Peer Evaluation Form for Group Work
Your name: ___Oscar Peczek_________________________________________________ Project Topic:
______________________________________________________
Write the name of each of your group members in a separate column. For each person, rate them in each of the categories
using the scale: 0 (not at all), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (all of the time).
Evaluation Criteria Group member: Group member: Group member: Group member:
Attended all group online Connor Greg Lee Austin Seth Roeth
meetings regularly or Doederlein Magallanes
communicated regularly by
email, in accordance with the
group’s schedule.
Contributed meaningfully to 5 5 5 5
group discussions.
Completed group assignments 5 5 5 5
on time.
Effectively covered their part of 5 5 5 5
the assignment.
Demonstrated a cooperative 5 5 5 5
and supportive attitude.
Contributed significantly to the 5 5 5 5
success of the project.
TOTAL SCORE (out of 30) 30 30 30 30
Feedback on team dynamics:
1. How effectively did your group work?
We worked together perfectly, can’t really complain about anything.
2. Were the behaviors of any of your team members particularly valuable or detrimental to the team? Explain.
All my team members had done their part, I personally had no issues, and they were all valuable to me.
3. What did you learn about working in a group from this project that you will carry into your next group
experience?
People are kinder than you think, my group was very helpful on anything I needed help with or if they had a question, we all
would help.
Adapted from a peer evaluation form developed at Johns Hopkins University (October, 2006)
Self-Evaluation of My Team Contributions
Your Name: Oscar
Rate yourself in each category as it relates to your personal contributions to the Group Project.
Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary
0 points 2 points 4 points 6 points Score
Contribute
Research, gather I did not collect I collected and I collected and I collected and 6
and share and/or did not relayed very little relayed some relayed a great
information relay any information – information – deal of
information that some relates to almost all of it information – all
relates to the the project. relates to the relates to the
project. project. project.
Be punctual I did not hand in I handed in most I handed in most I handed in all 4
any assignments assignments late assignments on assignments on
and/or did not and/or missed time and/or time and attended
attend group some chats. missed some chats all chats.
chats. but informed team
members ahead of
time.
Take Responsibility
Fulfill team I did not perform I performed very I performed nearly I performed all 6
responsibilities any duties of my little duties all duties and I duties of my
and share assigned team role and/or rarely did usually did the assigned team role
equally and/or always the assigned work assigned work – and I always did
relied on others to – often needed rarely needed the assigned work
do the work. reminding. reminding. without having to
be reminded.
Value Other’s Viewpoints
Cooperate with I always talked – I usually did most I listened, but I listened and 6
teammates never allowed of the talking – sometimes talked spoke a fair
anyone else to rarely allowed too much. I rarely amount and never
speak and/or I others to speak argued. argued with my
usually argued and/or I teammates.
with my sometimes argued
teammates. with my
teammates.
Make fair I usually wanted I often sided with I usually I always helped 6
decisions to have things my friends instead of considered all the team to reach
way. considering all views. a fair decision.
views.
Total (out of 30)
Overall, how would you rate your contribution as a group member?
_____A___ Excellent (A) ________ Good (B) ________ Fair (C) ________ Poor (D)
Please write one paragraph on your participation in this project (i.e. what was interesting about your topic, what you
thought was successful, what you thought was not, etc.)
Personally, I thought I was an exceptional team member, I consistently demonstrated my own dedication and enthusiasm on
the project. I communicated effectively, listened for others and tried my best to get majority to agree or not, I provided
valuable feedback for my team members as well. I made some mistakes and tried my best to make up for it. Overall, the whole
concept of enlightenment was fascinating to me, from the rationalism, humanism, and the cultural invocations made this
project fascinating, with my part in the presentation, I interviewed Kant himself and I thought that was cool.
