SE-QAD-F-002 , Rev.00, Rev. Date : 10.01.

2024

SHUBH ENTREPRISES POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS(PROCESS FMEA)

Part Name Process Responsibility Mr. Tarunn Document number

Part No /
Approval / Date Date (Org)
Issue
.
Customer /
Key Date Revision No 00
Model

Core Team Mr. Tarun Revision Date

Process Step C Resp. & Action Results
Potential S l Potential Cause(s) / O D R Recommen Target
Potential Effect(s) of Current Process Current Process S O D R
Function Requirements Failure e a Mechanism(s) of c e P ded Compl Actions
Failure Controls Prevention Controls Detection e c e P
Mode v s Failure c t N action(s) -etion Taken
v c t N
s Date

10. Qty. as per invoice Incorrect qty. Production planning failure,

Receipt & Supplier invoice clearing issue Supplier is instructed
Wrong documentation done by
Storage of 2 to verify before Inspection at receipt 7 42 None
supplier
Raw Material Dispatch
for Inspection
Supplier is instructed
Wrong weighing done by
3 2 to verify before Inspection at receipt 7 42 None
supplier
Dispatch
Proper and smooth Bad handling of Dusting of Material
Handling material on job training to be Inspection at
less skilled person 2 7 42 None
provided subsequent Stage

20. Accurate inspection Inaccurate Non-conforming material may Will detect in

Untrained inspector 2 Training to inspector 7 70 None
Inspection of inspection pass in production subsequent process
RM Inspection criteria
Will detect in
5 Inadequate inspection criteria 2 decided by cross 7 70 None
subsequent process
functional team
Inaccurate measuring Calibrated equipment Will detect in
2 7 70 None
equipment in use subsequent process
Chemical properties as Chemical NP:Part may crack if material
per grade properties not as grade not as per specifications
per grade Assy:None Supplier is instructed
Wrong material supplied by Testing done by
CE:None 7 2 to verify before 7 98 None
supplier supplier
EU:None Dispatch

No Dust Dust NP:May need rework for

sorting Supplier is instructed
Assy:None Wrong material supplied by Visual Inspection at
5 2 to verify before 7 70 None
CE:Unaesthetic look supplier receipt
Dispatch
EU:None
Material should be Material stored on NP:More material retreivability
Locations not defined Visual check for
stored at designated wrong place time 2 Locations defined 7 28 None
storage
location Assy:None 2
CE:None Stored on wrong location by Training to store Visual check for
30. EU:None 3 7 0 None
store executive executives storage
Storage of
Raw Material FIFO system to be FIFO system not NP:Quality of part will
No awareness of FIFO system Training to store
followed followed deteriorated 2 Visual check for FIFO 7 28 None
Assy:None among store executives executives
2
CE:None FIFO system not followed by Training to store
EU:None 3 Visual check for FIFO 7 0 None
store executive executives
 SE-QAD-F-002 , Rev.00, Rev. Date : 10.01.2024

SHUBH ENTREPRISES POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS(PROCESS FMEA)

Part Name Process Responsibility Mr. Tarunn Document number

Part No /
Approval / Date Date (Org)
Issue
.
Customer /
Key Date Revision No 00
Model

Core Team Mr. Tarun Revision Date

Process Step C Resp. & Action Results
Potential S l Potential Cause(s) / O D R Recommen Target
Potential Effect(s) of Current Process Current Process S O D R
Function Requirements Failure e a Mechanism(s) of c e P ded Compl Actions
Failure Controls Prevention Controls Detection e c e P
Mode v s Failure c t N action(s) -etion Taken
v c t N
s Date
Free From CRACK CRACK
Process paramter
Part reject 3 curing time 2 Inspection record 7 42
Standarization
Free From Short Short Moulding
Weight monitoring
Moulding Less Material/Regrinded No Regrinded material
Does not fullfill the Req. of
Customer / Part Failure 3 2 Inspection record 7 42
material to be added for
40. Molding & moulding
Inspection
Free From Un-cured Un-cured
Process paramter
Fitment NG 3 Less cooling time 2 Inspection record 7 42
Standarization
Free From AIR BUBBLE AIR BUBBLE
Process paramter
Part reject/ Low strength 3 Low Temp./ Air Open 2 Inspection record 7 42
Standarization
proper cutting & Improper cutting & IC- Poor Appearance
50. Finishing Finishing CE- Fitment Issue work instruction, visual Inspection at Final
3 Less skilled operator 2 7 42
DEFLASHING boundary samples Stage

Accurate inspection Inaccurate Non-conforming parts may 100% Visual

inspection pass, Fitment issue at CE 4 Untrained inspector 2 Training to inspector 7 56 None
Inspection

60. Inspection criteria

100% Visual
100% 4 Inadequate inspection criteria 2 decided by cross 7 56 None
Inspection
INSPECTION functional team

Inaccurate measuring Calibrated equipment 100% Visual

4 2 7 56 None
equipment in use Inspection
Packing material Problem at customer end Packing standard
not as per freezed as per
customer Packing requirements not clear customer
requirement 3 2 Visual inspection 7 42 None
Incorrect packing material used requirements
Training to packing
team
Packing material Parts can spread Training to packing
3 Damaged packing material used 2 Visual inspection 7 42 None
damaged team
Part qty. not as per Problem at customer end Packing standard
customer freezed as per
70. requirement customer
Packing Qty. requirements not clear requirements
3 2 Visual inspection 7 42 None
Counting / weighing error Training to packing
team
Calibrated weighing
balance used
 SE-QAD-F-002 , Rev.00, Rev. Date : 10.01.2024

SHUBH ENTREPRISES POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS(PROCESS FMEA)

Part Name Process Responsibility Mr. Tarunn Document number

Part No /
Approval / Date Date (Org)
Issue
.
Customer /
Key Date Revision No 00
Model
70.
Core Team Mr. Tarun Revision Date
Packing
Process Step C Resp. & Action Results
Potential S l Potential Cause(s) / O D R Recommen Target
Potential Effect(s) of Current Process Current Process S O D R
Function Requirements Failure e a Mechanism(s) of c e P ded Compl Actions
Failure Controls Prevention Controls Detection e c e P
Mode v s Failure c t N action(s) -etion Taken
v c t N
s Date
Identification of Problem at customer end Packing standard
part/ packing freezed as per
material not as per Identification requirements not
customer
customer 3 clear 2 Visual inspection 7 42 None
requirements
requirement Incorrect identification used
Training to packing
team
Material should be Material stored on NP:More material retreivability
Locations not defined Visual check for
stored at designated wrong place time 2 Locations defined 7 28 None
storage
location Assy:None 2
CE:None Stored on wrong location by Training to store Visual check for
80. EU:None 3 7 42 None
Material Move store executive executives storage
to FG & FIFO system to be FIFO system not NP:None
Storage followed followed Assy:None No awareness of FIFO system Training to store
2 Visual check for FIFO 7 56 None
CE:Quality of part may among store executives executives
4
deteriorated FIFO system not followed by Training to store
EU:None 3 Visual check for FIFO 7 84 None
store executive executives
Accurate inspection Inaccurate Non-conforming parts may Will detect at customer
Untrained inspector 2 Training to inspector 5 40 None
inspection pass end
90 Inspection criteria
Will detect at customer
Pre-Dispatch 4 Inadequate inspection criteria 2 decided by cross 5 40 None
end
Inspection functional team
Inaccurate measuring Calibrated equipment Will detect at customer
2 5 40 None
equipment in use end
100. Incorrect qty. as per Incorrect qty. not Invoice clearing problem Training to Dispatch Qty. verification at
4 Wrong invoice made 2 5 40 None
Dispatch invoice as per invoice team Dispatch Stage
Sev-Severity, Occ-Occurrence, Det-Detection, Class-Classification, NP-Next Process in SE, Assy-Assembly in SE,IC-Immediate Customer, CE-Customer End, EU-End User
Special Characteristics

Revision History
Rev.No. Rev. Date Revision Details

Prepared By:- Approved By:-