————— 5/8/2006 1:51:06 PM ————————————————————

Power and Sample Size

1-Sample Z Test

Testing mean = null (versus > null)

Calculating power for mean = null + difference
Alpha = 0.05 Assumed standard deviation = 2.5

Sample Target
Difference Size Power Actual Power
1 54 0.9 0.902259
Ho : Mu = 600
Ha: Mu>600
ALpa 5%
Sigma = 1.85

One-Sample Z: Time 1
Test of mu = 600 vs > 600
The assumed standard deviation = 1.85

95% Lower
Variable N Mean StDev SE Mean Bound Z P
Time 1 100 600.072 1.335 0.185 599.768 0.39 0.349

One-Sample Z: Time 1
Test of mu = 600 vs > 600
The assumed standard deviation = 1.85

95% Lower
Variable N Mean StDev SE Mean Bound Z P
Time 1 100 600.072 1.335 0.185 599.768 0.39 0.349
Descriptive Statistics: Time 1, Time 2, Time 3,
Time 4
Total
Variable Count Mean SE Mean StDev
Time 1 100 600.07 0.134 1.34
Time 2 100 599.55 0.0619 0.619
Time 3 100 600.23 0.187 1.87
Time 4 30 599.94 0.109 0.597

Two-Sample T-Test and CI: Time 1, Time 2

Two-sample T for Time 1 vs Time 2

N Mean StDev SE Mean

Time 1 100 600.07 1.34 0.13
Time 2 100 599.548 0.619 0.062

Difference = mu (Time 1) - mu (Time 2)

Estimate for difference: 0.524
95% lower bound for difference: 0.281
T-Test of difference = 0 (vs >): T-Value = 3.56 P-Value = 0.000
DF = 198
Both use Pooled StDev = 1.0406

One-way ANOVA: Time 1, Time 2

Source DF SS MS F P
Factor 1 13.73 13.73 12.68 0.000
Error 198 214.41 1.08
Total 199 228.14

S = 1.041 R-Sq = 6.02% R-Sq(adj) = 5.54%

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on

Pooled StDev
Level N Mean StDev ------+---------+---------+---------
+---
Time 1 100 600.07 1.34 (-------
*-------)
Time 2 100 599.55 0.62 (-------*-------)
------+---------+---------+---------
+---
599.50 599.75 600.00
600.25

Pooled StDev = 1.04

Histogram of H1_20, H2_20, H3_20, H4_20

Test and CI for Two Variances: H1_20, H4_20

Method

Null hypothesis Sigma(H1_20) / Sigma(H4_20) = 1

Alternative hypothesis Sigma(H1_20) / Sigma(H4_20) < 1
Significance level Alpha = 0.05

Statistics

Variable N StDev Variance

H1_20 20 0.942 0.888
H4_20 20 1.119 1.252

Ratio of standard deviations = 0.842

Ratio of variances = 0.709

95% One-Sided Confidence Intervals

Upper Bound Upper Bound

Distribution for StDev for Variance
of Data Ratio Ratio
Normal 1.240 1.537
Continuous 1.622 2.632
Tests

Test
Method DF1 DF2 Statistic P-Value
F Test (normal) 19 19 0.71 0.230
Levene's Test (any continuous) 1 38 0.01 0.469

Test and CI for One Variance: H4_20

Method

Null hypothesis Sigma = 1.5

Alternative hypothesis Sigma < 1.5

The chi-square method is only for the normal distribution.

The Bonett method is for any continuous distribution.

Statistics

Variable N StDev Variance

H4_20 20 1.12 1.25

95% One-Sided Confidence Intervals

Upper
Bound
for Upper Bound
Variable Method StDev for Variance
H4_20 Chi-Square 1.53 2.35
Bonett 1.58 2.50

Tests

Test
Variable Method Statistic DF P-Value
H4_20 Chi-Square 10.58 19 0.063
Bonett — — 0.080
Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test for Observed
Counts in Variable: Fre Obs
Using category names in Colour choice

Test Contribution
Category Observed Proportion Expected to Chi-Sq
NB 345 0.333333 263.333 25.3270
SB 267 0.333333 263.333 0.0511
Pink 178 0.333333 263.333 27.6523

N DF Chi-Sq P-Value
790 2 53.0304 0.000

Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test for Observed

Counts in Variable: Fre Obs
Using category names in Colour choice

Test Contribution
Category Observed Proportion Expected to Chi-Sq
NB 45 0.5 56 2.16071
SB 67 0.5 56 2.16071

N DF Chi-Sq P-Value
112 1 4.32143 0.038

Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test for Observed

Counts in Variable: Fre Obs
Using category names in Colour choice

Test Contribution
Category Observed Proportion Expected to Chi-Sq
NB 49 0.5 58 1.39655
SB 67 0.5 58 1.39655

N DF Chi-Sq P-Value
116 1 2.79310 0.095

Pie Chart of Fre Obs

Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test for Observed

Counts in Variable: Fre Obs
Using category names in Colour choice

Test Contribution
Category Observed Proportion Expected to Chi-Sq
NB 149 0.5 158 0.512658
SB 167 0.5 158 0.512658

N DF Chi-Sq P-Value
316 1 1.02532 0.311

————— 2/2/2023 3:21:22 PM

————————————————————

Welcome to Minitab, press F1 for help.

Retrieving project from file: ‘C:\Users\USER\Desktop\6 sigma\Six
Sigma
CBEMG - Copy\CBEMG Six Sigma Data Practice FIles\GB MEASUREMENT
DATA
SETS.MPJ’

Results for: gageaiag2.MTW

Gage R&R Study - XBar/R Method
 %Contribution
Source VarComp (of VarComp)
Total Gage R&R 0.0009802 3.47
Repeatability 0.0008727 3.09
Reproducibility 0.0001075 0.38
Part-To-Part 0.0272724 96.53
Total Variation 0.0282526 100.00

Study Var %Study Var

Source StdDev (SD) (6 × SD) (%SV)
Total Gage R&R 0.031308 0.18785 18.63
Repeatability 0.029541 0.17725 17.57
Reproducibility 0.010368 0.06221 6.17
Part-To-Part 0.165144 0.99086 98.25
Total Variation 0.168085 1.00851 100.00

Number of Distinct Categories = 7

Gage R&R for Response

Attribute Agreement Analysis for Reading

Within Appraisers
Assessment Agreement

Appraiser # Inspected # Matched Percent 95% CI

Tester 1 10 7 70.00 (34.75, 93.33)
Tester 2 10 8 80.00 (44.39, 97.48)

# Matched: Appraiser agrees with him/herself across trials.

Between Appraisers
Assessment Agreement
# Inspected # Matched Percent 95% CI
10 4 40.00 (12.16, 73.76)

# Matched: All appraisers’ assessments agree with each other.

Attribute Agreement Analysis

Attribute Agreement Analysis for Reading

Within Appraisers
Assessment Agreement

Appraiser # Inspected # Matched Percent 95% CI

Tester 1 10 7 70.00 (34.75, 93.33)
Tester 2 10 8 80.00 (44.39, 97.48)

# Matched: Appraiser agrees with him/herself across trials.

Each Appraiser vs Standard

Assessment Agreement

Appraiser # Inspected # Matched Percent 95% CI

Tester 1 10 6 60.00 (26.24, 87.84)
Tester 2 10 8 80.00 (44.39, 97.48)

# Matched: Appraiser’s assessment across trials agrees with the

known standard.

Assessment Disagreement

# Wrong / # Right /
Appraiser Right Percent Wrong Percent # Mixed
Percent
Tester 1 1 16.67 0 0.00 3
30.00
Tester 2 0 0.00 0 0.00 2
20.00

# Wrong / Right: Assessments across trials = Wrong / standard =

Right.
# Right / Wrong: Assessments across trials = Right / standard =
Wrong.
# Mixed: Assessments across trials are not identical.

Between Appraisers
Assessment Agreement

# Inspected # Matched Percent 95% CI

10 4 40.00 (12.16, 73.76)

# Matched: All appraisers’ assessments agree with each other.

All Appraisers vs Standard

Assessment Agreement

# Inspected # Matched Percent 95% CI

10 4 40.00 (12.16, 73.76)

# Matched: All appraisers’ assessments agree with the known

standard.

Attribute Agreement Analysis