[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views3 pages

MFAM 515 Chapter 4 Outline

Chapter 4 discusses interventions for crises involving suicidal ideation, risk assessment, and the management of clients who may be a danger to themselves or others. It outlines risk factors, symptoms, and various intervention strategies based on risk levels, including low, medium, and high risk. Additionally, it addresses non-suicidal self-injury, homicidal clients, and the challenges of working with gravely disabled individuals, emphasizing the importance of appropriate assessments and potential hospitalization.

Uploaded by

benjamin.balisky
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views3 pages

MFAM 515 Chapter 4 Outline

Chapter 4 discusses interventions for crises involving suicidal ideation, risk assessment, and the management of clients who may be a danger to themselves or others. It outlines risk factors, symptoms, and various intervention strategies based on risk levels, including low, medium, and high risk. Additionally, it addresses non-suicidal self-injury, homicidal clients, and the challenges of working with gravely disabled individuals, emphasizing the importance of appropriate assessments and potential hospitalization.

Uploaded by

benjamin.balisky
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Chapter 4 - Intervening with Crises related with danger to self, others or being gravely

disabled.

Suicidal Ideation: Results when a client is totally overwhelmed because of perception of


variety of events.
●​ Risk Factors: Unemployment, illness, impulsivity, rigid thinking (all or nothing),
stressful events, hospitalizations.
●​ Some statistics:
○​ 12.9/100k suicides in the US.
○​ 10th most leading cause of death.
○​ 3.5X more often than women.
○​ 7/10 suicides were white males 2014
○​ Whites highest in suicide. 2nd highest american indian.
●​ Symptoms and clues: Usually preceded by a warning. Clients do not always tell
crisis workers directly.
○​ Giving things away, withdrawal from usual activities, feeling hopeless or
worthless
●​ Most suicidal clients feel relieved with counselors ask client about thoughts of
self harm.

Suicidal Assessment: Purpose is to assess for signs of suicide to determine risk level.
●​ Not a single way to conduct a suicide assessment. Counselors must use discretion.
●​ Risk level leads to appropriate intervention.
●​ (SIS-MAP) developed by Shrivastava and Nelson: Scale Impact of Suicidality -
Management Assessment Planning.
○​ Balance risk and resilience factors. Fairly new scale.
○​ Multiple domains that contribute:
■​ Demographics, ideations, coping methods, current mental state, future
plans, comorbidities (drugs/alcohol), family history, biological (medical),
protective factors, economic/environmental problems (finances, support
groups, access to healthcare), and Psychiatric disorders.
●​ Table 4.1 Short and Simple Suicide Risk Assessment: Classification Tree approach.
Each next question is contingent on the previous answer.
○​ Factor → Client Response → Risk Level → Intervention.
○​ Answers to previous questions determine which question follows based on risk.
○​ Ideation(yes,no) → Plan (yes,no) low risk [if yes go to means] → Means
(yes,no) med risk [if yes ask for possible prevention] → Self Prevention (yes,no)
[if yes: med risk, if no: high risk]
■​ Low: Maintain regular contact, no-suicide contract plan.
■​ Med: (low+) Family watch, support groups, give weapons to counselors,
encourage prevention, reason, reframe, and support.
●​ Caplan’s characteristics of coping behavior to instill hope and
optimism.
■​ High: Involuntary hospitalization. Voluntary preference. Medication.

Risk Levels and Interventions


●​ Low-Risk suicidal clients: Never tried, has adequate support, fear act.
○​ “I thought about it. Scared to have feelings like this. Need someone to talk to.”
○​ Encouraged to make an appointment with an outpatient therapist.
○​ Educational interventions/ books.
○​ Reframing: “The part of you that sought help is strong.”
○​ Elderly people often consider suicide after the death of a spouse (require
medication, senior centers, out patient therapy.)
●​ Med Risk Suicidal: Often difficult to evaluate. They can still function but believe there is
no way out.
○​ Families may ignore or not take client threats seriously. Clients may carry out
threats of reaction.
○​ No-suicide contract, monitor with dail phone calls, enlist family help,
hospitalization as last resort.
○​ Ask client to bring the Means or suicidal weapons to counselor.
○​ Address ambivalence of clients and focus on the part that wants to live and future
plans.
●​ High Risk: “I am going to kill myself and you cannot stop me.”
○​ Very depressed and angry. Tried suicide before.
○​ Lack of support.
○​ Viable plans with the means.
○​ If possible, convince the client to admit himself voluntarily. This empowers
clients and reduces conflict.
■​ Involuntary hospitalization may be necessary (local police or PET
Psychiatric Emergency Team.
●​ Sometimes state law.
●​ Mental illness might also require hospitalization and medication.

Phenomenoligical Understanding of Suicide: Subjective and unique view of clients suicidal


thoughts and behaviors past and present.
●​ B section of ABC model of intervention.
●​ While gathering objective information explore subjective perceptions of the client.
●​ Suicide might seem to be a more viable alternative at times during stressors.
○​ Chronic family fighting, tough economy, confused social roles.

Non-Suicidal Self Injury (NSSI): Deliberatley damaging ones own body tissue without suicidal
intent.
●​ Six Criteria:
○​ Five or more days in the past year with intentional self inflicted damage with
absence of suicidal intent.
○​ Engage in self-injurious behavior for relief from negative feeling or cognitive
state, resolve interpersonal difficulty or induce a positive feeling state.
○​ Self-injury associated with negative thoughts or feelings.
○​ Behavior is not socially sanctioned.
○​ Behavior causes significant distress and interferes with areas of functioning.
○​ Behavior not better explained by another syndrome related to psychosis.
●​ Interventions: Cognitive Behavioral components creating a safe and nonthreatening
structured environment,
○​ Also psychodynamic and psychotherapy.
○​ Group therapy.
○​ SAFE self abuse finally ends support groups.

Client Who Is a Danger to Others

●​ Homicidal Client: Crisis worker must warn the intended victim and contact the police.
○​ May be a threat to the public because of psychosis.
○​ Homicidal ideation: psychiatric term for thoughts about homicide which range
from value ideas of revenge to detailed plans about the act.
○​ 10-17% of patient presentations to psychiatric facilities.
○​ Results from psychosis, delirium, personality disorders, substance-induced
psychosis.
●​ Risk Factors:
○​ History of violence.
○​ Thoughts of committing harm.
○​ Poor impulse control
○​ Delusions/hallucinations.
○​ Perception of rejection.
○​ Influence of substances.
○​ Antisocial personality disorder.

Psychotic Breakdowns and Gravely Disabled

Gravely Disabled: Client suffering from psychotic decompensation. State of active


delusions and hallucinations. Out of touch with reality.
●​ Extreme personality disorganization and heightened states of anxiety. Cannot function in
any way.
●​ Sometimes a client's psychotic thoughts can leave them both disabled and catatonic.
●​ Suicide by psychosis is possible.
●​ Crisis worker may need to be the client's ego strength until the client returns to a realistic
state of function.
●​ Cannot look after their basic needs: food, water or keep themselves clean.
●​ May be grounds for involuntary hospitalization and stabilization with medication.
●​ Stabilization period depends on severity of psychosocial stressor, client premorbid
function, and other support systems.
●​ The Mental Status Exam:
○​ Formal assessment tool aid to determine if someone is psychotic, gravely
disabled, danger to self or others
○​ Describes a person's state of mind under domains of: appearance, attitude,
behavior, speech, mood, thought process, thought content, perception, cognition,
insight, and judgment.

You might also like