Salmonella Resilience Limits Antibiotic Efficacy
Salmonella Resilience Limits Antibiotic Efficacy
[Link] Joseph Fanous1,2, Beatrice Claudi1,2, Vishwachi Tripathi1, Jiagui Li1, Frédéric Goormaghtigh1 &
Dirk Bumann1 ✉
Received: 18 January 2023
Effective antimicrobial therapy is crucial for control of bacterial infec- and prodrug of ciprofloxacin), which is distributed organism-wide11
tions. Antimicrobial resistance can impede treatment success, but within approximately 10 min. After 1 h, we euthanized the mice and
eradication failures occur even in the absence of resistance6. These recovered an approximately 20-fold diminished number of Salmonella
failures are often attributed to host stresses that trigger bacterial drug colony-forming units (CFUs) from the major target organ spleen12. This
tolerance1 and/or subsets of bacteria, such as persisters, that are refrac- CFU loss was around 300-fold slower compared with standard labora-
tory to killing2. Supporting evidence comes mostly from laboratory tory conditions for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (exponential
conditions, and the relevance under physiological conditions remains growth in Mueller–Hinton broth under normoxia at 37 °C) with an equiv-
unclear. Here we determined the quantitative effect of bacterial stresses alent enrofloxacin concentration12 (1.5 mg l−1) (Fig. 1a). Similarly, a dose
and heterogeneity on antimicrobial efficacy in a mouse model of inva- of 50 mg kg−1 ceftriaxone diminished CFUs in spleen approximately
sive salmonellosis, a difficult-to-treat infection that affects around 8-fold over 4 h, around 40-fold slower than under standard laboratory
15 million patients and causes around 200,000 deaths annually7. Our conditions with 25 mg l−1 ceftriaxone. Thus, the two recommended
mouse model replicates treatment failures observed in humans8 and bactericidal antibiotic classes for treatment of invasive salmonellosis
exposes Salmonella to diverse stresses, leading to the formation of (fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins)7 had poor anti-Salmonella
heterogeneous bacterial subsets with divergent properties and fates9,10. activity in infected mice, consistent with slow antimicrobial clearance in
Thus, the model is suitable for assessing the effects of host stresses humans13. This was not owing to the emergence of resistance, because
and bacterial heterogeneity on antimicrobial clearance in a clinically Salmonella from treated mice12 and humans retain full susceptibility.
relevant context. Slow clearance is the primary reason for eventual treatment failures
because some Salmonella still survive in host tissues when the critical
support of host inflammation vanishes12.
Inefficient killing of Salmonella
We infected genetically susceptible mice with gfp-expressing Salmo-
nella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium. Upon appearance Limited effect of diverse stresses
of clinical symptoms, we administered the recommended dose of 5 mg To identify constraints on anti-Salmonella activities, we mimicked
per kg (body weight) enrofloxacin (the widely used veterinary version the extensively characterized Salmonella tissue microenvironments
Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 2These authors contributed equally: Joseph Fanous, Beatrice Claudi. ✉e-mail: [Link]@[Link]
1
P = 4.9 × 10–7
Normalized CFU
Normalized CFU
lexA3
P = 0.98
10–2 10–2 –2 tisB
10
P = 0.89
P = 0.90
–11 Standard Δ3T
P = 3.4 × 10 In vitro
10–3 –3
10 10–3
Standard P = 3.7 × 10–5
10–4 In vitro
10–4
0 2 4 0 2 4 1h 4h 4h
10–1
P = 1.1 × 10–7
10–1 10–1
Normalized CFU
Normalized CFU
P = 0.81
Standard
P = 3.9 × 10–14 In vitro
10–3
P = 0.83
P = 0.83
10–3 10–3
–5
Standard P = 5.5 × 10
10–4 In vitro –4
10
0 2 4 0 2 4 1h 4h 4h
Fig. 1 | Poor anti-Salmonella activities of enrofloxacin and ceftriaxone. c, Survival of wild-type (WT) and indicated mutant Salmonella in spleen. Each
a, Salmonella survival in mouse spleen after an antibiotic dose (grey symbols symbol represents an individual mouse (enrofloxacin: wild type and lexA3 1 h,
show re-analysed data from ref. 12; enrofloxacin (ENR): 1 h, n = 10; 2 h, n = 3; 4 h, n = 3; wild type 4 h, n = 3; tisB, n = 4; Δ3T, n = 3; ceftriaxone: wild type and Δ3T,
n = 6; ceftriaxone (CRO), n = 6) or in Mueller–Hinton broth under normal n = 6). Horizontal bars represent geometric means. Enrofloxacin, one-way
atmosphere at 37 °C (red symbols (this study); enrofloxacin, n = 5; ceftriaxone, ANOVA of log-transformed data with comparisons to wild-type data and
n = 3). Each symbol represents an individual mouse or an independent in vitro Holm–Šídák correction for multiple comparisons; ceftriaxone, two-tailed
culture. Lines connect the geometric means. Two-tailed t-test of log-transformed t-test of log-transformed data. d, Survival of wild-type and indicated mutant
data. b, Salmonella survival in tissue-mimicking chemostat cultures (grey symbols Salmonella in chemostat cultures. Each symbol represents an individual
show re-analysed data from ref. 12; enrofloxacin: 1 h and 2 h, n = 12; 4 h, n = 7; chemostat reactor (enrofloxacin: wild type and lexA3 1 h, n = 5; wild type 4 h,
ceftriaxone 1 h, 2 h and 4 h, n = 4) or laboratory conditions (red symbols; number n = 16; tisB and Δ3T, n = 4; ceftriaxone: wild type, n = 8; Δ3T, n = 7). Horizontal bars
of samples as in a). Each symbol represents an individual chemostat reactor. represent geometric means (statistical tests as in c).
Lines connect the geometric means. Two-tailed t-test of log-transformed data.
in chemostats. We used 10% oxygen, 5% carbon dioxide balanced with tension, increased carbon dioxide tension and bicarbonate concentra-
10 mM bicarbonate at pH 5.6, and 23 nutrients available to Salmonella tion, osmolarity, glucose, oxidative stress and membrane-damaging
in the mouse spleen5. We set the inflow of fresh medium to 0.116 ml h−1 antimicrobial peptides (Supplementary Note 1). We also inactivated
per ml of culture, mimicking the severe nutrient starvation that limits AcrB, the main efflux pump for fluoroquinolones19 and a proposed cause
Salmonella growth in mice3 (approximately 0.16 divisions per hour, of delayed antimicrobial clearance20, and compared Salmonella cells
generation time approximately 6 h). Under these conditions, physi- with different cell size or cell age21 (Extended Data Fig. 1a). Some of these
ological concentrations of enrofloxacin12 (1.5 mg l−1) or ceftriaxone14 parameters affected Salmonella killing by enrofloxacin, but the effects
(25 mg l−1) killed Salmonella at rates similar to those in mice (Fig. 1b). were generally small (up to threefold; glucose has an approximately six-
A lexA3 allele, which blocks repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs)15, fold effect) compared with the approximately 300-fold difference from
accelerated enrofloxacin killing approximately 100-fold in mice and standard laboratory conditions (Fig. 2a), consistent with their moderate
chemostats (Fig. 1c,d), indicating that enrofloxacin triggered DSBs effects under other in vitro conditions (Supplementary Note 1). Oxida-
(which are lethal without repair) in almost all Salmonella, consistent tive and nitrosative stresses were not required for poor enrofloxacin
with pharmacological target attainment12 under both conditions. Tox- and ceftriaxone activities, consistent with their minor effects in vitro
ins encoded by tisB16 or ecnB3, shpAB and phD-doc17 (deleted in Δ3T), (Supplementary Note 1) and in mice (Supplementary Note 2). Combin-
had no detectable effects on enrofloxacin and ceftriaxone activities ing conditions that promote survival (pH 5.6; 5% CO2/10 mM bicarbo-
in mice and chemostats18 (Fig. 1c,d). In summary, tissue-mimicking nate; 0.4% glucose; 401 mOsm) resulted in approximately fivefold
chemostats recapitulated the poor in vivo activities of both antibiotics. greater survival (Fig. 2a, yellow circles). Unknown stresses or stress
To identify factors that constrained antibiotic activity in the chemo- combinations may exist in vivo, but our results indicate the presence
stat experiments, we varied tissue-associated stresses that are known of a non-stress factor that dominates the high in vivo-like Salmonella
to affect fluoroquinolone efficacy, including acidic pH, reduced oxygen survival in chemostats.
10–1
Normalized CFU
10–2
10–3
0
10
100
10
21
5.6
6.5
0.1
0.2
0.4
115
201
401
Std
Std
0.03
Small
Large
ΔacrB
Medium
CS
CS
High
Low
0.3/0
5/10
–
+
Oxygen (%) pH 16 μM
mOsm H2O2 (μM) Low High
CO2 (%)/BIC Glucose (%) LL-37 MHB
(mM) Nutrient supply
Size
b 1 h ENR 4 h CRO
c
100 100 1
P = 2.2 × 10–6 Chemostat
P < 1 × 10–15
Batch culture
10–1
Normalized CFU
Normalized CFU
10 –4 10–3 Slc11a1s/WT
0.01
0.1 1 0.1 1 Slc11a1s/hipAD88N 0 0.4 0.8 1.2
Division rate (h–1) Division rate (h–1) Slc11a1r r/WT Number of generations
Fig. 2 | Modulation of Salmonella killing by stresses and nutrient supply. ceftriaxone for division rates 0.083 h−1, 0.17 h−1 and 0.33 h−1, n = 5) or in individual
a, Salmonella survival after 1 h exposure to enrofloxacin in chemostat cultures batch cultures (enrofloxacin: tissue-mimicking medium, n = 3; Mueller–Hinton
with varying conditions. Each symbol represents an individual chemostat broth, n = 5; ceftriaxone: tissue-mimicking medium and Mueller–Hinton broth,
reactor. P values adjusted for multiple comparisons (Holm–Šídák) (two-tailed n = 3). One-way ANOVA with test for linear trend for log-transformed data for
t-test on log-transformed data for pH; ANOVA on log-transformed data tissue-mimicking medium or Mueller–Hinton broth cultures. c, Relationship
for glucose and osmolarity). BIC, bicarbonate; CS, combined stresses; between exposure time to ceftriaxone to number of generations and Salmonella
MHB, Mueller–Hinton broth; Std, standard tissue-mimicking conditions. survival for different proliferation rates and exposure times (geometric
b, Survival of Salmonella in mice (squares, geometric mean ± geometric s.d.; mean and geometric s.d.; upward triangles, division rate 0.17 h−1 and exposure
enrofloxacin: Slc11a1 s/WT, n = 10; Slc11a1 s /hipA D88N, n = 4; Slc11a1 r /WT, n = 8; for 1 h (n = 4), 2 h (n = 4) or 4 h (n = 9); downward triangles, 4 h exposure and
ceftriaxone, n = 6), or in chemostats in tissue-mimicking medium (geometric division rates 0.08 (n = 5) or 0.33 h−1 (n = 5)). The dashed line represents a
mean ± geometric s.d.; enrofloxacin for division rates 0.083 h−1, 0.17 h−1 and monoexponential fit and the shaded area shows the 95% confidence interval.
0.33 h−1, n = 10; ceftriaxone, n = 4), Mueller–Hinton broth (enrofloxacin or
To determine the role of nutrient access, we grew Salmonella in achieve ~0.16 divisions per hour, as seen in vivo3. These conditions
low-density batch cultures, keeping all other parameters the same as resulted in high Salmonella survival (approximately 3% after 1 h of
in tissue-mimicking chemostats. Facile nutrient access under these enrofloxacin and 30% after 4 h of ceftriaxone; Fig. 2a–c) as in mice,
conditions led to approximately tenfold faster replication (around indicating that starvation at levels similar to those experienced by
1.5 divisions per hour) and increased killing by enrofloxacin and cef- Salmonella in mice3,5 was sufficient to achieve in vivo-like antibiotic
triaxone by about 200-fold (Fig. 2a,b), highlighting the critical role of survival rates, even under non-physiological, stress-free conditions.
nutrient access in antibiotic killing. Multiple linear regression of the This was consistent with previous evidence linking starvation and slow
data shown in Fig. 2a, with survival as dependent variable and nutrient replication with increased resilience against antibiotic activity18,22.
access (which controlled the replication rate), oxygen, pH, CO2, glu- To determine the effect of replication rate in mice, we used two differ-
cose, LL-37, osmolarity and H2O2 as independent variables, explained ent approaches. First, we expressed the Escherichia coli toxin gene hipA
90.4% (R2) of the variance in survival (Extended Data Table 1). Nutrient in Salmonella. HipA inhibits translation and replication by phospho-
access and replication rate (P < 10−15), osmolarity (P = 8.6 × 10−7) and H2O2 rylating GltX, but this can be prevented by the antitoxin HipB23. When
(P = 0.020) had a significant effect; of these factors, nutrient access HipA and HipB levels are similar, fluctuations create a bimodal distribu-
and replication rate had by far the largest effect size (165-fold versus tion of growing ([HipA] < [HipB]) and non-growing ([HipA] > [HipB])
3-fold (osmolarity) and 1.5-fold (H2O2); Fig. 2a). Thus, nutrient access cells23. Without HipB, HipA impairs growth but does not create this
controlling replication rate dominated antibiotic survival. heterogeneity. We expressed the partially detoxified allele24 hipAD88N
To confirm this, we starved Salmonella under non-physiological in Salmonella (which naturally lacks hipAB). This did not affect the
stress-free conditions (Mueller–Hinton broth, pH 7.4, normoxia) in enrofloxacin mean inhibitory concentration (MIC) (0.06 mg l−1),
chemostats, limiting Salmonella nutrition by slow medium inflow to but reduced the replication rate in vitro (to around 47%) and in vivo
Short 1 min
Division
Time
Long
DSB
c 1 e
00:35 03:57 13:00 Division 26:26
0.1
DSB
ENR
0.01
LB DSB
Pre-activated
0 2 4 6
1
Undamaged fraction
Regrowing fraction
0.01
Regrowing fraction
ENR LB
0.1 0.1
0 2 4 6 8
1
0.1
0.01 0.01
0.01
ENR LB
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32
IVM
4 h/LB
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (h)
Time (h)
1 1 SOS+
SOS–
Non-responder fraction
Undamaged fraction
1,000
Post- Contribution to CFU
Normalized CFU
0.8
0.1 exposure 0 1 2 3 4 P = 6.3 × 10–12
Frequency
Fig. 3 | Salmonella DNA damage during and after exposure to enrofloxacin. same data as in d) or under in vivo-mimicking conditions (IVM) with declining
a, Time-lapse gallery of RecA foci in enrofloxacin-exposed Salmonella. Scale enrofloxacin concentrations and regrowth in nutrient-poor medium (276, 271
bar, 1 μm. b, Snapshots of Salmonella exposed for 1 h to enrofloxacin, followed and 378 cells). Circles represent independent experiments. Two-tailed t-test on
by drug washout for 30 min and incubation in LB. Scale bar, 5 μm. c, Fraction of log-transformed data. h, Fluorescence of Salmonella/pPcad-gfp or Salmonella
undamaged and regrowing cells during 1 h (top), 2 h (middle) or 4 h (bottom) lexA3/pPcad-gfp in untreated (0 h) or enrofloxacin-treated mice. The vertical
enrofloxacin exposure, washout and LB incubation (250 (top), 255 (middle) and line separates GFP+ responders from GFP− non-responders. The inset shows
250 (bottom) cells; dotted lines show monoexponential fits for damage during the median fluorescence (MFI) of GFP+ cells, the line connects the geometric
exposure and washout; summary data and independent replicates in d,g). means (test for non-zero slope in a linear regression of log-transformed
d, Fractions of undamaged cells at the end of enrofloxacin exposure, in LB, values). The histograms represent pooled data, circles in the inset graph
and regrowing survivors (two independent experiments, 755 and 1,233 cells). represent individual mice (1 h, n = 5; 3 h and 4 h, n = 4). i, Blue, fraction of GFP−
e, Snapshots of Salmonella exposed for 7 h to decreasing concentrations of non-responders in enrofloxacin-treated mice (0 h, n = 2; 1 h, n = 6; 2 h and 4 h,
enrofloxacin, followed by drug-free nutrient-poor medium (Supplementary n = 4). Each symbol represents an individual mouse. Brown, CFUs recovered
Video 3). Scale bar, 5 μm. f, Fraction of undamaged and regrowing cells during from similar samples (same data as in Fig. 1a; geometric mean ± geometric
and after 7 h exposure to decreasing concentrations of enrofloxacin (ENR) in s.d.; 1 h, n = 10; 2 h, n = 3; 4 h, n = 6). Two-way ANOVA for difference between
nutrient-poor medium (276 cells; dotted lines show monoexponential fits for SOS response and CFU recovery. j, Contribution of responders (SOS+) and
damage during exposure, post-antibiotic damage or baseline damage; summary non-responders (SOS−) to CFU counts (Supplementary Note 5; data are
data for this and two independent replicates in g). g, Fractions of regrowing mean ± s.d. for data from independently infected mice; 1 h, n = 6; 4 h, n = 4).
cells after 4 h enrofloxacin exposure and a switch to LB (4 h/LB; 250 and 444 cells; Two-way ANOVA for difference between SOS+ and SOS−.
240 min 2% BHI 120 min FLX 80 min BHI 240 min BHI
b c
1 1
0.1
0.1
Post-
exposure
0.01
0.01 P = 7 × 10–8
FLX
Fig. 4 | Killing of S. aureus by flucloxacillin. a, Snapshots of gfp-expressing counted as one survivor. Summary data for individual replicates are shown in c.
S. aureus (inverted fluorescence) before, during and after a 2 h exposure to c, Surviving fractions of S. aureus after 1 h, 2 h or 4 h exposure to flucloxacillin
flucloxacillin (FLX) and switching to antibiotic-free brain–heart infusion (BHI) and after switching to antibiotic-free BHI medium. Data from three independent
medium (Supplementary Video 4). Scale bar, 5 μm. b, Surviving fractions of experiments (619, 745 and 917 cells). Lines connect the geometric means.
S. aureus after 1 h (left), 2 h (middle) or 4 h (right) exposure to flucloxacillin Two-way ANOVA for difference between survival at the end of exposure and
followed by switching to BHI medium (937, 745 and 599 cells pooled from three colony-forming fractions. The arrow depicts the post-exposure loss of viability.
independent experiments). A growing colony originating from a single cell is
decline in CFUs, followed by a slower decrease. Salmonella exhibited tuberculosis, deep-seated S. aureus infections and brucellosis. Inef-
such a biphasic CFU decline during enrofloxacin treatment in mice. ficient drug delivery to infected tissues, biofilms and noncompliant
However, we found that standard CFU assays were misleading because patients may contribute to this problem. These infections also have long
enrofloxacin remains bound to its bacterial target gyrase even after incubation periods54–57, suggesting slow pathogen growth in human
washing, continuing to kill the bacteria during regrowth on the plates, tissues. Quantifying the effects of slow growth, stresses and persisters
which results in low CFU counts even for short treatment intervals. will require real-time, single-cell assays under physiologically relevant
Similar issues may occur with a wide range of other antibiotics. Thus, conditions.
CFU-based killing assays can provide confounded and misleading
results, suggesting non-existing distinct subsets of bacteria with dif-
ferent susceptibilities, underestimating the number of survivors, Online content
and misrepresenting their relationship to the bulk population. Using Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summa-
more appropriate single-cell, real-time assays, we found that damage ries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowl-
kinetics were rather uniform across the Salmonella population and edgements, peer review information; details of author contributions
much slower than CFU data suggested. More than 35% of Salmonella and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability
did not experience any serious damage during 4 h of enrofloxacin are available at [Link]
exposure, minimizing the influence of rare hyper-resilient persisters.
Ceftriaxone also exhibited homogeneously slow killing activity. Thus, 1. Bjarnsholt, T. et al. The importance of understanding the infectious microenvironment.
the bulk of Salmonella, not just a small subset, were difficult to kill. Lancet Infect. Dis. 22, e88–e92 (2022).
This was consistent with the slow, steady Salmonella clearance over 2. Balaban, N. Q. et al. Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence.
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 441–448 (2019).
several days of treatment with no detectable effect of non-replicating 3. Claudi, B. et al. Phenotypic variation of Salmonella in host tissues delays eradication by
persisters3,12. antimicrobial chemotherapy. Cell 158, 722–733 (2014).
Our results with two recommended classes of bactericidal antibiot- 4. Cunrath, O. & Bumann, D. Host resistance factor SLC11A1 restricts Salmonella growth
through magnesium deprivation. Science 366, 995–999 (2019).
ics for treating invasive salmonellosis challenge common assump- 5. Steeb, B. et al. Parallel exploitation of diverse host nutrients enhances Salmonella virulence.
tions about bacterial resilience and highlight the dominant role of PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003301 (2013).
starvation of the entire Salmonella population. The limited effects of 6. Doern, G. V. & Brecher, S. M. The clinical predictive value (or lack thereof) of the results of
in vitro. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49, S11–S14 (2011).
stresses and persisters observed in our study are consistent with the 7. WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: Bacterial Pathogens of Public Health
broad clinical efficacy of short antibiotic treatments for most infections Importance, to Guide Research, Development and Strategies to Prevent and Control
caused by non-resistant bacteria53, suggesting limited interference from Antimicrobial Resistance (World Health Organization, 2024).
8. Newson, J. P., Gaissmaier, M. S., McHugh, S. C. & Hardt, W. D. Studying antibiotic
inflammation-associated stresses and persisters. Longer treatment is persistence in vivo using the model organism Salmonella Typhimurium. Curr. Opin.
required for difficult-to-treat infections such as invasive salmonellosis, Microbiol. 70, 102224 (2022).
P= 3.4e-5
P= 1.5e-7
1
Normalized CFU
104
Green fluorescence
0.1
Sort Medium
OD600
0.1
0.01 WT
104 104
hisGP69L shpBQ97*
hipAD88N
0.001
Slc11a1s / WT
103 Small 0 5 10 15 20
Time in h Slc11a1s / hipAD88N
e
Sideward scatter
104 Phase contrast Slc11a1r / WT
c Slc11a1s / WT
103
Slc11a1s / hipAD88N 2 μm
P= 1.3e-6
Frequency
Divisions per h
Slc11a1r / WT
Fluorescence Laplacian
Frequency
0.10
P= 1.5e-4
0.05
Divisions per h
f h
01:55 04:39 DSB 05:31 06:18
Control 5 μm
Undamaged fract.
1 DSB
1.5 mg/L DSB Division
5 mg/L DSB
DSB
0.1 DSB Division
DSB
0 1 2 3 4
Time in h
MM DSB 9 min LB 61 min LB 108 min LB
g
i j
P= 1.5e-8
LB
Chemostat 1
Sideward scatter
Mouse spleen 16
Dividing fraction
10,000
Undamaged fract.
P= 0.003
Repair time in h
0.1
4
P= 3.1e-9
P= 0.72
P= 0.65 0.01
LoD LB 1
1,000
- + - + - + 0 2 4 6
Enrofloxacin treatment Time in h DSB- DSB+ DSB+ DSB+
, maximum fold difference in survival within tested range; Std. Error, standard error.
1