[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views4 pages

Process Control Chapter 4

Chapter 4 discusses transfer functions as algebraic expressions that describe the dynamic relationship between inputs and outputs in process models, independent of initial conditions and forcing functions. The chapter details the development of transfer functions through a blending system example, leading to the derivation of transfer functions G1(s) and G2(s) that depend solely on operating conditions. It emphasizes that these transfer functions facilitate analysis without the need for repeated solving of ordinary differential equations for varying initial conditions.

Uploaded by

amjad nasser
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views4 pages

Process Control Chapter 4

Chapter 4 discusses transfer functions as algebraic expressions that describe the dynamic relationship between inputs and outputs in process models, independent of initial conditions and forcing functions. The chapter details the development of transfer functions through a blending system example, leading to the derivation of transfer functions G1(s) and G2(s) that depend solely on operating conditions. It emphasizes that these transfer functions facilitate analysis without the need for repeated solving of ordinary differential equations for varying initial conditions.

Uploaded by

amjad nasser
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Process Control: Chapter 4 – Transfer Functions

4.0 Introduction:

- In chapter 3 we discussed how Laplace transform techniques could be used to determine the
response from different ODEs.
- However, the full solving procedure should be repeated for every model, even when changing
only the initial conditions or the type of forcing function.
- Transfer function: Algebraic expression for the dynamic relation between a selected input and
output for the process model.
- It’s independent on the: initial condition and type of forcing function.
- The properties of the dynamic system become apparent when the transfer function is written in
its standard form.
- TFs are derived only from linear ODEs; therefore, the non-linear ODEs have to be linearized first.

4.1 Development of Transfer Functions:

The following model describes a simple blending system, that blends two streams, one with pure A
(𝑥𝐴,2 = 1), and the other is diluted (𝑥𝐴,1 << 1), with a stream that leaves the tank with a small
concentration of A (𝑥𝐴 << 1).
𝑑𝑥 𝑤1 𝑤2
= (𝑥1 − 𝑥) + (𝑥 − 𝑥) (4.1)
𝑑𝑡 𝑉𝜌 𝑉𝜌 2
Assuming a constant flow for the first inlet stream: 𝑤1 = 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 𝑤
̅1

Assuming that the process at the beginning was at steady-state:


𝑤
̅1 𝑤
̅2
0= (𝑥̅1 − 𝑥̅ ) + (𝑥̅ − 𝑥̅ ) (4.2)
𝑉𝜌 𝑉𝜌 2
Simplifying and applying assumptions:

0=𝑤
̅1 𝑥̅1 − 𝑤
̅1 𝑥̅ + 𝑤
̅ 2 𝑥̅2 − 𝑤
̅ 2 𝑥̅ = 𝑤
̅1 𝑥̅1 − 𝒘 ̅−𝒘
̅ 𝟏𝒙 ̅+𝑤
̅ 𝟐𝒙 ̅2
0=𝑤 ̅̅
̅1 𝑥̅1 − 𝒘 𝒙+𝑤
̅2 (4.3)
Since 𝑥1 and 𝑥 are very small, and 𝑤2 is pure A, we would need small amount of mass flow rate of 𝑤2 ;
therefore, 𝑤
̅2 ≪ 𝑤̅, hence:

𝑤
̅ ≈𝑤
̅1 = 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 (4.4)
Therefore, for unsteady-state process:
𝑑𝑥
𝑉𝜌 =𝑤
̅𝑥1 + 𝑤2 − 𝑤
̅𝑥 (4.5)
𝑑𝑡
To get rid of the dependence of the process model on the first steady-state, subtract the steady-state
model from the unsteady-state model (4.5) - (4.3):
𝑑(𝑥 − 𝑥̅ )
𝑉𝜌 ̅(𝑥1 − 𝑥̅1 ) + (𝑤2 − 𝑤
=𝑤 ̅2 ) − 𝑤
̅(𝑥 − 𝑥̅ ) (4.6)
𝑑𝑡
Divide by 𝑤
̅ on both sides:
𝑉𝜌 𝑑(𝑥 − 𝑥̅ ) (𝑤2 − 𝑤
̅2 )
= (𝑥1 − 𝑥̅1 ) + − (𝑥 − 𝑥̅ ) (4.7)
𝑤̅ 𝑑𝑡 𝑤
̅
𝑉𝜌
Since, ̅
is a constant value, assume that:
𝑤

𝑉𝜌
𝜏= (4.8)
𝑤̅
And:
1
𝐾= (4.9)
𝑤
̅
And introducing new concept called deviation variable:

𝑥 ′ = 𝑥 − 𝑥̅
𝑥1′ = 𝑥1 − 𝑥̅1
Etc.

Therefore, equation 4.7 becomes:


𝑑𝑥′
𝜏 = 𝑥1′ + 𝐾𝑤2′ − 𝑥 ′ (4.10)
𝑑𝑡
Small 𝜏 → Faster response

Large 𝜏 → Slower response

K is process gain.

In case of steady-state, (4.10) becomes:

𝑥 ′ = 𝑥1′ + 𝐾𝑤2′ (4.11)


Therefore, if 𝑥1 was constant and has a value that is similar to the 𝑥1 at the first steady-state (𝑥1′ = 0),
(4.11) will be as follows:

𝑥 ′ = 𝐾𝑤2′ (4.12)
Therefore, any deviation of 𝑤2 from steady-state will lead to a deviation in 𝑥 K times larger than the
deviation in 𝑤2 .

However, since the process gain of 𝑥1 is 1; therefore, any deviation of 𝑥1 will cause 𝑥 to deviate with
same factor.

4.1.1 Transfer Functions

Apply Laplace on transform on (4.10) knowing that 𝑥 ′ ,𝑥1′ , and 𝑤2′ are functions of time:

𝑑𝑥 ′
ℒ (𝜏 ) = ℒ(𝑥1′ ) + ℒ(𝐾𝑤2′ ) − ℒ(𝑥 ′ )
𝑑𝑡
𝜏𝑠𝑋 ′ (𝑠) − 𝑥 ′ (0) = 𝑋1′ (𝑠) + 𝐾𝑊2′ (𝑠) − 𝑋 ′ (𝑠) (4.13)

Since the system was initially at its first steady-state; therefore, 𝑥 ′ (0) = 𝑥̅ − 𝑥̅ = 0:

𝜏𝑠𝑋 ′ (𝑠) = 𝑋1′ (𝑠) + 𝐾𝑊2′ (𝑠) − 𝑋 ′ (𝑠) (4.14)

Rearranging,

(𝜏𝑠 + 1)𝑋 ′ (𝑠) = 𝑋1′ (𝑠) + 𝐾𝑊2′ (𝑠)


1 𝐾
𝑋 ′ (𝑠) = ( ) 𝑋1′ (𝑠) + ( ) 𝑊 ′ (𝑠)
𝜏𝑠 + 1 𝜏𝑠 + 1 2
𝑋 ′ (𝑠) = 𝐺1 (𝑠)𝑋1′ (𝑠) + 𝐺2 (𝑠)𝑊2′ (𝑠) (4.15)
Therefore, the transfer functions are:
1 𝐾
𝐺1 (𝑠) = , 𝐺2 (𝑠) =
𝜏𝑠 + 1 𝜏𝑠 + 1
Hence, in the following cases:
𝑋 ′ (𝑠) 1
𝐺1 (𝑠) = ′ (𝑠) = , 𝑖𝑓 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑖𝑓 𝑊2′ (𝑠) = 0
𝑋1 𝜏𝑠 + 1

Similarly,
𝑋 ′ (𝑠) 𝐾
𝐺2 (𝑠) = ′ (𝑠) = , 𝑖𝑓 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑖𝑓 𝑋1′ (𝑠) = 0
𝑊2 𝜏𝑠 + 1

Notice that the transfer functions 𝐺1 (𝑠) and 𝐺2 (𝑠) do NOT depend on the initial conditions. They’re only
dependent on the operating conditions.

How to use equation 4.15?

Assume a process where 𝑥1 is not changing and it is kept as its initial steady-state value; therefore,
𝑥 ′ (𝑡) = 0. While the mass flow rate of pure A changed from 𝑤 ̅ 2 + 𝑀; therefore, 𝑤2′ (𝑡) = 𝑀:
̅ 2 to 𝑤

Hence,
𝑀
ℒ(𝑤2′ (𝑡)) =
𝑠
Substituting in equation 4.15:
𝐾𝑀
𝑋 ′ (𝑠) =
𝜏𝑠 2 + 𝑠

𝐾𝑀 𝐾𝑀 𝜏𝐾𝑀 1 𝜏 1 1
= − = 𝐾𝑀 ( − ) = 𝐾𝑀 ( − ) = 𝐾𝑀(1 − 𝑒 −𝑡/𝜏 )
𝑠(𝜏𝑠 + 1) 𝑠 𝜏𝑠 + 1 𝑠 𝜏𝑠 + 1 𝑠 𝑠+1
𝜏
𝑡
𝑥 ′ (𝑡) = 𝐾𝑀 (1 − 𝑒 −𝜏 ) (4.16)
*it’s mentioned that transfer functions do not depend on initial conditions, however, G1(s) contains w (bar) and G2(s) contains w2(bar) which
are the flow rates of the initial steady-state conditions.

From equation 4.16:


0
𝑥 ′ (𝑡 = 0) = 𝐾𝑀 (1 − 𝑒 −𝜏 ) = 𝐾𝑀(1 − 1) = 0

And,
𝑡
lim (𝑥 ′ (𝑡)) = lim (𝐾𝑀 (1 − 𝑒 −𝜏 )) = 𝐾𝑀(1 − 0) = 𝐾𝑀
𝑡→∞ 𝑛→∞

Approximate plot:

x'(t) vs. t
1.2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12

You might also like