French Revolution

The French Revolution[a] was a period of political and societal change in France which began with
the Estates General of 1789 and ended with the Coup of 18 Brumaire on 9 November 1799. Many of
the revolution's ideas are considered fundamental principles of liberal democracy,[1] and its values
remain central to modern French political discourse.[2] It was caused by a combination of social,
political, and economic factors which the existing regime proved unable to manage.

Financial crisis and widespread social distress led to the convocation of the Estates General in May
1789, its first meeting since 1614. The representatives of the Third Estate broke away and re-
constituted themselves as a National Assembly in June. The Storming of the Bastille in Paris on 14
July led to a series of radical measures by the Assembly, including the abolition of feudalism, state
control over the Catholic Church in France, and issuing the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of
the Citizen.

The next three years were dominated by a struggle for political control. King Louis XVI's attempted
flight to Varennes in June 1791 further discredited the monarchy, and military defeats after the
outbreak of the French Revolutionary Wars in April 1792 led to the insurrection of 10 August 1792.
As a result, the monarchy was replaced by the French First Republic in September, followed by the
execution of Louis XVI himself in January 1793.

After another revolt in June 1793, the constitution was suspended, and political power passed from
the National Convention to the Committee of Public Safety, dominated by radical Jacobins led by
Maximilien Robespierre. About 16,000 people were sentenced by the Revolutionary Tribunal and
executed in the Reign of Terror, which ended in July 1794 with the Thermidorian Reaction.
Weakened by external threats and internal opposition, the Committee of Public Safety was replaced
in November 1795 by the Directory. Its instability ended in the coup of 18 Brumaire and the
establishment of the Consulate, with Napoleon Bonaparte as First Consul.

Causes

The Revolution resulted from multiple long-term and short-term factors, culminating in a social,
economic, financial and political crisis in the late 1780s.[3][4][5] Combined with resistance to reform
by the ruling elite and indecisive policy by Louis XVI and his ministers, the result was a crisis the
state was unable to manage.[6][7]
Between 1715 and 1789, the French population
French Revolution
grew from 21 to 28 million, 20% of whom lived in
towns or cities, Paris alone having over 600,000 Part of the Atlantic Revolutions

inhabitants.[8] This was accompanied by a tripling

in the size of the middle class, which comprised
almost 10% of the population by 1789.[9] Despite
increases in overall prosperity, its benefits were
largely restricted to the rentier and mercantile
classes, while the living standards fell for wage
labourers and peasant farmers who rented their
land.[10][11] Economic recession from 1785,
combined with bad harvests in 1787 and 1788,
The Storming of the Bastille, 14 July 1789
led to high unemployment and food prices,
causing a financial and political crisis.[3][12][13][14] Date 5 May 1789 – 9
November 1799
While the state also experienced a debt crisis, the
(10 years, 6 months,
level of debt itself was not high compared with and 4 days)
[15]
Britain's. A significant problem was that tax
Location France
rates varied widely from one region to another,
were often different from the official amounts, Outcome Abolition of the
and were collected inconsistently. Its complexity Ancien régime and

meant uncertainty over the amount contributed creation of

by any authorised tax caused resentment among constitutional

monarchy
all taxpayers.[16][b] Attempts to simplify the
system were blocked by the regional Parlements Proclamation of

which approved financial policy. The resulting the French First

impasse led to the calling of the Estates General Republic in

September 1792
of 1789, which became radicalised by the
struggle for control of public finances.[18] Reign of Terror and
execution of Louis
Louis XVI was willing to consider reforms, but he XVI
often backed down when faced with opposition
French
from conservative elements within the nobility.
Revolutionary Wars
Enlightenment critiques of social institutions
Establishment of
were widely discussed among the educated
the French
French elite. At the same time, the American
Consulate in
Revolution and the European revolts of the 1780s
November 1799
inspired public debate on issues such as patriotism, liberty, equality, and democracy. These shaped
the response of the educated public to the crisis,[19] while scandals such as the Affair of the
Diamond Necklace fuelled widespread anger at the court, nobility, and church officials.[20]

Crisis of the Ancien Régime

The regional Parlements in 1789; note area

covered by the Parlement of Paris

Financial and political crisis

France faced a series of budgetary crises during the 18th century as revenues failed to keep pace
with expenditure.[21][22] Despite solid economic growth, the use of tax farmers meant this was not
reflected in a proportional growth in state tax income.[21] As the nobility and Church benefited from
a variety of exemptions, the tax burden fell mainly on the lower classes.[23] Reform was difficult
because new tax laws had to be registered with regional judicial bodies or parlements that were able
to block them. The king could impose laws by decree, but this risked open conflict with the
parlements, the nobility, and those subject to new taxes.[24]

France primarily used loans to fund the 1778 to 1783 Anglo-French War. Even after it ended, the
monarchy continued to borrow heavily, and by 1788, half of state revenue went on servicing its
debt.[25] In 1786, the French finance minister, Calonne, proposed reforms including a universal land
tax, the abolition of grain controls and internal tariffs, and new provincial assemblies appointed by
the king. The new taxes were rejected, first by a hand-picked Assembly of Notables dominated by
the nobility, then by the parlements when submitted by Calonne's successor Brienne. The notables
and parlements argued that the proposed taxes could only be approved by an Estates-General, a
representative body that last met in 1614.[26]
The conflict between the Crown and the parlements became a national political crisis. Both sides
issued a series of public statements, the government arguing that it was combating privilege, and
the parlement defending the ancient rights of the nation. Public opinion was firmly on the side of the
parlements, and riots broke out in several towns. Brienne's attempts to raise new loans failed, and
on 8 August 1788, he announced that the king would summon an Estates-General to convene the
following May. Brienne resigned and was replaced by Jacques Necker.[27]

In September 1788, the Parlement of Paris ruled that the Estates-General should convene in the
same form as in 1614, meaning that the three estates would meet and vote separately, with votes
counted by estate rather than by head. As a result, the clergy and nobility could combine to outvote
the Third Estate, despite representing less than 5% of the population.[28][29] With the relaxation of
censorship and laws against political clubs, a group of liberal nobles and middle class activists
known as the Society of Thirty launched a campaign for the doubling of Third Estate representation
and individual voting. The public debate sparked an average of 25 new political pamphlets
published each week from 25 September 1788.[30]

One of the most influential was written by Abbé Sieyès. Titled What Is the Third Estate?, it denounced
the privilege of the clergy and nobility, and argued the Third Estate represented the nation and
should sit alone as a National Assembly. Activists such as Jean Joseph Mounier, Antoine Barnave
and Maximilien Robespierre organised regional meetings, petitions and literature in support of these
demands.[31] In December, the king agreed to double the representation of the Third Estate, but left
the question of counting votes for the Estates-General to decide.[32]
Estates-General of 1789

Caricature of the Third Estate

carrying the First Estate (clergy)
and the Second Estate (nobility)
on its back

The Catholic Church in France was wealthy, owning nearly 10% of all land, as well as receiving
annual tithes.[33] However, three-quarters of the 303 clergy elected were parish priests, many of
whom earned less than unskilled labourers and had more in common with their poor parishioners
than with the bishops of the first estate.[34]

The Second Estate elected 322 deputies, representing about 400,000 men and women, who owned
about 25% of the land and collected seigneurial dues and rents from their tenants. Most delegates
were town-dwelling members of the noblesse d'épée, or traditional aristocracy. Courtiers and
representatives of the noblesse de robe (those who derived rank from judicial or administrative
posts) were underrepresented.[35]

Of the 610 deputies of the Third Estate, about two-thirds held legal qualifications and almost half
were venal office holders. Less than 100 were in trade or industry, and none were peasants or
artisans.[36] To assist delegates, each region completed a list of grievances, known as Cahiers de
doléances.[37] Tax inequality and seigneurial dues (feudal payments owed to landowners) headed
the grievances in the cahiers de doleances for the estate.[38]

On 5 May 1789, the Estates-General convened at Versailles, with Necker reiterating that each estate
should decide separately how and when it would meet and vote in common with the other estates.
On the following day, each estate was to separately verify the credentials of their representatives.
The Third Estate, however, voted to invite the other estates to join them in verifying all the
representatives of the Estates-General in common, and to agree that votes should be counted by
head. Negotiations continued until 12 June when the Third Estate unilaterally began verifying its
own members. On 17th, the Third Estate declared itself to be the National Assembly of France and
that all existing taxes were illegal.[39]

Le Serment du Jeu de paume by Jacques-

Louis David (c. 1791), depicting the Tennis
Court Oath

By 19 June, they had been joined by more than 100 members of the clergy.[40] Shaken by this
challenge to his authority, the king agreed to a reform package he would present personally to the
Estates-General. The Salle des États was closed to prepare for the joint session, but the members of
the Estates-General were not informed in advance. Finding their meeting place closed next day, they
took the so-called Tennis Court Oath, undertaking not to disperse until a new constitution had been
agreed.[41]

At the royal session, Louis XVI announced a series of reforms and stated no new taxes or loans
would be implemented without the consent of the Estates-General. However, he then undermined
this by re-stating his original demand for all three to sit and vote separately. The Third Estate
refused to leave the hall and reiterated their oath not to disperse until a constitution had been
agreed. Over the next days more members of the clergy joined the National Assembly. On 27 June,
faced with popular demonstrations and mutinies in his French Guards, Louis XVI commanded the
members of the first and second estates to join the third in the National Assembly.[42]

Constitutional monarchy (July 1789 – September 1792)

Abolition of the Ancien Régime

Even the limited reforms the king had announced went too far for Marie Antoinette and Louis'
younger brother the Comte d'Artois. On their advice, Louis dismissed Necker again as chief minister
on 11 July.[43] On 12 July, the Assembly went into a non-stop session following rumours that the
king was planning to use the Swiss Guards to force it to close. The news brought crowds of
protestors into the streets, and soldiers of the elite Gardes Françaises refused to disperse them.[44]
On 14 July many of these soldiers joined a crowd attacking the Bastille, a royal fortress with large
stores of arms and ammunition. Its governor, Bernard-René de Launay, surrendered after several
hours of fighting that cost the lives of 83 attackers. Launay was taken to the Hôtel de Ville, where he
was killed and his head placed on a pike and paraded around the city. Although rumoured to hold
many prisoners, the Bastille held only seven: four forgers, a lunatic, a failed assassin, and a deviant
nobleman. Nevertheless, it was a potent symbol of the Ancien Régime and it was demolished in the
following weeks.[45] Bastille Day has become the French national holiday.[46]

The Storming of the Bastille on 14 July

1789; the iconic event of the Revolution,
still commemorated each year as Bastille
Day

Alarmed by the prospect of losing control of the capital, Louis appointed the Marquis de Lafayette
commander of the National Guard, with Jean-Sylvain Bailly as head of a new administrative
structure known as the Commune. On 17 July, Louis visited Paris accompanied by 100 deputies,
where he was greeted by Bailly and accepted a tricolore cockade to loud cheers. However, it was
clear power had shifted from his court; he was welcomed as 'Louis XVI, father of the French and
king of a free people.'[47]

The short-lived unity enforced on the Assembly by a common threat quickly dissipated. Deputies
argued over constitutional forms, while civil authority rapidly deteriorated. On 22 July, former
Finance Minister Joseph Foullon and his son were lynched by a Parisian mob, and neither Bailly nor
Lafayette could prevent it. In rural areas, wild rumours and paranoia resulted in the formation of
militia and an agrarian insurrection known as the Great Fear.[48] The breakdown of law and order and
frequent attacks on aristocratic property led much of the nobility to flee abroad. These émigrés
funded reactionary forces within France and urged foreign monarchs to back a counter-
revolution.[49]

In response, the Assembly published the August Decrees which abolished feudalism. Over 25% of
French farmland was subject to feudal dues, providing the nobility with most of their income; these
were now cancelled, along with church tithes. While their former tenants were supposed to pay
them compensation, collecting it proved impossible, and the obligation was annulled in 1793.[50]
Other decrees included equality before the law, opening public office to all, freedom of worship, and
cancellation of special privileges held by provinces and towns.[51]

With the suspension of the 13 regional parlements in November, the key institutional pillars of the
old regime had all been abolished in less than four months. From its early stages, the Revolution
therefore displayed signs of its radical nature; what remained unclear was the constitutional
mechanism for turning intentions into practical applications.[52]

Creating a new constitution

On 9 July, the National Assembly declared itself the National Constituent Assembly[53] and
appointed a committee to draft a constitution and statement of rights.[54] Twenty drafts were
submitted, which were used by a sub-committee to create a Declaration of the Rights of Man and of
the Citizen, with Mirabeau being the most prominent member.[55] The declaration was approved by
the Assembly and published on 26 August as a statement of principle.[56]

The Assembly now concentrated on the constitution. Mounier and his monarchist supporters
advocated a bicameral system, with an upper house appointed by the king, who would also have the
right to appoint ministers and veto legislation. On 10 September, the majority of the Assembly, led
by Sieyès and Talleyrand, voted in favour of a single body, and the following day approved a
"suspensive veto" for the king, meaning Louis could delay implementation of a law but not block it
indefinitely. In October, the Assembly voted to restrict political rights, including voting rights, to
"active citizens", defined as French males over the age of 25 who paid direct taxes equal to three
days' labour. The remainder were designated "passive citizens", restricted to "civil rights", a
distinction opposed by a significant minority, including the Jacobin clubs.[57][58] By mid-1790, the
main elements of a constitutional monarchy were in place, although the constitution was not
accepted by Louis until 1791.[59]

Food shortages and the worsening economy caused frustration at the lack of progress and led to
popular unrest in Paris. This came to a head in late September 1789, when the Flanders Regiment
arrived in Versailles to reinforce the royal bodyguard and were welcomed with a formal banquet as
was common practice. The radical press described this as a 'gluttonous orgy' and claimed the
tricolour cockade had been abused, while the Assembly viewed their arrival as an attempt to
intimidate them.[60]

On 5 October, crowds of women assembled outside the Hôtel de Ville, agitating against high food
prices and shortages.[61] These protests quickly turned political, and after seizing weapons stored at
the Hôtel de Ville, some 7,000 of them marched on Versailles, where they entered the Assembly to
present their demands. They were followed to Versailles by 15,000 members of the National Guard
under Lafayette, who was virtually "a prisoner of his own troops".[62]

When the National Guard arrived later that evening, Lafayette persuaded Louis the safety of his
family required their relocation to Paris. Next morning, some of the protestors broke into the royal
apartments, searching for Marie Antoinette, who had escaped. They ransacked the palace, killing
several guards. Order was eventually restored, and the royal family and Assembly left for Paris,
escorted by the National Guard.[63] Louis had announced his acceptance of the August Decrees and
the declaration, and his official title changed from 'King of France' to 'King of the French'.[64]

Catholic Church

Historian John McManners argues "in eighteenth-century France, throne and altar were commonly
spoken of as in close alliance; their simultaneous collapse ... would one day provide the final proof
of their interdependence." One suggestion is that after a century of persecution, some French
Protestants actively supported an anti-Catholic regime, a resentment fuelled by Enlightenment
thinkers such as Voltaire.[65] Jean-Jacques Rousseau, considered a philosophical founder of the
revolution,[66][67][68] wrote it was "manifestly contrary to the law of nature... that a handful of people
should gorge themselves with superfluities, while the hungry multitude goes in want of
necessities."[69]

In this caricature, monks and nuns enjoy

their new freedom after the decree of 16
February 1790.

The Revolution caused a massive shift of power from the Catholic Church to the state; although the
extent of religious belief has been questioned, elimination of tolerance for religious minorities
meant by 1789 being French also meant being Catholic.[70] The church was the largest individual
landowner in France, controlling nearly 10% of all estates and levied tithes, effectively a 10% tax on
income, collected from peasant farmers in the form of crops. In return, it provided a minimal level of
social support.[71]

The August Decrees abolished tithes, and on 2 November the Assembly confiscated all church
property, the value of which was used to back a new paper currency known as assignats. In return,
the state assumed responsibilities such as paying the clergy and caring for the poor, the sick and
the orphaned.[72] On 13 February 1790, religious orders and monasteries were dissolved, while
monks and nuns were encouraged to return to private life.[73]

The Civil Constitution of the Clergy of 12 July 1790 made them employees of the state, established
rates of pay, and developed a system for electing priests and bishops. Pope Pius VI and many
French Catholics objected to this since it denied the authority of the Pope over the French church. In
October, 30 bishops wrote a declaration denouncing the law, further fuelling opposition.[74] When
clergy were required to swear loyalty to the Civil Constitution in November, it split the church
between the 24% who complied and the majority who refused.[75] This stiffened popular resistance
against state interference, especially in traditionally Catholic areas such as Normandy, Brittany and
the Vendée, where only a few priests took the oath and the civilian population turned against the
revolution.[74] The result was state-led persecution of "refractory clergy", many of whom were forced
into exile, deported, or executed.[76]

Political divisions

The period from October 1789 to spring 1791 is usually seen as one of relative tranquility, when
some of the most important legislative reforms were enacted. However, conflict over the source of
legitimate authority was more apparent in the provinces, where officers of the Ancien Régime had
been swept away but not yet replaced by new structures. This was less obvious in Paris, since the
National Guard made it the best policed city in Europe, but disorder in the provinces inevitably
affected members of the Assembly.[77]

The Fête de la Fédération on 14 July 1790

celebrated the establishment of the
constitutional monarchy.
Centrists led by Sieyès, Lafayette, Mirabeau and Bailly created a majority by forging consensus with
monarchiens like Mounier, and independents including Adrien Duport, Barnave and Alexandre
Lameth. At one end of the political spectrum, reactionaries like Cazalès and Maury denounced the
Revolution in all its forms, with radicals like Maximilien Robespierre at the other. He and Jean-Paul
Marat opposed the criteria for "active citizens", gaining them substantial support among the
Parisian proletariat, many of whom had been disenfranchised by the measure.[78]

On 14 July 1790, celebrations were held throughout France commemorating the fall of the Bastille,
with participants swearing an oath of fidelity to "the nation, the law and the king." The Fête de la
Fédération in Paris was attended by the royal family, with Talleyrand performing a mass. Despite this
show of unity, the Assembly was increasingly divided, while external players like the Paris Commune
and National Guard competed for power. One of the most significant was the Jacobin club;
originally a forum for general debate, by August 1790 it had over 150 members, split into different
factions.[79]

The Assembly continued to develop new institutions; in September 1790, the regional Parlements
were abolished and their legal functions replaced by a new independent judiciary, with jury trials for
criminal cases. However, moderate deputies were uneasy at popular demands for universal
suffrage, labour unions and cheap bread, and over the winter of 1790 and 1791, they passed a
series of measures intended to disarm popular radicalism. These included exclusion of poorer
citizens from the National Guard, limits on use of petitions and posters, and the June 1791 Le
Chapelier Law suppressing trade guilds and any form of worker organisation.[80]

The traditional force for preserving law and order was the army, which was increasingly divided
between officers, who largely came from the nobility, and ordinary soldiers. In August 1790, the
loyalist General Bouillé suppressed a serious mutiny at Nancy; although congratulated by the
Assembly, he was criticised by Jacobin radicals for the severity of his actions. Growing disorder
meant many professional officers either left or became émigrés, further destabilising the
institution.[81]

Varennes and after

Held in the Tuileries Palace under virtual house arrest, Louis XVI was urged by his brother and wife
to re-assert his independence by taking refuge with Bouillé, who was based at Montmédy with
10,000 soldiers considered loyal to the Crown.[82] The royal family left the palace in disguise on the
night of 20 June 1791; late the next day, Louis was recognised as he passed through Varennes,
arrested and taken back to Paris. The attempted escape had a profound impact on public opinion;
since it was clear Louis had been seeking refuge in Austria, the Assembly now demanded oaths of
loyalty to the regime and began preparing for war, while fear of 'spies and traitors' became
pervasive.[83]

After the Flight to Varennes; the royal family are escorted

back to Paris

Despite calls to replace the monarchy with a republic, Louis retained his position but was generally
regarded with acute suspicion and forced to swear allegiance to the constitution. A new decree
stated retracting this oath, making war upon the nation, or permitting anyone to do so in his name
would be considered abdication. However, radicals led by Jacques Pierre Brissot prepared a petition
demanding his deposition, and on 17 July, an immense crowd gathered in the Champ de Mars to
sign. Led by Lafayette, the National Guard was ordered to "preserve public order" and responded to
a barrage of stones by firing into the crowd, killing between 13 and 50 people.[84]

The massacre badly damaged Lafayette's reputation; the authorities responded by closing radical
clubs and newspapers, while their leaders went into exile or hiding, including Marat.[85] On 27
August, Emperor Leopold II and King Frederick William II of Prussia issued the Declaration of Pillnitz
declaring their support for Louis and hinting at an invasion of France on his behalf. In reality, the
meeting between Leopold and Frederick was primarily to discuss the partitions of Poland; the
declaration was intended to satisfy Comte d'Artois and other French émigrés, but the threat rallied
popular support behind the regime.[86]

Based on a motion proposed by Robespierre, existing deputies were barred from elections held in
September for the French Legislative Assembly. Although Robespierre was one of those excluded,
his support in the clubs gave him a political power base not available to Lafayette and Bailly, who
resigned respectively as head of the National Guard and the Paris Commune. The new laws were
gathered together in the 1791 Constitution, and submitted to Louis XVI, who pledged to defend it
"from enemies at home and abroad". On 30 September, the Constituent Assembly was dissolved,
and the Legislative Assembly convened the next day.[87]

Fall of the monarchy

The Legislative Assembly is often dismissed by historians as an ineffective body, compromised by

divisions over the role of the monarchy, an issue exacerbated when Louis attempted to prevent or
reverse limitations on his powers.[88] At the same time, restricting the vote to those who paid a
minimal amount of tax disenfranchised a significant proportion of the 6 million Frenchmen over 25,
while only 10% of those able to vote actually did so. Finally, poor harvests and rising food prices led
to unrest among the urban class known as sans-culottes, who saw the new regime as failing to meet
their demands for bread and work.[89]

This meant the new constitution was opposed by significant elements inside and outside the
Assembly, itself split into three main groups. 264 members were affiliated with Barnave's Feuillants,
constitutional monarchists who considered the Revolution had gone far enough, while another 136
were Jacobin leftists who supported a republic, led by Brissot and usually referred to as
Brissotins.[90] The remaining 345 belonged to La Plaine, a centrist faction who switched votes
depending on the issue, but many of whom shared doubts as to whether Louis was committed to
the Revolution.[90] After he officially accepted the new Constitution, one recorded response was
"Vive le roi, s'il est de bon foi!", or "Long live the king – if he keeps his word".[91]

Although a minority in the Assembly, control of key committees allowed the Brissotins to provoke
Louis into using his veto. They first managed to pass decrees confiscating émigré property and
threatening them with the death penalty.[92] This was followed by measures against non-juring
priests, whose opposition to the Civil Constitution led to a state of near civil war in southern France,
which Barnave tried to defuse by relaxing the more punitive provisions. On 29 November, the
Assembly approved a decree giving refractory clergy eight days to comply, or face charges of
'conspiracy against the nation', an act opposed even by Robespierre.[93] When Louis vetoed both, his
opponents were able to portray him as opposed to reform in general.[94]
 The insurrection of 10 August 1792

Brissot accompanied this with a campaign for war against Austria and Prussia, often interpreted as
a mixture of calculation and idealism. While exploiting popular anti-Austrianism, it reflected a
genuine belief in exporting the values of political liberty and popular sovereignty.[95] Simultaneously,
conservatives headed by Marie Antoinette also favoured war, seeing it as a way to regain control of
the military, and restore royal authority. In December 1791, Louis made a speech in the Assembly
giving foreign powers a month to disband the émigrés or face war, an act greeted with enthusiasm
by supporters, but suspicion from opponents.[96]

Barnave's inability to build a consensus in the Assembly resulted in the appointment of a new
government, chiefly composed of Brissotins. On 20 April 1792, the French Revolutionary Wars began
when French armies attacked Austrian and Prussian forces along their borders, before suffering a
series of disastrous defeats. In an effort to mobilise popular support, the government ordered non-
juring priests to swear the oath or be deported, dissolved the Constitutional Guard and replaced it
with 20,000 fédérés; Louis agreed to disband the Guard, but vetoed the other two proposals, while
Lafayette called on the Assembly to suppress the clubs.[97]

Popular anger increased when details of the Brunswick Manifesto reached Paris on 1 August,
threatening 'unforgettable vengeance' should any oppose the Allies in seeking to restore the power
of the monarchy. On the morning of 10 August, a combined force of the Paris National Guard and
provincial fédérés attacked the Tuileries Palace, killing many of the Swiss Guards protecting it.[98]
Louis and his family took refuge with the Assembly and shortly after 11:00 am, the deputies present
voted to 'temporarily relieve the king', effectively suspending the monarchy.[99]
First Republic (1792–1795)

Proclamation of the First Republic

Execution of Louis XVI in the Place de la

Concorde, facing the empty pedestal where
the statue of his grandfather Louis XV
previously stood

In late August, elections were held for the National Convention. Restrictions on the franchise meant
the number of votes cast fell to 3.3 million, versus 4 million in 1791, while intimidation was
widespread.[100] The Brissotins split between moderate Girondins led by Brissot, and radical
Montagnards, headed by Robespierre, Georges Danton and Jean-Paul Marat. While loyalties
constantly shifted, voting patterns suggest roughly 160 of the 749 deputies can generally be
categorised as Girondists, with another 200 Montagnards. The remainder were part of a centrist
faction known as La Plaine, headed by Bertrand Barère, Pierre Joseph Cambon and Lazare
Carnot.[101]

In the September Massacres, between 1,100 and 1,600 prisoners held in Parisian jails were
summarily executed, the vast majority being common criminals.[102] A response to the capture of
Longwy and Verdun by Prussia, the perpetrators were largely National Guard members and fédérés
on their way to the front. While responsibility is still disputed, even moderates expressed sympathy
for the action, which soon spread to the provinces. One suggestion is that the killings stemmed
from concern over growing lawlessness, rather than political ideology.[103]

On 20 September, the French defeated the Prussians at the Battle of Valmy, in what was the first
major victory by the army of France during the Revolutionary Wars. Emboldened by this, on 22
September the Convention replaced the monarchy with the French First Republic and introduced a
new calendar, with 1792 becoming "Year One".[104] The next few months were taken up with the trial
of Citoyen Louis Capet, formerly Louis XVI. While evenly divided on the question of his guilt,
members of the convention were increasingly influenced by radicals based within the Jacobin clubs
and Paris Commune. The Brunswick Manifesto made it easy to portray Louis as a threat to the
Revolution, especially when extracts from his personal correspondence showed him conspiring with
Royalist exiles.[105]

On 17 January 1793, Louis was sentenced to death for "conspiracy against public liberty and
general safety". 361 deputies were in favour, 288 against, while another 72 voted to execute him,
subject to delaying conditions. The sentence was carried out on 21 January on the Place de la
Révolution, now the Place de la Concorde.[106] Conservatives across Europe called for the
destruction of revolutionary France, and in February the Convention responded by declaring war on
Britain and the Dutch Republic. Together with Austria and Prussia, these two countries were later
joined by Spain, Portugal, Naples, and Tuscany in the War of the First Coalition.[107]

Political crisis and fall of the Girondins

The Girondins hoped war would unite the people behind the government and provide an excuse for
rising prices and food shortages. Instead, they found themselves the target of popular anger and in
what proved a disastrous strategic move, many left Paris for the provinces. The first conscription
measure or levée en masse on 24 February sparked riots in the capital and other regional centres.
Already unsettled by changes imposed on the church, in March the traditionally conservative and
royalist Vendée rose in revolt. On 18th, General Charles François Dumouriez was defeated at
Neerwinden and defected to the Austrians. Uprisings followed in Bordeaux, Lyon, Toulon, Marseille
and Caen. The Republic seemed on the verge of collapse.[108]

The crisis led to the creation on 6 April 1793 of the Committee of Public Safety, an executive
committee accountable to the convention.[109] The Girondins made a fatal political error by indicting
Marat before the Revolutionary Tribunal for allegedly directing the September massacres; he was
quickly acquitted, further isolating the Girondins from the sans-culottes. When Jacques Hébert
called for a popular revolt against the "henchmen of Louis Capet" on 24 May, he was arrested by the
Commission of Twelve, a Girondin-dominated tribunal set up to expose 'plots'. In response to
protests by the Commune, the Commission warned "if by your incessant rebellions something
befalls the representatives of the nation, Paris will be obliterated".[108]
 The Death of Marat by Jacques-
Louis David (1793)

Growing discontent allowed the clubs to mobilise against the Girondins. Backed by the Commune
and elements of the National Guard, on 31 May they attempted to seize power in a coup. Although
the coup failed, on 2 June the convention was surrounded by a crowd of up to 80,000, demanding
cheap bread, unemployment pay and political reforms, including restriction of the vote to the sans-
culottes, and the right to remove deputies at will.[110] Ten members of the commission and another
twenty-nine members of the Girondin faction were arrested, and on 10 June, the Montagnards took
over the Committee of Public Safety.[111]

Meanwhile, a committee led by Robespierre's close ally Louis Antoine de Saint-Just was tasked with
preparing a new constitution. Completed in only eight days, it was ratified by the convention on 24
June and contained radical reforms, including universal male suffrage. However, normal legal
processes were suspended following the assassination of Marat on 13 July by the Girondist
Charlotte Corday, which the Committee of Public Safety used as an excuse to take control. The 1793
Constitution was suspended indefinitely in October.[112]

Key areas of focus for the new government included creating a new state ideology, economic
regulation and winning the war.[113] They were helped by divisions among their internal opponents;
while areas like the Vendée and Brittany wanted to restore the monarchy, most supported the
Republic but opposed the regime in Paris. On 17 August, the Convention voted a second levée en
masse; despite initial problems in equipping and supplying such large numbers, by mid-October
Republican forces had re-taken Lyon, Marseille and Bordeaux, while defeating Coalition armies at
Hondschoote and Wattignies.[114] The new class of military leaders included a young colonel named
Napoleon Bonaparte, who was appointed commander of artillery at the siege of Toulon thanks to
his friendship with Augustin Robespierre. His success in that role resulted in promotion to the Army
of Italy in April 1794, and the beginning of his rise to military and political power.[115]
Reign of Terror

Nine émigrés are executed by guillotine,

1793

Although intended to bolster revolutionary fervour, the Reign of Terror rapidly degenerated into the
settlement of personal grievances. At the end of July, the Convention set price controls on a wide
range of goods, with the death penalty for hoarders. On 9 September, 'revolutionary groups' were
established to enforce these controls, while the Law of Suspects on 17 September approved the
arrest of suspected "enemies of freedom". This initiated what has become known as the "Terror".
From September 1793 to July 1794, around 300,000 were arrested,[116] with some 16,600 people
executed on charges of counter-revolutionary activity, while another 40,000 may have been
summarily executed, or died awaiting trial.[117]

Price controls made farmers reluctant to sell their produce in Parisian markets, and by early
September the city was suffering acute food shortages. At the same time, the war increased public
debt, which the Assembly tried to finance by selling confiscated property. However, few would buy
assets that might be repossessed by their former owners, a concern that could only be achieved by
military victory. This meant the financial position worsened as threats to the Republic increased,
while printing assignats to deal with the deficit further increased inflation.[118]

On 10 October, the Convention recognised the Committee of Public Safety as the supreme
Revolutionary Government and suspended the constitution until peace was achieved.[112] In mid-
October, Marie Antoinette was convicted of a long list of crimes and guillotined; two weeks later, the
Girondist leaders arrested in June were also executed, along with Philippe Égalité. The "Terror" was
not confined to Paris, with over 2,000 killed in Lyons after its recapture.[119]
 Georges Danton; Robespierre's
close friend and Montagnard
leader, executed 5 April 1794

At Cholet on 17 October, the Republican army won a decisive victory over the Vendée rebels, and the
survivors escaped into Brittany. A defeat at Le Mans on 23 December ended the rebellion as a major
threat, although the insurgency continued until 1796. The extent of the repression that followed has
been debated by French historians since the mid-19th century.[120] Between November 1793 and
February 1794, over 4,000 were drowned in the Loire at Nantes under the supervision of Jean-
Baptiste Carrier. Historian Reynald Secher claims that as many as 117,000 died between 1793 and
1796. Although those numbers have been challenged, François Furet concludes it "not only revealed
massacre and destruction on an unprecedented scale, but a zeal so violent that it has bestowed as
its legacy much of the region's identity."[121][c]

At the height of the Terror, not even its supporters were immune from suspicion, leading to divisions
within the Montagnard faction between radical Hébertists and moderates led by Danton.[d]
Robespierre saw their dispute as de-stabilising the regime, and, as a deist, objected to the anti-
religious policies advocated by the atheist Hébert, who was arrested and executed on 24 March with
19 of his colleagues.[125] To retain the loyalty of the remaining Hébertists, Danton was arrested and
executed on 5 April with Camille Desmoulins, after a show trial that arguably did more damage to
Robespierre than any other act in this period.[126]

The Law of 22 Prairial (10 June) denied "enemies of the people" the right to defend themselves.
Those arrested in the provinces were sent to Paris for judgment; from March to July, executions in
Paris increased from 5 to 26 per day.[127] Many Jacobins ridiculed the festival of the Cult of the
Supreme Being on 8 June, a lavish and expensive ceremony led by Robespierre, who was also
accused of circulating claims he was a second Messiah. Relaxation of price controls and rampant
inflation caused increasing unrest among the sans-culottes, but the improved military situation
reduced fears the Republic was in danger. Fearing their own survival depended on Robespierre's
removal, on 29 June three members of the Committee of Public Safety openly accused him of being
a dictator.[128] Robespierre responded by refusing to attend Committee meetings, allowing his
opponents to build a coalition against him. In a speech made to the convention on 26 July, he
claimed certain members were conspiring against the Republic, an almost certain death sentence if
confirmed. When he refused to provide names, the session broke up in confusion. That evening he
repeated these claims at the Jacobins club, where it was greeted with demands for execution of the
'traitors'. Fearing the consequences if they did not act first, his opponents attacked Robespierre and
his allies in the Convention next day. When Robespierre attempted to speak, his voice failed, one
deputy crying "The blood of Danton chokes him!"[129]

The execution of Robespierre on 28 July 1794

marked the end of the Reign of Terror.

After the Convention authorised his arrest, he and his supporters took refuge in the Hotel de Ville,
which was defended by elements of the National Guard. Other units loyal to the Convention stormed
the building that evening and detained Robespierre, who severely injured himself attempting suicide.
He was executed on 28 July with 19 colleagues, including Saint-Just and Georges Couthon,
followed by 83 members of the Commune.[130] The Law of 22 Prairial was repealed, any surviving
Girondists reinstated as deputies, and the Jacobin Club was closed and banned.[131]

There are various interpretations of the Terror and the violence with which it was conducted. Furet
argues that the intense ideological commitment of the revolutionaries and their utopian goals
required the extermination of any opposition.[132] A middle position suggests violence was not
inevitable but the product of a series of complex internal events, exacerbated by war.[133]

Thermidorian reaction

The bloodshed did not end with the death of Robespierre; southern France saw a wave of revenge
killings, directed against alleged Jacobins, Republican officials and Protestants. Although the
victors of Thermidor asserted control over the Commune by executing their leaders, some of those
closely involved in the "Terror" retained their positions. They included Paul Barras, later chief
executive of the French Directory, and Joseph Fouché, director of the killings in Lyon who served as
Minister of Police under the Directory, the Consulate and Empire.[134] Despite his links to Augustin
Robespierre, military success in Italy meant Bonaparte escaped censure.[135]

Former Viscount and Montagnard

Paul Barras, who took part in the
Thermidorian reaction and later
headed the French Directory

The December 1794 Treaty of La Jaunaye ended the Chouannerie in western France by allowing
freedom of worship and the return of non-juring priests.[136] This was accompanied by military
success; in January 1795, French forces helped the Dutch Patriots set up the Batavian Republic,
securing their northern border.[137] The war with Prussia was concluded in favour of France by the
Peace of Basel in April 1795, while Spain made peace shortly thereafter.[138]

However, the Republic still faced a crisis at home. Food shortages arising from a poor 1794 harvest
were exacerbated in northern France by the need to supply the army in Flanders, while the winter
was the worst since 1709.[139] By April 1795, people were starving, and the assignat was worth only
8% of its face value; in desperation, the Parisian poor rose again.[140] They were quickly dispersed
and the main impact was another round of arrests, while Jacobin prisoners in Lyon were summarily
executed.[141]

A committee drafted the Constitution of the Year III, approved by plebiscite on 23 September 1795
and put into place on 27 September.[142] Largely designed by Pierre Daunou and Boissy d'Anglas, it
established a bicameral legislature, intended to slow down the legislative process, ending the wild
swings of policy under the previous unicameral systems. The Council of 500 was responsible for
drafting legislation, which was reviewed and approved by the Council of Ancients, an upper house
containing 250 men over the age of 40. Executive power was in the hands of five directors, selected
by the Council of Ancients from a list provided by the lower house, with a five-year mandate.[143]
Deputies were chosen by indirect election, a total franchise of around 5 million voting in primaries
for 30,000 electors, or 0.6% of the population. Since they were also subject to stringent property
qualification, it guaranteed the return of conservative or moderate deputies. In addition, rather than
dissolving the previous legislature as in 1791 and 1792, the so-called 'law of two-thirds' ruled only
150 new deputies would be elected each year. The remaining 600 Conventionnels kept their seats, a
move intended to ensure stability.[144]

French Directory (1795–1799)

Troops under Napoleon fire on Royalist

insurgents in Paris, 5 October 1795

Jacobin sympathisers viewed the French Directory as a betrayal of the Revolution, while
Bonapartists later justified Napoleon's coup by emphasising its corruption.[145] The regime also
faced internal unrest, a weak economy, and an expensive war, while the Council of 500 could block
legislation at will. Since the directors had no power to call new elections, the only way to break a
deadlock was rule by decree or use force. As a result, the directory was characterised by "chronic
violence, ambivalent forms of justice, and repeated recourse to heavy-handed repression."[146]

Retention of the Conventionnels ensured the Thermidorians held a majority in the legislature and
three of the five directors, but they were increasingly challenged by the right. On 5 October,
Convention troops led by Napoleon put down a royalist rising in Paris; when the first legislative
elections were held two weeks later, over 100 of the 150 new deputies were royalists of some
sort.[147] The power of the Parisian sans-culottes had been broken by the suppression of the May
1795 revolt; relieved of pressure from below, the Jacobin clubs became supporters of the directory,
largely to prevent restoration of the monarchy.[148]

Removal of price controls and a collapse in the value of the assignat led to inflation and soaring
food prices. By April 1796, over 500,000 Parisians were unemployed, resulting in the May
insurrection known as the Conspiracy of the Equals. Led by the revolutionary François-Noël Babeuf,
their demands included immediate implementation of the 1793 Constitution, and a more equitable
distribution of wealth. Despite support from sections of the military, the revolt was easily crushed,
while Babeuf and other leaders were executed.[149] Nevertheless, by 1799 the economy had been
stabilised, and important reforms made allowing steady expansion of French industry. Many of
these remained in place for much of the 19th century.[150]

Prior to 1797, three of the five directors were firmly Republican; Barras, Révellière-Lépeaux and Jean-
François Rewbell, as were around 40% of the legislature. The same percentage were broadly centrist
or unaffiliated, along with two directors, Étienne-François Letourneur and Lazare Carnot. Although
only 20% were committed Royalists, many centrists supported the restoration of the exiled Louis
XVIII in the belief this would bring peace.[151] The elections of May 1797 resulted in significant gains
for the right, with Royalists Jean-Charles Pichegru elected president of the Council of 500, and
Barthélemy appointed a director.[152]

Napoléon Bonaparte in the

Council of 500 during 18 Brumaire,
9 November 1799

With Royalists apparently on the verge of power, Republicans attempted a pre-emptive coup on 4
September. Using troops from Napoleon's Army of Italy under Pierre Augereau, the Council of 500
was forced to approve the arrest of Barthélemy, Pichegru and Carnot. The elections were annulled,
63 leading Royalists deported to French Guiana, and laws were passed against émigrés, Royalists
and ultra-Jacobins. The removal of his conservative opponents opened the way for direct conflict
between Barras and those on the left.[153]

Fighting continued despite general war weariness, and the 1798 elections resulted in a resurgence
in Jacobin strength. Napoleon's invasion of Egypt in July 1798 confirmed European fears of French
expansionism, and the War of the Second Coalition began in November. Without a majority in the
legislature, the directors relied on the army to enforce decrees and extract revenue from conquered
territories. Generals like Napoleon and Barthélemy Catherine Joubert became central to the political
process, while both the army and directory became notorious for their corruption.[154]
It has been suggested the directory collapsed because by 1799, many 'preferred the uncertainties of
authoritarian rule to the continuing ambiguities of parliamentary politics'.[155] The architect of its
end was Sieyès, who when asked what he had done during the Terror allegedly answered "I
survived". Nominated to the directory, his first action was to remove Barras, with the help of allies
including Talleyrand, and Napoleon's brother Lucien, president of the Council of 500.[156] On 9
November 1799, the coup of 18 Brumaire replaced the five directors with the French Consulate,
which consisted of three members, Napoleon, Sieyès, and Roger Ducos. Most historians consider
this the end point of the French Revolution.[157]

Role of ideology

The role of ideology in the Revolution is controversial with Jonathan Israel stating that the "radical
Enlightenment" was the primary driving force of the Revolution.[158] Cobban, however, argues "[t]he
actions of the revolutionaries were most often prescribed by the need to find practical solutions to
immediate problems, using the resources at hand, not by pre-conceived theories."[159]

The identification of ideologies is complicated by the profusion of revolutionary clubs, factions and
publications, absence of formal political parties, and individual flexibility in the face of changing
circumstances.[160] In addition, although the Declaration of the Rights of Man was a fundamental
document for all revolutionary factions, its interpretation varied widely.[161]

While all revolutionaries professed their devotion to liberty in principle, "it appeared to mean
whatever those in power wanted."[162] For example, the liberties specified in the Rights of Man were
limited by law when they might "cause harm to others, or be abused". Prior to 1792, Jacobins and
others frequently opposed press restrictions on the grounds these violated a basic right.[163]
However, the radical National Convention passed laws in September 1793 and July 1794 imposing
the death penalty for offences such as "disparaging the National Convention", and "misleading
public opinion."[164]

While revolutionaries also endorsed the principle of equality, few advocated equality of wealth since
property was also viewed as a right.[165] The National Assembly opposed equal political rights for
women,[166] while the abolition of slavery in the colonies was delayed until February 1794 because it
conflicted with the property rights of slave owners, and many feared it would disrupt trade.[167]
Political equality for male citizens was another divisive issue, with the 1791 constitution limiting the
right to vote and stand for office to males over 25 who met a property qualification, so-called "active
citizens". This restriction was opposed by many activists, including Robespierre, the Jacobins, and
Cordeliers.[168]
The principle that sovereignty resided in the nation was a key concept of the Revolution.[169]
However, Israel argues this obscures ideological differences over whether the will of the nation was
best expressed through representative assemblies and constitutions, or direct action by
revolutionary crowds, and popular assemblies such as the sections of the Paris commune.[170]
Many considered constitutional monarchy as incompatible with the principle of popular
sovereignty,[171] but prior to 1792, there was a strong bloc with an ideological commitment to such a
system, based on the writings of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Montesquieu and Voltaire.[172]

Israel argues the nationalisation of church property and the establishment of the Constitutional
Church reflected an ideological commitment to secularism, and a determination to undermine a
bastion of old regime privilege.[173] While Cobban agrees the Constitutional Church was motivated
by ideology, he sees its origins in the anti-clericalism of Voltaire and other Enlightenment
figures.[174]

Jacobins were hostile to formal political parties and factions which they saw as a threat to national
unity and the general will, with "political virtue" and "love of country" key elements of their
ideology.[175][176] They viewed the ideal revolutionary as selfless, sincere, free of political ambition,
and devoted to the nation.[177] The disputes leading to the departure first of the Feuillants, then later
the Girondists, were conducted in terms of the relative political virtue and patriotism of the
disputants. In December 1793, all members of the Jacobin clubs were subject to a "purifying
scrutiny", to determine whether they were "men of virtue".[178]

French Revolutionary Wars

The Battle of Valmy by Horace Vernet,

1826. French victory at the Battle of Valmy
on 20 September 1792 validated the
Revolutionary idea of armies composed of
citizens

The Revolution initiated a series of conflicts that began in 1792 and ended with Napoleon's defeat at
Waterloo in 1815. In its early stages, this seemed unlikely; the 1791 Constitution specifically
disavowed "war for the purpose of conquest", and although traditional tensions between France and
Austria re-emerged in the 1780s, Emperor Joseph II cautiously welcomed the reforms. Austria was
at war with the Ottomans, as were the Russians, while both were negotiating with Prussia over
partitioning Poland. Most importantly, Britain preferred peace, and as Emperor Leopold II stated
after the Declaration of Pillnitz, "without England, there is no case".[179]

In late 1791, factions within the Assembly came to see war as a way to unite the country and secure
the Revolution by eliminating hostile forces on its borders and establishing its "natural frontiers".[180]
France declared war on Austria in April 1792 and issued the first conscription orders, with recruits
serving for twelve months. By the time peace finally came in 1815, the conflict had involved every
major European power as well as the United States, redrawn the map of Europe and expanded into
the Americas, the Middle East, and the Indian Ocean.[181]

From 1701 to 1801, the population of Europe grew from 118 to 187 million; combined with new
mass production techniques, this allowed belligerents to support large armies, requiring the
mobilisation of national resources. It was a different kind of war, fought by nations rather than kings,
intended to destroy their opponents' ability to resist, but also to implement deep-ranging social
change. While all wars are political to some degree, this period was remarkable for the emphasis
placed on reshaping boundaries and the creation of entirely new European states.[182]

In April 1792, French armies invaded the Austrian Netherlands but suffered a series of setbacks
before victory over an Austrian-Prussian army at Valmy in September. After defeating a second
Austrian army at Jemappes on 6 November, they occupied the Netherlands, areas of the Rhineland,
Nice and Savoy. Emboldened by this success, in February 1793 France declared war on the Dutch
Republic, Spain and Britain, beginning the War of the First Coalition.[183] However, the expiration of
the 12-month term for the 1792 recruits forced the French to relinquish their conquests. In August,
new conscription measures were passed, and by May 1794 the French army had between 750,000
and 800,000 men.[184] Despite high rates of desertion, this was large enough to manage multiple
internal and external threats; for comparison, the combined Prussian-Austrian army was less than
90,000.[185]
 Napoleon's Italian campaigns reshaped the
map of Italy

By February 1795, France had annexed the Austrian Netherlands, established their frontier on the
left bank of the Rhine and replaced the Dutch Republic with the Batavian Republic, a satellite state.
These victories led to the collapse of the anti-French coalition; Prussia made peace in April 1795,
followed soon after by Spain, leaving Britain and Austria as the only major powers still in the
war.[186] In October 1797, a series of defeats by Bonaparte in Italy led Austria to agree to the Treaty
of Campo Formio, in which they formally ceded the Netherlands and recognised the Cisalpine
Republic.[187]

Fighting continued for two reasons; first, French state finances had come to rely on indemnities
levied on their defeated opponents. Second, armies were primarily loyal to their generals, for whom
the wealth achieved by victory and the status it conferred became objectives in themselves. Leading
soldiers like Lazare Hoche, Jean-Charles Pichegru and Lazare Carnot wielded significant political
influence and often set policy; Campo Formio was approved by Bonaparte, not the Directory, which
strongly objected to terms it considered too lenient.[187]

Despite these concerns, the Directory never developed a realistic peace programme, fearing the
destabilising effects of peace and the consequent demobilisation of hundreds of thousands of
young men. As long as the generals and their armies stayed away from Paris, they were happy to
allow them to continue fighting, a key factor behind sanctioning Bonaparte's invasion of Egypt. This
resulted in aggressive and opportunistic policies, leading to the War of the Second Coalition in
November 1798.[188]
Slavery and the colonies

The Saint-Domingue slave revolt in 1791

In 1789, the most populous French colonies were Saint-Domingue (today Haiti), Martinique,
Guadeloupe, the Île Bourbon (Réunion) and the Île de la France. These colonies produced
commodities such as sugar, coffee and cotton for exclusive export to France. There were about
700,000 slaves in the colonies, of which about 500,000 were in Saint-Domingue. Colonial products
accounted for about a third of France's exports.[189]

In February 1788, the Society of the Friends of the Blacks was formed in France with the aim of
abolishing slavery in the empire. In August 1789, colonial slave owners and merchants formed the
rival Club de Massiac to represent their interests. When the Constituent Assembly adopted the
Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen in August 1789, delegates representing the
colonial landowners successfully argued that the principles should not apply in the colonies as they
would bring economic ruin and disrupt trade. Colonial landowners also gained control of the
Colonial Committee of the Assembly from where they exerted a powerful influence against
abolition.[190][191]

People of colour also faced social and legal discrimination in mainland France and its colonies,
including a bar on their access to professions such as law, medicine and pharmacy.[192][e] In 1789–
90, a delegation of free coloureds, led by Vincent Ogé and Julien Raimond, unsuccessfully lobbied
the Assembly to end discrimination against this group. Ogé left for Saint-Domingue where an
uprising against white landowners broke out in October 1790. The revolt failed, and Ogé was
killed.[196][191]

In May 1791, the National Assembly granted full political rights to coloureds born of two free
parents but left the rights of freed slaves to be determined by the colonial assemblies. The
assemblies refused to implement the decree and fighting broke out between the coloured
population of Saint-Domingue and white colonists, each side recruiting slaves to their forces. A
major slave revolt followed in August.[197]
In March 1792, the Legislative Assembly responded to the revolt by granting citizenship to all free
coloureds and sending two commissioners, Léger-Félicité Sonthonax and Étienne Polverel, and
6,000 troops to Saint-Domingue to enforce the decree. On arrival in September, the commissioners
announced that slavery would remain in force. Over 72,000 slaves were still in revolt, mostly in the
north.[198]

Brissot and his supporters envisaged an eventual abolition of slavery but their immediate concern
was securing trade and the support of merchants for the revolutionary wars. After Brissot's fall, the
new constitution of June 1793 included a new Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen but
excluded the colonies from its provisions. In any event, the new constitution was suspended until
France was at peace.[199]

In early 1793, royalist planters from Guadeloupe and Saint-Domingue formed an alliance with
Britain. The Spanish supported insurgent slaves, led by Jean-François Papillon and Georges
Biassou, in the north of Saint-Domingue. White planters loyal to the republic sent representatives to
Paris to convince the Jacobin controlled Convention that those calling for the abolition of slavery
were British agents and supporters of Brissot, hoping to disrupt trade.[200]

In June, the commissioners in Saint-Domingue freed 10,000 slaves fighting for the republic. As the
royalists and their British and Spanish supporters were also offering freedom for slaves willing to
fight for their cause, the commissioners outbid them by abolishing slavery in the north in August,
and throughout the colony in October. Representatives were sent to Paris to gain the approval of the
convention for the decision.[200][201]

The Convention voted for the abolition of slavery in the colonies on 4 February 1794 and decreed
that all residents of the colonies had the full rights of French citizens irrespective of colour.[202] An
army of 1,000 sans-culottes led by Victor Hugues was sent to Guadeloupe to expel the British and
enforce the decree. The army recruited former slaves and eventually numbered 11,000, capturing
Guadeloupe and other smaller islands. Abolition was also proclaimed on Guyane. Martinique
remained under British occupation, while colonial landowners in Réunion and the Îles Mascareignes
repulsed the republicans.[203] Black armies drove the Spanish out of Saint-Domingue in 1795, and
the British troops withdrew in 1798.[204]

In republican controlled areas from 1793 to 1799, freed slaves were required to work on their former
plantations or for their former masters if they were in domestic service. They were paid a wage and
gained property rights. Black and coloured generals were effectively in control of large areas of
Guadeloupe and Saint-Domingue, including Toussaint Louverture in the north of Saint-Domingue,
and André Rigaud in the south. Historian Fréderic Régent states that the restrictions on the freedom
of employment and movement of former slaves meant that, "only whites, persons of color already
freed before the decree, and former slaves in the army or on warships really benefited from general
emancipation."[203]

Media and symbolism

Newspapers

A copy of L'Ami du peuple stained

with the blood of Marat

Newspapers and pamphlets played a central role in stimulating and defining the Revolution. Prior to
1789, there have been a small number of heavily censored newspapers that needed a royal licence
to operate, but the Estates General created an enormous demand for news, and over 130
newspapers appeared by the end of the year. Among the most significant were Marat's L'Ami du
peuple and Elysée Loustallot's Revolutions de Paris.[205] Over the next decade, more than 2,000
newspapers were founded, 500 in Paris alone. Most lasted only a matter of weeks but they became
the main communication medium, combined with the very large pamphlet literature.[206]

Newspapers were read aloud in taverns and clubs and circulated hand to hand. There was a
widespread assumption that writing was a vocation, not a business, and the role of the press was
the advancement of civic republicanism.[207] By 1793 the radicals were most active but initially the
royalists flooded the country with their publication the "L'Ami du Roi" (Friends of the King) until they
were suppressed.[208]

Revolutionary symbols

To illustrate the differences between the new Republic and the old regime, the leaders needed to
implement a new set of symbols to be celebrated instead of the old religious and monarchical
symbols. To this end, symbols were borrowed from historic cultures and redefined, while those of
the old regime were either destroyed or reattributed acceptable characteristics. These revised
symbols were used to instil in the public a new sense of tradition and reverence for the
Enlightenment and the Republic.[209]
La Marseillaise

La Marseillaise

1:20

The French national anthem La

Marseillaise; text in French.

Problems playing this file? See media help.

Marche des Marseillois, 1792, satirical

etching, London[210]

"La Marseillaise" (French pronunciation: [la maʁsɛjɛːz]) became the national anthem of France. The
song was written and composed in 1792 by Claude Joseph Rouget de Lisle, and was originally titled
"Chant de guerre pour l'Armée du Rhin". The French National Convention adopted it as the First
Republic's anthem in 1795. It acquired its nickname after being sung in Paris by volunteers from
Marseille marching on the capital.

The song is the first example of the "European march" anthemic style, while the evocative melody
and lyrics led to its widespread use as a song of revolution and incorporation into many pieces of
classical and popular music. De Lisle was instructed to 'produce a hymn which conveys to the soul
of the people the enthusiasm which it (the music) suggests.'[211]

Guillotine

Cartoon attacking the

excesses of the
Revolution as symbolised
by the guillotine
The guillotine remains "the principal symbol of the Terror in the French Revolution."[212] Invented by a
physician during the Revolution as a quicker, more efficient and more distinctive form of execution,
the guillotine became a part of popular culture and historic memory. It was celebrated on the left as
the people's avenger, for example in the revolutionary song La guillotine permanente,[213] and cursed
as the symbol of the Terror by the right.[214]

Its operation became a popular entertainment that attracted great crowds of spectators. Vendors
sold programmes listing the names of those scheduled to die. Many people came day after day and
vied for the best locations from which to observe the proceedings; knitting women (tricoteuses)
formed a cadre of hardcore regulars, inciting the crowd. Parents often brought their children. By the
end of the Terror, the crowds had thinned drastically. Repetition had staled even this most grisly of
entertainments, and audiences grew bored.[215]

Cockade, tricolore, and liberty cap

Simon Chenard as a Sans-

Culotte by Louis-Léopold Boilly,
1792. A sans-culotte and
Tricoloure

Cockades were widely worn by revolutionaries beginning in 1789. They pinned the blue-and-red
cockade of Paris onto the white cockade of the Ancien Régime. Camille Desmoulins asked his
followers to wear green cockades on 12 July 1789. The Paris militia, formed on 13 July, adopted a
blue and red cockade. Blue and red are the traditional colours of Paris, and they are used on the
city's coat of arms. Cockades with various colour schemes were used during the storming of the
Bastille on 14 July.[216]

The Liberty cap, also known as the Phrygian cap, or pileus, is a brimless, felt cap that is conical in
shape with the tip pulled forward. It reflects Roman republicanism and liberty, alluding to the Roman
ritual of manumission, in which a freed slave receives the bonnet as a symbol of his newfound
liberty.[217]

Role of women

Club of patriotic women in a

church

Deprived of political rights by the Ancien Régime, the Revolution initially allowed women to
participate, although only to a limited degree. Activists included Girondists like Olympe de Gouges,
author of the Declaration of the Rights of Woman and of the Female Citizen, and Charlotte Corday,
killer of Marat. Others like Théroigne de Méricourt, Pauline Léon and the Society of Revolutionary
Republican Women supported the Jacobins, staged demonstrations in the National Assembly and
took part in the October 1789 March to Versailles. Despite this, the 1791 and 1793 constitutions
denied them political rights and democratic citizenship.[218]

In 1793, the Society of Revolutionary Republican Women campaigned for strict price controls on
bread, and a law that would compel all women to wear the tricolour cockade. Although both
demands were successful, in October the male-dominated Jacobins who then controlled the
government denounced the Society as dangerous rabble-rousers and made all women's clubs and
associations illegal. Organised women were permanently shut out of the French Revolution after 30
October 1793.[219]

At the same time, especially in the provinces, women played a prominent role in resisting social
changes introduced by the Revolution. This was particularly so in terms of the reduced role of the
Catholic Church; for those living in rural areas, closing of the churches meant a loss of
normality.[220] This sparked a counter-revolutionary movement led by women; while supporting other
political and social changes, they opposed the dissolution of the Catholic Church and revolutionary
cults like the Cult of the Supreme Being.[221] Olwen Hufton argues some wanted to protect the
Church from heretical changes enforced by revolutionaries, viewing themselves as "defenders of
faith".[222]
Prominent women

Olympe de Gouges, Girondist

author of the Declaration of the
Rights of Woman and of the
Female Citizen, executed in
November 1793

Olympe de Gouges was an author whose publications emphasised that while women and men were
different, this should not prevent equality under the law. In her Declaration of the Rights of Woman
and of the Female Citizen she insisted women deserved rights, especially in areas concerning them
directly, such as divorce and recognition of illegitimate children.[223] Along with other Girondists, she
was executed in November 1793 during the Terror.

Madame Roland, also known as Manon or Marie Roland, was another important female activist
whose political focus was not specifically women but other aspects of the government. A Girondist,
her personal letters to leaders of the Revolution influenced policy; in addition, she often hosted
political gatherings of the Brissotins, a political group which allowed women to join. She too was
executed in November 1793.[224]

Economic policies

The Revolution abolished many economic constraints imposed by the Ancien Régime, including
church tithes and feudal dues although tenants often paid higher rents and taxes.[225] All church
lands were nationalised, along with those owned by Royalist exiles, which were used to back paper
currency known as assignats, and the feudal guild system eliminated.[226] It also abolished the
highly inefficient system of tax farming, whereby private individuals would collect taxes for a hefty
fee. The government seized the foundations that had been set up (starting in the 13th century) to
provide an annual stream of revenue for hospitals, poor relief, and education. The state sold the
lands but typically local authorities did not replace the funding and so most of the nation's
charitable and school systems were massively disrupted.[227]

Early Assignat of 29 September 1790: 500

livres

Between 1790 and 1796, industrial and agricultural output dropped, foreign trade plunged, and
prices soared, forcing the government to finance expenditure by issuing ever increasing quantities
assignats. When this resulted in escalating inflation, the response was to impose price controls and
persecute private speculators and traders, creating a black market. Between 1789 and 1793, the
annual deficit increased from 10% to 64% of gross national product, while annual inflation reached
3,500% after a poor harvest in 1794 and the removal of price controls. The assignats were
withdrawn in 1796 but inflation continued until the introduction of the gold-based Franc germinal in
1803.[228]

Impact

The French Revolution had a major impact on western history by ending feudalism in France and
creating a path for advances in individual freedoms throughout Europe.[229][2] The revolution
represented the most significant challenge to political absolutism up to that point in history and
spread democratic ideals throughout Europe and ultimately the world.[230] Its impact on French
nationalism was profound, while also stimulating nationalist movements throughout Europe.[231]
Some modern historians argue the concept of the nation state was a direct consequence of the
revolution.[232] As such, the revolution is often seen as marking the start of modernity and the
modern period.[233]

France

The long-term impact on France was profound, shaping politics, society, religion and ideas, and
polarising politics for more than a century. Historian François Aulard writes:
 "From the social point of view, the Revolution consisted in the suppression
of what was called the feudal system, in the emancipation of the
individual, in greater division of landed property, the abolition of the
privileges of noble birth, the establishment of equality, the simplification
of life.... The French Revolution differed from other revolutions in being
not merely national, for it aimed at benefiting all humanity."[234]

The revolution permanently crippled the power of the aristocracy and drained the wealth of the
Church, although the two institutions survived. Hanson suggests the French underwent a
fundamental transformation in self-identity, evidenced by the elimination of privileges and their
replacement by intrinsic human rights.[235] After the collapse of the First French Empire in 1815, the
French public lost many of the rights and privileges earned since the revolution, but remembered the
participatory politics that characterised the period. According to Paul Hanson, "Revolution became a
tradition, and republicanism an enduring option."[236]

The Revolution meant an end to arbitrary royal rule and held out the promise of rule by law under a
constitutional order. Napoleon as emperor set up a constitutional system and the restored
Bourbons were forced to retain one. After the abdication of Napoleon III in 1871, the French Third
Republic was launched with a deep commitment to upholding the ideals of the Revolution.[237][238]
The Vichy regime (1940–1944) tried to undo the revolutionary heritage but retained the republic.
However, there were no efforts by the Bourbons, Vichy or any other government to restore the
privileges that had been stripped away from the nobility in 1789. France permanently became a
society of equals under the law.[236]

Agriculture was transformed by the Revolution. With the breakup of large estates controlled by the
Church and the nobility and worked by hired hands, rural France became more a land of small
independent farms. Harvest taxes were ended, such as the tithe and seigneurial dues.
Primogeniture was ended both for nobles and peasants, thereby weakening the family patriarch, and
led to a fall in the birth rate since all children had a share in the family property.[239] Cobban argues
the Revolution bequeathed to the nation "a ruling class of landowners."[240]

Economic historians are divided on the economic impact of the Revolution. One suggestion is the
resulting fragmentation of agricultural holdings had a significant negative impact in the early years
of 19th century, then became positive in the second half of the century because it facilitated the rise
in human capital investments.[241] Others argue the redistribution of land had an immediate positive
impact on agricultural productivity, before the scale of these gains gradually declined over the
course of the 19th century.[242]
In the cities, entrepreneurship on a small scale flourished, as restrictive monopolies, privileges,
barriers, rules, taxes and guilds gave way. However, the British blockade virtually ended overseas
and colonial trade, hurting the cities and their supply chains. Overall, the Revolution did not greatly
change the French business system, and probably helped freeze in place the horizons of the small
business owner. The typical businessman owned a small store, mill or shop, with family help and a
few paid employees; large-scale industry was less common than in other industrialising nations.[243]

Europe outside France

Historians often see the impact of the Revolution as through the institutions and ideas exported by
Napoleon. Economic historians Dan Bogart, Mauricio Drelichman, Oscar Gelderblom, and Jean-
Laurent Rosenthal describe Napoleon's codified law as the French Revolution's "most significant
export."[244] According to Daron Acemoglu, Davide Cantoni, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson
the French Revolution had long-term effects in Europe. They suggest that "areas that were occupied
by the French and that underwent radical institutional reform experienced more rapid urbanization
and economic growth, especially after 1850. There is no evidence of a negative effect of French
invasion."[245]

The Revolution sparked intense debate in Britain. The Revolution Controversy was a "pamphlet war"
set off by the publication of A Discourse on the Love of Our Country, a speech given by Richard Price
to the Revolution Society on 4 November 1789, supporting the French Revolution. Edmund Burke
responded in November 1790 with his own pamphlet, Reflections on the Revolution in France,
attacking the French Revolution as a threat to the aristocracy of all countries.[246][247] William Coxe
opposed Price's premise that one's country is principles and people, not the State itself.[248]

Conversely, two seminal political pieces of political history were written in Price's favour, supporting
the general right of the French people to replace their State. One of the first of these "pamphlets"
into print was A Vindication of the Rights of Men by Mary Wollstonecraft . Wollstonecraft's title was
echoed by Thomas Paine's Rights of Man, published a few months later. In 1792 Christopher Wyvill
published Defence of Dr. Price and the Reformers of England, a plea for reform and moderation.[249]
This exchange of ideas has been described as "one of the great political debates in British
history".[250]

In Ireland, the effect was to transform what had been an attempt by Protestant settlers to gain some
autonomy into a mass movement led by the Society of United Irishmen involving Catholics and
Protestants. It stimulated the demand for further reform throughout Ireland, especially in Ulster, and
led to the Irish Rebellion of 1798, which was brutally suppressed by government troops.[251] The
German reaction to the Revolution swung from favourable to antagonistic. At first it brought liberal
and democratic ideas, the end of guilds, serfdom and the Jewish ghetto. It brought economic
freedoms and agrarian and legal reform. Above all the antagonism helped stimulate and shape
German nationalism.[252]

France invaded Switzerland and turned it into the "Helvetic Republic" (1798–1803), a French puppet
state. French interference with localism and traditions was deeply resented in Switzerland, although
some reforms took hold and survived in the later period of restoration.[253][254] France invaded and
occupied the region now known as Belgium between 1794 and 1814. The new government enforced
reforms, incorporating the region into France. Resistance was strong in every sector, as Belgian
nationalism emerged to oppose French rule. The French legal system, however, was adopted, with
its equal legal rights, and abolition of class distinctions.[255]

The Kingdom of Denmark adopted liberalising reforms in line with those of the French Revolution.
Reform was gradual and the regime itself carried out agrarian reforms that had the effect of
weakening absolutism by creating a class of independent peasant freeholders. Much of the
initiative came from well-organised liberals who directed political change in the first half of the 19th
century.[256] The Constitution of Norway of 1814 was inspired by the French Revolution[257] and was
considered to be one of the most liberal and democratic constitutions at the time.[258]

North America

Initially, most people in the Province of Quebec were favourable toward the revolutionaries' aims.
The Revolution took place against the background of an ongoing campaign for constitutional reform
in the colony by Loyalist emigrants from the United States.[259] Public opinion began to shift against
the Revolution after the Flight to Varennes and further soured after the September Massacres and
the subsequent execution of Louis XVI.[260] French migration to the Canadas experienced a
substantial decline during and after the Revolution. Only a limited number of artisans, professionals,
and religious emigres were allowed to settle in the region during this period.[261] Most emigres
settled in Montreal or Quebec City.[261] The influx of religious emigres also revitalised the local
Catholic Church, with exiled priests establishing a number of parishes across the Canadas.[261]

In the United States, the French Revolution deeply polarised American politics, and this polarisation
led to the creation of the First Party System. In 1793, as war broke out in Europe, the Democratic-
Republican Party led by former American minister to France Thomas Jefferson favored
revolutionary France and pointed to the 1778 treaty that was still in effect. George Washington and
his unanimous cabinet, including Jefferson, decided that the treaty did not bind the United States to
enter the war. Washington proclaimed neutrality instead.[262]

Historiography

The first writings on the French revolution were near contemporaneous with events and mainly
divided along ideological lines. These included Edmund Burke's conservative critique Reflections on
the Revolution in France (1790) and Thomas Paine's response Rights of Man (1791).[263] From 1815,
narrative histories dominated, often based on first-hand experience of the revolutionary years. By
the mid-nineteenth century, more scholarly histories appeared, written by specialists and based on
original documents and a more critical assessment of contemporary accounts.[264]

Hippolyte Taine, conservative Georges Lefebvre, Marxist historian

historian of the French of the French Revolution
Revolution

Dupuy identifies three main strands in nineteenth century historiography of the Revolution. The first
is represented by reactionary writers who rejected the revolutionary ideals of popular sovereignty,
civil equality, and the promotion of rationality, progress and personal happiness over religious faith.
The second stream is those writers who celebrated its democratic, and republican values. The third
were liberals like Germaine de Staël and Guizot, who accepted the necessity of reforms establishing
a constitution and the rights of man, but rejected state interference with private property and
individual rights, even when supported by a democratic majority.[265]

Jules Michelet was a leading 19th-century historian of the democratic republican strand, and Thiers,
Mignet and Tocqueville were prominent in the liberal strand.[266] Hippolyte Taine's Origins of
Contemporary France (1875–1894) was modern in its use of departmental archives, but Dupuy sees
him as reactionary, given his contempt for the crowd, and Revolutionary values.[267]