Kode

Dokumen
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni
Program Studi S1 Sastra Inggris

RENCANA PEMBELAJARAN SEMESTER

MATA KULIAH (MK) KODE Rumpun MK BOBOT (sks) SEMESTER Tgl
Penyusunan
Functional Grammar 7920203281 Mata Kuliah Wajib T=3 P=0 ECTS=4.77 2 23 Juni 2025
Program Studi
OTORISASI Pengembang RPS Koordinator RMK Koordinator Program Studi

....................................... ....................................... Dr. Ali Mustofa, S.S., M.Pd.

Model Case Study

Pembelajaran
Capaian CPL-PRODI yang dibebankan pada MK
Pembelajaran
(CP) CPL-3 Mengembangkan pemikiran logis, kritis, sistematis, dan kreatif dalam melakukan pekerjaan yang spesifik di
bidang keahliannya serta sesuai dengan standar kompetensi kerja bidang yang bersangkutan
CPL-5 Mampu mengaplikasikan konsep dan teori Linguistik dasar dalam Bahasa Inggris untuk merespons beragam
fenomena bahasa
CPL-7 Mampu mengaplikasikan konsep dan teori budaya untuk menganalisis serta merespons fenomena sosial budaya
dengan cara yang responsif terhadap budaya
CPL-11 Mampu mendemonstrasikan kemampuan berbahasa Inggris, yang ditunjukkan dengan pencapaian skor tes
kemampuan Bahasa Inggris yang setara dengan minimal CEFR level B2
Capaian Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah (CPMK)
CPMK - 1 Demonstrate proficiency in Functional Grammar for communicative purpose in social context
CPMK - 2 Understand the form, function, and structure of linguistic unit based on Functional Grammar from different texts
CPMK - 3 Identify the language in use in different texts and genres based on Functional Grammar perspective
CPMK - 4 Analyze texts in various sociocultural context using Functional Grammar
Matrik CPL - CPMK

CPMK CPL-3 CPL-5 CPL-7 CPL-11

CPMK-1 ✔

CPMK-2 ✔

CPMK-3 ✔

CPMK-4 ✔

Matrik CPMK pada Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-CPMK)

CPMK Minggu Ke

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

CPMK-1 ✔

CPMK-2 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

CPMK-3 ✔ ✔ ✔

CPMK-4 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Deskripsi This course equips students with practical skills in applying functional grammar principles to analyze and interpret language in real-
Singkat MK world contexts. It integrates theoretical foundations with hands-on application, emphasizing the functional perspective of grammar
and its relevance in understanding how language functions in communication. The Students will be introduced to the framework for
analyzing grammar and meaning along three dimensions: (1) how language represents states and activities, (2) how language
functions in the interaction between people, and (3) how information is structured in sentences and texts. Through theoretical inputs
and practical activities, students will raise their awareness of how language users convey meaning through their choice of words
and grammatical structures in specific situations. The course will additionally include analyses of authentic texts in various genres,
touching upon various SDG issues focused on gender equality (SDG 5), reduced inequality (SDG 10), and no poverty (SDG 1). This
course will use a range of assessment tasks including text analyses and interpretation, projects, and written tests. By the end of the
course, the students will deepen their understanding of grammatical structures and their functional significance in various genres
while also carrying out critical analyses and developing collaboration skills essential for future academic and professional
endeavors.

Pustaka Utama :

1. Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
2. Bartlett, T., & O'Grady, G. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics. London: Routledge.
3. Halliday, MAK, Matthiesen, CMIM. 2001. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd Edition. London. Hodder Headline
Group.
4. Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Benjamins.
5. Meyer, C. F. (2009). The structure of English texts. In Introducing English Linguistics (pp. 79–110). chapter, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.

Pendukung :

1. SDG 5: https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/gender-equality
2. SDG 10: https://unglobalcompact.org/take-action/action/dei
3. SDG 1: https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/ending-poverty

Dosen Dr. Dian Rivia Himmawati, S.S., M.Hum.

Pengampu Lisetyo Ariyanti, S.S., M.Pd.
Ayunita Leliana, S.S., M.Pd.
Fariq Shiddiq Tasaufy, S.S., M.Hum.
Cicilia Deandra Maya Putri, S.Hum., M.A.
Bantuk Pembelajaran,
Kemampuan akhir Penilaian Metode Pembelajaran,
Penugasan Mahasiswa, Materi Bobot
Mg Ke- tiap tahapan [ Estimasi Waktu] Pembelajaran Penilaian
belajar [ Pustaka ] (%)
(Sub-CPMK) Indikator Kriteria & Bentuk Luring Daring (online)
(offline)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
1 Able to understand Explaining the Kriteria: Interactive Materi: 2%
the scope of scope of 1.Class discussion learning; introduction to
Minggu ke 1

Functional Grammar Functional

Grammar in 2.Class Small functional
communicative participation Group grammar
functions (oral discussion Pustaka:
and written). Bentuk Penilaian : 3 X 50 Halliday,
Aktifitas Partisipasif MAK,
Matthiesen,
CMIM. 2001.
An
Introduction to
Functional
Grammar, 3rd
Edition.
London.
Hodder
Headline
Group

Materi:
Introduction to
Functional
Grammar in
Use
Pustaka:
Fontaine, L.
(2012).
Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.
 2 Able to understand Explaining the Kriteria: Interactive Materi: The 3%
the dimension of text concept of 1.Class discussion learning; dimension of
Minggu ke 2

and context register, genre,

field, mode and 2.Class Small text
tenor. participation Group Pustaka:
discussion Meyer, C. F.
Bentuk Penilaian : 3 X 50 (2009). The
Aktifitas Partisipasif structure of
English texts.
In Introducing
English
Linguistics
(pp. 79–110).
chapter,
Cambridge:
Cambridge
University
Press.

Materi:
Context: Field,
Mode, and
Tenor
Pustaka:
Martin, J. R.
(1992).
English Text:
System and
Structure.
Benjamins.
3 Able to explain the Clearly explains Kriteria: Interactive Materi: The 3%
structure of text how the text’s 1.Class discussion learning; component of
Minggu ke 3

structure supports
the overall 2.Class Small text
message or participation Group Pustaka:
purpose in each discussion Meyer, C. F.
stage, including Bentuk Penilaian : 3 X 50
how ideas are (2009). The
Aktifitas Partisipasif structure of
organised and
how transitions English texts.
are used
In Introducing
English
Linguistics
(pp. 79–110).
chapter,
Cambridge:
Cambridge
University
Press.

Materi: Text's
structure and
stages
Pustaka:
Martin, J. R.
(1992).
English Text:
System and
Structure.
Benjamins.
 4 Able to explain the Summarize the Kriteria: Interactive Materi: Rank 3%
form and function of concept of rank 1.Class discussion learning; system;
Minggu ke 4

the ranks system systems; Clause,

within the text groups, words 2.Mind-Mapping Small clause
and morpheme presentation Group complex,
discussion clause,
Bentuk Penilaian : 3 X 50 groups,
Aktifitas Partisipasif morpheme
Pustaka:
Fontaine, L.
(2012).
Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.

Materi: Rank
system;
clause
complex,
clause,
groups,
morpheme
Pustaka:
Bartlett, T., &
O'Grady, G.
(Eds.). (2017).
The
Routledge
handbook of
systemic
functional
linguistics.
London:
Routledge.

5 Able to Identify the Identify specific Kriteria: Case study; Materi: Rank 3%
form and function of ranks or levels Presenting the Small system;
Minggu ke 5

ranks system within described in the accuracy and

text given text Group clause, groups
completeness of
identifying discussion and word
ranks/levels in a 3 X 50 Pustaka:
text Fontaine, L.
(2012).
Bentuk Penilaian :
Analysing
Aktifitas Partisipasif
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.

Materi: The
function of
groups
Pustaka:
Bartlett, T., &
O'Grady, G.
(Eds.). (2017).
The
Routledge
handbook of
systemic
functional
linguistics.
London:
Routledge.
 6 Able to explain the Classify the Kriteria: Interactive Materi: 3%
Experiential process, 1.Class discussion learning; Experiential
Minggu ke 6

Metafunction participants, and

circumstances 2.Multiple-Choice Small Metafunction
from various Questions Group Pustaka:
genres discussion Fontaine, L.
Bentuk Penilaian : 3 X 50 (2012).
Aktifitas Partisipasif Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.

Materi: Types
of Process
and
Experiential
elements
Pustaka:
Fontaine, L.
(2012).
Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.

7 Able to Identify the Identify transitivity Kriteria: Case study; Materi: 4%

form and function of of clauses from Text analysis and Small Experiential
Minggu ke 7

Experiential different genre of discussion

Metafunction text. Group Metafunction
discussion Pustaka:
Bentuk Penilaian : 3 X 50 Fontaine, L.
Aktifitas Partisipasif
(2012).
Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.

Materi:
Process and
other
Experiential
elements
Pustaka:
Fontaine, L.
(2012).
Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.
 8 Able to analyse the Identify the ranks Kriteria: Case study Materi: 25%
ranks and transitivity and transitivity Case Analysis; Mid 3 X 50 Structure of
Minggu ke 8

within the text in the within the text Term Test

chosen genre from music lyric text
orally. Pustaka:
Bentuk Penilaian :
Bartlett, T., &
Tes
O'Grady, G.
(Eds.). (2017).
The
Routledge
handbook of
systemic
functional
linguistics.
London:
Routledge.

Materi: Rank
System
Pustaka:
Martin, J. R.
(1992).
English Text:
System and
Structure.
Benjamins.

Materi:
Metafunction
Pustaka:
Bartlett, T., &
O'Grady, G.
(Eds.). (2017).
The
Routledge
handbook of
systemic
functional
linguistics.
London:
Routledge.

9 Able to Explain the Outline the Kriteria: Interactive Materi: 3%

Interpersonal elements of Class discussion learning; MOOD
Minggu ke 9

Metafunction Interpersonal
Metafucntion; Small System
mood system and Bentuk Penilaian : Group Pustaka:
finite elements Aktifitas Partisipasif discussion Fontaine, L.
3 X 50 (2012).
Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.

Materi: Finite
elements
Pustaka:
Bartlett, T., &
O'Grady, G.
(Eds.). (2017).
The
Routledge
handbook of
systemic
functional
linguistics.
London:
Routledge.
 10 Able to Identify the Identify the Mood Kriteria: Small group Materi: 3%
form and function of relation between Text analysis and discussion; MOOD
Minggu ke 10

Interpersonal Subject and Finite small group

Metafunction of clause within Case study System
discussion
the text 3 X 50 Pustaka:
Bentuk Penilaian : Fontaine, L.
Aktifitas Partisipasif (2012).
Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.

Materi: Finite
elements
Pustaka:
Bartlett, T., &
O'Grady, G.
(Eds.). (2017).
The
Routledge
handbook of
systemic
functional
linguistics.
London:
Routledge.

11 Able to Explain the Explain orally the Kriteria: Case study Materi: Given 3%
Textual Metafunction difference Small group on text and New
Minggu ke 11

between of discussion
topical, related to information
interpersonal and SDG‘s 5 Pustaka:
Bentuk Penilaian :
textual theme (gender); Fontaine, L.
Aktifitas Partisipasif Small group (2012).
discussion Analysing
3 X 50
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.

Materi:
Structure of
Textual
Metafunction
Pustaka:
Fontaine, L.
(2012).
Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.
 12 Able to Identify the 1.To identify the Kriteria: Interactive Materi: Given 3%
form and function thematization Text analysis and learning; and New
Minggu ke 12

Identify the Textual small group

Metafunction of text Case study information
discussion
2.To identify the 3 X 50 Pustaka:
organisation Bentuk Penilaian : Fontaine, L.
of selected Aktifitas Partisipasif, (2012).
texts Penilaian Portofolio Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.

Materi:
Structure of
Textual
Metafunction
Pustaka:
Fontaine, L.
(2012).
Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.

13 Able to apply the 1.Identify the Kriteria: Interactive Materi: How 3%

concept of three metafunction Class discussion learning; to analyse text
Minggu ke 13

Metafunctions
structure of Small group using three
clause from Bentuk Penilaian : discussion metafunction
various texts Aktifitas Partisipasif 3 X 50 Pustaka:
2.Apply the Fontaine, L.
concept of the (2012).
thee Analysing
metafunction
English
to analyse the
grammar: A
text
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.
 14 Able to Interpret text Able to examine Kriteria: Case study; Materi: The 5%
based on three the clause Individual individual relation
Minggu ke 14

Metafunctions metafunctional presentation

structure presentation between each
3 X 50 metafunction.
Bentuk Penilaian : Pustaka:
Aktifitas Partisipasif,
Fontaine, L.
Penilaian Portofolio
(2012).
Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.

Materi: How
to interpret the
text
Pustaka:
Fontaine, L.
(2012).
Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.

15 Able to Interpret text Students able to Kriteria: Group text Materi: How 4%
based on three compare the Group presentation analysis to interpret the
Minggu ke 15

Metafunctions metafunctional
structure (Deadline: text using
Bentuk Penilaian : week 15) Functional
Aktifitas Partisipasif 3 X 50 Grammar
Pustaka:
Fontaine, L.
(2012).
Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.
 16 Able to analyze song 1.Identify the Kriteria: Take-home exam; LMS Materi: 30%
lyric based on metafunctional Video presentation 3 x 50 evaluate and
Minggu ke 16

Functional Gramar
structure compose an
2.Compare the Bentuk Penilaian : analysis of the
metafunctional Aktifitas Partisipasif, selected text
structure Penilaian Hasil Pustaka:
3.Interpret the Project / Penilaian Halliday,
text based on Produk
MAK,
metafuntional Matthiesen,
structure
CMIM. 2001.
An
Introduction to
Functional
Grammar, 3rd
Edition.
London.
Hodder
Headline
Group

Materi:
Analysing text
using
Functional
Grammar
Pustaka:
Fontaine, L.
(2012).
Analysing
English
grammar: A
systemic
functional
introduction.
Cambridge
University
Press.

Rekap Persentase Evaluasi : Case Study

No Evaluasi Persentase
1. Aktifitas Partisipasif 56%
2. Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk 15%
3. Penilaian Portofolio 4%
4. Tes 25%
100%

Catatan
1. Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Prodi (CPL - Prodi) adalah kemampuan yang dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan prodi yang
merupakan internalisasi dari sikap, penguasaan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan sesuai dengan jenjang prodinya yang
diperoleh melalui proses pembelajaran.
2. CPL yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah adalah beberapa capaian pembelajaran lulusan program studi (CPL-Prodi) yang
digunakan untuk pembentukan/pengembangan sebuah mata kuliah yang terdiri dari aspek sikap, ketrampulan umum,
ketrampilan khusus dan pengetahuan.
3. CP Mata kuliah (CPMK) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari CPL yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah,
dan bersifat spesifik terhadap bahan kajian atau materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
4. Sub-CPMK Mata kuliah (Sub-CPMK) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari CPMK yang dapat diukur
atau diamati dan merupakan kemampuan akhir yang direncanakan pada tiap tahap pembelajaran, dan bersifat spesifik
terhadap materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
5. Indikator penilaian kemampuan dalam proses maupun hasil belajar mahasiswa adalah pernyataan spesifik dan terukur
yang mengidentifikasi kemampuan atau kinerja hasil belajar mahasiswa yang disertai bukti-bukti.
6. Kreteria Penilaian adalah patokan yang digunakan sebagai ukuran atau tolok ukur ketercapaian pembelajaran dalam
penilaian berdasarkan indikator-indikator yang telah ditetapkan. Kreteria penilaian merupakan pedoman bagi penilai agar
penilaian konsisten dan tidak bias. Kreteria dapat berupa kuantitatif ataupun kualitatif.
7. Bentuk penilaian: tes dan non-tes.
8. Bentuk pembelajaran: Kuliah, Responsi, Tutorial, Seminar atau yang setara, Praktikum, Praktik Studio, Praktik Bengkel,
Praktik Lapangan, Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan/atau bentuk pembelajaran lain yang setara.
9. Metode Pembelajaran: Small Group Discussion, Role-Play & Simulation, Discovery Learning, Self-Directed Learning,
Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, Contextual Learning, Project Based Learning, dan metode lainnya yg setara.
10. Materi Pembelajaran adalah rincian atau uraian dari bahan kajian yg dapat disajikan dalam bentuk beberapa pokok dan
sub-pokok bahasan.
11. Bobot penilaian adalah prosentasi penilaian terhadap setiap pencapaian sub-CPMK yang besarnya proposional dengan
tingkat kesulitan pencapaian sub-CPMK tsb., dan totalnya 100%.
12. TM=Tatap Muka, PT=Penugasan terstruktur, BM=Belajar mandiri.
 RPS ini telah divalidasi pada tanggal 6 Maret 2024

Koordinator Program Studi S1 UPM Program Studi S1 Sastra

Sastra Inggris Inggris

Dr. Ali Mustofa, S.S., M.Pd. Uci Elly Kholidah, S.S., M.A.
NIDN 0014067509 NIDN 0023069001

File PDF ini digenerate pada tanggal 23 Juni 2025 Jam 21:29 menggunakan aplikasi RPS-OBE SiDia Unesa