Augusta University Grading Criteria for Posters
Grading Criteria for Immunology for All Article Analysis Posters
Poster Title:
Poster Code:
GENERAL FORMAT AND WRITING 10 pts Earned
1. Is the poster one page only? 5
2. Is each section specifically labeled (intro, methods, results, discuss,
5
personal view, lit cited)
3. Is the writing free of misspelled words? (-1 for each obvious error) (-5 max)
4. Is the writing clear, concise, and grammatically, correct? (-5 max)
TITLE 6 pts Earned
1. Does the poster have a title that appears on the poster? 6
INTRODUCTION 20 pts Earned
1. Minimum one-paragraph introduction is present? 10
1. Elementary Content Summation: Is the AI-generated content
5
summary present and within 200 words ± 50 words?
2. Profession Content Summation: Is the AI-generated content
5
summary present and within 200 words ± 50 words?
MATERIALS AND METHODS 18 pts Earned
1. Does this section contain a one paragraph summary of what was
6
done, written in past tense?
2. Are the tools that were used to conduct the analysis listed?
Keyword Analysis
Named Entity Recognition (NER) 8
Topic Modeling
Readability Scores and Text Complexity (2 analyses)
4. Results, data, and data analysis should not be included in this
4
section.
RESULTS 74 pts Earned
1. Does this section contain a summary paragraph of the analysis? The
6
written summary should not include any interpretation of the data.
Are each of the following analyses included in the results section, and
are the top results clearly presented?
Keyword Analysis (Top 10 keywords) (5 pts)
Named Entity Recognition (Top 10 entities) (5 pts) 20
Topic Modeling (Top 3 themes) (5 pts)
Readability Scores (6 readability analyses) (5 pts)
Augusta University Grading Criteria for Posters
State-of-the-Art Research Technique:
A. Elementary: Simplified and creative explanation. 4
B. A figure/image/flowchart of some sort is present? 6
C. Professional: Detailed explanation, clear labeling, and
4
significance.
D. A profession figure is present for the research technique. 6
Most Significant Data Figure:
A. Elementary: Simplified with accessible language. 4
B. A figure/image/flowchart of some sort is present? 6
C. Professional: Detailed analysis, clear labeling, and significance
4
highlighted.
D. The actual figure of interest from article is present? 6
2. Tables (At least one Table Should be Present. Graphs may be
optionally included and are essentially evaluated like a table.
A. Do the tables have figure numbers? 2
B. Do the tables have clear, explanatory titles? 2
C. Do table headings make sense? 2
D. Do the tables clearly summarize the data? 2
DISCUSSION 16 pts Earned
1. Does the discussion summarize the main points from the results? 6
2. Does the discussion attempt to interpret the results? 5
3. Are areas for additional research, unanswered questions, or
5
additional data that could be useful discussed? (any or similar ideas)
LITERATURE CITED 16 pts Earned
1. Does the poster include at least four citations to include:
A. The peer reviewed article being reviewed? 2
B. At least two additional peer-reviewed journal articles? 4
C. At least one additional source of any type? 2
2. Are the citations actually found within the body of the poster? 2
3. Are the references listed in the numerical order in which they are
2
cited in the poster?
4. Are the entries in the correct citation format not just websites? 4
Reviewer Notes and Comments: Total Score____________/160
