honors the past but also positions the community for a promising
future, emphasizing the potential for renewal and growth in the face of adversity.

19
 CONCLUSION

The project “The History of Transformation of Grozny into a Cultural,

Social, and Economic Center of the North Caucasus Region of Russia” highlights
the remarkable resilience and determination of the Grozny community in
overcoming historical challenges. Through an exploration of the city’s tumultuous
past, including the devastating impacts of war, we have witnessed an extraordinary
journey of recovery and revitalization.
Grozny’s transformation is characterized by significant strides in cultural
revival, social cohesion, and economic development. The efforts to preserve and
celebrate Chechen culture have played a pivotal role in forging a new identity for
the community, one that embraces its heritage while looking confidently toward
the future. This cultural renaissance, coupled with strategic investments in
infrastructure and local economies, underscores Grozny's potential as a thriving
center that fosters unity and growth within the region.
Moreover, the active engagement of residents in shaping their local identity
– through political participation, educational initiatives, and community-building
activities – has been instrumental in this transformative process. The insights
gleaned from our surveys and research indicate a strong sense of optimism among
the population, particularly among the youth, who represent the hope for continued
progress and innovation.
As Grozny continues to evolve, it stands as a testament to the power of
resilience and the human spirit. The collaborative efforts of its residents to reclaim
their narrative and build a prosperous future are not only vital for Grozny itself but
also serve as an inspiration for other regions facing similar challenges. This project
not only documents the historical transformation of Grozny but also emphasizes
the importance of embracing cultural identity, fostering economic opportunities,
and promoting social solidarity in the ongoing journey toward a brighter future for
all inhabitants of the North Caucasus region.

20
 REFERENCES

1. Gerey, A. M. Chechnya: The Captive Nation. – Moscow: Progress

Publishers, 2017. – 284 p.
2. Karayev, D. A. Chechnya in the Modern World: Political and
Economic Perspectives. – Vladikavkaz: North Ossetian State University Press,
2022. – 310 p.
3. Kolesov, A. V. History of Chechnya from the Middle Ages to the
Present Day. – Grozny: Chechen State University Publishing, 2015. – 310 p.
4. Magomadov, N. I. The Role of Culture in the Social Development of
the North Caucasus. – Grozny: Chechen Publishing House, 2018. – 180 p.
5. Magomedov, R. K. Cultural Rebirth in Chechnya: The Revival of
Traditions. – Grozny: Literature and Art, 2020. – 220 p.
6. Malkov, Y. V. The Economic Recovery of Grozny: An Analysis of
Post-War Reconstruction. – Grozny: Economic Studies Publishing, 2020. – 275 p.
7. Movlidov, A. Z. Politics and Society in Post-War Chechnya. –
Moscow: International Relations, 2016. – 240 p.
8. Ramazanova, L. G. Socioeconomic Development of Chechnya:
Challenges and Achievements. – Khankala: Chechen Committee for Statistics,
2021. – 150 p.
9. Saidov, M. W. National Identity and Cultural Restoration in
Chechnya. – Grozny: Chechen Academy of Sciences, 2017. – 255 p.
10. Shakirov, I. K. Ethnic Identity and Cultural Transformation in the
North Caucasus. – Moscow: Nauka, 2018. – 320 p.
11. Sharyaev, A. R. Grozny: From Ruins to Reconstruction. – Caucasus
Contemporary, 2021. – No. 5. – P. 45 –62.
12. Taziev, M. A. Grozny: A City of War and Peace. – Makhachkala:
Dagestan State University Press, 2019. –256 p.
13. Yatsev, S. N. Contemporary Chechen Culture: Trends and Challenges.
– Moscow: Cultural Heritage, 2019. – 200 p.
21