STRUCTURE AUDIT REPORT Of BUILDING Rayat Shikshan Sanstha’s Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil College of Engineering, Satara DATE: 06/04/2023INTRODUCTION/BASIC DATA. CLIENT: - Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil College of Engineering, Satara 41. TYPE OF STRUCTURE + R.C.C.FRAMED STRUCTURE 2. CONSTRUCTION HISTORY Gr Floor around = as_ informed ARCHITECT/DEVELOPER First & Second floor around 1989 3. YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION 1989 4, MODE OF USE ORIGINAL USE Educational 5. MAJOR REPAIR WORKS } os CARRIED OUT TILL TODAY 6. MAJOR DISTRESS SIGNS OR Complaints : Not seen 7. AVAILABILITY OF DRAWINGS: Architectural plan of Building 8. REPAIR HISTORY Not Known 9. As per MCGM guideline structural audit is mandatory at every three year for a Structure which is more than 30 years old.CONDITION SURVEY REPORT ON THE INSPECTION OF BUILDING INTRODUCTION. Ender the instructions from the one of the Pricncipal, Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil College of Engineering Satara, M/s. were invited to submit their proposal to survey the said building under reference to understand thescope of our work, principles and procedures of investigation during Structural survey. Subsequently the tenant appointed us as consulting engineers for survey for the ‘above said building under reference. A visual survey of the flat which were open for inspection inside of premises and outside was conducted by Mrs. Aparna V. Phalake & Mr. Abhay B. Shelar. PURPOSE : ‘The purpose of the inspection was to examine the external and internal condition of the building, assess the condition of RCC member's viz. columns, beams, and slabs and submit a civil & structural survey report for assessment of the same. METHODOLOGY :- Following methodology has been adopted during the health study of Building * _ Tocarry out visual inspection of whole structure and collect details of each structural member in terms of dimensions, type, distress observed. VISUAL SURVEY :- The entire building from outside and flats whichever were open and allowed for inspection from inside was inspected. The visual inspection was carried out followed by light tapping wherever Fequired in wall members. Further Non Destructive Tests were carried out on RCC members and details are mentioned in this report. Further Non Destructive Tests like Rebound Hammer, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test, Carbonation Test, Half Cell potential tests, Cover meter test, Core test, Aggregate cement ratio test, Chemical analysis test Chloride and Sulphide were carried out at certain locations on RCC membersOBSERVATIONS ‘The said building under reference is a R.C.C framed structure Ground +2 upper about 34 years old as informed by Our observations after visual inspection are as under: 1 External plaster has developed cracks at some places. The plaster appears to have de- bonded at places because of ageing and temperature siresses. Through this cracks the rain water seeps the internal face of walls imparting dampness to the walls inside of the rooms and giving water marks on painted surfaces. Because of the dampness the paint also becomes loose. In Chesmistry Lab faculty room where reinforcement is exposed in slab/celling. There are cracks in celling and loose plaster shows signs of deterioration and debonding from parent concrete. Water Leakages & dampness in walls observed in many classroom and laboratory due to seepage from outside during monsoon. The some of chaljas have cracked and likely to fall any moment because the reinforcement inside is corroded and concrete has spalled off at places. The slab below water tank in front library which is not mentioned in architectural plan but exist has severe damage such as spalling of concrete and steel getting corroded which in very bad condition and has to be repaired immediately. At some places vegetation is occurred need to be removed to avoid future distress in the concrete.Vegetation Observed to parapet wall at open space in front of LibraryMajor leakages has been observed on second floor at Chemistry lab where contact between slab and beam has been lost Leakages observed in many classroom at second floorREMEDIAL MEASURES FOR REPAIRS 1. For repairs to RCC members under distress like beams, slabs, columns, chaljas from inside and outside, we recommend the following : b. Remove all the loose rust of reinforcement by hammering and cleaning the rusted surface by stiff wire brush. Remove the residual rust by applying rust remover with cotton waste swab. Allow the Solution to remain for at least 24 hrs. and then brush off the loose particles of any by ‘means of the brush Apply rust passivator in two coats to reinforcement which acts as rust preventor in intervals of 4 hrs. Between 2 coats. Apply Polymer Modified mortar In 1:6:15 and make up the cover concrete to RCC member and cured for min, 3 days. If after the corrosion the existing reinforcement is in adequate then the new reinforcement by the side of old reinforcement be provided and the jacketing of the column has to be done as per the advice of the R.C.C. consultant. The wall beside Some of the columns may be required to be broken for working space depending on site condition 2. Incase if there is more honey combing or voids in concrete after the removal of plaster then injection grouting by plain cement slurry with polymer if required will have to be done at places. 3. After the repairs to the R.C.C, members, the surface be internally and externally replastered and painted as per the requirement.CONCLUSION -- BRESENTLY THE CONDITION OF RCC MEMBERS FROM OUTSIDE AND THE INSIDE OF THE CLASSROOM AND LABORATORY WHICH ARE SURVEYED WHICH IN OUR OPINION CAN PRESENTLY BE CONSIDERED AS GOOD. CERTAIN PORTION OF THE BUILDING NEEDS TO BE REPAIRED. ALL RCC MEMBERS MARKED IN OUR REPORT TO BE REPAIRED ON TOP PRIORITY ON WAR FOOTING WITHIN 30 DAYS OF SUBMISSION OF REPORT. LIST OF TOP PRIORITY MEMBERS ARE MARKED SEPERATELY IN THIS REPORT. IN OUR OPINION THE BUILDING UNDER REFERENCE CAN BE REPAIRED WITH PROPER METHODS AS SUGGESTED UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF AN EXPERT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WITH PROPER PERMISSION FROM ALL CONCERED STATUTORY AUTHORITIES. MAJORITY OF THE BUILDING IS SUPPORTED ON BEAM AND COLUMN WHICH IN OUR OPINION SHOW NO SIGNS OF DISTRESS IN RCC MEMERS, EXTERNAL PLASTER AS ON THE DATE OF SURVEY. ‘The above suggested repairs are ulmost necessary to enhance the life span of the existing building Also the leakages through the walls have to be stopped to prevent further deterioration he estimated cost of strengthening and repairs to the building as per the detail description in Annexure ~ A is about Rs. plus GST which is based on prevailing market rate of labour and material in that area,PROFORMA ‘B’ ‘Subject : Structural assessment report of BUILDING Date :24/03/2023 Subject STRUCTURAL AUDIT Report ‘Name of Consultant 1 | Name of Bidg BP. Collegeof Engineering Satara 2 CTS No. Ward 3 | No of storeys 4 | Year of construction oo 3 | Mode of Use EDUCATIONAL 6 | Mode of construction of existing building 1) Foundation RCC ae ii) Floors RCC. ‘Walls. BRICK WALLS iv) Beams RCC. v) Columns: RCC, vi) Roof RCC [7 | History of repairs done year wise | Not Known’ } (2) Slab recasting (©) Column Jacketing (6) Structural Repairs (d) Tenantable repairs (€) Roof Waterproofing (f) Plumbing (9) Addition/Alterations if any ‘5 | Date of Inspection by Consultant PINS 005 & [Condition of aa i, intemal Plaster ‘Good ii, External Plaster Good Til, Plumbing Good iv. Drainage Lines/Chambers | GoodPage 2 10 ‘Observations @) Doors and windows don't cose | Yes doesn't close at places b) Columns and beams stest_ No exposed ©) Settlement uneven flooring No gaps between skirting and floor [ d) Foundation settlement. No @) Deffections/sagging No j ) Major cracks in No colurmnsfoeams 1g) Seepages/Leakages Yes from balcony tops and parapet junction, h) Staircase areas No i) itwalls z }) UG. Tank k) OHT/Column condition 5 |) Parapet wails at terrace No Reapirs required EEE m)Chajas| Needs repairs urgently n) Common areas ‘No Reapirs required 0) Toilet blocks No Reapirs required P) Terrace waterproofing Needs repairs 12 | Testearried cuton structure NDT Ultrasonic Pulse Velociy | Ave. 3 8Kmis Rebound Hammertest_ Ave. 12.5 MPa Core test ‘Ave. 14M Pa. 113 | Distress mapping plan and ‘Attached with this report photographs 14 | Description of repairs to be done i) Column Jacketing Not requirediil Structural repairs Page 3 Repairs required at faculty room of Chemistry Lab whether it is to be ‘evacuated/pulled down I v) Chaija/ Drop pardi No recasting | [16 | Conclusions of Consultant Wheiher structure is livable/or | YES, STRUCTURE IS LIVABLE after repairsifrequency of repairs required in extended life period [8 | Whether structure requires NO tenantable repairs/Major Structural repairs & its time frame C | Whether structure can be allowed | YES to occupy during course of repairs [0] Nature/Mtethodology of repairs | RCC MEMBERS TO BE REPAIRED BY HIGH ‘STRENGTH POLYMER MODIFIED MORTAR WHEREVER REQUIRED ON TOP PRIORITY =| Whether structure requires | NO immediate propping. If so, its propping plan/methodology given? |F | Whether other immediate safety | REPAIRS TO BE CARRIED OUT TO RCC | ‘measures required-Whatis specific | MEMBERS IDENTIFIED IN THIS REPORT | recommendation? FOR TOP PRORITY | Enhancement in We of structure | 10 TO 18 YEARS SUBJECT TO PROPER MAINTENANCEPage 4 a Projected repair costisq.ft RCC repair cost approx. per sq.ft [1 Projected reconstruction cost aa.ht persaft J ‘Specific remarks, whether building | No needs to be | vacated/demolished/repairable K Whether structure in extremely No critical condition [16 Critical Observation NIL 17 | Classifteation of Building Old Building - No eviction needs minor repairsonly Old Building No eviction, only structural repairs only New Building No eviction needs no repairs aa Mrs. A. V. Phalake Mr. A. B. Shelar ME. Structure ME, Structure Head of the Department of Civil Engineering tae COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING ‘SATARA,