Physiological and Growth Response of Quinoa under Changing

Climatic Conditions: A Review

Muhammad Daod Khan1*, Muhammad Sajjad1*, Rabia Nadeem2, Gulshan Mukhtar3, Asif
Mehmood1, Raza Mustafa4, Muhammad Saud Khan5 and Sheharyar Babar6
1
Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan
2
Agronomic Research Institute, Faisalabad
3
National Institute of Food Science and Technology University of Agriculture Faisalabad Punjab
Pakistan
4
University of Poonch Rawalakot Azad Jammu & Kashmir
5
College of Life Science and Technology Tarim University Xinjiang Alaer China
4
Institute of Agricultural Extension Education and Rural Development, Univesity of Agriculture
Faisalabad, Pakistan
*Corresponding authors: Muhammad Sajjad (muhammadsajjaduaf@gmail.com); Muhammad
Daod Khan (kdaod3579@gmail.com)
Abstract
The world's population is growing, but there is also a parallel decrease in the amount of arable
land available due to desertification and salinization, which are mostly the result of
anthropogenic activities like climate change. The entire ecosystem will be altered by rising
temperatures, which will seriously affect global climate perspectives and jeopardize food
security. This review focuses on how the extremely hardy Chenopodium quinoa Willd. can
support or supply ecosystem services while sustainably mitigating some of the negative effects,
such famine. In contrast to the conventional food staples, quinoa exhibits a remarkable ability to
withstand abiotic stresses and is a highly nutritious crop with a distinct nutritional profile. As
such, it holds potential importance for ensuring food security and nutritional adequacy. With
regard to the growing worldwide population, the consequences of climate change, desalination,
phytoremediation, nutrient deficit, and poverty alleviation, this crop has the ability to improve
global conditions.
Keywords: Quinoa, Physiology, Growth, Climate Change, Agro-climatic
1. Introduction
Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) belongs to the Amaranthaceae family and is primarily
cultivated in the arid regions of South America's Andes. It also exhibits broad adaptability to
altitudes that vary between 0-4 km. It also demonstrates adaptability to various climatic
conditions, including cold, temperate, and warm environments (Bazile et al., 2014). Quinoa is a
broad-leafed plant composed of starchy dicotyledonous seeds and is not a cereal (Fig. 1). Rather,
it is regarded as a pseudo-cereal crop. Quinoa was once referred to as "the mother grain" and has
a well-established outstanding nutritional quality. With a cultivation history spanning about 7000
years, quinoa is one of the most ancient crops of the Andes (Bazile, 2022).
 a b

Fig. 1 Quinoa (a) plants leave (b) seeds

The quinoa plant (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is one of the most important agricultural and
globally significant food-related plants that is currently being examined because of the impact of
environmental temperature on its growth and development (Ruiz et al., 2014). The consequences
of a changing climate are currently endangering food security in several parts of the world, and it
is anticipated that the significant temperature changes that occur throughout the day and night
will have a greater impact on the production of quinoa (Hinojosa et al., 2019).

Quinoa is now a widely grown commercial crop in the world. While it took several centuries for
previously introduced crops such as potatoes and soybeans to gain widespread acceptance and
appeal, it has taken only 30 years for quinoa to achieve an almost superior standing on a
worldwide scale. Quinoa's rich mineral content and exceptional resistance to abiotic stressors and
poor agricultural practices have garnered it attention on a global scale. It has transformed from a
local crop that was hardly eaten to a highly significant pseudo grain. Due to the increasing
popularity of quinoa consumption worldwide, export levels have surpassed USD 70 million in
Bolivia and USD 25 million in Peru (Andrango et al., 2020).

Chenopodium quinoa is a common native grain of the Andes. It falls under the pseudocereal
category. Given their comparable macronutrient makeup to cereals, pseudocereals are frequently
categorized as bread cereals (Mir et al., 2019). The three most well-known pseudocereals are
quinoa, amaranth, and buckwheat. "Any of several plants that aren't related to the grass family
but yield seeds and fruits that are used as flour for bread and other staples" is how the dictionary
defines the term (Fig. 2). They are currently becoming more popular as gluten-free substitutes for
grains, according to the health grain consortium.

Fig.2 Three verity trail of quinoa grown at Chakara site University of Agriculture, Faisalabad

The purpose of this analysis is to provide an overview of the significance of quinoa as a source
of nutritious food and its adaptability to changing global temperatures and population expansion.

1.2. Morphology

Quinoa is a broad-leafed plant with starchy dicotyledonous seeds and is not a cereal; it is
regarded as a pseudo-cereal crop. Quinoa was once referred to as "the mother grain" and has a
well-established outstanding nutritional quality. With a cultivation history spanning about 7000
years, quinoa is one of the most ancient crops in the Andes (Martínez et al., 2015).

Quinoa plants have thick, tall, woody stalks and taproot systems (Fig. 3). They can grow
to a height of 0.3 to 3 m and are available in a variety of colors, including white, yellow, pink,
and darker shades of red, purple, and black. Its polymorphic leaves begin life as green and
eventually change to crimson, purple, or yellow as they mature. The diameter of the seed varies
between 0.28 and 2.1 cm, and its colors may be pink, black, red, orange, white, or yellow (Sosa
et al., 2017).
Fig. 3 Root system of Quinoa

1.3. Global Cultivated Area

Between 2000 and 2019, there has been a notable increase in the cultivated land area,
mostly in Bolivia (from 35,690 to 64,789 ha -1) and Peru (from 27,578 to 37,625 ha -1). The United
States (53.1%), Canada (15.0%), France (8.0%), the Netherlands (6.1%), Belgium (4.5%),
Germany (4%) and the United Kingdom (2%) are the main importers of their harvests (Jaikishun
et al., 2019).

Bolivia and Peru continue to be the world's leading producers of quinoa, however. In
2013, 45,000 ha of quinoa were grown in Peru and 75,000 ha in Bolivia. More than 85% of the
world's quinoa is produced in these two nations, with the remaining 15%-20% coming from
Ecuador, the United States, China, Chile, France, Argentina, and Canada combined (Bazile et al.,
2015). 2013 was declared the International Year of Quinoa (IYQ) by the UN General Assembly.

1.4. Climate change a threat

Given the consequences of global warming and population expansion, quinoa is a

versatile pseudocereal crop having tremendous potential to overcome the increasing demands of
food and eliminate poverty. It is considered a crop resistant to climatic change and comes from
the Andes. The ancient Incas and Tiwankans grew and ate it for generations until wheat took its
place as the main food source. Due to its extraordinary agronomic adaptations to many adverse
climatic circumstances, quinoa is a very nutritious, gluten-free seed crop that may be grown in
regions that are vulnerable to climate change. Quinoa grows and adapts to even the harshest and
most merciless climates, including frost, high salinity, and drought (Ruiz et al., 2014). Under
fast-shifting climate paradigm shifts, this crop has the capability of providing a sustainable
global food supply while also reducing strain on arable land (Ruiz et al., 2016).

Global climate change is expected to have a major socioeconomic impact on both the
environment and the world's population due to its effects on crop plant yield and growth. With
the world's population expected to exceed 9.8 billion by the mid-2000s and 11.2 billion by the
22nd century, respectively, there will need to be an increase in current agricultural production in
order to meet the needs of the alarmingly increasing population (Bazile et al., 2016).

Without a doubt, the climate has been changing over time, but recently, the severity and
effects have increased. A growing population's survival on agriculture, which is the foundation
of food security, is being negatively impacted by global warming. Global warming is causing
direct repercussions such as flooding, soil salinization, and drought, which will significantly
degrade the soil structure and plants (Tang et al., 2015).

The various impacts of climate change have led to a number of changes in the way that
plants grow and develop, which is concerning for the agricultural sector because environmental
stresses have a significant impact on plant behavior and global agricultural production systems.
To deal with these effects, both public and private organizations have started developing
strategic plans that will enable the addition and improvement of plant species that are more able
to withstand unfavorable agricultural and environmental circumstances, ultimately increasing the
quantity and quality of food that is available to humans (Padulosi et al., 2013). But the biggest
issue facing agriculture in the past few decades has been temperature rise, which climatic
estimates indicate will continue until the end of the twenty-first century, rising between 1.5 and 6
°C (Betts et al 2018).

We are increasing the global food availability and observing changes in the phenological
and physiological behavior of the most important agricultural crops. According to numerous
studies, shorter periods of time with high and low temperature fluctuations combined with longer
droughts, problems with salinity in soils, and/or flooding could jeopardize food production and,
in turn, global food security (Hinojosa et al., 2018).

1.5. Nutritional value

Quinoa and amaranth are regarded as "one of the crops of the 21st century" due to their
resistance and nutrition. They will be crucial for supplying sustainable food under unfavorable
climatic conditions brought on by climate change scenarios (Jaikishun et al., 2019). Food and
Agricultural Organisation (FAO) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared that
quinoa is capable of meeting human body functioning needs as it contains all essential amino
acids that a human body needs. Its protein content is higher than that of rice, barley, corn, rye
and sorghum, but it is comparable to that of wheat (Gonzalez et al., 2012) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4 Nutrients obtained by one cup of quinoa seed

According to FAO/WHO/UNU, quinoa protein can provide more amino acids than are
recommended for adult nutritional requirements, specifically 181% of histidine, 273% of
isoleucine, 340% of lysine, 211% of methionine and cysteine, 321% of phenylalanine and
tyrosine, 333% of threonine, 230% of tryptophan, and 325% of valine. Additionally, quinoa is
also composed of carbs between 58% and 64% in its dry matter, along with suitable levels of
vital fatty acids and appropriate proportions of glucose, saccharose, fructose, and maltose.
Furthermore, quinoa contains appropriate levels of carbohydrates, fat, protein, and ash when
compared to rice, corn, wheat, oats, and barley (Park et al., 2017). Quinoa is also significantly
higher in folic acid, carotene, and the vitamins C (ascorbic acid), A, E, and B complex than rice
and barley. Quinoa is a highly nutritious grain that has been grown in Bolivia and Peru's Andean
regions for the past 5,000-7,000 years (Tang et al., 2015). Following nutrients are available in
quinoa:

 Calories: 222

 Fat: 4g

 Sodium: 13mg

 Carbohydrates: 39g
  Fiber: 5g

 Sugars: 2g

 Protein: 8g

 Magnesium: 118.4mg

 Iron: 2.8mg

 Folate: 77.7mcg

 Vitamin B6: 0.2mg

FAOSTAT estimates that 80,000 ha of quinoa were reported globally in 2002; these are
mostly found in the Andes. Without a doubt, Bolivia and Peru produce more quinoa than any
other country in the world, including the Andes. While Bolivia and Peru continue to produce the
majority of the crop, agronomic experiments and cultivation are spreading to many other
countries. Currently, 56 countries are cultivating quinoa, up from 6 in the previous phase, and 23
more are in the experimental stage, preparing to enter field production soon. Higher levels of
total ash (3.83%), crude fat (5.13%) and crude protein (14.02%) were found in the raw quinoa
flour. The levels of Ca+2 (83.30 mg/100 g), Mg+2 (201.17 mg/100 g), Zn+2 (5.23 mg/100 g),
acid detergent fiber (27.40%), methionine (3.37 g/100 g protein), and tryptophan (0.98 g/100 g
protein) were also greater in the raw flour. Quinoa sprouting increased the amount of iron (5.67
mg/100 g), neutral detergent fiber (77.73%), and crude fiber (4.06%). Compared to other
processed forms, the largest amount of nutrients was retained in raw flour and sprouted quinoa
(Bhathal et al., 2017).

Bastidas et al. (2016) stated that quinoa has remarkable nutritional value and possible
health advantages because of its high protein content (all necessary amino acids are highly
bioavailable), low glycaemic index, unsaturated fatty acid content, vitamins, minerals, and other
beneficial substances; it is also gluten-free. Moreover, plants have a food print that is 30 to 60
times smaller for carbon and water than meat, making quinoa a sustainable food.

2. Physiological Response of Quinoa to Changing Climatic Conditions

Beginning in South America, quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is distinguished by its

nutrition and high and remarkable ability to adapt to a varied array of edapho-climatic situations.
The plant's genetic variability is evident in its diverse physiological and phenological responses.
The study set out to assess the proximal composition and physiological reaction of the grains to
three different fertilization types at 2,875 meters above sea level. It has been noted that
fertilization sources influence phenological and physiological behavior, primarily leaf count,
stem length, and chlorophyll content, but not yield (García-Parra et al., 2019). As a result of
increased demographic pressure brought on by the world's population growth, arable land is
constantly disappearing. Sea levels, soil nutrition and biochemistry, global temperatures, and
climate variability are all being impacted by anthropogenic global warming. Since 1900, the
measured temperature has increased by 0.6°C, and this increase is occurring faster than
anticipated.

The summer of 2022 was the driest and warmest on record in the Northern Hemisphere
and the second warmest in Europe since the beginning of climatological records. Environmental
changes are thought to be the detrimental factors affecting agronomic production, not only in
middle- and low-income countries and also in plants, but also in lowland countries of these. The
carbon dioxide increases with climatic changes in environmental temperature and air (Maja &
Ayano, 2023).

2.1. Temperature Stress

The two abiotic stressors that have been studied the most in relation to quinoa are salinity
and drought; research on other significant stressors, like UV-B light irradiance, heavy metals,
cold, and heat is lacking. The erratic weather patterns observed over the past few decades have
increased the prevalence of abiotic stress. Moreover, stressors are typically combinations of two
or more. Exhaustive descriptions of quinoa's tolerance, current understanding of various abiotic
stresses, a review of the plant's physiological reactions to these stressors, and an account of
recent developments in molecular tools that may help us comprehend underlying abiotic stresses
tolerance of quinoa's mechanisms.

2.1.1. Impact on photosynthesis and metabolic processes

Extreme heat stress events are occurring more frequently as climate change results and
global warming, which has plant productivity impact is negative. A complex physiological
process that is sensitive to heat is photosynthesis. Assimilation of CO 2, photochemical processes,
turnover of D1 and D2 proteins, and chlorophyll biosynthesis are all impacted by heat stress.
Damage to the chloroplast caused by heat stress downregulates key proteins to inactivates heat-
sensitive and chloroplast components, such as Rubisco activate, which results in a redox
imbalance, lowers photosynthetic efficiency, and may even kill cells. The organelles are main
initiators of signaling and responses to cellular heat stress because Calvin cycle all processes of
photochemical in the lamellae of chloroplast thylakoid and stroma are vulnerable to injury of
heat stress. Strategies for defensive crop plant from photochemical damaged heat-induce are
covered, along with how chloroplast reactions, retrograde signaling, and sensitivity are involved
to the photosynthetic apparatus tolerance and sensitivity (Zahra et al., 2023). Stress caused by
both high light and high temperature (HLHT) can affect photosynthesis. It takes a lot of work
and effort to obtain HLHT tolerant photoautotrophs, and the underlying molecular pathways are
usually yet unknown. Through combinatorial perturbations of the cultivation environment and
genetic fidelity mechanism, the authors are able to increase the cyanobacterium Synechococcus
elongatus PCC 7942's mutation rates by a factor of three. The authors Synechococcus mutants
isolate with enhanced tolerance to HLHT using the hypermutation technique, and find genome
alterations that facilitate adaptation. The shikimate kinase gene encoding is highly expressed
when a certain mutation in upstream occurred of non-coding gene region. Better resistance to
HLHT is achieved in both Synechococcus and Synechocystis when the shikimate kinase-
encoding gene is overexpressed (Sun et al., 2023).

High-temperature (HT) stress, an analysis of nitrogen effects treatment on growth of

tomato plants, fruit quality, photosynthetic efficiency, and metabolism activities of nitrogen was
conducted. Three daily maximum and minimum temperatures were used during the fruiting stage
and flowering including control (18°C/28°C), sub-high (25°C/35°C), and high (30°C/40°C)
temperature stress. Five days were allotted for the short-term experiment, with the nitrogen (46%
N, urea) levels being set at 312.5 (N 5), 0 (N1), 187.5 (N3), 125 (N2), and 250 (N4) kg hm2. Tomato
plants' growth, production, and fruit quality were all hampered by HT stress. It's interesting to
note that while fruit quality decreased, SHT stress of short-term increased yield and growth
through increased nitrogen metabolism and photosynthetic efficiency. Applying nitrogen
sparingly enough can improve tomato plants stress tolerance of high-temperature (Luo et al.,
2023).

2.2. Heat and cold stress responses in quinoa

Extreme weather events and climate variability are expected to occur more frequently in
the future years, which will affect the consistent and secure production of food. Because of its
high nutritional content and versatility, quinoa as a viable option has been proposed for
providing greater food security in a world with more fluctuating weather patterns. Quinoa can
grow and remarkably adaptable in a condition of wide range, such as drought, heat, salinity, cold,
soil, UV-B radiation, and heavy metals. The two most often researched stresses on quinoa are
adaptation to salinity and drought, and the genetic diversity of these two pressures has been
thoroughly explained (Ain et al., 2023). To enhance the amount of GABA, quinoa was subjected
to cold stress prior to fermentation with Lactobacillus plantarum. Sixteen different strains of
Lactobacillus plantarum were selected as the best for GABA production based on GABA
production levels and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) activity. Fermented quinoa with stress
of cold treatment at -20°C and 4°C showed maximal increases in GABA content of 1191% and
774%, respectively. There were more flaws, cracks, mucus, and pinholes on the fermented
quinoa flour surface that had been subjected to cold stress. According to an investigation
performed using a FTIR, cold stress caused the quinoa's -OH bonds to violently shatter and
postponed the fermentation process's protein degradation (Fig. 5). Furthermore, the stress of cold
lowered quinoa flour peak viscosity, according to rapid visco analyzer (RVA) data. As a whole,
the cold stress remedy (Zhang et al., 2022).

A B

Fig. 5 Effect of high temperature on the distal axis length of quinoa flowers. Here we see a plant
(A) cultivated in a controlled environment at 22/16 °C, and in (B) a high temperature
environment at 40/24 °C.
 To better understand the quinoa plant's reaction to cold stress, the comparison of full-
length transcriptomes of the cold-sensitive variety CSQ5 and cold-resistant variety CRQ64.
These transcriptomes contained 6432 unique genes and 55,389 novel isoforms. Comparing
CRQ64 to CSQ5, differently expressed genes (DEGs) and alternative events of splicing were
more prevalent during cold stress. DEGs that were unique to CRQ64 were found to be
substantially enriched in pathways that support ROS homeostasis and osmoregulation in plants,
including phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and sucrose metabolism. More genes with peroxidase
activity in CRQ64 were enriched in differentially alternative splicing during cold stress. A total
of 2956 long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) and 5988 transcription factors were found (Zheng et
al., 2022).

2.3. Water Stress

One of the primary abiotic causes of agronomic losses in the world is drought. Many
approaches have been proposed to mitigate its effects, including the use of plant growth-
promoting bacteria (PGPBs), which have demonstrated resistance to abiotic stress. With
emerging crops like quinoa, this feature has not received much attention despite its potential to
help reduce food insecurity. The quinoa rhizosphere bacterial populations are shaped by the
genotype, water environment, and type of inoculant, which in turn affect plant performance. In
order to address this, the importance of these parameters was defined using two distinct quinoa
cultivars (with differing water stress tolerance), two water conditions (optimal and limiting), and
two soil infusions. We identified distinct bacterial families that differ in terms of genotype.
Numerous bacterial families were found, with variations observed in genotypes and water
conditions. Water stress conditions enhanced the presence of some families. For instance, the
Nocardioidaceae family was more common in cultivar F15, which was sensitive to water. On the
other hand, the Pseudomonadaceae family, the Burkholderiaceae family, and the
Sphingomonadaceae family were more common in cultivar F16, which was tolerant to water and
had a higher total polyphenol content. These changes show that the genotype and environment
have a big effect on the bacteria that live in the roots of quinoa. They also suggest that this plant
species is a great source of PGPBs that can be used when water is limited (Maestro-Gaitán et al.,
2023).

2.3.1. Drought and waterlogging effects on quinoa physiology

 This research looks at an agroecosystem that is prone to drought and uses a drip system in
sandy soil to test the physiological response and productivity of 19 different types of elite quinoa
grown in three different field capacities (95, 35, and 65%). During the 2019-20 and 2020-21
growing seasons, for the experiment, a split-plot in a randomized complete block design was
employed. Significant variations were found in the analyzed genotypes, water treatments, and
their interactions, according to the results. The components of fluorescence chlorophyll were
highly susceptible to water stress and experienced a dramatic reduction at lower moisture levels
in the soil. Under both full irrigation and drought stress, fluorescence (Fo) showed the strongest
correlation with seed yield and water usage efficiency (WUE). This could be applied to breeding
efforts to increase WUE and yield. The ideal WUE from moderate irrigation (65% FC)
demonstrated the significance. The best WUE from moderate irrigation (65% FC) demonstrated
how crucial it is to determine water requirements. Seed production ranges from 3.8 to 2.2 t ha -1,
but under water regimes, it drops to 62.8%. With yields of 3.8, 3.7, 3.5, and 3.5 t ha -1,
respectively, "V9," "Apelawa," "30TES," and "27GR" were the genotypes most suited for
growing under full irrigation. "Ames 10334" and "QU629-99" provided the largest seed yield
(1.4 t ha-1) during the spring drought (Fig. 6). However, in some moisture conditions, the
genotype "Apelawa" might perform better. Given that it yielded 1.2 t ha-1 during a stream
drought, cultivation is advised, particularly in areas with erratic precipitation (El-Harty et al.,
2023).

Fig. 6 Quinoa field affected by drought

Waterlogging stressful conditions and methods of tillage significantly improved the

growth of rapeseed and production characteristics. When compared to CK, the rapeseed yield in
the BR and SR groups increased significantly under waterlogging conditions by 22.70% and
33.09%, respectively. The main things that affected the yield of rapeseed were urease, NO3-N,
NH4+-N, and malonaldehyde (MDA). These factors also affected the levels of superoxide
dismutase (SOD), MDA, and nitrate reductase in the roots and soil. Under waterlogging stress,
the groups of BR and SR exhibited higher levels of NO3-N (180.30 and 139.77%), NH4+-N
(115.78 and 66.59%), urease (41.27 and 26.45%), SOD (6.64 and 4.66%), nitrate reductase
(71.67 and 26.67%), and lower MDA content (14.31% and 13.35%) compared to the CK group
(Tian et al., 2023).

2.3.2. Mechanisms of water use efficiency in quinoa

Vermicompost and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) interact with quinoa yield and
yield-related factors at different drought stress levels. To test this theory, two factorial-split trials
with four duplicates each were created in a similar manner. The main plot was irrigated at 75%,
50%, and 100% of the plant water requirement (PWR). The sub-plots, on the other hand, were
irrigated with gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) (10, 0, 5 mg -1) and vermicompost (V) levels of
(0, 5 t ha-1). Plant height was significantly impacted by severe drought stress. Comparing the
plant height under 50% PWR to the control conditions, a reduction of 31.8% was observed. The
1000 seed output and seed mass were adversely impacted by drought stress; however, these
effects were mitigated by foliar spray of GABA. When GABA (10 mg -1) was applied to the
leaves instead of not, the harvest index and seed yield went up to 15.5% and 21.22, respectively,
after 50% of PWR application. The concentrations of P and K, as well as the amounts of sucrose
and proline, increased as a result of the PWR being reduced from 100% to 50%. Under identical
circumstances, the application of GABA or V significantly enhanced these characteristics.
Regarding water use efficiency, a comparable pattern was also noted. Consequently, V (5 t ha-1)
and GABA (10 mg-l) may be useful in reducing water stress (Jamshideyni et al., 2023). A fully
randomized design with 48 weighted lysimeters was used to test it (Fig. 7).
 Fig. 7 Water use efficiency in quinoa plant

Four different irrigation effects (S4: 20, S3: 10, S2: 5, and S1: 0.25 dS m -1) were tested,
along with different rates of water application (W2: 100, W3: 70, W1: 120, and W4: 50%). The
effects drained water from the field. When the water needs were fully met (W1 and W2), seed
production was 30% higher than in treatments where W3 and W4 only partially satisfied the
water demand. The water response coefficients of crops were shown to be tolerant (Ky = 0.47) to
salinity-induced water stress but sensitive (Ky = 1.55) to drought-induced water stress. In soil
extracts, the authors discovered that the salinity threshold in quinoa is around 4 dS m-1, with a
3.4% slope yield. The water response coefficients of crops were shown to be tolerant (ky = 0.47)
to salinity-induced water stress but sensitive (ky = 1.55) to drought-induced water stress. The
authors discovered that quinoa, a crop classed as moderately salt resistant, has a value of salinity
threshold of around 4 dS m with a 3.4% slope in yield. The authors assessed how salinity and
water levels combined affected seed output and came to the conclusion that, in the event of
several stressors, the crop will react most to the stressor having the most significant effect (water
stress or salinity). The individual responses to salt and water stress were a favorable indicator of
the seed yield when both were stressed at the same time for all treatments (Miranda et al., 2012).

2.4. CO2 Concentrations

Quinoa's superior nutritional qualities have led to a global surge in production. Because
of its resilience to environmental challenges, this crop can be grown in sustainable farming
systems. There aren't many studies that look at how various agricultural management practices
affect climate change. Measure soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions using the following
metrics: yields and biomass of crops fertilized with conventional fertilizers (urea) and organic
fertilizers (digestate), as well as carbon dioxide (CO 2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4).
the collective N2O emission between control (0 kg N ha -1), urea (50-100 kg N ha -1), and digestate
(50-100 kg N ha-1). Digestate contains less than 100kg N ha-1, higher GHG emission (337.8 kg C
ha-1) CO2.The total amount of N2O emissions between digestate (50-100 kg N ha -1), and urea (50-
100 kg N ha-1). In comparison to treatments with lower nitrogen (N) inputs, higher cumulative
GHG emissions are reported under digestate (100 kg N ha -1), CO2 (337.8 kg C ha-1) and 0.23 kg
N ha-1 of N2O. Therefore, study not only gives agricultural extension workers more knowledge to
support sustainable quinoa production globally, but it also brings up a discussion regarding the
benefits and drawbacks of increased fertilization to improve yields (Alvar-Beltrán et al., 2022).

2.4.1. Quinoa response to elevated atmospheric CO2 levels

Quinoa Willd, (C3) and Amaranthus retroflexus L. (C4-NAD), two plants with different
forms of photosynthesis, were studied for their thermal durability at short-term increased
temperatures (35°Ρ, eT) under ambient concentrations. The function of PS II and PS I, water,
proline, growth parameters, and MDA, gas exchange parameter of CO 2/H2O, and concentration
for important photorespiratory (GDC) enzymes and photosynthetic (Rubisco, PEPC) were all
examined (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8 Response of quinoa plant against elevated atmospheric CO2 levels

C4-type plants under managements, exhibit transpiration of higher values, PS I activity,

visible photosynthesis intensity and growth of dry biomass than C3-type plants. They also
exhibit lower proline concentration. Both types' stomatal apparatus and photosynthetic was
susceptible to eT, which showed up as a drop in apparent photosynthesis and transpiration
(Rakhmankulova et al., 2023).

3. Growth Response of Quinoa to Changing Climatic Conditions

Quinoa is an essential Andean crop due to genetic variety, and great environment
tolerance that can be strategically used to regenerate damaged lands in hot, dry climates. Field
studies were carried out from November to April in two cropping seasons. Plant height, the
quantity of panicles on each plant, thousand grain weight (TGW), grain protein content (GPt),
grain yield (GYd), and grain saponin were among the parameters that were assessed. Plant
height, the quantity of panicles on each plant, grain yield (GYd), TGW, grain saponin content
(GSC), GPt, and maturity indicators were among the parameters that were examined. When year
impact compared to cropping, the genotype effect was found to be the primary source of variance
in the majority of the parameters examined. Compared to other genotypes, genotype Q102
generated (2.87 t/ha) GYd high and (16.7 g/100 g DM) GPt: it took a medium time amount of
149 days to accomplish maturity of harvesting. The majority of the attributes tested had low
values for the genotype Giza1, which also displayed the lowest GYd. It did, however, have the
lowest (0.62 g/100 g DM) GSC and shortest harvest maturity (139 days). Although the Santa
Maria variety164 days took to reach harvests maturity and high 1.92 g/100 g DM of GSC, it had
(2.68 g) TGW high. Even though optimal traits for production and not found in grain quality
single genotypes, research indicated that variety of quinoa has advantages as a novel crop for dry
agriculture, especially in hot (Fig. 9), North Africa arid regions (Oustani et al., 2023).
Fig. 9 Quinoa response to changing climate

3.1. Phenological Changes

Crop yield circumstances are rapidly deteriorated due to climatic changes. For example, it
is predicted that most regions of the world will see a rise in salinization and aridity. It is therefore
necessary to find new stress-tolerant genotypes and species with employing them in agronomy
going forward. Although they exist, stress-tolerant organisms are genuinely ignored and misused.
Numerous research have made use of crop simulation models, including those that choose the
right cultivar, figure out when to plant, and forecast how variety and climate change will affect
growth (Eghbali et al., 2023).

3.2. Flowering and seed development under altered climate

Unfavorable climate during flowering significantly reduces crop yields and jeopardizes
the relationships between plants and pollinators. These characteristics are reliant on a common
characteristic: flowers' metabolism. In this viewpoint piece, we hope to shed light on the
metabolic alterations that flowers undergo in response to climatic fluctuations. We emphasize the
significant impact these metabolic alterations have on the health of entire ecosystems, plant-
pollinator interactions, and the fitness of both autogamous and allogamous species. The authors
go over the molecular mechanisms that result in color, fragrance, and nectar secretion changes as
well as gamete development failure. Next, we investigated the expression of genes that might be
responsible for these heat- and drought-induced alterations using publicly available expression
data. Finally, the report on metabolite measurements from heat-wave-exposed flowers addresses
how the short-term experiment's findings could lead to erroneous assumptions about the
beneficial effects of heat on floral fitness. With any luck, this piece will highlight this frequently
overlooked relationship and its significant ramifications (Borghi et al., 2019).

The seasonal flowering of plants will influence the quantity of flowers they produce,
thereby influencing their ability to reproduce. Particularly considering the possibility of future
global climate shifts, it's crucial to link specific aspects of the phenology of plant flowers to the
quantity they yield. Warming was found to have no significant influence on the length or
productivity of flowering but to dramatically accelerate the flowering first date in P.
saundersiana and P. fruticosa. Simulated snowstorms, in contrast to warming, postponed P.
saundersiana's initial flowering date but had no impact on P. fruticosa. When the flowering date
was shifted later for both species, the flower yield increased. Simulated snowstorms, in contrast
to warming, postponed P. saundersiana's initial flowering date but had no appreciable impact on
P. fruticosa. As flowering shifted later for both species, the flower yield increased. These
findings suggest that while alpine plant phenology is altered by climatic changes, improvements
in the timing of the initial blooming alone may not result in longer flowering times and higher
levels of reproductive activity. Rather, these results highlight the significance of the latest
blooming date in mediating plant reproductive success and effort (Dorji et al., 2020).

3.3. Impact on crop cycle and yield

The finding collected indicates that October 16th is the optimal date to sow for the
"Q102" genotype, ranking top for the majority of the characteristics examined. The findings
collected indicate that October 16th is the optimal date to sow for the "Q102" genotype, ranking
top for the majority of the characteristics examined. However, (October 31 st) second sowing date
had the highest grain yields. Regarding genotype "Giza1", sowing date first and second no yield
was noted; only on the third sowing date was a very low grain yield noted. In comparison to
genotype "Giza1," the data obtained indicate that genotype "Q102" has a stronger capacity for
adaptation to the edapho climate environments. The study demonstrates that the ability to
produce quinoa in Saharan locations is associated with both the sowing date and genotype
(Mehda et al., 2023). In addition to limited moisture and high temperatures during the flower
stage, late quinoa sowing in Morocco's desert Rehamna region produces stunted plants and low
yields. Short-cycle cultivars can be sown early as a smart way to increase yields and growth. In
2020-2021, a field experimentation was carried for looking into sowing impact on development,
yield, and growth. The study assessed five sowing, along with two cultivar, Titicaca and ICBA-
Q5. For both cultivars, late seeding resulted in poorer yields and growth as well as shorter days
until panicle emergence, blooming, and maturity. In dry areas of Morocco, it is advised to seed
ICBA-Q5 earlier in order to maximize quinoa output (Taaime et al., 2022).

4. Molecular and Genetic Responses

4.1. Genetic Diversity:

The conservation status and methods employed for these resources can be evaluated with
the aid of genetic diversity analysis (El-Harty et al. 2021). It helps us identify more sources of
gene variation to expand the geographical scope and productivity of crops. Genetic markers are
essential to the preservation of germplasm.

The establishment of core collections. Molecular marker technologies have been used in
several research to classify genotypes of quinoa (Zhang et al. 2017). Li and Quiros created
sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers, which are utilized to amplify DNA
coding areas using primers that target open reading frames (Li and Quiros 2001). Plant biological
investigations employ Sequence-Related Amplified Polymorphism (SRAP) markers to
investigate theories related to plant systematics and biogeography. Using SRAP markers,
Robarts and Wolfe compiled the findings from 171 publications (Robarts and Wolfe 2014).

They emphasized how SRAP markers could improve the authors underlined the potential
of SRAP markers to augment the existing array of molecular tools across multiple domains by
offering a user-friendly, changeable marker with intrinsic biological importance (Robarts and
Wolfe 2014). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to describe using SRAP for
quinoa diversity assessment. The purpose of this study was to characterize 32 imported quinoa
genotypes cultivated in Saudi Arabia's semi-arid climate at the morphological level and evaluate
the genetic diversity of these genotypes using SRAP markers at the molecular level (Fig. 10).
Fig. 10 Genetic and Molecular response of Quinoa

4.2. Examining quinoa varieties for climate resilience:

A dataset including 32 genotypes was subjected to Principal Coordinate Analysis

(PCoA), which demonstrated a clear segregation into two subpopulations with evenly distributed
representation along the axes. The population structure was mostly explained by the first three
coordinates. In particular, the first coordinate clearly distinguished between the genotypes of
Population One and Population Two. STRUCTURE-based model-based genetic clustering
confirmed this segregation even further. The researchers in (Salazar et al. 2019) found a high
genetic heterozygosity value across 84 accessions in the Ecuadorian Andes using species-
specific SSR markers, suggesting significant variety in Ecuadorian quinoa. On the other hand,
He values in a varied panel of 31 farmed quinoa accessions covering important South American
quinoa-growing regions were reported by (Mason et al. 2005). Increased heterozygosity (He)
values after utilizing microsatellite loci to assess the genetic diversity of 152 quinoa accessions
(Christensen et al. 2007).

Examining the genetic diversity of 59 quinoa accessions from Chile's coastal and
highland regions. They found that the genotypes from the coastal regions had more alleles than
the genotypes from the highlands, and their Shannon index values were higher (Fuentes et al.
2009). Using RAPD, Castillo et al. evaluated the genetic diversity of Bolivian quinoa cultivars
that were grown and wild. Between cultivated and weedy forms, the genetic diversity index (He)
was, respectively. There were no discernible variations in genetic diversity between ecoregions.
They concluded that RAPD markers showed a high level of intra-population diversity and a
stable population structure. Additionally, (Hossein-Pour et al. 2019) used inter-primer binding
site markers to produce values for the number of alleles (Ne), Nei's genetic diversity (h), and
Shannon's information index, respectively, for a genotype of French Vanilla quinoa.

It's possible for the number of alleles and gene diversity seen in different studies to be
different. This is because the germplasm used in each study may be different in size and location,
and the molecular markers used may be different (dominant vs. codominant). Numerous studies
utilizing RAPD markers have revealed minimal differences between the various accessions of C.
quinoa and other Chenopodium species. All the species under study showed substantial levels of
polymorphism, despite the stated low amount of intraspecific variation (Ruas et al. 1999).
Furthermore, Bois et al. (2006) demonstrated that pure populations of weedy and farmed quinoa
exhibited minimal levels of differentiation. Still, it is thought that population differentiation
matters more than genotype differentiation between cultivated and weedy. The focus on
population differentiation could be because there is large gene flow between cultivated and
weedy quinoa, which can be seen at the field level.

4.3. Breeding strategies for improved climate adaptation:

Due to changes in temperature and precipitation patterns, the continued trend of climate
warming is impacting crop output worldwide (Hasegawa et al. 2021). This trend emphasizes how
urgent it is to create crop varieties that can both maintain consistent yields and adjust to changing
environmental circumstances. Even in areas where it is naturally grown, quinoa is an essential
crop and is subject to this requirement. Frequent hailstorms, droughts, and changes in rainfall
patterns are among the difficult climatic conditions that the Andean highlands of Peru must deal
with (Flubacher et al. 2017). These circumstances significantly jeopardize smallholder farmers'
revenue and ability to secure food.

The development of quinoa lines with improved traits like yield, plant height, and days to
maturity must take precedence in order to reduce the hazards associated with an unfavorable
environment. Native quinoa genetic resources are quite diverse throughout the Andes (Bazile et
al. 2016), which gives plant breeders a fantastic starting point for developing new and improved
varieties suited to specific production zones (Fig. 11). Specifically, smallholder farmers and
other industry stakeholders' preferences and needs should be considered during the breeding
process (Gamboa et al. 2018).
Fig. 11 Breeding strategies in quinoa to improve adaptation against climate.

Farmers in the highlands of Peru show a strong preference for quinoa types that have
larger grains, lower levels of saponins, higher yields, and early maturation (Gamboa et al. 2018).

4.4. Gene Expression:

Plant growth and development are significantly influenced by transcription factors (TFs),
which are essential proteins that regulate genes, especially in stressful environments (Kim et al.
2021). TFs interact with cis-acting regions to either activate or inhibit downstream gene
expression; they are often divided into activators and inhibitors (Riechmann et al. 2000). Some
TFs can act as both activators and repressors, depending on where they bind and the other TFs
they can heterodimerize with (Boyle and Després 2010). Two-role transcription factors like A.
thaliana PR-1, AtYY1, and the potato PR-10a gene are well-known examples. These all include
activation and repression domains (Li et al. 2016). Zinc-finger transcription factors are among
the crucial TFs in plants.

These proteins can attach to proteins, RNA, or DNA because of zinc-finger domains that
are stabilized by zinc and other metal ions (Khanna et al. 2009). In particular, plants react to
light, temperature, changes in plant development, and environmental conditions by controlling
the transcription of zinc finger proteins. This is done by BBX proteins (Robson et al. 2001). In
the BBX TF family, the N-terminus has one or two B-box domains. On the other hand, some
genes have a CCT (Constans, Co-like, and TOC1) protein domain at the C-terminus. According
to Griffiths et al. (2003), the CCT protein domain and the conserved B-box domain both make
substantial contributions to their respective activities. Arabidopsis thaliana, Gossypium spp.,
Vitis vinifera, Capsicum annuum, Solanum lycopersicum, Phyllostachys heterocycle, and Oryza
sativa all have the BBX TF family, but no one knows what it does in quinoa (Chenopodium
quinoa Willd., Cq). Photomorphogenesis, flowering induction, shading reactions, carotenoid
biosynthesis, and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses are just a few of the physiological and
biochemical processes that plants can't do without. This is supported by an increasing body of
research (Murphy et al., 2018).

4.5. Molecular mechanisms underlying stress tolerance:

The main cause of crop losses is abiotic stress, which results in yield reductions of more
than 50% on a global scale (Mittler 2006). These stressors, which are frequently combined,
include cold, drought, waterlogging, high salinity, heavy metals, extreme heat, and ultraviolet-B
light irradiance (UV-B), all of which have been thoroughly investigated in plants (Suzuki et al.
2014). Quinoa is an Andean crop called "jupha" or "jiura" in Aymara and "kiuna" or "kinwa" in
Quechua (Bazile et al. 2015). The native geographical distribution of quinoa, which is grown
from sea level near the coast to 4000 meters above sea level (m.a.s.l.), includes southern
Colombia, the coast of south-central Chile, a branch in northwest Argentina, and some
subtropical lowlands in Bolivia (Costa Tártara et al. 2012).

Around Lake Titicaca in southern Peru and Bolivia, these plants were first domesticated
some 8000–7500 years ago, according to historical records. Because of its highly diversified
genetic pool and inherent variability in a wide range of traits—such as inflorescence type, seed
color, seed size, duration of life cycle, salt tolerance, saponin content, and nutritional value—
quinoa is able to adapt to a variety of conditions (Bertero et al. 2004). Since the 1960s, gene
banks have been set up in the Andes to protect the genetic diversity of quinoa. Thirty-one gene
banks in thirty countries house 16,422 conserved accessions, most of which are centered in
Bolivia and Peru (Murphy and Matanguihan 2015). In order to support global food security, this
coordinated initiative attempts to protect the rich genetic heritage of quinoa and assist in its
adaptation to shifting environmental conditions.

4.6. Identifying key genes associated with climate resilience:

 Quinoa grows vigorously in a wide range of soil and temperature conditions, being able
to flourish in areas that are both rainy and tropical as well as chilly and dry. Exceptional
adaptability to a wide range of edaphoclimatic conditions characterizes its remarkable diversity.
These conditions encompass a wide range of altitudes, from sea level to 4,000 meters above sea
level, with annual precipitation ranging from 2,000 mm to extreme aridity, significant variability
in soil and nutrient availability, and climates ranging from tropical to cold-arid. Stress avoidance
and stress tolerance are the two main techniques that plants use to respond to decreased water
availability (Claeys and Inze 2013).

Water absorption and loss are intended to be balanced by stress avoidance mechanisms.
Increased root development, a decrease in tissue water potential, and solute buildup are all
components of enhanced water intake. Simultaneously, stomata close to minimize water loss
through evaporation, which limits shoot growth and speeds up leaf senescence. On the other
hand, when stress increases beyond the capacity of stress avoidance mechanisms, stress tolerance
mechanisms take over to guard against cell damage. According to Claeys and Inze (2013), these
processes involve the detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the accumulation of
protective proteins, including late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins and solutes, such as
proline, which serves as both an osmolyte and an osmoprotectants.

It is sometimes proposed that the diversity seen in local quinoa types represents selection
and adaptation to the particular soil, even if the exact causes of the heterogeneity in quinoa's
physiological reactions to the environment are still mostly unknown. climates of many
environments. However, prior research (Bois et al. 2006) had not convincingly shown a clear
morphophysiological adaptation of these genotypes to local ecological conditions. Quinoa is a
fascinating model plant because of its five main ecotypes' varied traits and the tolerance traits
that go along with it (Bhargava and Srivastava 2013).

5. Challenges and Future Directions:

Quinoa faces several important problems, including managing pests and illnesses,
creating climate-resilient cultivars, and preserving genetic variety. Stabilizing market prices and
increasing production in a sustainable manner are important factors. Future research should
concentrate on improving the nutritional value, comprehending mechanisms of adaptation,
incorporating quinoa into a variety of food systems, promoting international cooperation,
funding training and education, and supporting legislative initiatives.
5.1. Current Challenges:

When growing quinoa, the stand establishment stage is critical since it affects both seed
quality and yield. Farmers who cultivate on marginal or saline soils often face challenges such as
low crop stand establishment and poor germination. Significant differences in stand
establishments were found in FAO testing conducted in the UAE. Quinoa seed germination and
early stand establishment are highly dependent on temperature and moisture content. The
germination of quinoa seeds and the growth of seedlings are significantly impacted by
temperature. Temperatures between 20 and 35°C are ideal for germination, with declines
occurring below 15°C and above 45°C. Elevated temperatures over 35°C result in a rise in seed
loss, with a complete cessation at 50°C. Low temperatures can cause embryo death, which
prevents germination.

For researchers, quinoa poses a challenge in terms of stand establishment due to its small
seeds and low soil moisture content. Because they are orthodox, quinoa seeds can dry out by up
to 5% without becoming inactive. On the other hand, low moisture causes non-enzymatic
processes that age seeds and change their functional protein composition. As a result, the seed's
ability to protect itself from damage caused by free radicals during germination is diminished. It
is imperative to tackle these obstacles in order to achieve effective quinoa farming.

5.2. Limitations in existing research:

In the 1990s, the Andean countries enhanced their ability to clean grains, and the rapid
rise of the organic food industry which included quinoa sparked interest in whole grains. In the
US, quinoa gained popularity as a specialty food item by the late 2000s. During the 1960s and
1980s, research in the Andes concentrated on plant breeding, nutrition, uses, processing,
industry, and germplasm collection.

Political factors influenced the varying levels of agricultural research in the southern
states. Cultivar release, bio-inputs, integrating native vegetation, and socioeconomic studies are
all recent research topics. After the 2000s, there was an increase in average quinoa yields in the
region, particularly in Ecuador and Peru. As of 2017, genomic sequencing of 26 quinoa cultivars
has been completed. Breeding efforts for specific traits and stress tolerance may be accelerated
internationally as a result. Innovative breeding techniques are being used in new projects outside
of the Andean region to achieve decreased saponin, high-yielding cultivars, and climatic
resilience. Regretfully, the Andean region lacks these capacities. China is making large
investments in quinoa research; 12,000 hectares were planted in 2018, mostly in the north of the
nation.

5.3. Gaps in understanding specific physiological and growth responses:

Quinoa altiplano variation "Kankolla" was discovered by Jensen et al. (2000) to be less
responsive to drought in comparison to stomatal responses during early growth stages. In
response to this discovery, they postulated that early growth stages, characterized by high net
photosynthetic rates and a particular leaf area, facilitate greater root systems' water intake,
thereby protecting the plant against drought in the future. If a drought was imposed under
Bolivian Altiplano conditions during the pre-anthesis stage, one of the alternative drought
response mechanisms might be to delay development.

OJIP analysis was used in field experiments, such as growing seasons for quinoa in
Morocco. This method is made up of four steps: O, J, I, and P. The O, J, I, and P steps
correspond to the redox states of the photosystems (PS II and PS I). The purpose of this study is
to investigate variations in the photochemical performance of photosystem II (PSII). The
findings indicated that a 'Puno' variety planted at sea level saw a reduction in Fv/Fm and the
quantum yield of electron transport due to drought stress. This suggests that OJIP parameters
could be a useful tool for evaluating drought stress. Another study looked at the OJIP transient of
chlorophyll a fluorescence in the sea-level variety "Red Head," which is grown in semi-
controlled conditions in Italy. It was found that there were no differences in 16 parameters
related to chlorophyll luminescence between the control and drought treatments. These two
contradicting findings probably show that the quinoa response to drought is influenced by
genotypic heterogeneity.

To be sure that the chlorophyll fluorescence OJIP transient is a good way to measure
drought in quinoa, more research needs to be done with a larger number of genotypes and
measurements of gas exchange at the same time. Previous research has examined quinoa and its
relatives' root system architecture and soil moisture. Compared to quinoa relatives C. hiricinum
and C. pallidicaule, quinoa roots exhibit faster elongation and abundant and longer external
branching, which enhances their potential for foraging. A recent study on the architecture and
dynamics of the root system under drought conditions compared the genotypes of C. hiricinum,
quinoa that thrives in wet environments, with those of C. pallidicaule, quinoa that grows in dry
environments. The results showed that the quinoa genotypes exhibited faster taproot growth
under dry soil conditions compared to the genotypes of the other two species. In addition, the
quinoa genotype from the dry habitat showed longer, coarser, and more frequent root segments
compared to the genotype from the wet environment. Due to these results, the authors propose
that quinoa be used as a viable model plant to study the biophysical and eco-physiological
characteristics of plants rooted in deep soil layers.

5.4. Future Research Directions:

The genetic foundations and mechanisms underlying quinoa's ability to withstand abiotic
stressors and how they affect the grain's chemical makeup should be the main subjects of future
research. With this extra knowledge, quinoa breeders will be able to create new kinds that are
more widely suited to a range of environmental circumstances, which will help quinoa spread
throughout the world. Similarly, new genetic combinations with excellent prospects for breeding
for production in harsh environments should be made available by the current investigation of
intercrosses between quinoa and its wild cousins. When combined, quinoa provides a powerful
model to thoroughly investigate abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms and novel genes for
enhanced plant performance.

6. Climate-Resilient Agriculture:
The adoption of climate-resilient agriculture is crucial in tackling the obstacles presented
by climate change. Enhancing the resilience of agriculture-based communities, especially in
different areas of the Philippines, requires strategies to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of
climate change (Jensen et al. 2000). The Philippines and other developing nations with tropical
climates may be more sensitive to these effects for a variety of reasons (Escarcha et al. 2018).
The northeastern agricultural growth of Mindanao has been continuously subjected to many
climate dangers, including typhoons, droughts, erosion, and pests and illnesses caused by
changing climate conditions, improper farming techniques, and land-use practices.
These together are referred to as "anthropogenic" or "human-driven" climate change, and
they have the potential to seriously harm agriculture and farming. The impoverished rural
community experiences a rise in poverty (Maialetti et al. 2024). Stuecker et al. (2018) assert that
both immediate climate-induced events, such as floods, droughts, and storm surges, as well as
gradual climate changes, such as changes in temperature and rainfall, sea level rise, intrusion,
and soil erosion, pose significant harm to the population that relies on agriculture and farming.
6.1. Applying quinoa insights to other crops:
 Using knowledge gained from quinoa farming on other crops can teach us important
lessons about improving agricultural sustainability. Quinoa's capacity to adapt to a wide range of
climates highlights the significance of growing crops that are appropriate for a given region.
Water-efficient techniques used in the production of quinoa can serve as an example for
optimizing water consumption in the development of other crops. Accepting short growing
seasons—as quinoa does—improves planting and harvesting flexibility and strengthens the
resilience of agriculture as a whole.
Due to its nutrient-rich profile, quinoa is an excellent crop to incorporate into rotation
systems, as it fosters soil health and provides a diverse range of dietary options. Minimizing
environmental harm can be achieved by extending low-impact farming practices, like reduced
pesticide use, that are observed in quinoa cultivation to other crops. Breeding programs for
different crops can benefit from quinoa's trait of leveraging genetic variety to increase resilience
against pests and illnesses.
Quinoa's community-focused strategy can serve as an inspiration for other crops'
community engagement plans, promoting sustainable farming methods. The need to give priority
to crops with high nutritional content is highlighted by the global relevance of quinoa for
addressing food security. In the end, the global growth of diversified, adaptive, and sustainable
agricultural systems is aided by the cross-application of quinoa ideas.
6.2. Promoting sustainable agricultural practices:

Encouraging sustainable farming methods is essential for the long-term health of the
environment, economy, and society. This entails implementing strategies like agroforestry,
precision farming, and conservation agriculture to improve soil health, maximize resource
utilization, and encourage biodiversity. Promoting organic farming, varied cropping patterns, and
water-saving techniques helps manage water resources sustainably and has a smaller negative
impact on the environment.

Crop rotation, cover crops, and integrated pest management are crucial techniques for
controlling pests and diseases and preserving soil fertility. Participating in decision-making
processes with local communities promotes ownership and allows sustainable practices to be
customized for particular areas. Farmers are better equipped to implement sustainable practices
when information and cutting-edge technologies are shared through support for research,
teaching, and extension services. Facing climate change requires climate-smart agriculture,
which prioritizes adaptation and resilience. The widespread adoption of sustainable agriculture is
facilitated by promoting regulations that promote ecologically friendly practices and opening up
markets for items produced sustainably. In general, encouraging these methods improves
agricultural systems' efficiency, resilience, and environmental friendliness.

6.3. Quinoa as a potential climate-resilient staple:

Quinoa's capacity to adapt to a wide range of conditions makes it a promising staple that
could withstand climate change. Quinoa exhibits remarkable adaptability, flourishing in a wide
range of conditions, from humid tropical places to frigid desert regions. It is a resilient crop in
the face of climate change because of its capacity to withstand variations in temperature,
precipitation, and soil conditions. Furthermore, quinoa is a climate-resilient crop that shows
promise for the future of sustainable agriculture due to its short growth seasons and efficient use
of water.

6.4. Policy implications for promoting quinoa cultivation:

Investing in research and extension services, offering financial incentives, and enhancing
infrastructure are all necessary to promote quinoa farming. It is imperative to maintain genetic
diversity, ensure equitable market access, and adopt climate-resilient techniques. Sustainable
practices are improved by farmer education and training, water management regulations, and
certification requirements. A healthy quinoa industry is facilitated by supporting land tenure,
fostering crop diversity, and involving local communities. Sustainable agriculture and food
security can be further advanced by preserving policy flexibility and encouraging research
cooperation.

7. Conclusion

The examination of quinoa's development and physiological responses to shifting

climates highlights the intricate interactions between this hardy crop and the ever-changing
environmental issues brought on by climate change. Considering the uncertain future, quinoa
presents itself as a viable option for sustainable agriculture due to its resilience to a variety of
climates and soil types. It is critical to understand how quinoa reacts physiologically when
temperatures rise, precipitation patterns change, and extreme weather events increase in
frequency. The crop is a vital resource for ensuring global food security because of its resilience
to fluctuating temperatures, capacity to adapt to water scarcity, and ability to flourish in a variety
of soil types. But there are obstacles in store.
 The dates of quinoa flowering & seed development can be affected by high temperatures,
variations in day length, and fluctuations in precipitation. Furthermore, the interplay between
these climate shifts and rising carbon dioxide levels calls for continued study and breeding to
create quinoa cultivars that are tolerant to the changing climate. These have significant
ramifications for both sustainable agriculture and future food security. Because of quinoa's
environmental resilience, it can be grown in a variety of ways, which reduces the danger of
climate change causing changes to typical cropping areas. Furthermore, quinoa is a viable option
for areas experiencing a growing shortage of water because of its drought resistance and water
efficiency.

To fully utilize quinoa in the face of changing climate circumstances, a comprehensive

strategy is needed. This entails ongoing research into the physiological reactions of the crop,
breeding initiatives to improve resilience, and the creation of sustainable farming methods.
Policies that encourage agroecological practices and assist quinoa's adoption as a crop adaptable
to climate change are also crucial.

Essentially, researching how quinoa reacts to climate change is a scientific endeavor as

well as a sign of hope for sustainable agriculture. Understanding and utilizing quinoa's special
qualities can help us create resilient food systems that can withstand the effects of a fast-
changing climate. To assure a safe and sustainable future, scientists, farmers, legislators, and
communities must work together.
References:
Ain, Q. T., Siddique, K., Bawazeer, S., Ali, I., Mazhar, M., Rasool, R., & Jafar, T. H. (2023).
Adaptive mechanisms in quinoa for coping in stressful environments: an
update. PeerJ, 11, e14832.

Alvar-Beltrán, J., Dalla Marta, A., Vivoli, R., Verdi, L., & Orlandini, S. (2022). Greenhouse gas
emissions and yield production from an organic and conventional fertilization on
quinoa. Agronomy, 12, 1015.

Amin, H., Habib, A., Asif, M., Hameed, M. U., Wassi, M., Manzoor, M., ... & Sajjad, M. (2023).
Effect of Foliar Application of Boron, Zinc and Manganese on Growth, Yield and Oil
Contents of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Asian J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutri, 9(4), 86-94.
Andrango, G., Johnson, A., & Bellemare, M. F. (2020). Quinoa Production and Growth Potential
in Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru. Choices, 35, 1-10.

Bastidas, E. G., Roura, R., Rizzolo, D. A. D., Massanés, T., & Gomis, R. (2016). Quinoa
(Chenopodium quinoa Willd), from nutritional value to potential health benefits: an
integrative review. Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences, 2016, vol. 6, num. 3.

Bazile, D. (2022). Quinoa, A Model Crop for Tomorrow’s Agriculture. In Biology and
Biotechnology of Quinoa: Super Grain for Food Security (pp. 397-417). Singapore:
Springer Singapore.

Bazile, D., Bertero, H. D., & Nieto, C. (2014). Estado del arte de la quinua en el mundo en 2014:
Libro de resúmenes.

Bazile, D., Bertero, H. D., & Nieto, C. (2015). State of the Art Report on Quinoa around the
World in 2013.

Bazile, D., Jacobsen, S. E., & Verniau, A. (2016). The global expansion of quinoa: trends and
limits. Frontiers in plant science, 7, 622.

Bertero, H. D., De la Vega, A. J., Correa, G., Jacobsen, S. E., & Mujica, A. (2004). Genotype
and genotype-by-environment interaction effects for grain yield and grain size of quinoa
(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as revealed by pattern analysis of international multi-
environment trials. Field crops research, 89, 299-318.

Betts, R. A., Alfieri, L., Bradshaw, C., Caesar, J., Feyen, L., Friedlingstein, P., & Wyser, K.
(2018). Changes in climate extremes, fresh water availability and vulnerability to food
 insecurity projected at 1.5 C and 2 C global warming with a higher-resolution global
climate model. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical,
Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376, 20160452.

Bhargava, A. and S. Srivastava. 2013. Quinoa: Botany, production and uses. Centre Agri. Biosci.
Intl.

Bhathal, S. K., Kaur, N., & Gill, J. (2017). Effect of processing on the nutritional composition of
quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Agric. Res. J, 54, 90-93.

Bois, J. F., Winkel, T., Lhomme, J. P., Raffaillac, J. P., & Rocheteau, A. (2006). Response of
some Andean cultivars of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to temperature: Effects
on germination, phenology, growth and freezing. European Journal of agronomy, 25,
299-308.

Borghi, M., Perez de Souza, L., Yoshida, T., & Fernie, A. R. (2019). Flowers and climate
change: a metabolic perspective. New Phytologist, 224, 1425-1441.

Boyle, P., & Després, C. (2010). Dual-function transcription factors and their entourage: unique
and unifying themes governing two pathogenesis-related genes. Plant signaling &
behavior, 5, 629-634.

Christensen, S. A., Pratt, D. B., Pratt, C., Nelson, P. T., Stevens, M. R., Jellen, E. N., ... &
Maughan, P. J. (2007). Assessment of genetic diversity in the USDA and CIP-FAO
international nursery collections of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) using
microsatellite markers. Plant Genetic Resources, 5, 82-95.

Claeys, H., & Inzé, D. (2013). The agony of choice: how plants balance growth and survival
under water-limiting conditions. Plant physiology, 162, 1768-1779.

Costa Tártara, S. M., Manifesto, M. M., Bramardi, S. J., & Bertero, H. D. (2012). Genetic
structure in cultivated quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), a reflection of landscape
structure in Northwest Argentina. Conservation Genetics, 13, 1027-1038.

Dorji, T., Hopping, K. A., Meng, F., Wang, S., Jiang, L., & Klein, J. A. (2020). Impacts of
climate change on flowering phenology and production in alpine plants: The importance
of end of flowering. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 291, 106795.
Eghbali, S., Nassiri-Mahallati, M., Jahan, M., & Salehi, M. (2023). Quinoa Phenological
Development Modeling Based on Field Data. Iranian Journal of Field Crops
Research, 21.

El-Harty, E. H., Ghazy, A., Alateeq, T. K., Al-Faifi, S. A., Khan, M. A., Afzal, M., & Migdadi,
H. M. (2021). Morphological and molecular characterization of quinoa
genotypes. Agriculture, 11, 286.

El-Harty, E. H., SELEIMAN, M. F., AFZAL, M., & ALGHAMDI, S. (2023). Water use
efficiency (WUE) and productivity of promising quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild.)
genotypes grown under three water regimes. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-
Napoca, 51, 13209-13209.

Escarcha, J. F., Lassa, J. A., & Zander, K. K. (2018). Livestock under climate change: a
systematic review of impacts and adaptation. Climate, 6, 54.

Flubacher, M., Sedlmeier, K., Lechthaler, F., Rohrer, M., Cristobal, L., & Vinogradova, A.
(2017, April). Socio-economic vulnerability, adaptation to agro-climatic risk and the
potential of user-tailored climate services for the Andean Highlands: The case of quinoa
production in the region of Puno. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (p.
17580).

Fuentes, F. F., Martinez, E. A., Hinrichsen, P. V., Jellen, E. N., & Maughan, P. J. (2009).
Assessment of genetic diversity patterns in Chilean quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
germplasm using multiplex fluorescent microsatellite markers. Conservation
Genetics, 10, 369-377.

Gamboa, C., Van den Broeck, G., & Maertens, M. (2018). Smallholders’ preferences for
improved quinoa varieties in the Peruvian Andes. Sustainability, 10, 3735.

García-Parra, M., García-Molano, J., & Deaquiz-Oyola, Y. (2019). Physiological performance of

quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under agricultural climatic conditions in Boyaca,
Colombia. Agronomía Colombiana, 37, 144-152.

Gonzalez, J. A., Konishi, Y., Bruno, M., Valoy, M., & Prado, F. E. (2012). Interrelationships
among seed yield, total protein and amino acid composition of ten quinoa (Chenopodium
quinoa) cultivars from two different agroecological regions. Journal of the Science of
Food and Agriculture, 92, 1222-1229.
Griffiths, S., Dunford, R. P., Coupland, G., & Laurie, D. A. (2003). The evolution of
CONSTANS-like gene families in barley, rice, and Arabidopsis. Plant physiology, 131,
1855-1867.

Hasegawa, T., Sakurai, G., Fujimori, S., Takahashi, K., Hijioka, Y., & Masui, T. (2021).
Extreme climate events increase risk of global food insecurity and adaptation
needs. Nature Food, 2, 587-595.

Hinojosa, L., González, J. A., Barrios-Masias, F. H., Fuentes, F., & Murphy, K. M. (2018).
Quinoa abiotic stress responses: A review. Plants, 7, 106.

Hinojosa, L., Matanguihan, J. B., & Murphy, K. M. (2019). Effect of high temperature on pollen
morphology, plant growth and seed yield in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa
Willd.). Journal of agronomy and crop science, 205, 33-45.

Hossein-Pour, A., Haliloglu, K., Ozkan, G., & Tan, M. (2019). Genetic diversity and population
structure of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) using iPBS-retrotransposons markers.

Ijaz, B., Nazeer, S., Sajjad, M., Nadeem, M., Anwar, H., Idrees, M., ... & Khan, R. H. U. (2023).
Effect of various foliar applied micronutrients (Zn+ Fe+ Cu+ B) on growth and yield of
wheat under Faisalabad condition. Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural
Sciences, 11, 184-189.
Ijaz, B., Waraich, E. A., Shah, A., & Nazeer, S. (2023). Morpho-physiological responses of
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to foliar applied potassium under different planting
geometry.
Jaikishun, S., Li, W., Yang, Z., & Song, S. (2019). Quinoa: In perspective of global
challenges. Agronomy, 9, 176.

Jamshideyni, M., Behdani, M. A., Parsa, S., & Khoramdel, S. (2023). Evaluation of yield and
water use efficiency of quinoa under irrigation regimes, gamma aminobutyric acid, and
vermicompost application. Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 119, 1-15.

Jensen, C. R., Jacobsen, S. E., Andersen, M. N., Nunez, N., Andersen, S. D., Rasmussen, L., &
Mogensen, V. O. (2000). Leaf gas exchange and water relation characteristics of field
quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) during soil drying. European journal of
Agronomy, 13, 11-25.

Khaliq, A., Zafar, M., Sajjad, M., Hassan, M. U., Mudassar, M. A., Shakoor, M. A., ... & Niaz,
S. (2023). Nitrogen use efficiency in sunflower (helianthus annuus l.) influenced by
 various fertigation and bed planting techniques. Pakistan Journal of Biotechnology, 20,
385-392.
Khanna, R., 2009. The Arabidopsis B-box zinc finger family. Plant Cell. 21: 3416-3420.

Kim, M., Xi, H., Park, S., Yun, Y., & Park, J. (2021). Genome-wide comparative analyses of
GATA transcription factors among seven Populus genomes. Scientific reports, 11, 16578.

Li, G., & Quiros, C. F. (2001). Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), a new marker
system based on a simple PCR reaction: its application to mapping and gene tagging in
Brassica. Theoretical and applied genetics, 103, 455-461.

Li, T., Wu, X. Y., Li, H., Song, J. H., & Liu, J. Y. (2016). A dual-function transcription factor,
AtYY1, is a novel negative regulator of the Arabidopsis ABA response
network. Molecular plant, 9, 650-661.

Luo, J., Yang, Z., Zhang, F., & Li, C. (2023). Effect of nitrogen application on enhancing high-
temperature stress tolerance of tomato plants during the flowering and fruiting
stage. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1172078.

Maestro‐Gaitán, I., Granado‐Rodríguez, S., Redondo‐Nieto, M., Battaglia, A., Poza‐Viejo, L.,
Matías, J., ... & Reguera, M. (2023). Unveiling changes in rhizosphere‐associated bacteria
linked to the genotype and water stress in quinoa. Microbial Biotechnology, 16, 2326-2344.

Maialetti, M., Clemente, M., Rontos, K., Scarpitta, D., Stefanoni, A., Rossi, F., & Salvati, L.
(2024). Climate-Driven vs Human-Driven Land Degradation? The Role of Urbanization
and Agricultural Intensification in Italy, 1960-2030. Sustainability, 16, 8938.

Maja, M. M., & Ayano, S. F. (2021). The impact of population growth on natural resources and
farmers’ capacity to adapt to climate change in low-income countries. Earth Systems and
Environment, 5, 271-283.

Martínez, E. A., Fuentes, F. F., & Bazile, D. (2015). History of quinoa: its origin, domestication,
diversification, and cultivation with particular reference to the Chilean context. Quinoa:
Improvement and sustainable production, 19-24.

Mason, S. L., Stevens, M. R., Jellen, E. N., Bonifacio, A., Fairbanks, D. J., Coleman, C. E., ... &
Maughan, P. J. (2005). Development and use of microsatellite markers for germplasm
characterization in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Crop Science, 45, 1618-1630.

Mehda, S., Oustani, M., Bouazza, S., & Djaballah, I. (2023). Effect of sowing dates on the
 vegetative growth and yield parameters of two quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
genotypes. Journal of Agriculture and Applied Biology, 4, 95-106.

Mir, N. A., Yousuf, B., Gul, K., Riar, C. S., & Singh, S. (2019). Cereals and pseudocereals:
Genera introduction, classification, and nutritional properties. In Food Bioactives (pp.
281-322). Apple Academic Press.

Miranda, M., Vega-Gálvez, A., Sanders, M., López, J., Lemus-Mondaca, R., Martínez, E., & Di
Scala, K. (2012). Modelling the water sorption isotherms of quinoa seeds (Chenopodium
quinoa Willd.) and determination of sorption heats. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 5,
1686-1693.

Mittler, R. (2006). Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends in plant
science, 11, 15-19.

Murphy, K. M., Matanguihan, J. B., Fuentes, F. F., Gómez‐Pando, L. R., Jellen, E. N., Maughan,
P. J., & Jarvis, D. E. (2018). Quinoa breeding and genomics. Plant breeding reviews, 42,
257-320.

Murphy, K. S., & Matanguihan, J. (Eds.). (2015). Quinoa: Improvement and sustainable
production. John Wiley & Sons.

Nazeer, S., Tahir, M., Sajjad, M., Idrees, M., Hameed, M. U., Saleem, M. A., & Shehzad, A.
(2020). Response of Different Micronutrients (Zn, Cu and Mn) Soil Application on Yield
and Quality of Late Sown Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Agro-Climatic Conditions of
Faisalabad, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences, pp. 18.
Oustani, M., Mehda, S., Halilat, M. T., & Chenchouni, H. (2023). Yield, growth development
and grain characteristics of seven Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes grown
in open-field production systems under hot-arid climatic conditions. Scientific
reports, 13, 1991.

Padulosi, S., Thompson, J., & Rudebjer, P. G. (2013). Fighting poverty, hunger and malnutrition
with neglected and underutilized species: needs, challenges and the way forward.

Park, J. H., Lee, Y. J., Kim, Y. H., & Yoon, K. S. (2017). Antioxidant and antimicrobial
activities of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seeds cultivated in Korea. Preventive
nutrition and food science, 22, 195.
Porcel, R. (2023). The adaptation of crops to the environment under climate change:
Physiological and agronomic strategies. Agronomy, 13, 938.

Rakhmankulova, Z. F., Shuyskaya, E. V., Prokofieva, M. Y., Saidova, L. T., & Voronin, P. Y.
(2023). Effect of Elevated CO2 and Temperature on Plants with Different Type of
Photosynthesis: Quinoa (C3) and Amaranth (C4). Russian Journal of Plant
Physiology, 70, 117.

Rehman, A., Imran, M., Sajjad, M., Umair, R., Nawaz, S., & Ijaz, B. (2025). Evaluation of
herbicide efficiency and their impact with reduced rates along with adjuvants at varying
application time in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agricultural Research (JAR)., 63, 49-
57.
Riechmann, J. L., Heard, J., Martin, G., Reuber, L., Jiang, C. Z., Keddie, J., ... & -L. Yu, G.
(2000). Arabidopsis transcription factors: genome-wide comparative analysis among
eukaryotes. Science, 290, 2105-2110.

Robarts, D. W., & Wolfe, A. D. (2014). Sequence‐related amplified polymorphism (SRAP)

markers: A potential resource for studies in plant molecular biology1. Applications in
plant sciences, 2, 1400017.

Robson, F., Costa, M. M. R., Hepworth, S. R., Vizir, I., Pin˜ eiro, M., Reeves, P. H., &
Coupland, G. (2001). Functional importance of conserved domains in the flowering‐time
gene CONSTANS demonstrated by analysis of mutant alleles and transgenic plants. The
Plant Journal, 28, 619-631.

Ruas, P. M., Ruas, P. M., Bonifacio, A., Bonifacio, A., Ruas, C. F., Ruas, C. F., & Andersen, W.
R. (1999). Genetic relationship among 19 accessions of six species of Chenopodium L.,
by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA fragments (RAPD). Euphytica, 105, 25-32.

Ruiz, K. B., Biondi, S., Martínez, E. A., Orsini, F., Antognoni, F., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2016).
Quinoa–a model crop for understanding salt-tolerance mechanisms in halophytes. Plant
Biosystems-An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 150, 357-
371.

Ruiz, K. B., Biondi, S., Oses, R., Acuña-Rodríguez, I. S., Antognoni, F., Martinez-Mosqueira, E.
A., & Molina-Montenegro, M. A. (2014). Quinoa biodiversity and sustainability for food
security under climate change. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 34,
349-359.
Sajjad, M., Hussain, K., Wajid, S. A., & Saqib, Z. A. (2024). The impact of split nitrogen
fertilizer applications on the productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of rice. Nitrogen, 6,
1.
Salazar, J., de Lourdes Torres, M., Gutierrez, B., & Torres, A. F. (2019). Molecular
characterization of Ecuadorian quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) diversity:
implications for conservation and breeding. Euphytica, 215, 60.

Shakeel, A., Anjum, L., Ibni Zamir, S., Rizwan, M., Arshad, M., Mehmood, Q., ... & Waqas, A.
(2021). Irrigation water quality effects on CO2 emissions along with crop and soil
responses. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 58, 637-642.
Sohaib, N., Arif, M., Shah, M. N., Mahmood, S., Ali, H., Amjid, M., ... & Anwar, H. (2023).
Exploring the Role of Anti-Oxidant on Growth and Yield of Cotton to Mitigate the Heat
Stress.
Sosa‐Zuniga, V., Brito, V., Fuentes, F., & Steinfort, U. (2017). Phenological growth stages of
quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) based on the BBCH scale. Annals of Applied
Biology, 171, 117-124.

Stuecker, M. F., Tigchelaar, M., & Kantar, M. B. (2018). Climate variability impacts on rice
production in the Philippines. PloS one, 13, e0201426.

Sun, H., Luan, G., Ma, Y., Lou, W., Chen, R., Feng, D., & Lu, X. (2023). Engineered
hypermutation adapts cyanobacterial photosynthesis to combined high light and high
temperature stress. Nature Communications, 14, 1238.

Suzuki, N., Rivero, R. M., Shulaev, V., Blumwald, E., & Mittler, R. (2014). Abiotic and biotic
stress combinations. New Phytologist, 203, 32-43.

Taaime, N., El Mejahed, K., Moussafir, M., Bouabid, R., Oukarroum, A., Choukr-Allah, R., &
El Gharous, M. (2022). Early sowing of quinoa cultivars, benefits from rainy season and
enhances quinoa development, growth, and yield under arid condition in
Morocco. Sustainability, 14, 4010.

Tang, Y., Li, X., Chen, P. X., Zhang, B., Hernandez, M., Zhang, H., & Tsao, R. (2015).
Characterisation of fatty acid, carotenoid, tocopherol/tocotrienol compositions and
antioxidant activities in seeds of three Chenopodium quinoa Willd. genotypes. Food
chemistry, 174, 502-508.
Tian, X., Li, Z., Liu, Y., & Li, W. (2023). Role of tillage measures in mitigating waterlogging
damage in rapeseed. BMC Plant Biology, 23, 231.

Zahra, N., Hafeez, M. B., Ghaffar, A., Kausar, A., Al Zeidi, M., Siddique, K. H., & Farooq, M.
(2023). Plant photosynthesis under heat stress: Effects and management. Environmental
and Experimental Botany, 206, 105178.

Zhang, T., Gu, M., Liu, Y., Lv, Y., Zhou, L., Lu, H., & Zhao, H. (2017). Development of novel
InDel markers and genetic diversity in Chenopodium quinoa through whole-genome re-
sequencing. BMC genomics, 18, 685.

Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., Li, T., Zhang, X., & Wang, L. (2022). Enhance production of γ-
aminobutyric acid (GABA) and improve the function of fermented quinoa by cold
stress. Foods, 11, 3908.

Zheng, L., Zhao, Y., Gan, Y., Li, H., Luo, S., Liu, X., & Ma, C. (2022). Full-length
transcriptome sequencing reveals the impact of cold stress on alternative splicing in
quinoa. International journal of molecular sciences, 23, 5724.