[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views5 pages

CWE-222 Lectures 32-33

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 5

CASE STUDIES--1 ROAD PROJECT IN MALAYSIA

An EIA for a proposed new road project As a case study of an EIA study
conducted in Malaysia, reference is made to a study performed for a proposed road
linking Cameron Highlands to Kuala Lipis in the state of Pahang in West Malaysia
This road linkage would greatly reduce travel distance and time between the two
areas. However, the proposed road need to traverse through forested areas and
relatively hilly terrain along certain stretches.

Existing environment :-A thorough understanding and appreciation of the existing


undisturbed environment is necessary for an EIA exercise as it will be the basis for
the prediction of possible impacts. Information and data were gathered directly
from field surveys or collected from secondary sources. The elements which have
been addressed include the following:

Physical environment and land resources :-The proposed project area lies mostly
in forested hilly terrain such that there would be a considerable conservation
interest due to the need for forest clearance. The geology and soil characteristics of
the proposed project area are typical of a hilly terrain in a tropical region. For this
condition erosion is a problem during the construction stage and during the
operational stage the safety of slopes requires attention. Appropriate preventive
and protection measures should be provided during the construction period.
Climatic and hydrological conditions :-The climatic conditions along the proposed
route were obtained from climatic and rainfall stations. The climatic components
which are of relevance include rainfall, temperature, relative humidity, sunshine,
evaporation and wind conditions. The river system and drainage pattern for the
proposed project area was also studied. The extend of catchment areas were
determined.

Noise levels and air and water quality:- These parameters were obtained through
sampling techniques and direct measurement on-site. Water quality parameters for
selected rivers flowing within the study area were determined for the existing
conditions.

Flora and fauna:- As the proposed road traverse through forested areas, an indepth
study was made to determine the types of flora and fauna within the study area and
in its vicinity. Both terrestrial and aquatic flora and fauna were identified. An
inventory of the existing flora and fauna was established.

Principal project activities and possible environmental impacts:- The principal


project activities were grouped into different project phases and those activities
which may have impacts on the existing environment were highlighted and
discussed. The project phases is defined as the preconstruction, construction and
operational phases. The major activities within the pre-construction phase include
the following; project planning, site surveys, land acquisition and construction of
access road and tracks. Only the last activity has any significant impact on the
environment as trees are cleared and bare lands are exposed. As to the construction
phase, the major activities are as follows; land clearing operations, burning, labour
recruitment and base camp construction, earthworks, slope stabilisation, stream
crossings, piling, road construction, transportation of construction materials and
waste disposal. Most of these activities have significant impacts on the
environment. For the operational or post-construction phase, the major activities
addressed include the following; road traffic operations and maintenance of
pavement and road shoulder, slopes, bridges and drainage systems.

Potential environmental impact and assessment.

An evaluation and assessment of the environmental components likely to


experience significant impacts either positively or negatively together with the
magnitude and nature of the impacts were performed. The evaluation of impacts
are based on accepted and established methodology and guidelines given in the
Handbook of El A Guidelines [2] were adhered to. The main points to be noted
are: Physico-chemical aspects Soil erosion and sedimentation will mainly be
significant during the construction period and with proper management the impact
can be minimised. The hydrological regime is not expected to be significantly
affected by the project. The quality of air and water and noise pollution will be an
environmental concern in the operational stage. This aspect and the solid waste can
be tackled with proper management. Biological In general, due to the fact that the
affected land is restricted to a strip of land along the stretch of the proposed road,
the impact on the flora and fauna is somehow limited. During the construction
stage disturbance to the flora and fauna can be controlled. However, the fauna can
be susceptible to danger in the long run as the area is more accessible. Human
Socio-economic aspects considered include land use and employment issues. In
general, the impacts on human are beneficial or positive. The project will enhance
the economic potential of the whole area. Existing economic activities can be
upgraded with the presence of the new road and new economic activities can be
generated. Apart from this, with the new road greater accessibility and improved
communication facilities are expected to be of benefit to the area.

Mitigation measures and environmental monitoring

After determining the types and nature of possible impacts due to the proposed
road project, various mitigation measures were considered and evaluated and
consequently proposed for implementation so as to reduce the adverse
environmental impacts that may occur. Any negative impacts could be
substantially mitigated by sound engineering practise and stringent control of the
various activities.

The monitoring objectives are to collect long-term data and regulate the changes
caused by the project and shall include climatic, water quality, air quality, stream
flow, fauna and floristic monitoring and traffic accidents.

Enforcement of El A recommendations

Road construction is unique in a sense that the project proponent is normally


either the state or the federal governments agencies. Theoretically, enforcement of
EIA recommendations for these projects should be simple as it simply require
coordination and cooperation of the relevant governmental bodies. However, in
actuality it may turn out to be more complicated. For road constructions, the
disturbance to the physical environment mainly affect a strip of land along the
corridor of the road. Issues like soil erosion will be critical during the construction
period and monitoring by the Department of Environment could be facilitated by
its inclusion in some of the site meetings. Recent reports suggest that the DOE is
more willing to penalise offenders. However, the main obstacle to effective
monitoring by them is lack of manpower. The risk and impact of surface erosion,
one of the main environmental concerns, have generally been adequately assessed
by environmental impact assessors. They have also suggested a range of mitigation
measures which can bring this problem within a manageable level. However, it is
up to the developer or the project initiator to assess the effectiveness of any
measure undertaken. The DOE should be furnished with evidence that appropriate
measures are taken and they are effective. The DOE should be in a position to
request a redo of any mitigating measures considered ineffective. Further, as
indicated , there could be problem as vegetation cover on slopes may not be
effectively established. The other physical impact is the stability of cut and
embankment slopes. Instrumentation and monitoring of these slopes should be
given a higher consideration. Instrumentation of certain stretches which are
considered of a higher risk should be made mandatory. This will require a new
legislation but is necessary to help the enforcement of EIA recommendations as the
developer should be required to furnish monitoring data indicating that the slopes
are safe

However, the protection of the wildlife is a more serious matter in the long term as
the road will improve accessibility to the whole area. More people will and it will
be more difficult for the DOE to manage the enforcement issue long term
protection is less straightforward. Certain issues may not come directly under the
subject of environmental quality. Here the recommendation may have to be
enforced under a different legislation and hence becomes the responsibility of other
agencies.

Conclusions

The following conclusions can be drawn from the above discussions:

(i). In the case of new roads traversing through forested hilly terrains, there are
several physio-chemical and biological aspects that require appropriate attention to
minimise possible impacts due to the development of the project. However, the
considerations in implementing such a project should take into account the benefits
as a whole.

(ii). In order for the legislations relating to the environmental issues to be


effective, the Department of Environment should have the capability to enforce the
recommendations of the environmental consultants preparing the environmental
impact assessment report. The issue of trained and adequate manpower for
enforcement of EIA recommendation should be given due consideration.
(iii). As the environment is a multi-aspects issue the enforcement of EIA
recommendations require a multi-agencies approach.

You might also like