[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
295 views15 pages

Bank of Baroda (Money Suit) BARUN SANKAR BANERJEE

Money suit bank account

Uploaded by

consult.legalinc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
295 views15 pages

Bank of Baroda (Money Suit) BARUN SANKAR BANERJEE

Money suit bank account

Uploaded by

consult.legalinc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

IN THE COURT OF LD. CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DIVN.

) AT ALIPORE

BEFORE THE LD. 8TH BENCH

MONEY SUIT NO. OF 2016

BANK OF BARODA,

A body corporate constituted

under the Banking Companies

(Acquisition and Transfer of

Undertaking) Act, 1970 having its

head office at Mandvi Baroda

and its Kolkata Metro Regional

office at Baroda Tower, 4th Floor,

Plot 38/2, Block GN, Sector-V,

Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700091,

in the State of West Bengal and

carrying on banking business

amongst other places and its

branch office at 200T, S.P.

Mukherjee Road, P.S- Tollygunge

Kolkata-700026, commonly

known as Tollygunge Branch.

...PLAINTIFF

VERSUS
2

1) Barun Sankar Banerjee, son of

Late Girija Sankar Banerjee,

residing at 22/1, Mondal Para

Road, Joypore Pally, P.S.–

Behala, Kolkata-700034.

2) Sujata Banerjee, wife of Sri

Barun Sankar Banerjee,

residing at 22/1, Mondal Para

Road, Joypore Pally, P.S.–

Behala, Kolkata-700034

...DEFENDANTS

SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF A SUM OF RS. 6,54,546.73/- (RUPEES


SIX LAC FIFTY FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED POINT SEVEN
THREE ONLY) AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS, THE PLAINTIFF
ABOVENAMED

The plaintiff states that:-

1. That at all material times the plaintiff carried on and

still carries on business inter alia, at its branch office at 200T,

S.P.Mukherjee Road, P.S- Tollygunge, Kolkata-700026,

commonly known as Tollygunge Branch (hereinafter referred to

as the ‘said branch’).

2. That the defendants are the borrower and residing at

22/1, Mondal Para Road, Joypore Pally, P.S.–Behala, Kolkata-

700034.
3

3. That upon an application of the defendants, the

plaintiff bank had sanctioned a Term Loan with a limit of Rs.

5,60,000/- (Rupees Five Lac Sixty Thousand only) vide sanction

letter dated 10.10.2011. The aforesaid sanctioned letter was

duly signed by the defendants acknowledging and accepting

the terms and conditions contained therein.

A Xerox copy of Application dated 07.10.2011 is

annexed herewith and marked as Annexure ‘A’.

5. That in order to secure due repayment of the said

credit facility together with interests, costs, charges,

commissions, expenses and other monies payable, the

defendants executed the following documents (amongst other)

on 10.10.2011.

a) Demand Promissory Note;

b) Draft Undertaking;

c) Loan Agreement for individual’s ( Housing Loan);

d) General Form of Guarantee ;

e) Declaration in the matter of Mortgage by deposit of

Title Deeds in respect of Immovable;

f) Annexure ‘A’;

g) Memorandum of Entry;

h) Letter of Confirmation of Mortgage;


4

The copies of the aforesaid documents executed by the

defendants are enclosed herewith and marked with annexure

‘A1’ collectively.

The plaintiff craves leave from the Learned Court to

produce the original of those documents at the time of hearing,

if necessary.

5. That the plaintiff bank sanctioned the above credit

facility in favour of defendants for the Home loan requirement

of the defendants in a loan account opened in the books of

plaintiff at the said branch in the name of defendant no. 1

herein on the following amongst various other terms and

conditions :-

a) It was agreed that the defendants would repay the

amount becoming due on the said loan account on

demand together with interest thereon @ 0.1% below

premium lending rate of the bank (under floating

option) with a minimum 13.25% per annum puts

interest tax with monthly rests.


5

b) The defendants also agreed to repay the said loan at

the said branch of the plaintiff in 60 equated monthly

installments.

c) The defendants further agreed to bear interest at the

additional rate of 2% per month on the amount of

installment and/or interest in case of non-payment and

delayed payment on overdue amount for overdue

period and/or default in payment of any installment

and/or interest.

Copy of the sanctioned letter dated 10.10.2011 is

annexed herewith and marked with annexure ‘B’.

The plaintiff further craves leave from the Ld. Court to

produce the original sanction letter at the time of hearing, if

necessary.

6. Not although the plaintiff disbursed the sanctioned

amount of loan in favour of the defendants, the defendants

intentionally failed and neglected to repay the loan amount of

the plaintiff bank, as a result the account became Non

Performing Account on 09.11.2015 but sent a letter

acknowledging the debt by signed and executed a letter of

Acknowledgement of Debt on 09.08.2014 indicating the

acknowledgment and acceptance of their debt and further


6

thereby extending the period of limitation for recovery of the

aforesaid loan and such the aforesaid claim is not barred in any

way.

A copy of the Letter of Acknowledgement of debt is

annexed herewith and marked with Annexure ‘C’.

The plaintiff further craves leave of the Learned Court

to produce the original document, at the time of hearing, if

required.

7. That the plaintiff lent and disbursed the said credit

facility to the defendants through its Tollygunge Branch, as

agreed upon and the defendants became liable to pay the dues

of the plaintiff on demand as per agreed terms jointly or

severally.

8. That even after several requests, claims, demand and

reminders through personal contact, telephone and by letters,

as well as send legal notice through it’s Ld. Advocate by legal

notice dated 31/03/2016, the defendants intentionally failed

and neglected to abide by the conditions agreed upon and

even after demand failed to repay the loan of the plaintiff bank
7

along with interest as per agreed terms although the

defendants is economically sound.

A copy of legal demand notice dated 31/03/2016 along

with postal receipt are annexed herewith and collectively

marked with annexure ‘D’.

The Plaintiff Bank being a Nationalized Financial

Institution of the Union of India and to act according to

guidelines of R.B.I. as well as SARFECIE ACT and to recover of

loan, the Plaintiff Bank served SARFAECE Notice U/S. 13(2) of

the SARFAECE ACT, 2002. The Defendants filed an S.A.

Application before the DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL to stop the

legal proceedings of recovery as well as filed a Defamatory

Suit, being no. 208 of 2015 lying with the Ld. 7 th Civil Judge

Senior Division at Alipore. The Plaintiff Bank entered

appearance of those matters by filing duly executed

Vokalatnamas and will contest both the matters by filling

Written Objections and Written Statements.

9. That there is now due and owing to the plaintiff from

the defendants a sum of RS. 6,54,546.73/- (RUPEES SIX LAC

FIFTY FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED POINT SEVEN THREE

ONLY) with interest calculated up to 26.09.2016 which is

reflecting in the statement of accounts maintained by the

plaintiff in its ordinary course of business including penal


8

interest in the name of the defendants’ account of the

aforesaid loan. That the plaintiff is entitled to claim further

interest at the rate of 13.15% per annum plus 2% penal

interest per month thereon from16.04.016 as per the agreed

terms till the date of repayment of the entire claim made

herein and the plaintiff undertakes to pay the ad-valorem court

fees thereon.

The copy of Statement of Accounts up to 26.09.2016

including penal interest is annexed herewith and marked with

annexure ‘E’.

The plaintiff further craves leave of the Ld. Court to

produce the original documents, at the time of hearing, if

required.

10. That for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction, the

plaintiff values its claim at RS. 6,54,546.73/- (RUPEES SIX LAC

FIFTY FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED POINT SEVEN THREE

ONLY) and advalorem court fees of Rs. 21,580/- (Rupees

Twenty One Thousand Five Hundred Eighty) only is paid

thereon.

11 That the plaintiff lent and extended and disbursed the

said credit facility to the defendants through its Tollygunge


9

Branch, 200T, S.P. Mukherjee Road, P.S. – Tollygunge, Kolkata-

700026, situated within the jurisdiction of this Ld. Court firstly

on 10.10.2011 when the loan facility was sanctioned by the

plaintiff in favour of defendants and issued the sanction letter

in favour of defendants, after that the defendants accepted the

terms and conditions of such sanction by putting their

signature therein and then on 10.10.2011 when the demand

promissory note and other documents accepting the terms of

loan were executed by the defendants at the said Branch of the

plaintiff bank and thereafter when the loan was disbursed to

the defendants , on 09.01.2014 when the defendants

acknowledged their debts by executing letter of

acknowledgement of debt. Thereafter on 09.11.2015 when due

to intentional default of the defendants the account was

classified as NPA and finally it is crystal clear that the

defendants availed loan and till remain unpaid and thereafter

has been continuing from day to day. Thus the cause of action

arose within jurisdiction of this learned court and this court has

ample jurisdiction to try and entertain this case and further the

aforesaid claim is not barred by limitation in any way

whatsoever.

12. That the list of documents are enclosed herewith and

the plaintiff crave of the Ld. Court to produce the original of


10

those or any such other documents (which are in its custody), if

required, at the time of hearing.

The plaintiff therefore prays for :-

a) A decree of RS. 6,54,546.73/-

(RUPEES SIX LAC FIFTY FOUR

THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED

POINT SEVEN THREE ONLY)

against the defendants inter alia

directing the defendants to pay

the said sum of RS. 6,54,546.73/-

(RUPEES SIX LAC FIFTY FOUR

THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED

POINT SEVEN THREE ONLY) with

interest at the rate of 13.15% per

annum plus 2% penal interest

per month thereon from

27.09.2016 till realization of the

entire debts including interim

interest and interests on

judgment.

b) Costs;

c) Receiver;

d) Injunction;
11

e) Attachment;

f) Any other and/or further reliefs

as the plaintiff is entitled in law

and equity.

VERIFICATION

I, , the Authorized Chief Manager of the

plaintiff bank abovenamed, do hereby declares and states that

the statements contained in paragraphs 1 and including the

cause title thereof are true to my knowledge, those contained

in paragraphs to are based on information derived

from the said branch office records which I believe to be true

and correct and the rests are my respectful submissions before

this Learned Court.

I sign this verification on this _____ day of September,

2016 at my Branch office

at……………………………………………………….., P.S. –

Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700 026, commonly known as Lake

Market Branch.
12

AFFIDAVIT

I, , son/daughter of

, aged about 56 years, working for gain at

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, P.S- Tollygunge, Kolkata-

700026, known as Lake Market Branch, do hereby solemnly

affirm and say as follows:-

1. That I am one of the Authorized Branch Manager of the

Plaintiff and I have made myself well acquainted with the facts

and circumstances of the case and am competent to verify the

plaint and affirm this affidavit for and on behalf of the plaintiff.

2. That the statements contained in paragraphs 1 and

including the cause title thereof are true to my knowledge,

those contained in paragraphs and are based on

information derived from my office records which I believe to

be true and correct and the rests are my respectful

submissions before this Learned Court.

Identified by me

DEPONENT

Advocate
13

DOCUMENTS RELIED ON BY THE PLAINTIFF

a. Demand Promissory Note dated 10.10.2011;

b. Draft Undertaking dated 10.10.2011;

c. Loan agreement for individual’s (Housing Loan)

dated 10.10.2011;

d. General Form of Guarantee dated 10.10.2011;

e. Declaration in the matter of Mortgage by deposit of

Title Deeds in respect of Immovable dated

10.10.2011;

f. Annexure ‘A’ dated 10.10.2011.

g. Memorandum of Entry 10.10.2011;

h. Letter of Confirmation of Mortgage dated

10.10.2011 ;

i. Sanction letter dated 10.10.2011;

j. Letter of Acknowledgment of Debt dated

09.08.2014;

k. Legal notice dated 31.03.2016;

l. Statement of Account dated 26.09.2016;

DOCUMENTS PRODUCED WITH THE PLAINT

a. Demand Promissory Note dated 10.10.2011;


14

b. Draft Undertaking dated 10.10.2011;

c. Loan agreement for individual’s (Housing Loan)

dated 10.10.2011;

d. General Form of Guarantee dated 10.10.2011;

e. Declaration in the matter of Mortgage by deposit of

Title Deeds in respect of Immovable dated

10.10.2011;

f. Annexure ‘A’ dated 10.10.2011.

g. Memorandum of Entry 10.10.2011;

h. Letter of Confirmation of Mortgage dated

10.10.2011 ;

i. Sanction letter dated 10.10.2011;

j. Letter of Acknowledgment of Debt dated

09.08.2014;

k. Legal notice dated 31.03.2016;

l. Statement of Account dated 26.09.2016;

COPIES OF EXHIBITS ANNEXED TO THE PLAINT

NIL
15

IN THE COURT OF LD. CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DIVN.) AT ALIPORE

BEFORE THE LD. 8th BENCH

MONEY SUIT NO. OF 2016

BANK OF BARODA

-Versus-

BARUN SANKAR BANERJEE & ANR.

REGISTERED ADDRESS

Name Plaintiff Registered address Remarks


or
Defenda
nt
Bank of Plaintiff 2 200T, S.P. Mukherjee Road, NIL
Baroda P.S. - Tollygunge, Kolkata-
700026. Known as
Tollygunge Branch.

You might also like