NAME OF COURT

Address, City, State, and zip code

Your Name ) Jurisdiction: Court of Record, under

) the rules of Common Law1
Petitioner )
)
- Against - ) Case no: ___________________
) Magistrate:
Prosecuting Attorney' s name; )
Prosecuting Attorneys Title; ) Trial By Jury
)
) VERIFIED SHOW CAUSE OF THE
Respondent ) INFERIOR COURT'S PERSONAL
JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF
ACCORDING TO THE UNITED
STATES CONSTITUTION
5

YOUR STATE )
) :SS2
YOUR COUNTY )
I, Your Name, a man or woman (choose one), one of the People3 of Your State,
10 competent to defend myself in a court of law, hereinafter petitioner, by special

1 “A Court of Record is a judicial tribunal having attributes and exercising functions independently of the person of the
magistrate designated generally to hold it, and proceeding according to the course of common law, its acts and proceedings
being enrolled for a perpetual memorial”. Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc.
Mass., 171, per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689.
5 2 An affidavit uncontested unrebutted unanswered stands as truth. - United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 536 (7th Cir.
1981); Cert. Denied, 50 U.S. L. W. 2169; S. Ct. March 22, 1982 1982.
3 PEOPLE: People are supreme, not the state. [Waring vs. the Mayor of Savanah, 60 Georgiaat 93]; The state cannot
diminish rights of the people. [Hertado v. California, 100 US 516]; Preamble to the US and NY Constitutions - We the
people ... do ordain and establish this Constitution...; ...at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they
10 are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects...with none to govern but themselves...
[CHISHOLM v. GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455, 2 DALL (1793) pp471-472]: The people of this State,
as the successors of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the King by his
prerogative. [Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am. Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3,
228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 167; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7].

PAGE 1 OF 6
 appearance4 for the purpose of testing the sufficiency of the jurisdiction of the Name of
the court where the Juvenile hearings are.5;

Petitioner, hereby challenges the inferior court's personal jurisdiction and open’s a court
of record to move the above said court to a Court of Record for cause and dismissal for
15 lack of personam jurisdiction in violation of my right of due process in a ‘Court not of
Record.’

For the reasons set forth more fully in Plaintiffs' Affidavit In Support Of Verified
Show Cause Of The Inferior Court's Personal Jurisdiction Over Plaintiff According
To The United States Constitution, the Court should require Defendant to :

20 1) Show by what U.S. Constitutional authority, Respondent, while having no

agreement with petitioner, conspired6 under color of law in a “nisi prius 7 de facto8

15 4 A Special Appearance is for the purpose of testing the sufficiency of service or the jurisdiction of the court; a general
appearance is made where the defendant waives defects of service and submits to the jurisdiction. - State v. Huller, 23 N.M.
306, 168 P. 528, 534, 1 A.L.R. 170.
5 “Trial court acts without jurisdiction when it acts without inherent or common law authority, ...” State v. Rodriguez, 725
A.2d 635, 125 Md.App 428, cert den 731 A.2d 971,354 Md. 573 (1999).
20 6 18 USC 241: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State,
Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him
by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons
go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment
of any right or privilege so secured They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and
25 if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to
kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
7 NISI PRIUS: is a Latin term (Bouvier's Law) Where courts bearing this name exist in the United States, they are
instituted by statutory provision.; Black's 5th "Prius" means "first." "Nisi" means "unless." A "nisi prius" procedure is a
30 procedure to which a party FIRST agrees UNLESS he objects.; Blacks 4th - A rule of procedure in courts is that if a party
fails to object to something, then it means he agrees to it. A nisi procedure is a procedure to which a person has failed to
object A "nisi prius court" is a court which will proceed unless a party objects. The agreement to proceed is obtained from
the parties first.
8 DE FACTO: In fact, in deed, actually. This phrase is used to characterize an officer, a government, a past action, or a
35 state of affairs which must be accepted for all practical purposes, but is illegal or illegitimate. In this sense it is the contrary
of de jure, which means rightful, legitimate, just, or constitutional. Thus, an officer, king, or government de facto is one
who is in actual possession of the office or supreme power, but by usurpation, or without lawful title; while an officer, king,
or governor de jure is one who has just claim and rightful title to the office or power, but has never had plenary possession
of it, or is not in actual possession. 4 Bl.Comm. 77, 78. MacLeod v. United States, 229 U.S. 416, 33 S.Ct. 955, 57 L.Ed.
40 1260; Wheatley v. Consolidated Lumber Co., 167 Cal. 441, 139 P. 1057, 1059.

PAGE 2 OF 6
 quasi9 court not of record proceeding in equity” and not at law; 10 depriveing11
petitioner of their unalienable right12 of due process, secured by the Bill of Rights,
25 with the intent to proceed unlawfully carrying petitioner away to jurisdictions
unknown.

2) Show by what U.S. Constitutional authority, Respondent, while not being able to
prove a claim and fiduciary authority over petitioner necessary for a lawful
seizure of body and/or property in a court of record, could lawfully conspire,
30 devise, and proceed with a plan under the color of law to bypass petitioner’s
unalienable right of “due process” in a court not of record in jurisdictions’
unknown.

3) Show by what U.S. Constitutional authority the respondent denied petitioner’s

unalienable right of due process13 in a court of record proceeding according to
35 Natural Law protected by Amendments V and VII.
9 QUASI: Lat. As if; almost as it were; analogous to. This term is used in legal phraseology to indicate that one subject
resembles another, with which it is compared, in certain characteristics, but that there are intrinsic and material differences
between them. Bicknell v. ,Garrett, 1 Wash.2d 564, 96 P.2d 592, 595, 126 A.L.R. 258; Cannon v. Miller, 22 Wash.2d 227,
155 P.2d 500, 503, 507, 157 A.L.R. 530. Marker v. State, 25 Ala.App. 91, 142 So. 105, 106. It is often prefixed to English
45 words, implying mere appearance or want of reality. State v. Jeffrey, 188 Minn. 476, 247 N.W. 692, 693.
10 AT LAW. [Bouvier's] This phrase is used to point out that a thing is to be done according to the course of the common
law; it is distinguished from a proceeding in equity.; ALL CASES AT LAW. [Black's Law 4th] Within constitutional
guaranty of jury trial, refers to common law ac-tions as distinguished from causes in equity and certain other proceedings.
Breimhorst v. Beck-man, 227 Minn. 409, 35 N.W.2d 719, 734. According to law; by, for, or in law; particularly in
50 distinction from that which is done in or according to equity; or in titles such as sergeant at law, barrister at law, attorney or
counsellor at law. Hooker v. Nichols, 116 N.C. 157, 21 S.E. 208.
11 18 USC 242 Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in
any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities
secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on
55 account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts
committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous
weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results
from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated
60 sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or
imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
12 42 USC 1983 Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or
Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person
within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and
65 laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress,…
13 "Law of the land," "due course of law," and "due process of law" are synonymous. People v. Skinner, Cal., 110 P.2d
41, 45; State v. Rossi, 71 R.I. 284, 43 A.2d 323, 326; Direct Plumbing Supply Co. v. City of Dayton, 138 Ohio St. 540, 38
N.E.2d 70, 72, 137 A.L.R. 1058; Stoner v. Higginson, 316 Pa. 481, 175 A. 527, 531.

PAGE 3 OF 6
 4) Show why the attached violation(s) or charges against the petitioner should not be
dismissed for lack of personam jurisdiction. And, if not dismissed, by what
‘constitutional’ authority the aforesaid court acts.

40 5) Verify14 that each and every statement is true.

Petitioner denies the above said court's personam jurisdiction and moves said court to
cease and desist from all actions against petitioner and restore the petitioner to their
original state for lack of constitutional authority and personam jurisdiction.

45

50

_______________________________
55 SEAL Proceeding Sui Juris, in pro per

14 Verify: Verification is the legal context refers to a declaration under oath or upon penalty of perjury that a statement or
pleading is true.

PAGE 4 OF 6
 USE THE BELOW IF ONLY ONE PETITIONER. ERASE IT AND THESE RED WORDS IF
60 THERE ARE 2 (TWO) PETITIONERS

NOTARY

Subscribed and sworn, without prejudice, and with all rights reserved,

65 (Print your name)_______________________________________________________,

Principal, by Special Appearance, i; a (wo)man; proceeding Sui Juris.
Date:_____________
Signature:______________________________________________________

70 On this ______day of____________, 20____, before me, the undersigned, a Notary

Public in and for _______________________(state), personally appeared the above-
signed, known to me to be the one whose name(s) is/are signed on this instrument, and
has acknowledged to me that s/he has executed the same.
Signed:_________________________________________
75 Printed Name:____________________________________
Date:___________________________________________
My Commission Expires:____________________________

USE THE BELOW INSTEAD IF TWO PETITIONERS. ERASE IT AND THESE RED
80 WORDS IF THERE ARE ONLY 1 (ONE) PETITIONER

NOTARY

Subscribed and sworn, without prejudice, and with all rights reserved,

85 Petitioner 1: (Print)______________________________________________________,
Principal, by Special Appearance, i; a (wo)man; proceeding Sui Juris.

PAGE 5 OF 6
 Date:_____________
Signature:______________________________________________________

90 Petitioner 2: (Print)______________________________________________________,
Principal, by Special Appearance, i; a (wo)man; proceeding Sui Juris.
Date:_____________
Signature:______________________________________________________
On this ______day of____________, 20____, before me, the undersigned, a Notary
95 Public in and for _______________________(state), personally appeared the above-
signed, known to me to be the one whose names are signed on this instrument, and have
acknowledged to me that they have executed the same.
Signed:_________________________________________
Printed Name:____________________________________
100 Date:___________________________________________
My Commission Expires:____________________________

PAGE 6 OF 6