1 (5)
1 (5)
1 (5)
Advisory Editors
M. A. J. Chaplain, St. Andrews, UK
Angus Macintyre, Edinburgh, UK
Simon Scott, London, UK
Nicole Snashall, Leicester, UK
Endre Süli, Oxford, UK
Michael R. Tehranchi, Cambridge, UK
John F. Toland, Bath, UK
The Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series (SUMS) is a series designed for
undergraduates in mathematics and the sciences worldwide. From core foundational
material to final year topics, SUMS books take a fresh and modern approach.
Textual explanations are supported by a wealth of examples, problems and
fully-worked solutions, with particular attention paid to universal areas of difficulty.
These practical and concise texts are designed for a one- or two-semester course but
the self-study approach makes them ideal for independent use.
Fundamental Mathematical
Analysis
123
Robert Magnus
Faculty of Physical Sciences
University of Iceland
Reykjavik, Iceland
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2020
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether
the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of
illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and
transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar
or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from
the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained
herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard
to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
To Jórunn Erla
Preface
This text has developed from courses that I have taught on analysis to university
students of mathematics in their first semester. However, it has grown to be much
more than a course for first year students. Although the 11 chapters (beginning at
Chap. 2) include the material usually to be found in beginning courses of analysis, I
have also had further objectives that are not usually communicated to beginning
students.
In my view mathematics underwent a transformation in the late nineteenth
century and early twentieth, indeed a revolution, that could not have been foreseen.
Previously there had not been general agreement about standards of proof except
perhaps in classical Euclidean geometry. The logical basis of arguments used to
prove results about calculus and infinite series, indeed about most mathematics
since the Renaissance, was not understood, and there was some anxiety as to
whether the edifice of mathematical knowledge might come crashing down. Some
mathematicians issued warnings, but the speed and momentum of new discoveries
was fortunately unstoppable, and the results seemed correct; they certainly passed
all empirical tests of correctness. The idea that analysis was transformed, from a
subject with shaky foundations, to become a flagship of correct mathematical
argument, and that this change occurred over a rather short period, is something that
I regard as important for understanding its nature. Suddenly there was general
agreement over what constituted a correct proof, provided only that the details
could be taken in by a human reader. Historically, analysis was a great success
story.
The objective implied by the last paragraph, to communicate to the reader the
success of analysis in overcoming previously held doubts, is not attained by
pedantic rigour or a painstaking level of formality. Nor does it call for any genuine
attempt to recount the history of analysis or follow a historical development of the
subject. Nor does it call for any novel approach to any topic. It does, though, colour
the way the topics are presented. It calls for clarity and meaning in the proofs,
honesty about what has been achieved and the ever present awareness that the
reader is an intelligent adult who genuinely is trying to understand what analysis is
about and why it is important.
vii
viii Preface
Set theory has played a basic role in the evolution of analysis. A text of this kind
has to present a certain amount of set theory at the outset. But a proper axiomatic
treatment of set theory would alienate many readers. The alternative to this has
usually been the awfully named naive set theory, involving a careless approach to
difficult ideas. But this too can alienate readers (though probably not the same
group of readers). Some middle approach is needed that is honest about set theory
but not pedantically detailed. The reader should be made aware that there is a need
for clear principles for building sets, including many sets that mathematicians take
for granted, even if these principles are not all explained in detail. How can anal-
ysis, as it is usually understood, exist unless it is accepted that an infinite set exists?
This a major stumbling block for those not trained in mathematics and a “look it’s
obvious” approach will not win any converts. And why should it? In an accurate
treatment an infinite set is introduced by a set-building axiom. When set theory is
naive, non-mathematicians can appear foolish, and mathematicians can appear
doctrinaire.
Every text of this kind has its red lines, introduced by the hackneyed phrase
‘beyond the scope of this book’. The word ‘fundamental’ of the title is supposed to
be taken seriously and construed as meaning a certain portion of analysis. What bits
of analysis are fundamental? They must include the following items: an accurate
description of the real numbers, limits, infinite series, continuity, derivatives,
integrals and the elementary transcendental functions. These are standard contents
of a first university course in analysis. Very broadly, the boundaries of fundamental
analysis lie where the key to further progress requires certain far-reaching theories
that are introduced to students after a first course, typically, complex analysis,
metric spaces, multivariate calculus or the Lebesgue integral.
In this text there is no discussion of countability versus uncountability for sets.
There are no open or closed sets (apart from intervals), and therefore no topology or
metrics; and certainly no Heine–Borel theorem, though we go dangerously close to
requiring it. This means that we stop short of a nice, necessary and sufficient
condition for integrability. The integral is Riemann-Darboux; though I freely
confess my view that the Lebesgue integral is the greatest advance in analysis of the
twentieth century. There is no general treatment of any class of differential equa-
tions; though some very special and important equations appear at crucial places in
the narrative. There is no complex analysis (though there is a chapter introducing
complex numbers) and almost no functions of several variables; certainly no final
chapter, so beloved by authors of analysis texts, entitled ‘Extension to several
variables’. Surely several variables deserve a book of their own.
Missing is any construction of the real numbers or the complex numbers. My
view is clear: neither construction is needed for analysis. They serve only two
purposes: logically, to prove that the axioms of analysis are consistent; and peda-
gogically, to answer students who obstinately want to know what the square root of
two and the square root of minus one are in reality, and who are not necessarily
convinced by the answers. Moreover, giving prominence to constructions tends to
suggest that there is only one right way to understand real numbers or complex
numbers.
Preface ix
After reading two paragraphs devoted to what is not included, the reader may
well wonder what the author considers fundamental analysis to be. To see what is
included the reader is referred to the rather thorough list of contents.
Analysis is like the trunk of a great tree that gives rise to branches, some small,
some large and some still growing. I have included a number of sections marked
with the symbol ð}Þ and referred to as nuggets (as in nugget of wisdom, though I'm
actively searching for a different name). These take up fascinating topics that can be
explored using fundamental analysis, but can be omitted without losing the main
thread. They go in some cases far beyond what a beginning student would ordi-
narily encounter. They serve to enrich the narrative and often point to a whole
subject area that springs out of the main trunk of the tree. They are not needed in the
main text of sections not so marked; however, they may be needed for some of the
exercises. Some push the boundaries of the main text and encroach on areas where
one really starts to need complex analysis or multivariate calculus to make sig-
nificant progress. Mostly they can be omitted in a first course of analysis. These
sections, and exercises elsewhere that may need material from them, are marked
with the nugget symbol ð}Þ. Most conclude with a short subsection called ‘Pointers
to further study’ listing topics or whole subject areas that the reader can look up if
they wish to pursue the topic of the nugget further.
This text began life as lectures for a first course of analysis, which was taught a
number of times to mathematics students in their first year at the University of
Iceland, and consisted of 23 lectures of 80 min each. Material from all 12 chapters
was covered in the lectures, in the same order of presentation, omitting the content
of sections marked with the nugget symbol ð}Þ. Some of the topics that ended up in
the nuggets were assigned to students as study projects on which they were required
to give a presentation.
Thus, in spite of a considerable expansion, and because the additional and more
demanding material is clearly marked, the text can be used as the basis for a course.
The instructor would only have to agree with the author on a number of key
pedagogical issues, that can give rise to heated disputes and to which the answer is a
matter of personal preference. For example, over whether or not to construct the real
numbers; or over whether to present sequences and series before functions of a real
variable; or whether uniform convergence should be covered in a first course; or
how to define the circular functions. The first issue is discussed in the nugget
(Sect. 3.10) ‘Philosophical implications of decimals’ and elsewhere in this preface;
the elementary transcendental functions are rigorously defined and studied at the
earliest point in the text at which it is possible in a practical and meaningful manner.
The text contains many exercises mostly collected together into exercise sec-
tions. However, some isolated exercises interrupt the text with the purpose of
inviting the reader to engage immediately and constructively with the material. It
x Preface
will be noticed that many of the exercises are challenging and some of them present
results of independent interest. It is expected that the instructor can provide addi-
tional routine exercises for the purpose of practising the basic rules.
Scattered throughout the text are some pictures. The philosophy behind them is
that they may help the reader to visualise an idea or a proof, but are never a
necessary part of the discourse. They were hand-drawn using the free graphics
software IPE and are intended to resemble nice impromptu sketches that a teacher
might make in class.
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 What Is Mathematical Analysis? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Milestones in the History of Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 Real Numbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1 Natural Numbers and Set Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1.1 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.2 Axioms for the Real Numbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2.1 Arithmetic Axioms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2.2 Axioms of Ordering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2.3 Integers and Rationals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.2.4 Q is Insufficient for Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.2.5 Dedekind Sections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.2.6 Axiom of Completeness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.2.7 Square Root of 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.2.8 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.2.9 The Functions Max, Min, and Absolute Value . . . . . 15
2.2.10 Mathematical Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.2.11 Exercises (cont’d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.3 Decimal Fractions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.3.1 Practical and Theoretical Meaning of Decimals . . . . 21
2.3.2 Algorithm for Decimals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3.3 Decimal Representation of Rational Numbers . . . . . . 23
2.3.4 Repeating Decimals and Geometric Series . . . . . . . . 23
2.3.5 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.4 Subsets of R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.4.1 Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.4.2 The Completeness Axiom Again . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.4.3 Bounded Subsets of R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.4.4 Supremum and Infimum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
xi
xii Contents