PET Implementation Framework
PET Implementation Framework
Interventional
Framework
Uganda Pre-Eclampsia
Interventional Framework
Foreword
The pre-eclampsia
interventional framework
will provide a basis for
tracking implementation
and assessment of
achievements against
targets, with the overall
aim of reducing the
maternal and neonatal
morbidity and mortality
due to pre-eclampsia.
In Uganda pre-eclampsia is the second leading cause of maternal mortality at 15%, after postpartum
haemorrhage (PPH) that causes 45% of the maternal deaths (MPDSR Report 2020/2021). The Ministry of
Health (MoH) formed the National Safe Motherhood Expert Committee (NASMEC) with constituent sub-
committees that include the Pre-eclampsia subcommittee, to try and address the very high maternal and
perinatal morbidity and mortality due to pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. The
Pre-eclampsia subcommittee has since embarked on several activities including pre-eclampsia awareness
creation; participate in reviews and audits of pre-eclampsia related deaths nationally; conducted a national
survey on the prevention and management practices of pre-eclampsia as well as developing the pre-
eclampsia intervention frame work.
The pre-eclampsia interventional framework will provide a basis for tracking implementation and assessment
of achievements against targets, with the overall aim of reducing the maternal and neonatal morbidity
and mortality due to pre-eclampsia. The framework has been designed to provide updated, practical and
useful information in monitoring and evaluation, data collection, management and lastly implementation
arrangements for the prevention and management of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. The frame work
requires active involvement of all stake holders right from policy and advocacy level to the clinical teams
involved in patient care.
I want to appreciate the NASMEC Pre-eclampsia subcommittee members, partners and all stakeholders that
contributed towards the development of this framework.
I would like to
acknowledge the
Ministry of Health
for supporting the
NASMEC Pre-eclampsia
subcommittee to deliver
its mandate and UNICEF
for funding the frame
work development
processes.
I would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Health for supporting the NASMEC Pre-eclampsia subcommittee to
deliver its mandate and UNICEF for funding the frame work development processes. In the same light, I would like to
appreciate and acknowledge the technical people who participated in the development of the frame work: Dr Jackline
Akello (Nebbi Hospital), Dr Sarah Nakubulwa (Makerere University), Dr Musa Sekikubo (Makerere Uinversity),
Dr Moses Adroma (Makerere University), Dr Charles Irumba (Bukuku Health Centre IV), Dr Agery Bameka
(Buwenge General Hospital), Ms Rehema Nabuufu (Kawempe National Referral Hospital), Mr Julius
Ssendiwala (Monitoring & Evaluation Specialist), Dr Patricia Pirio (UNICEF), Ms Grace Latigi (UNICEF) and
Dr. Atnafu Getachew Asfaw (UNICEF).
Finally, acknowledgements go to our regional pre-eclampsia champions across the country for their
contribution towards development of this frame work and for enthusiastically participating in all the subcommittee
activities.
Together we can significantly reduce maternal and perinatal deaths due to pre-eclampsia.
FOREWORD i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS iv
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Goal 1
1.3 Objectives 1
3.0 SCOPE 5
Uganda’s maternal mortality ratio reduced from 438 (UDHS2011) to 336 per 100,000 live births (UDHS
2016) while perinatal mortality has stagnated and contributes 42% of all under-5 mortality. The leading
causes of maternal mortality are; post-partum haemorrhage (PPH), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
(HDP) and puerperal infections. Conversely, birth asphyxia, complications of prematurity and infections are
the leading causes of perinatal mortality. In Uganda pre-eclampsia is the second leading cause of maternal
mortality at 15%, after PPH that causes 45% of maternal deaths (MPDSR Report 2020/2021).
The burden of pre-eclampsia has been demonstrated in several studies in Uganda. A prospective cohort
study among 403 women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy found that the case-specific maternal
mortality ratio was 780 per 100,000 live births for all hypertensive disorders;1940 per 100,000 live births
for severe pre-eclampsia and 501 per 100,000 live births for eclampsia (Nakimuli et al, 2016). The case-
fatality ratio was 5.1 % for all hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and this was 8 times higher for eclampsia
compared to severe pre-eclampsia. Kiondo et al, 2012, documented risk factors for pre-eclampsia in
Uganda which included chronic hypertension, low education levels, primi parity and parity of five or more.
A study in southwestern Uganda (Nabulo et al, 2021) found that myths and misconceptions about pre-
eclampsia and eclampsia, late antenatal attendance, low awareness and limited or no surveillance of pre-
eclampsia as the main contributing factors to mortality due to pre-eclampsia.
Several interventions have been proposed to prevent and manage pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. These
include improving community awareness and prevention, early diagnosis and timely intervention, early
detection and management of any complications, availability and administration of life saving drugs,
deciding on delivery plan and early referrals where necessary (Lassi, 2015). There is a need to monitor the
implementation of these interventions and how they contribute to maternal and perinatal outcomes. This
interventional framework will provide the basis for tracking implementation and assessment of achievements
against the targets (Micha, 2017).
1.2 Goal
To reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality attributed to pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive
disorders in pregnancy in Uganda
1.3 Objectives
1. To improve leadership, accountability, advocacy and policy environment for the management of maternal
and new-born health with focus on Pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
2. To institute preventive mechanisms for Pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy at
all levels of the health care system.
3. To improve access to essential commodities and supplies for the management of Pre-eclampsia and
other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
4. To improve overall clinical management of pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
5. To create community awareness of Pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Monitoring, evaluation and feedback will provide information required to effectively track and guide the pre-
eclampsia program implementation, improving effectiveness and efficiency of programs, promote learning
and guide decision making. This will include documentation of successful interventions, challenges, gaps in
implementation of pre-eclampsia and other HDP interventions. To conduct effective monitoring, evaluation
and feedback, there is need to establish benchmarks upon which monitoring, and evaluations will be based.
Data for key performance indicators should be routinely collected and analysed to monitor pre-eclampsia
program outputs at all levels of the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) result chain as shown in figure 1 below.
Improved Reduced
Medical Intervention
management Maternal
supplies Health access & Service
of and Perinatal
Indicator Workforce SOPs readiness.
preeclampsia/ Morbidity
IEC materials Quality, safety,
Financing
eclampsia and and Mortality
Governance
Information and Efficiency
other HDP due to PET
Data
Health facility / community assessments
Collection
Analysis
and Service and data quality assessments and program evaluations
synthesis
a) Planning: This will involve identifying key elements for monitoring and the indicators which will be
used to effectively track and guide program implementation, improve efficiency and effectiveness of
programs. The indicators for monitoring inputs, processes, outputs and outcomes have been developed.
b) Monitoring: The key elements for monitoring of program implementation will include (i) Inputs as well as
their efficient and effective use in the various program areas; (ii) Processes/activities being implemented
vis-à-vis the planned activities and timeliness of implementation of the various program activities and
(iii) Level of involvement of various stakeholders along the continuum of health care delivery. To monitor
performance, routine data collection and reporting will be guided by the REAP strategic framework.
Data sources will include National HMIS, support supervision and mentorship reports and evaluation
results.
c) Evaluation: Periodic evaluations will examine questions related to activity implementation. Programmatic
success will be analyzed using routinely collected data and feedback from stakeholders. The identified
best practices and lessons learnt will form a basis for recommendations and scale-up of interventions.
The evaluation questions will include (i) To what extent are planned activities actually realized, (ii) How
well are the PET interventions implemented, (iii) What outcomes were observed, (iv) Do PET interventions
make a difference? To answer some of these questions, the program will conduct baseline assessments
and follow-on periodic re-assessments.
d) Information dissemination: At all levels, quarterly performance review meetings will be held to review
progress of program implementation. Data from the various sources will be aggregated and analyzed
periodically to produce program reports which will be shared with all key stakeholders and implementing
partner.
Reduced maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality attributed to preeclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Uganda
Improved leadership, advocacy Established preventive Improved access to essential Improved management of Improved community awareness
accountability, and policy mechanisms for PET commodities and supplies for pre-eclampsia of PET
environment for management of management of PET
maternal and new-born health
with focus on PET
• Functional national, • Improved Risk assessment • Availability of supplies and • Improved availability of • Improved community
regional and HF • Administration of low dose commodities for the up-to-date clinical protocols awareness initiatives
subcommittee on PET aspirin to high-risk management of • Improved in-service Strengthen
• Incorporate PET prevention mothers pre-eclampsia training for Health workers in • Community health workers
and management into • Integration of hypertensive • Availability of essential PET management Improved capacity to identify and refer
sexual and reproductive disorders and PET into preventive medicines referral mechanisms high-risk pregnant mothers
health policy health education sessions during pregnancy • Improved management of
• Availability of updated • Availability of nationally pre-eclampsia Improved
guidelines on the adopted eclampsia kit for management of
management of PET the management of PET complications of
• Institute Supportive • Functional laboratory and pre-eclampsia
supervision mechanisms ultra-sound scan to • Establish QI initiatives on PET
• Increased support of data investigate complications related death and near miss
system to monitor PET at of PET reviews. Improved
all levels • Improved advocacy for postpartum follow-up for
• Functionalize all CEMONC health care financing for long term sequelae
sites to enhance PET commodities and
management of PET supplies
Proportion of Num: Number of Review all 15% of all 7% of Midterm survey Reduce PET PI, MOH,
Maternal deaths Maternal death MPDSR reports maternal Maternal (2.5 years) related deaths by RRH and all
attributed to pre- due to Pre- to ascertain the deaths deaths by 50% champions
eclampsia eclampsia cause of death 2030
Den: Total
number of
maternal deaths.
Perinatal mortality Number of still Count the deaths 38 19 UDHS every 5 Reduce perinatal PI, MOH, RRH
rate per 1,000 births and early from hospital years and other deaths by at least and champions
births neonatal deaths records, DHSI2, data sources 50%
per 1000 births MPDSR, UDHS annually
1. To strengthen leadership, accountability, advocacy and policy environment for management of maternal and new-born health with focus on Hypertensive disorders in
pregnancy.
The committee
should monitor
PET and other
safe motherhood
issues
Proportion of Existence of Minutes 0 2,259 All health In-charges of
health facilities functional Health facilities facilities
with a functional facility Safe managing
safe motherhood/ motherhood/ PET should
PET committee PET committees have a PET
meet monthly with subcommittee.
specified TOR These include all
HC IIIs and IVs,
Gen hospitals, RR
Hospitals and NR
Hospitals
1.3 Availability Revised and The guideline will Revised and 0 1 Once in 5 years The current MOH and
of updated approved include all aspects approved with midterm guideline is NASMEC –PET
guidelines on the guidelines in place of prevention, guidelines in review undergoing committee
management of treatment of PET, place review to include
PET and sequelae management of
complications
National PET National PET 0 1 Once with possible MTRAC form NASMEC-PET,
Proforma has Proforma review after 2 will be revised to
a checklist with (Appendix 1) years track PET/HDP
variables obtained Developed and cases
Development
from history, disseminated
of a National
examination,
Proforma for PET
medications
management A National
and time of
Proforma for PET
administration,
management will
investigations
help standardize
care
1.7 Advocate for Number of Advocacy meeting Policy briefs, ND 4 Quarterly Advocacy MOH
improved health advocacy will create minutes (take meeting will
financing for PET meetings held with awareness and it up as 1st inform decision NASMEC-PET
programs stakeholders. magnitude of indicator) makers about the
morbidity and need to prevent
• Parliamentary mortality due and mitigate the
committee on to PET. Costed effects of PET
health interventional and thus allocate
• Uganda women plans will be resources to
parliamentary shared with all support PET
association stakeholders to activities
• Development solicit funding
partners for the critical
(UNICEF, WHO, activities.
CDC, USAID)
Implementing
partners
2.3 Integration of Proportion of All health talks Health education 64% 100% Bi-annual IEC material will MOH NASMEC
hypertensive group health given to pregnant schedules /book be available for PET, health
disorders and education sessions women should health workers facility in
PET into health conducted in include the PET and patients charges.
education session which PET is topics
discussed
Proportion of All health talks Health education 43% 100% Bi-annual
women given given to post- schedules/book
discharge partum women
instructions and should include the
IEC materials PET topics
on signs and
symptoms of PET
| 24
Objective/ Indicator Definition Means of Baseline Target Frequency Assumptions Responsible
Strategy verification person/entity
3.1 Improved access Proportion of Sufficient stock Stock cards 18% 75 % Biannually The drugs will MOH, NMS,
to essential health facilities that can last for 3 be delivered by JMS, HF in-
preventive with sufficient months Rx Solutions, NMS, JMS a part charge
medicines during stock of low dispensing logs of the essential
pregnancy dose aspirin for medicines for
supplementation ANC
(75-150mg)
3.4 Functional Proportion of Emergency Presence of a ND 70% Annual Ultrasound MOH, UNHLS,
ultra-sound scan CEMONC facilities obstetric scan sonographer machines are Facility in-
to investigate able to perform should be able to & a functional supplied by NMS charges
complications of basic emergency give you a report ultrasound scan and JMS and
PET obstetric on maternal – machine. are managed by
Ultrasound Scans fetal parameters sonographer
Patient medical
records
3.5 Advocate for Number of Advocacy meeting Minutes 0 4 Quarterly Regular MoH,
improved health advocacy will create engagement of NASMEC –PET
financing for PET meetings held with awareness and Policy briefs stakeholders by subcommittee,
commodities and stakeholders. magnitude of NASMEC-PET hospital
supplies morbidity and subcommittee directors,
• Parliamentary mortality due and regional professional
Reports
committee on to PET. Costed champions bodies
health interventional may result
• Uganda women plans will be into increased
parliamentary shared with all funding.
association stakeholders to
• Development solicit funding
partners for the critical
(UNICEF, WHO, activities.
CDC, USAID)
| 27
Objective/ Indicator Definition Means of Baseline Target Frequency Assumptions Responsible
Strategy verification person/entity
4. Improved management of pre-eclampsia
4.1 Revision of MOH Updated clinical 0 1 Five years with MOH/
clinical protocols guideline and midterm review NASMEC-PET
and guidelines protocol for PET subcommittee
for management management
of PET
4.2 Revised protocols Proportion of Revised protocols Survey 48% 100% Annually There should MOH/
disseminated health facilities and Flow chart be a revised NASMEC-PET
with updated should be protocol with flow subcommittee,
protocols in ANC available in all chart awaiting partners
antenatal clinics printing that can
be printed and
placed in the
antenatal clinic
4.3 Disseminate Proportion of Protocol and Flow Survey 69% 100% Annually There should a MOH/
revised clinical health facilities chart present in revised protocol NASMEC-PET
protocols on the with revised the labor ward with flow chart subcommittee
management clinical protocols and postnatal awaiting printing
of PET that are on management units that can be
available in the of PET in maternity printed and
labor ward and and postnatal placed in the
postnatal areas areas. labour ward and
of the maternity postnatal units
consistent with
MOH guidelines
4.4 Strengthen in- Proportion of HF Health workers Evidence in 54.7% 90% Annually All maternity MOH/
service training with maternity should attend training book staff should NASMEC-PET
for Health and ANC staff training/CPD in the unit, have refresher subcommittee,
workers in PET that received sessions on the minutes and CPD on PET and HDP RRH team and
management training in PET components of handbook once a year as implementing
management in the protocol plus part of CPD partners
the last 12 months physical copies in requirements
the HFs
Proportion of All women Patient records, 26% 100% Bi annually Guidelines for MoH,
women with with mild pre- registers management of NASMEC PET
mild pre- eclampsia at term pre-eclampsia subcommittee
eclampsia at term (37weeks and and induction and Health
recommended above) without of labor are facility in
for induction as contraindication disseminated to charges
appropriate. for induction of all units
labor.
Proportion of Maternal and Patient records, 54% 100% Bi annually A standardized MoH,
women diagnosed fetal well-being registers monitoring tool NASMEC PET
with severe pre- of all women for PET will be subcommittee
eclampsia whose with severe pre- utilized at all and Health
vital signs, reflexes eclampsia should levels facility incharges
and fetal heart be monitored
rate are monitored regularly for at
based on the least 72 hours
protocol after delivery.
Proportion of All women Patient records, Bi-annually CEMONC MoH, IPs and
women diagnosed diagnosed with registers facilities should Health facility in
with pre- pre-eclampsia 49% 100% have functional charges
eclampsia that should have laboratories.
had laboratory laboratory
investigations like investigations
| 30
Objective/ Indicator Definition Means of Baseline Target Frequency Assumptions Responsible
Strategy verification person/entity
4.10 Improved Proportion of All women with Patient records, 64% 100% Bi-annually Mothers and DHT, Health
management of women with severe severe pre- registers health workers facility in
pre-eclampsia pre-eclampsia eclampsia should will follow the charges
in postpartum that are monitored be monitored Post-partum
period immediately after immediately after schedules
birth (first 72 delivery, at 1
hours) week, 6 weeks
Proportion of and 12 weeks Patient records, ND 100% Bi-annually
women with severe after birth. registers
pre-eclampsia that
were monitored at
1 week after birth.
| 31
Objective/ Indicator Definition Means of Baseline Target Frequency Assumptions Responsible
Strategy verification person/entity
5.2 Integrate PET Number of Appropriate Reports ND 6 Annually Celebrations of MoH, NASMEC
awareness awareness PET awareness women’s day,
campaigns in campaigns materials and international
critical national conducted on platforms will be midwifery day,
celebrations. select national and utilized to enable Mother’s Day,
international days dissemination of Father’s Day,
PET warning signs doctor’s day, etc
and management.
5.3 Strengthen Proportion of CHWs will be List of trained 0 40% annually Health care MoH, DHT,
Community health facilities trained in signs CHWs facilities already Regional
health workers with at least 3 and symptoms of have CHWs champions and
capacity to community health PET system in place health facility in
identify and workers trained in charges
refer high- danger signs of
risk pregnant PET
mothers
Proportion of CHWs will refer Carbon copies CHWs will be Health facility in
pregnant women mothers from of referred cases trained and refer charges, CHWs
suspected/ community to from community 0 100% Annually mothers to the
diagnosed with health care to health facilities, health facility
PET who were facilities for care VHT registers
referred by
community health
workers
Proportion of Women will be Women 43% 100% Quarterly There will be IEC MoH, NASM
women given discharged with with written information on
discharge clearly written information on cards given to
instructions and instructions with pet patients
IEC materials PET information
on signs and
symptoms of PET
5.1 Routine data sources provide data that are collected on a continuous basis, such as information
that health facilities collect on the patients utilizing their services. Although these data are collected
continuously with patient encounters, processing, aggregation and reporting on the data usually
takes place on a weekly, monthly or quarterly basis. This data is available more frequently and can
be used effectively to monitor the implementation of the framework. However, due to incomplete
documentation and poor record keeping the quality of the data from these sources may be poor.
5.1.1 Health Management Information System (HMIS) is a Ministry of Health driven platform which provides
tools for monitoring health services provided at each health facility and district in the country. It
provides paper tools in form of registers, proformas, prescription forms and reporting forms. Data
from the registers at service delivery levels are aggregated on paper-based forms that are submitted
to the district or entered directly in the electronic platform (District Health Information software 2
(DHIS2)) which is accessible at both district and MoH headquarters.
5.1.2 Logistics management information system (LMIS) is a platform which monitors the distribution of
health commodities across the country. LMIS is mostly paper based although efforts are in place to
scaleup electronic LMIS across all healthcare units in the country. LMIS captures data on procurement,
storage, and dispensing of medicines and health supplies. Thus, it manages medicines and health
supplies from start to finish, from the planning stages of procurement to the point when the product
is given to the patient. All data related to health commodities including PET and MNCH commodities
will be generated from this system.
5.1.3 The Integrated Human Resource Information System (iHRIS) will provide data on the health work
force. The system tracks the number of health workers by cadre, qualifications, licenses and practice
requirements. The system will provide data which will guide in deciding where capacity building
efforts should be focused and advocacy data for the recruitment of more health workers.
5.2 Non-routine Data Sources: Non-routine data sources provide data that are collected on a periodic
basis, usually annually, biennially or every five years. Using non-routine data minimizes the problem
of incorrectly estimating the target population when calculating coverage indicators although they
are often expensive thus irregular. These include.
5.2.1 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey Population survey (UDHS) provides statistical data on the
Ugandan population’s demographic characteristics, family planning initiatives, maternal mortality,
and infant and child mortality. It also provides data other healthcare services and activities including
antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care, children’s immunisations, and management of childhood
diseases among others. UDHS will provide data for the monitoring changes in impact indicators
which include maternal mortality ratio per 100,000 live births and perinatal mortality rate per 1,000
births.
5.2.2 Periodic Cross-sectional surveys will be designed to provide data which will monitor the outcomes
and short-term outputs of the program which cannot be obtained through the conventional routine
or non-routine systems. These surveys will be guided by the Ministry of Health under the NASMEC
Senior Leadership Team. The surveys will specifically provide data which will be used to measure the
following indicators.
5.2.3 The Annual Health Sector Performance Report (AHSPR) summarizes progress made in the health
sector, challenges and lessons learnt each financial year (FY). The AHSPR focuses on the overall
sectoral performance against the targets set for the FY and trends in performance for selected
indicators over the previous years. This report will provide data on the interim outputs of the program
Data for most of the indicators will be collected from other data sources which are not necessary
collected on routine basis. Some of these sources include the following
• Health facility documentation journals which will show if health facilities are implementing
quality improvement projects on PET.
• Support supervision reports which will assess various competencies at the facility, district and
regional levels.
• Clinical mentorship reports which will provide information on the competencies of the various
health workers.
• Meeting Minutes at various levels will inform the program if the various technical working
groups are constituted and functional.
• Training and activity report will provide evidence on the implementation of the activities.
5.4 Data Flow
The figure 3 below shows the flow of data from community through the Village health team reports
submitted through health facilities. Health facility reports submitted on weekly, monthly, or quarterly
basis to the district health office which are reviewed and then submitted to MOH headquarters. This
data is eventually made available through the national DHIS for decision making. Similarly, there is
feedback from MoH to the lower facilities which is in form of national health assembly, district health
offices performance review meetings for health facility teams as well as meetings held by health
facilities together with community health workers in which feedback is provided.
Professional
Academia Bodies
Regional Referral
Hospital
Health Facility
Data quality needs to be monitored and maintained throughout the data collection process. The
following strategies should be utilized at national, regional, district and health facility level to ensure
high quality data:
• Ensuring availability of standardized data collection and reporting tools with job aides to
guide data collectors.
• Regular data cleaning at all levels of data entry that is at the facility before data is entered in
the registers and at the district before data is entered into DHIS.
• Regular supportive supervision and data verification exercises using standardized tools to
establish the extent of variation and support teams to collect high quality data.
• Regular capacity building of health workers, record officers and personnel with data
management roles at all levels.
• Strengthening the information feedback mechanism to ensure that any data quality issues
identified at any level are communicated through the system.
• Conduct regular performance review to discuss data quality issues by all stakeholders in the
health sector.
To establish an effective monitoring and evaluation system, there is a need to clarify the roles and respon-
sibilities of different stakeholders, and who requires what information and for what purpose. The MoH will
require a coherent information flow system that is developed through regular consultations. The table below
gives a broad outline of roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder.
The Ministry of Health is responsible for the compilation, management and dissemination of all data
collected through the national HMIS and subsystems. All information products on the program will be
cleared by the Maternal and Child Health Technical Working Group. These products include: Policy Briefs,
MPDSR reports, bulletins, quarterly reports and annual health sector performance report. These products
will be disseminated through various for a such as meetings, print media, electronically on the MoH website
and digital media.
Communication Time
Cross matched blood requested from haematology __:__
Specialist on duty informed __:__
Anaesthetist /anesthesiologist informed __:__
Theatre informed where applicable __:__
Time transferred to Theatre __:__
Time transferred to HDU/ICU : circle where applicable __:__
Table subsequent observations