Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 1
Evaluator Name_Heenal Patel
Directions: Write your name on the evaluator line (above) and each remaining team member name per column below. For each category (row), you are allotted 15 points (for a four-person team) that you may distribute among your 3 remaining team members (if there are only a total of 3 people on your team, please use 10 points). You may assign the points any way you see fit up to your allotted amount per category, including 0 points if a team member did not contribute materially. Do NOT include yourself in the point distribution. The grading system is set up such that equal participation is rewarded (i.e. 5 points each), and skewed participation results in rewarding the contributors and penalizing the non-contributors. Submit completed evaluations to the assignment box. Team Member Name: Alli Miller Josh Schwartz Peter Bossinas
Comprehension: Seemed to understand
5 5 3 requirements for assignment.
Preparation: Is well informed; has good
ideas; researches thoroughly; is ready for 4 4 4 action Organization: Organizes and divides work and responsibly and correctly for the best 5 5 4 achievement of objectives; completes tasks but doesn’t lose track of timeline. Focus: Consistently stays focused on the task and what needs to be done. Very self- 5 5 3 directed. Participation: Is always ready to lend a hand; reaches out to help; is readily 5 5 4 available; contributes ideas and suggestions; attends all meetings Quality of Work: Provides work of the 5 5 5 highest quality. Responsiveness: Reacted sensitively to verbal and nonverbal cues of other team 5 4 4 members. Leadership: Is firm and fair, holds others accountable for their commitments, is 4 5 4 personally accountable, is always supportive of others in leadership roles. Attitide: Never is publicly critical of the project or the work of others. Always has a 5 5 5 positive attitude about the task(s).
