USC Marshall
USC Marshall
0 units)
Syllabus – Spring 2018
Sections: 16687; MW, 10-11:50am; HOH2
16689; MW, 4-5:50pm; JFF236
Instructor: Christine El-Haddad, Ph.D.
Office: HOH421
Office Hours: By appointment
Email: elhaddad@marshall.usc.edu
Course Description
Business enterprise in today’s environment increasingly involves crossing national borders and, more
generally, engaging in business activities in numerous countries that are often very different from one
another. Understanding the key strategic opportunities and challenges associated with global business
activity and developing skills in this area have become essential requirements for success. MOR492, Global
Strategy, introduces the key concepts, frameworks and principles needed to formulate and implement
successful global strategies. It is designed to provide students with the knowledge, skills and business
judgement required to create, sustain, and renew competitive advantage within a global context.
The course consists of two main parts. Part I, Fundamentals of Global Strategy, covers four main topics
that address the key dimensions of global strategy.
• The first topic, “Why do firms go abroad?”, focuses on the opportunities and challenges of international
expansion and introduces strategies for creating value globally.
• The second topic addresses the questions of “Where and when to locate?” and covers frameworks for
assessing potential locations for international expansion and for determining the optimal timing of
entry.
• The third topic, “What is global?”, covers frameworks for allocating products and activities across
locations to maximize value creation and capture.
• The fourth topic, “How to execute global strategies?”, is concerned with selecting the right mode of
entry into foreign markets and the optimal organizational structure for global operations.
Part II, Special Topics in Global Strategy, addresses four main topics that represent some of the most
important strategic challenges faced by multinational corporations today.
• The first topic, “How to manage global innovation and learning?”, introduces traditional and emerging
models of cross-border innovation and reviews their strengths and limitations.
• The second topic, “How to manage cross-border collaboration?”, is concerned with the fundamental
principles for forming and managing successful strategic alliances.
• The third topic, “How to do good and do well?”, focuses on how multinational corporations can identify
and successfully exploit opportunities to achieve a competitive advantage while also creating value for
society.
• The fourth topic addresses the question “How to win in emerging markets?” and provides frameworks
for assessing emerging markets’ potential and for crafting and executing strategies for succeeding in
those markets.
The course is designed for students who seek to work in, or with, firms that operate in many different
countries, or which operate outside the United States. It is also appropriate for students pursuing strategic
positions in local firms that compete with large multinational enterprises.
Learning Objectives
Upon successful completion of the course, students will be able to:
The course will place a special emphasis on developing your critical thinking skills. Cases will seek to
develop your ability to uncover the various potential problems, challenges and opportunities faced by a
multinational enterprise, select the most important, develop alternative courses of action for addressing
those issues, assess the different courses of action in light of multiple criteria, select the solutions that have
the potential to be the most effective and develop an effective implementation plan. The course will also
place a special emphasis on developing your oral and written communication skills through presentations
and reports.
Required Materials
Harvard Coursepack. Assigned readings and cases for this course are compiled in a digital coursepack
available from Harvard Business School Publishing at the following link:
http://cb.hbsp.harvard.edu/cbmp/access/72702816
Additional readings may be distributed in class or posted to Blackboard. When necessary, I may assign
additional materials for you to purchase.
Blackboard (Bb). I will post various course materials to Blackboard including the course syllabus,
powerpoints, lecture notes, case discussion questions and assignments. Please check Blackboard regularly
for any new information or materials relevant to upcoming sessions.
3x5 Index Cards. Please bring a deck of 3x5 index cards to every class to record your oral class
participation.
There are other reasons for employing the case discussion method of instruction. First, it allows you to
develop skills at problem definition in addition to problem solving. Cases typically do not have an obvious
set of tasks whose performance will lead to mastery. Rather, they force you to sift through a mass of
information, some of it irrelevant or contradictory, in order to identify the key strategic issues. Second, the
case method gives you a chance to deal with ambiguity. Most cases do not have obvious "right" answers.
Managers must be able to function in situations where the right answer is not known, without falling into
the trap of assuming that any answer is as good as another. Some analyses and proposed strategies are
clearly wrong, and some are clearly better than others are. A popular phrase in case analysis classes is
"There are no right answers, but there are wrong answers."
These rationales are offered because the case method may be unfamiliar to some of you and frequently
causes initial confusion. There will be many times when I will not reveal my own opinions about a particular
issue, and there will be many cases that do not end up neatly packaged with an "answer." You may discover
that your preparation "misses" key points of a case, especially at first. This is a normal part of the learning
experience.
The quality of your learning experience during our class discussions will be directly determined by: 1) your
degree of preparation, active listening, and participation, and 2) your classmates' preparation, listening, and
participation. Some will not agree with you, and you may be asked to defend your argument. So long as
criticism is directed at arguments and not at individuals, is relevant to the issues at hand and coherently
argued, it is very much welcomed.
Course Evaluation
Your course grade will be determined as follows:
In order to pass this course successfully, a passing grade (> 50%) must be achieved in the combined average
of the individual components and in the combined average of the group components. Please note that if
your individual performance in the course is unsatisfactory, it will not be brought up by a good group
grade.
Final grades represent how you perform in the class relative to other students. Three items are considered
when assigning final grades:
1. Your weighted score as a percentage of the available points for all assignments (the points you receive
divided by the number of points possible).
2. The overall average percentage score within the class.
3. Your ranking among all students in the class.
Attendance Policy
Class attendance is absolutely essential. All missed classes will be noted. The policy on missed classes is
to allow each student three (3) absences, no questions asked, no penalty. All further absences over this
limit will reduce the student's course contribution grade and final course grade, no questions asked, no
excuses of any kind accepted. Students with an excessive number of absences are at risk of failing the
course. Only official university engagements, such as officially scheduled USC Marshall sponsored case
competitions and sports events, will be accepted as exceptions to this policy. Job interviews etc., are not
excused, so choose your absences carefully. Habitual lateness and leaving class early, for whatever reason,
will be noted as evidence of low course commitment and penalized. Simply put, you cannot learn from
our class discussions, and your classmates cannot learn from you, if you are not present.
Pre-class preparation. Your ability to learn from case discussions is directly proportional to the quality of
your preparation. What you get from this course will depend on what you put in – not just in terms of your
reading and analysis of the cases, but your willingness to question and to seek alternate perspectives, to be
clear about your own position, and to defend your arguments. Unless you have thought about the cases, it
is very hard to contribute to the case discussion and to learn from others’ questions and contributions to
class. For guidelines on how best to prepare for a case discussion, please refer to the Guide to Case
Preparation posted to Blackboard and bring your notes to class to aid you in the class discussion. Students
can also submit case notes. Case notes are individually prepared, but brief, answers to the case discussion
questions. They should be a maximum of one typed page, single-spaced, 11- point font. Bullet point form
is appropriate. Case notes must be submitted to me in hard copy format prior to the beginning of class to
receive credit. They will be checked with a plus, check or minus based on quality and thoroughness.
Students should turn in at least five (5) case notes during the semester. Please note that case notes do
not substitute for active oral contribution to our class discussions and cannot be submitted to make up for a
class absence.
In order to test the level of student preparation for a case discussion, I may give a short case quiz at the
beginning of class. The quiz will generally consist of short-answer questions related to the case. Quizzes
may be viewed by coming during office hours. No make-up opportunities will be given to students who
are absent or late.
In-class participation. Class participation is critical in this course. Each student has a responsibility to
participate in class and to enhance the learning experience of all class participants. In relative terms, a
classroom is a cost-free environment for experimenting and learning to "play the game". Make use of it. In-
class participation includes both oral participation in our class discussions as well as participation in various
written assignments. If you are uncomfortable with oral participation, please let me know at the beginning
of the semester and I will work with you to help you overcome this barrier.
In grading oral participation, I will look at both the quantity and quality of your oral contributions. To help
me track oral participation, students who actively participated in the oral discussion during a class session
should turn in a participation card at the end of that session. The card should list your name, the date, and
a numbered list of your oral contributions during that day’s discussion. For this purpose, please purchase a
package of 3x5 index cards and bring them to each class.
With regard to quality, the dimensions I look for include:
Relevance. Does the comment bear on the subject at hand? Comments that do not link up with what the
discussion is focusing on can actually detract from the learning experience.
Causal Linkage. Are the logical antecedents or consequences of a particular argument traced out?
Comments that push the implications of a fact or idea as far as possible are generally superior.
Responsiveness. Does the comment react in an important way to what someone else has said?
Analysis. Is the reasoning employed consistent and logical?
Evidence. Have data from the case, from personal experience, from general knowledge been employed to
support the assertions made?
Importance. Does the contribution further our understanding of the issues at hand? Is a connection made
with other cases we have analyzed?
In addition to weekly opportunities for oral participation in case discussions led by the instructor, each
student will also have the opportunity to serve as a case leader, taking the lead on a specific part of a case
discussion. Case leadership involves two distinct roles: case presenter and case challenger. As a case
presenter, you will analyze a specific part of a case and do a short 5-minute presentation of your analysis
to the class using powerpoints. As a case challenger, you will prepare and ask questions in class that
challenge our analysis of a case and demonstrate critical thinking. You will also help provide an update to
the case. Detailed instructions regarding your case leadership assignment will be discussed in class and
posted to Blackboard.
Post-class contribution. In a case-oriented, discussion-based class, much of the learning happens after class,
as the “dust settles” and the key take-aways from each case become clear. Shortly after each class session
devoted to a case discussion (preferably within a few hours, while your memory is fresh and within a
maximum of 3 days), please take some time to write down your three (3) key take-aways from the case in
the form of a short note (approximately 10 lines or longer) posted on our Blackboard Discussion Board
(accessible through the course Tools link in Blackboard). These postings can also include responses to other
students’ postings already on the Discussion space. They may also discuss connections you see between
the case and the associated readings, prior case discussions, or other real-world issues. Students must post
their take-aways for at least five (5) cases during the semester.
I will use the following criteria to assess your post-class take-away posting on our Blackboard Discussion
space:
Coverage. The best take-aways synthesize the key ideas that emerged during the discussion and from the
readings. Weaker take-aways focus on just a subset.
Insight. Weak take-aways list the topics we addressed; the best take-aways pinpoint the lessons learned
about those topics. The best take-aways also suggest new questions that are raised by these lessons.
Connections. The best take-aways link the lessons of this discussion to others earlier in the course. Weaker
take-aways don’t make such connections.
Point of View. The best take-aways reveal how the discussion has enriched your own thinking. Weaker
take-aways lack that personal engagement, or simply reiterate a pre-formed personal opinion.
Midterm Exam (20%). The midterm exam will take place on Monday, February 12 and will consist of 50
multiple-choice and True/False questions. Sample questions and a list of material covered by the midterm
exam will be posted to Blackboard.
Final Exam (25%). The final exam will be a two-hour comprehensive exam and will consist of 50 multiple-
choice and True/False questions. The date and time of the final exam is determined by the University. You
should attend the exam for your specific section.
Team Final Project Paper and Presentation (25%)
You will work with your team to draft a report in which you analyze an emerging market and advise an
existing multinational corporation not already present in that emerging market on whether they should enter
a particular business sector (e.g. automobile, retail, manufacturing etc.) in that market. You will prepare
your report as if you were going to present your findings to the top management team of the company. If
you choose to enter, you should clearly specify the reasons and propose a detailed strategy and
implementation plan to achieve success in that foreign market. If you choose not to enter, you should clearly
specify the reasons. If the decision is contingent on some factors, you will need to identify those.
Two days near the end of the course are set aside for presentations of your final project. The presentation
allows each team to report their analysis and recommendations to the class. The exact presentation date and
time for each team will be assigned by a random drawing. Detailed instructions regarding the group project
including instructions on the paper and the presentation will be discussed in class and posted to Blackboard.
Peer Evaluations. Each of you will complete a peer evaluation of the members of your team with respect to
the team final project. A copy of the peer evaluation form is posted to Blackboard and is due on the day of
the final exam. Scores for individual student contributions to the team final project are assigned by me,
based on my assessment of the team’s project quality, my observations of the team’s working dynamics
and thoughtful consideration of the information provided through your peer evaluations.
If you experience any group-related problem (e.g. conflict, free-rider etc.), please let me know
immediately. Do not wait until the end of the semester. If you report this problem too late, there is
not much I can do.
Course Policies
Add/Drop Process
If you are absent three or more times prior to January 19th, 2018, I may ask you to withdraw from the course
by that date if you do not notify me prior to your absence. These policies maintain professionalism and
ensure a system that is fair to all students.
Students will be referred to the Office of Student Judicial Affairs and Community Standards for further
review, should there be any suspicion of academic dishonesty. The Review process can be found at:
http://www.usc.edu/student-affairs/SJACS/ . Failure to adhere to the academic conduct standards set forth
by these guidelines and our programs will not be tolerated by the USC Marshall community and can lead
to dismissal.
Support Systems
The following support systems are available to USC students.
Diversity at USC
Includes tabs for Events, Programs and Training, Task Force (including representatives from each school),
Chronology, Participate, and Resources for Students.
https://diversity.usc.edu/
No student may record any lecture, class discussion or meeting with me without my prior express written
permission. I reserve all rights, including copyright, to my course syllabi, lectures, powerpoints, prior
exams, answer keys, and all supplementary course materials available to the students enrolled in my class
whether posted on Blackboard or otherwise. They may not be reproduced, distributed, copied, or
disseminated in any media or in any form, including but not limited to all course note-sharing websites.
Course Schedule
# Date Session Topics & Agenda Readings/Assignments
Fundamentals of Strategy
1 M 1/8 Course Introduction and Overview;
Fundamentals of Strategy I
Lecture
2 W 1/10 Fundamentals of Strategy II Case: The U.S. Airline Industry in 2012 (BB)
Lecture, case analysis, team formation
M 1/15 Martin Luther King’s Birthday – No Class
I. Fundamentals of Global Strategy
3 W 1/17 Why Do Firms Go Abroad? Opportunities Readings: Managing Global Expansion (CP);
and Challenges of International Expansion ADDING value (BB); Managing Differences: The
Lecture Central Challenge of Global Strategy (CP)
4 M 1/22 - Motivation for international expansion, Case: Grolsch: Growing Globally (CP)
location strategy, choice of entry mode
Case discussion
5 W 1/24 Strategies for Global Value Creation: Readings: Adaptation Strategies (BB); Aggregation
Adaptation, Aggregation, Arbitrage Strategies (BB); Arbitrage Strategies (BB)
Lecture Case: Levendary Café (CP)
- Adaptation Final project proposal due
Case discussion
6 M 1/29 - Adaptation Case: Wal-Mart in Europe (CP)
Case discussion
7 W 1/31 Where to Locate? Crafting Location Readings: Distance Still Matters (CP); Strategies that
Strategies for Competitive Advantage Fit Emerging Markets (CP)
Lecture, in-class exercises
8 M 2/5 - Location strategy, adaptation Case: Grupo Bimbo (CP)
Case discussion
9 W 2/7 - Location strategy, developed markets Case: Haier: Taking a Chinese Company Global (CP)
Case discussion
10 M 2/12 Midterm Exam
11 W 2/14 - Global expansion Case: The Globalization of the NFL (CP)
In-class case analysis
M 2/19 President’s Day - No Class
12 W 2/21 - Adaptation, emerging markets Case: Yum! China (CP)
Case discussion
13 M 2/26 What is Global? Allocating Products and Case: P&G Japan: SK-II Globalization Project (CP)
Activities Across Locations
Lecture, case discussion
14 W 2/28 - Outsourcing Case: P&G: Global Business Services (CP)
Case discussion Final project working outline due
15 M 3/5 - Regional and global business strategies Case: The Globalization of East Asian pop music(CP)
Case discussion
16 W 3/7 Project Feedback Session
3/11-18 Spring Recess – No Class
17 M 3/19 How to Execute Global Strategies? Foreign Case: Walmart around the world (CP)
Entry Modes and Global Org. Structures
Lecture, case analysis
18 W 3/21 - Foreign entry modes Case: Lincoln Electric (CP)
Case discussion
19 M 3/26 - Headquarter-subsidiary relations Case: Silvio Napoli at Schindler India (A) (CP)
Case discussion
II. Special Topics in Global Strategy
20 W 3/28 How to Manage Global Innovation & Reading: How GE is Disrupting Itself (CP)
Learning?
Lecture
- Reverse innovation Case: Health City Cayman Islands (CP)
Case discussion
21 M 4/2 - Reverse innovation Case: GE in India: Changing Healthcare (CP)
Case Discussion
22 W 4/4 How to Manage Cross-Border Case: Renault-Nissan Alliance (CP)
Collaboration? First final draft of final project due
Lecture, case discussion
23 M 4/9 - Partner negotiation in international JVs Case: Nora-Sakari: A Proposed JV in Malaysia (CP)
Case discussion
24 W 4/11 Project Feedback Session
25 M 4/16 How to Do Good and Do Well? MNEs and Reading: Creating Shared Value (CP)
Social Responsibility
Lecture
- Global sourcing, ethics Case: IKEA’s Global Sourcing Challenge (A) (CP)
Case discussion
26 W 4/18 - Global sourcing, ethics Case: IKEA’s Global Sourcing Challenge (B) (CP)
Case discussion
27 M 4/23 How to Win in Emerging Markets? Final project paper due
Final Project Presentations I
28 W 4/25 Final Project Presentations II
Final Exam
• Section 16687 (MW 10:00 - 11:50am): Mon., May 7, 2018; 8 - 10am
• Section 16689 (MW 4:00 - 5:50pm): Wed., May 2, 2018; 4:30 – 6:30pm
CP = Harvard Coursepack
BB = Blackboard