03/04/2025
ase
C ase
C ourt
C I tem Room links
no. name name Stage/Order no. no.
S(COM
C SSET
A Vide order dated 03.10.2024, the Hon‟ble 4 R - 3, ttps://jrdh
h
M)- RECONST EFORE
B ourt framed issues and learned Local
C EW
N c.webex.co
885/202 RUCTION MS. Commissioner has been appointed for COURT m/join/jrd
2 I.A. COMPANY SHUCHI recording of evidence. 2. As per office note, S hc3
21677/20 (INDIA) LALER, list of witnesses filed by This is a digitally BLOCK
22 I.A. LIMITED JOINT signed order. The authenticity of the order (GROU
21679/2 VERSUS REGISTR can be re-verified from Delhi High Court ND
022 I.A. ACHAL AR Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown FLOOR)
10642/2 INFRASTR (JUDICIA above. The Order is downloaded from the ,(OS-A)
023 I.A. UCTURE L) DHC Server on 02/04/2025 at 16:43:53
8490/20 PRIVATE defendant no.1. Evidence by way of affidavit
2 LIMITED filed by plaintiff. List of witnesses of plaintiff
& ORS. returned under objections. Appropriate steps
in this regard be taken. 3. Learned counsels
for parties submit that the evidence is being
recorded before learned Local
Commissioner. Matter is adjourned. 4.
Re-notify the matter on 03.04.2025.
S
C NTERO
E one for plaintiff. Sh. Sandeep Joshi, Ld.
N 2 22
(COMM)/ HEALTHCA South-Ea Counsel for defendant. (joined through ttps://dist
h
606/2023 RE t , Saket
s Video Conferencing) Ms. Harshita Lulla, Ld. rictcourtdel
SOLUTION :778 SH. Local Commissioner. (joined through Video hi.webex.co
S PRIVATE BHUPES Conferencing) Evidence not yet concluded m/meet/djc
LIMITED H before Ld. Local Commissioner. Ld. Local omm05-se
VERSUS KUMAR, Commissioner is directed to conclude the
CONTINEN District evidence positively within 15 days and in eeting
M
TAL Judge case parties not lead evidence then Ld. Local ID=2516
CARGO (Commerc Commissioner may be proceed further in 172 7576
CARE PVT. ial accordance with the order dated 28.05.2024
LTD. AND Court)-05 vide which Ld. Local Commissioner was
ARS..
appointed. Put up the matter on 03.04.2025,
for awaiting of report of Ld. Local
Commissioner.
T
C RANAY
P resent: Complainant with Ld. Counsel Ms. 52
P 12
Cases/19 KAPOOR ast,
E Samaridhi. Sh. Pawan Bedi, Ld. counsel for ain
M ttps://dist
h
65/2018 VERSUS KKD:446 the accused. Accused absent. Today the Court rictcourtdel
GRISISH Sh. matter was listed for DE. The matter is Buildin hi.webex.co
GOSWAM Divyam pending since DE after part m/meet/re
Lila, cross-examination since 02.08.2024. adermm.m
Municipal Thereafter, adjournments have been granted unicipal.eas
Magistrate on two dates i.e. 22.10.2024 and 17.01.2025. t\
A cost of Rs.10,000/- was also imposed on
the accused for such adjournment, however,
the same was not paid till date, nor the
accused is present today for leading the DE.
Ld. counsel for the accused has submitted
that the accused is out side of India and
ccused wants to settle the matter. It appears
a
that accused is deliberately not appearing for
participating in the cross-examination.
Hence, the evidence of the accused DW-1 is
now closed. There is no other DW is present
and hence, the right of the accused to lead
the DE is also now closed. The matter is at
the stage of final arguments, and therefore,
let the parties argue on the merits of the case
on 03.04.2025. The accused is exempted
today on oral application for today. In case,
the final arguments are not led on the next
date, the arguments would be heard
ex-parte. In case, the counsel for the accused
does not appear on the next date and
accused is absent, the bail of the accused will
be cancelled and bail bonds will be forfeited
with out further adjournment, and necessary
warrants for arrest of the accused will also be
issued.
S
C UNION h. Ravi Kumar, Advocate for the Plaintiff
S 1 301 ttps://dist
h
(COMM)/ ANK OF
B hahdar
S through videoconferencing. None for the rictcourtdel
7/2023 INDIA a, defendants, who are already ‘exparte’ vide hi.webex.co
VERSUS KKD766 order dated 05.10.2023. The Ld. Counsel for m/meet/dd
SURENDR Sh. the plaintiff has filed the copies of the c.vc.shahda
A SINGH Brijesh Orders, passed by the Hon’ble Supreme ra02
RATHORE Kumar Court and the Hon’ble NCLAT, in various
Garg, proceedings, with list of documents. The
District same be checked and taken on record. It is
Judge reported by the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
(Commerc that after appointment of the IRP, the
ial Court) present proceedings cannot proceed further.
He has prayed for withdrawal of the present
suit. However, the AR of the plaintiff is
reported to be not available today for making
his statement, regarding withdrawal of the
present suit. On request of the Ld. Counsel
for the plaintiff, adjourned for recording the
statement of the AR of the plaintiff,
regarding withdrawal of the present suit on
03.04.2025.
. B.
S EDIATI
M
PROTECH ON
PRIVATE
VERSUS
DLF
LIMITED
.B
S 11.30 AM TO 2.30 PM
PROTECT RBITRA
A
PRIVATE TION
LTD VS
HURL
