NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

(Ministry of Road Transport and Highways,

Govt. of India)

PRESENTATION ON
1. Construction of service road as well as introduction of grade separated
structures at specified major junctions for improvement of corridor
efficiency of Pampore-Qazigund section of NH-44 for a length 46.835 Km
on LHS and for a length 47.530 Km on RHS in the Union Territory of
Jammu & Kashmir on EPC Mode.
Key Plan of the Project Alignment (Pampore to Qazigund section of NH-44)
 Necessity and Background of Project
• The expected traffic volume as of 2022 is 13257 PCU per day and traffic at the end of Construction
period is expected to be 38773 PCU per day.
• In order to provide LOS-B and considering the provisions of the contained in NHAI OM dated
30.10.2019, 4 lane with service roads has been proposed within the limit of existing ROW &
proposed ROW at canal crossing locations.
The Various benefits of the proposed project highway is as under:-
• Provides direct connectivity to 110 CRPF Battalion headquarters to 163 CRPF Battalion
headquarters.

• Provides Direct connectivity between District HQ of Srinagar and District HQ of Anantnag.

• Provides shortest connectivity between District HQ of Srinagar and District HQ of Jammu via NH-44.

• On route, the project road provides direct connectivity to 16 nos. of villages and indirect
connectivity to 53 nos. of villages.
 Necessity and Background of Project
• The project road is having existing 4-lane divided carriageway with some locations of the project road
having service roads. But the project road from Pampore to Qazigund is widely used by Indian army &
Indian army moves in the formation of convoy. Due to which they block the main 4-lane highway for
security reasons which hinders the common traffic over the main highway and the entire traffic is
diverted thorough the service road. Thus, the construction of service roads becomes necessary for the
smooth and hinderance free movement of common traffic through service road during the conditions of
blockage over main highway. Also, the project road should be upgraded to 4-lane with service road
configuration to provide partial access control.
• The project road provides direct connectivity to Sericulture mill, polythene factory, Safforn fields of
Lethipora, Forest timber yard & Food corporation of India warehouse. Besides, on route there are many
small scales to medium scale industries. The project road provides direct connectivity to 2 stone
crusher quarries.
• The project road connects Government polytechnic IUST campus, Awantipora village. Also, the project
road provides direct connectivity to Birla open mind school at Existing Ch. at 8.870 Km.
 Necessity and Background of Project
• Mode of Project

EPC is being proposed as the model of development.

• Scheme of the Project

The Proposed Highway has been included in the NH(O) scheme .
 Proposed Package of the Project

Total Length
Section District Name
in Km.

Construction of service road as

well as introduction of grade
separated structures at specified
major junctions for
improvement of corridor
Srinagar & LHS = 46.835 Km
I efficiency of Pampore-Qazigund
Anantnag RHS = 47.530 Km
section of NH-44 for a length
46.835 Km on LHS and for a
length 47.530 Km on RHS in the
Union Territory of Jammu &
Kashmir on EPC Mode
 TRAFFIC ON PROJECT HIGHWAY & EXISTING
FAST MOVING VEHICLES SLOW MOVING VEHICLES
Yearwise

Horse Cart
Hand Cart
Car/ Jeep/

Rickshaw
Van/ Taxi

Mini Bus
Wheeler/
Total Total

Wheeler

M-Axle

Bullock
without
Tractor

Tractor
2-Axle

3-Axle

Trailer

Trailer
Truck

Truck

Truck
Three

Cycle

Cycle
Projection of

Auto

LCV

with
Two

Cart
Bus
(No) (PCU)
AADT (PCU)

2022 13766 2173 3972 18 54 311 175 150 180 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 20805 15484
2023 14454 2282 4171 19 57 327 184 158 189 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 21845 16258
2024 15177 2396 4379 20 60 343 193 165 198 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 22938 17071
2025 15936 2516 4598 21 63 360 203 174 208 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 24084 17924
2026 16733 2641 4828 22 66 378 213 182 219 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 25289 18820
2027 17569 2773 5069 23 69 397 223 191 230 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 26553 19761
2028 18448 2912 5323 24 72 417 235 201 241 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 27881 20749
2029 19370 3058 5589 25 76 438 246 211 253 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 29275 21787
2030 20339 3211 5868 27 80 459 259 222 266 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 30738 22876
2031 21356 3371 6162 28 84 482 271 233 279 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 32275 24020
2032 22423 3540 6470 29 88 507 285 244 293 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 33889 25221
2033 23545 3717 6793 31 92 532 299 257 308 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 35584 26482
2034 24722 3902 7133 32 97 559 314 269 323 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 37363 27806
2035 25958 4098 7490 34 102 586 330 283 339 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 39231 29196
2036 27256 4302 7864 36 107 616 346 297 356 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 41192 30656
2037 28619 4518 8258 37 112 647 364 312 374 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 43252 32189
2038 30049 4743 8670 39 118 679 382 327 393 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 45415 33799
2039 31552 4981 9104 41 124 713 401 344 413 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 47685 35488
2040 33130 5230 9559 43 130 748 421 361 433 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 50070 37263
2041 34786 5491 10037 45 136 786 442 379 455 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 52573 39126
2042 36525 5766 10539 48 143 825 464 398 478 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 55202 41082
2043 38352 6054 11066 50 150 866 488 418 501 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 57962 43136
2044 40269 6357 11619 53 158 910 512 439 527 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 60860 45293
 SALIENT FEATURE OF THE PROJECT ROAD
Sr. No. Particulars Proposed Remarks
LHS = 46.835 Km
1 Length (Km) The project road follows the existing alignment within the proposed ROW.
RHS = 47.530 Km
(i) Reconstruction of main c/w
for the approaches of grade Design traffic: 50 MSA for main C/w
separated structures in a length
Design traffic: 20 MSA for service roads
of 10.750 km with flexible
2 Type of Pavement Pavement. (i)Crust composition for main C/w: BC-40 mm, DBM-105, WMM-250mm, GSB-
200mm
(ii) construction of service road
in a length of LHS = 46.835 km (ii) Crust composition for Service roads: BC -40mm, DBM -50mm, AIL -100mm,
& RHS = 47.530 Km with CTB -155mm, GSB -200mm
Flexible pavement

Sl. Design Ch. Type of

Span Arrangement (m) Width (m)
No. (Km) Structure
1 229+180 VUP 1x30.00 2x14.5+1.5
2 231+325 VUP 1x15.00 2x14.5+1.5
3 236+086 VUP 1x20+1x30+1x20 2x14.5+1.5
3 VUPs (Nos.) 09 Nos. 4 238+520 VUP 1x20+2x30+1x20 2x14.5+1.5
5 250+700 VUP 1x20+1x30+1x20 2x14.5+1.5
6 252+070 VUP 1x15+1x30+1x15 2x14.5+1.5
7 259+795 VUP 1x15.00 2x14.5+1.5
8 271+060 VUP 1x30.00 2x14.5+1.5
9 273+470 VUP 1x30.00 2x14.5+1.5

4 Major Bridges (Nos.) Nil -

 SALIENT FEATURE OF THE PROJECT ROAD
Sr. No. Particulars Proposed Remarks

1. At Km 250+315 – 1x18.0 = 18.0 m

5 Minor Bridges (Nos.) 1 Nos.
(widening)

6 ROB/RUB Nil -
7 VOP (Nos.) Nil -

Reconstruction – 02 Nos.
8 Culverts (Nos.) 170 Nos. New Culvert – 35 Nos.
Widening – 133 Nos.
 SALIENT FEATURE OF THE PROJECT ROAD
Sr. No. Particulars Proposed Remarks
9 Toll plaza (Nos.) Nil -
Length of Service Roads LHS = 46.835 Km
10 -
(in Km) RHS = 47.530 Km
11 Bypasses Nil -
12 Realignments Nil -
Open Drains along the Irrigational canals
RCC drain in a length of 69.145 Km side of the project road & RCC Drains on
13 Roadside Drainage (in km)
RCC Open Drain in a length of 18.014 Km both sides of the project road on built-up
locations
14 Major Junctions (Nos.) 10 nos. 7 Nos. – Y, 1 Nos. – T, 2 Nos. - + junctions
22 Nos. – Y, 17 Nos. – T, 23 Nos. - +, 1
15 Minor Junctions (Nos.) 63 nos.
Nos. - Staggered junctions
Base Year (2022): - AADT (No.) – 20805, AADT
(PCU) – 15484
16 Traffic in PCU -
Year of Award (2025)- AADT (No.) – 24084, AADT
(PCU) – 17924
17 Retaining Wall RCC Retaining wall – 1.220 Km To retain the earth slopes
18 Toe wall RCC Toe wall – 0.880 Km To retain the earth slopes
Thrie-Beam Single Faced metal crash barriers –
19 Safety barriers 0.390 Km -
Concrete crash barriers – 20.660 Km
 PROJECT ROAD PAVEMENT DESIGN FOR PACKAGE-III & IV

carriageway: Carriageway is with 2-Lane configuration as per the IRC SP: 73-2018. Design Traffic of 20 MSA
with minimum effective CBR 10%.

For Reconstruction and widening of the For new construction of service

Layer details existing carriageway roads
Minimum layer thickness (mm) Minimum layer thickness (mm)
Bituminous Course (BC) 40 40
Dense Bituminous Macadam
105 50
(DBM)
Aggregate Interlayer (AIL) - 100

Cement Treated Base (CTB) - 155

Wet Mixed macadam (WMM) 250 -

Granular Sub Base (GSB) 200 200
 TOTAL ABSTRACT OF PROJECT COST
ORIGINAL CONTRACT
Bill No. Description
Amount in Rs. Amount in Cr.
1 Road Work
(i) Site-Clearance 1,61,48,474.00 1.61
(ii) Earthwork, Erosion Control & Drainage 24,54,27,309.00 24.54
(iii) Sub-base, Base Courses & Shoulder 97,94,66,385.00 97.95
(iv) Surface Courses (Bituminous) 71,57,44,048.00 71.57
(v) Traffic Signs, Marking and Other Appurtenances 8,40,57,746.00 8.41
(vii) Toe Wall 76,64,490.00 0.77
(viii) Retaining Wall 12,48,65,220.00 12.49
(ix) Lined Canal 17,53,60,578.88 17.54
(x) Junction Improvement 11,94,15,823.08 11.94
(xi) Drainage 60,61,49,634.64 60.61
(xi) Under floor Heating Systems for Preventing Icing on Highways (Lumpsum) 4,94,28,750.00 4.94
2 Structures
(i) Box Culvert 1,05,49,84,972.00 105.50
(ii) Hume Pipe Culvert 41,57,609.00 0.42
(iii) Minor Bridges 3,66,81,039.00 3.67
(iv) VUP 1,67,27,91,064.00 167.28
(v) Flyover 1,71,90,40,767.00 171.90
(vi) Highway Lighting 14,78,59,484.64 14.79
(vii) Utility Shifting 45,48,97,128.39 45.49
(viii) ATMS 6,39,36,412.00 6.39
A Cost Of Civil Works (Sub Total A) 8,27,80,76,935.00 827.81
Cost Per Km 8,77,24,018.00 8.77
ADD 18% GST 1,49,00,53,848.30 149.01
B Cost Of Civil Work Including Taxes (Sub Total B) 9,76,81,30,783.30 976.81
 TOTAL ABSTRACT OF PROJECT COST
ORIGINAL CONTRACT
Bill No. Description
Amount in Rs. Amount in Cr.
B Cost Of Civil Work Including Taxes (Sub Total B) 8,27,80,769.35 8.28
Contingencies @ 1% of A 41,39,03,846.75 41.39
Escalation Charges @ 5% 24,83,42,308.05 24.83
Agency Charges @3% of (A) 24,83,42,308.05 24.83
Supervision charges @ 3% of (A) 1,13,72,428.21 1.14
Supervision charges for Utility Shifting @ 2.5% 20,69,51,923.38 20.70
Maintenance charges @ 2.5% of (A) for 4 years 1,21,16,93,583.78 121.17
C Sub Total (C) 1,24,17,11,540.25 124.17
D L.A. COST (Tentative and will be finalized after JMS) 12,22,15,35,907.33 1,222.15
Total Project Cost (TPC) To Be Borne by Developer (B+C+D) 12,95,13,441.50 12.95
Total project Cost Per Km 8,27,80,769.35 8.28
 NORMATIVE COST
Normative Cost Comparison
As Per MoRTH Circular no. RW/NH-24036/27/2010-PPP Dated - 25/04/2018
Estimated Cost Estimated Cost Normative Cost Normative Cost
Sl. No. Description Unit Scope Difference (in Cr) Remarks
(in Cr) per Unit (in Cr) per Unit (in Cr) (in Cr)
1 Main Carriageway
2 Service/Slip Road
(i) Service Road (7m) Km. 90.810 195.68 2.15 4.19 380.72 185.04 Estimated Cost < Normative Cost
3 Structures
Estimated Cost > Normative Cost Estimated cost
is much higher than the normative cost as
estimated cost is calculated while considering lead
(i) Minor Bridge Sqm. 324.00 3.67 0.0113213 0.0036037 1.17 -2.50 charges for aggregates and sand, while there is no
change in normative cost for structures after
increasing Lead distance. Therefore, it is not
possible to compare structure costs.
4 Flyover/Underpasses/Overpasses
(i) Vehicular Underpass (VUP) Sqm. 3,659.20 30.91 0.0084483 0.0036926 13.51 -17.40 Estimated Cost > Normative Cost Estimated cost
is much higher than the normative cost as
estimated cost is calculated while considering lead
charges for aggregates and sand, while there is no
(ii) Flyover Sqm. 8,700.00 57.97 0.0066629 0.0039124 34.04 -23.93
change in normative cost for structures after
increasing Lead distance. Therefore, it is not
possible to compare structure costs.
5 Reinforced Earth Wall
(i) Reinforced Earth Wall Sqm. 96,236.35 250.30 0.0026009 0.0027561 265.24 14.93 Estimated Cost < Normative Cost
6 Culverts (Box, Slab & Pipe)
Estimated Cost > Normative Cost. The Estimated
Cost of Box Culvert Includes cost of Retaining
(i) Box Culvert RMT 3,874.25 105.50 0.0272307 0.0115288 44.67 -60.83 Wall and Protection works also. And there is no
such information whether these are included in
normative cost or not.
(ii) Hume Pipe Culvert RMT 168.50 0.42 0.0024674 0.0025483 0.43 0.01 Estimated Cost > Normative Cost
7 Junction Improvement
(i) Major Nos 10.00 0.8917519
11.94 0.1658553 42.14 30.20 Estimated Cost < Normative Cost
(ii) Minor Nos 62.00 0.5357988
8 Toe Wall RMT 861.50 0.77 0.0008897 0.0025079 2.16 1.39 Estimated Cost < Normative Cost
9 Retaining Wall RMT 1,202.00 12.49 0.0103881 0.0049043 5.89 -6.59 Estimated Cost > Normative Cost
10 • LinedNormative cost
Canal & Drainage has not been calculated
RMTas per 88,356.00
the morth circular
78.15 for the0.0008845
year 2021 because
0.0007344 it does not64.89
contain the calculations
-13.26 as perEstimated
Hilly Cost
terrain
> Normative Cost
Estimated Cost > Normative Cost Estimated cost
11 Metal Beam Crash Barrier RMT 590.00 0.28 0.0004753 0.0003496 0.21 -0.07
is calculated for Thrie Beam Crash Barrier
 NORMATIVE COST
Normative Cost Comparison
As Per MoRTH Circular no. RW/NH-24036/27/2010-PPP Dated - 25/04/2018
Estimated Cost Estimated Cost Normative Cost Normative Cost Difference (in
Sl. No. Description Unit Scope Remarks
(in Cr) per Unit (in Cr) per Unit (in Cr) (in Cr) Cr)
Items with No Provision of Normative Cost in Tool
a Horticulture LS - - - No provision in normative tool.
b Highway Lighting LS 14.79 14.79 - No provision in normative tool.
c Traffic Signages LS 3.83 3.83 - No provision in normative tool.
d ATMS LS 6.39 6.39 - No provision in normative tool.
e Utility Shifting LS 45.49 45.49 - No provision in normative tool.
Under floor Heating Systems for Preventing Icing
F LS 4.94 4.94 - No provision in normative tool.
on Highways
Total Cost 827.81 929.85 102.05 Estimated Cost < Normative Cost
Length of Service Road 94.36 94.36
Per Km Cost 8.77 9.85 1.08 Estimated Cost < Normative Cost
Typical Cross sections
THANK YOU