CITY OF TAYABAS
Founded in 1578 and had its first civil
government in 1620
In 1703, Tayabas earned the royal title
“La Muy Noble Villa de Tayabas” from the
Spanish Monarch
Became a City in 2007
Number of Barangays: 66 Barangays
Total Population: 91,428 NSO2010
Total Land Area:
23, 224* ha.
23,095** ha
Income Class: 6th Class
*GIS Generated
** Based on IRA
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
22 May 2012 The Office of the City Planning and Development Coordinator
(OCPDC) received a copy of Executive Order No. 07 – Creating
the Sectoral or Functional Committee
for the Preparation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP)
and Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP)
Figure 1. Simplified CLUP-CDP Process
Source: DILG's “Rationalized Local Planning System”
HLURB CLUP Guidebooks
Formulating the City’s Vision
Profiling: “Ecological Profile”
The CLUP: Concepts, Functions and Process
Determinants of the “Urban Form”
Identifying physical development challenges
Projecting demand, determining supply of
buildable land
Evaluating Alternatives: Selecting Preferred
Spatial Strategy
Formulating the Land and Water Policy
Framework
Detailing the Land Use Plan
Zoning and Other Regulatory Tools
Hazard Analysis
The city’s urban form is DRR-CCA
sensitive
The new urban expansion of Tayabas is
located in the safe areas of the city
“Compact” to reduce emissions of
Greenhouse Gases & undue land
conversion
Incorporating National Policies
Volcanic Hazard
Earthquake/Rain Induced Landslide
Soil Erosion
Flooding
Trace Approximate Fault Line
Earthquake Erosion
Code Land Slide Hazard Hazard Volcanic Hazard Flood Hazard Slope Land Classification
Not Low
1.1.1 Susceptible Susceptibility No Erosion Not Prone to Lahar No Flooding 0-8 Alienable/Disposable
1.1.2 not-low Low-med no-slight Not Prone to Lahar no-slight seasonal 0-18 Alienable/Disposable
not-least prone to
1.1.3 not-low Low-high no-moderate lahar no-slight seasonal 0-18 Alienable/Disposable
not-moderate prone to
1.1.4 not-low Low-high no-severe lahar no-slight seasonal 0-18 Alienable/Disposable
not- not-highly prone to
1.1.5 medium Low-high no-severe lahar no-slight seasonal 0-18 Alienable/Disposable
not-highly prone to
1.1.6 not-high Low-high no-severe lahar no-slight seasonal 0-18 Alienable/Disposable
1.1.7 med-high Low-med mod-severe Not Prone to Lahar no flooding 0-18 Alienable/Disposable
severe
1.1.8 med-high med-high erosion Not Prone to Lahar no flooding 0-18 Alienable/Disposable
Not Low
1.2.1 Susceptible Susceptibility no erosion Not Prone to Lahar no flooding 18-above Alienable/Disposable
1.2.2 not-low low-med no-slight Not Prone to Lahar no-slight seasonal 18-above Alienable/Disposable
1.2.3 not-low low-high no-moderate Not Prone to Lahar no-slight seasonal 18-above Alienable/Disposable
not-moderate prone to
1.2.4 not-low low-high no-moderate lahar no-slight seasonal 18-above Alienable/Disposable
not- not-highly prone to
1.2.5 medium Low-high no-moderate lahar no-slight seasonal 18-above Alienable/Disposable
not-highly prone to
1.2.6 not-high Low-high no-severe lahar no-slight seasonal 18-above Alienable/Disposable
1.2.7 med-high low-med mod-severe Not Prone to Lahar no flooding 18-above Alienable/Disposable
severe
1.2.8 med-high med-high erosion Not Prone to Lahar no flooding 18-above Alienable/Disposable
Stakeholders Identification
& Finalization
Process
Detailing goals and
Objectives per sector
Public Consultation :
Functional Committee
Presentation of Alternative Public Consultation :
Urban Forms (Refinement) POs, NGOs
Public Consultation :
GAM RATING LGU, Academe, Financial
Institution and Private
Sector
Alternative Urban Form
Preparation for the Public Consultation–Functional
Committee with the LCE October 15, 2012
Selection of the Preferred Alternative Urban Form of the Functional
Committee and Dry Run for the Public Consultation October 24, 2012
Selection of the Preferred Alternative Urban Form
Public Consultation: POs, NGOs November 05, 2012
Selection of the Preferred Alternative Urban Form – Public Consultation
Financial Institution, Academe, LGU, Private Sector November 06, 2012
1. Linear Trend Extension
2. Modified Core-Concentric
3. New Town
SOCIETAL SECTOR LINEAR TREND MODIFIED CORE- NEW TOWN
EXTENSION CONCENTRIC URBAN FORM
ENVIRONMENT 140 45 210
INFRASTRUCTURE 145 45 175
ECONOMIC 46 150 216
INSTITUTION 158 275 254
SPORTS 185 260 287
KISLAP 185 230 265
FARMERS 178 180 258
PAG-ASA YOUTH ASSOCIATION 130 215 255
ENVIRONMENT (2) 172 260 275
HEALTH 190 210 270
SENIOR CITIZENS 195 245 190
TK 237 248 223
BANTAY BAYAN FEDERATION 255 275 215
QMWD 280 210 20
EDUCATION 185 205 190
PEACE AND ORDER 80 150 250
SK FEDERATION 95 187 191
TURUMBA 180 230 200
TOTAL 3036 3620 3944
RANK 3rd 2nd 1st
Old Poblacion
New Town
Calumpang-Isabang
CITY OF TAYABAS
Projects were identified from:
A. Vision-Reality Gap
B. Local Development Indicators
C. Map Overlay Analysis
Projects underwent through:
A. Sifting
B. Classification of ownership &
responsibility
C. Determining the implementation
period
D. Level urgency
E. Goal-Achievement Matrix (GAM)
The CDP identified a total of 182 projects, 124 non-projects, and 71
legislations
SECTORS PROJECT NON-PROJECT LEGISLATION
Social
41 40 30
Economic
22 16 6
Environment
56 25 8
Infrastructure
53 9 11
Institution
10 34 16
TOTAL
182 124 71
Investible projects
SECTORS IMMEDIATE MEDIUM TERM LONG TERM
(1-3) (3-6) (6-9)
Social 18 9 14
Economic 14 7 1
Environment 27 22 7
Infrastructure 26 19 8
Institution 7 2 1
TOTAL 92 59 31
CDP key projects:
A. Master Planning of the 3 Main
Growth Areas of the City
B. Land Banking
C. Formulation of a Disaster Risk
Reduction-Climate Change
Adaptation/Mitigation Plan (DRR-
CCA Plan)
