Dr. D. Y.

Patil Institute of Technology

Presentation of Seminar-I
On
“Environmental Impact Assessment”

Name of Guide:- Mrs. Gayatri Niphadkar

Presented by :- 1) Chirayu R. Wadile

2) Aakash V. Jagtap
3) Apurv D. Chavan
4) Devansh P. Jaiswal
 INTRODUCTION

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). This comprehensive analysis

will explore the objectives and implications of EIA, highlighting its
importance in evaluating the environmental consequences of proposed
projects. This is a critical process that aims to ensure sustainable
development and protect our planet.
 WHAT IS EIA?

EIA is a systematic processthat evaluates the environmental consequences of

proposed projects. It helps identify, assess, and mitigate potential
environmental impacts, ensuring sustainable development. By considering
various factors such as air quality, biodiversity, and socio- economic aspects,
EIA plays a crucial role in decision-making for project implementation.
 KEY OBJECTIVES

The key objectives of EIAinclude:

1.Identifying potential environmental impacts.
2. Assessing the significanceof impacts.
3. Proposing mitigation measures.
4. Evaluating alternatives.
5. Enhancing public participation.

These objectives ensure that projects are designed

and implemented in promoting sustainable
development.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

EIA considers various environmental

impacts, including air and water
pollution, habitat destruction,
biodiversity loss, noise pollution,
and social displacement. By
assessing these impacts, EIA helps
identify ways to minimize harm and
promote sustainable practices. It also
ensures that potential risks are
addressed, safeguarding both the
environment and human well-being.
 SIGNIFICANCE OF EIA

EIA plays a crucial role in sustainable development by ensuring that development projects
consider and address potential environmental impacts. It helps in preventing or minimizing
adverse effects on ecosystems, biodiversity, natural resources, and human health. EIA also
promotes transparency, public participation, and informed decision- making, leading to more
environmentally responsible and socially acceptable projects.
 CHALLENGES

Despite its importance, EIA faces several challenges, including:

1) Insufficient expertise and resources.
2) Limited public awareness and participation.
3) Inadequate integration with other planning processes
4) Inconsistent implementation and enforcement Addressing.

These challenges is crucial to enhance the effectiveness and credibility of EIA in

achieving its objectives.
 PROCESS OVERVIEW

The EIA process typically involves the following steps:

1. Screening :to determine if a project requires EIA.

2. Scoping to identify key issues and boundaries.
3. Impact assessment to evaluate potential effects.
4. Mitigation and monitoring to propose measures and ensure compliance.
5. Review and decision-making to assess project viability.
 Case Study on EIA of METRO

1) Land Environment:
 Before Project :
• In the Pune City black soils are predominant. Soil samples were collected from 12
locations and it is found that the soils are slightly alkaline.
• The land use of 5 km on either side of the project corridors has been identified.
• The proposed project corridors in Pune City fall in Zone III as per revised seismic zoning
map of India.

 After Project :
• The original RAP report submitted in 2019 was likely to affect about 234 families which
is now 274 Subsequently migrated by Government.
• Upon completion of survey, 1264 families to be rehabilitated by the three agencies and
share of rehabilitation had been duly allocated.
• Maha Metro footprint is only impacting 274 families at Kamgar Putla and Rajiv Gandhi
Nagar slums hence the no. of PAF get revised.
 Case Study on EIA of METRO

2) Ecological Environment:
 Before Project :
• Ecological systems show complex inter-relationships between biotic and abiotic
components including dependence, competition
• The vegetation pattern of the city is conducive almost for all types of tropical species.
• The predominant tree species observed at the site are Indian rain tree, Subabol,
Copperpod, Kadam, shubhrachafa, Asoka, Devils tree, Sisham, Neem, Banyan, Peepal,
Eucalyptus, Bargad etc.

 After Project :
• The impacted tree numbers has gone up due to change in alignment (to avoid the Agan
Khan Palace) increase in alignment length and various other factors like R&R issues and
design.
• Out of 2452 impacted trees, 2264 have been transplanted at various locations of the
City whereas 188 trees have been felled due to non-feasibility of transplantation.
• Mainly the maximum trees are felled in Civil court to Swargate stretch Due to
transportation Problems
 Case Study on EIA of METRO

3) Ambient Environment :
 Before Project :
• Air quality monitoring was carried out at 33 locations which include stations, depot and
casting yard, results indicate that PM10 & PM2.5 exceeding the permissible limits for
residential, Industrial.
• Parameters SO2 and NO2 were noted within the permissible limits. Road suspended
dust and vehicle emissions are the major sources of pollution.
• it is observed that Leq for day and night at all monitoring locations were exceeding the
permissible limits for commercial zone as per National Ambient Noise Standards.

 After Project :
• Air pollution occurs due to excavation, loading and unloading of construction materials,
and emissions from vehicles, construction equipment and DG sets etc.
• Air pollution due to transportation of construction material and excavated/fill material is
quantified as follows by considering the BS III vehicles.
• Emission during the period of construction due to truck movement on account of
transportation of civil construction material and disposal/backfill of earth is estimated.
 Case Study on EIA of Samrudhi Mahamarg
1) Land environment :
 Before Project :
• The built-up land in 10 km radius from project site comprises of villages, towns, panchayat and
revenue villages that include buildings, Industries, factories, transport, communications, utilities in
association with water and vegetation.
• This land use/land cover class (Agriculture Vegetation, forest vegetation area) in the study area
coved 159 sq. km. area under forest area and 154 sq. Km. area comes under Agriculture class.
• These areas were identified and mapped as water bodies; this unit is spatially distributed in 34.3
sq. km area. This is 1.9% of total area.
• Within study area most of area comes under Open Land class which is 833 sq. km. (46 %) out of
area.Out of total area 378.7 sq. km area found under this class. This is 21.3 % of total area. 87.3 Sq.
Km area found under barren land.
 After Project :
• Being green field project loss of agricultural land.
• Generation and storage of spoils and debris due to construction activities.
• Changes in land-use pattern due to proposed new alignment and allied amenities.
• Development of 6 interchanges in the surrounding areas will cause change in land use
pattern.
• Excavation of approximately 1260 tons of fertile soil from agricultural fields.
 Case Study on EIA of Samrudhi Mahamarg
2) Ecological Environment :
 Before Project :
• The alignment passes through forested area and private forest while the rest is protected
forest in Thane and Nashik region.
• The basaltic rock is the major source of soil due to chemical and physical weathering.
• Ecological assessment of the area assumes more importance as the forest patches under
scrutiny are under reserve, protected, private forest.

 After Project :
• The impacts of projects also vary according to the environmental setting, especially the
degree of naturalness in the local and regional ecosystems.
• The construction phase involves the vegetation removal, earth moving and road building
activities that actually impact on sensitive locations.
• In addition to physical destruction of habitat within the footprint, soil erosion and other
forms of pollution are the primary impacts in this phase.
• The forest area of 383.8535 Ha is getting affected hence the diversion of forest land is
required.
 Case Study on EIA of Samrudhi Mahamarg
3) Ambient Environment:
 Before Project :
• Surface Water Quality samples were collected from streams, rivers and other water
bodies at 10 locations along the alignment.
• The analysis of groundwater samples taken from the study area indicate existing levels
of pollution in the form of high coliform content, higher alkalinity and turbidity in the
water table.
• These areas were identified and mapped as water bodies; this unit is spatially
distributed in 34.3 sq. km area. This is 1.9% of total area.
 After Project :
• During operation phase there is less possibility of any impact to water bodies.
• The proposed Expressway will be access controlled and no connectivity would be
provided near any water bodies.
• The fresh water will be utilized in rest areas, admin buildings, toll area and maintenance
areas along the project corridor. The waste water will be generated from these needs to
be treated.
• No adverse impact is anticipated on ground water quality. On the positive side, laying of
pavement within the formation width may lead to increased runoff water.
 Conclusion

1. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) case study helps to provided valuable insights into the
potential environmental effects of the proposed project.
2. Through a comprehensive analysis of the project's potential impacts on various environmental factors,
including air quality, water resources, ecosystems, and communities, we have identified both positive
and negative consequences.
3. The positive aspects include the creation of jobs, economic growth, and enhanced infrastructure,
which can contribute to the overall development of the region.
4. However, the negative impacts such as air pollution, water contamination, habitat disruption, and
community displacement must not be overlooked.
5. The successful implementation of the proposed project with minimal environmental impact can serve
as a model for sustainable development in the years to come.
THANK YOU