33 s2.0 S0950061818329039 Main
33 s2.0 S0950061818329039 Main
33 s2.0 S0950061818329039 Main
h i g h l i g h t s
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: This paper presents a study on the effect of carbonated-aggregates on mechanical properties and thermal
Received 25 June 2018 conductivity of eco-concretes. These carbon negative eco-aggregates are produced by accelerated carbon-
Received in revised form 13 November 2018 ation where industrial by-products or incinerators’ waste are combined with carbon dioxide (CO2). These
Accepted 23 November 2018
manufactured aggregates have particular characteristics giving them a certain interest in the field of civil
Available online 28 November 2018
engineering such as in replacement of natural aggregates in concrete. Morphological, physical, mechan-
ical and thermal characterizations were performed on eco-aggregates in order to use them in the produc-
Keywords:
tion of concrete. Then, concretes based on these carbonated-aggregates were formulated. In the
Incinerators’ waste
Carbon negative aggregates
experimental program, different mixtures were prepared by partially replacing natural aggregates by car-
Accelerated carbonation technology bonated ones resulting in concretes with unit weights varying between 1750 and 2290 kg/m3. For all pro-
Formulation duced concrete mixes, the water to cement (w/c) ratio was kept constant. Compressive strength, modulus
Mechanical properties of elasticity, thermal conductivity, water absorption and sorptivity were measured. Results have been
Thermal conductivity compared to control concrete mixes produced using ordinary aggregates and expanded clay. The results
show that the tested eco-concretes have sufficient mechanical strength and interesting thermal conduc-
tivity. Therefore, they could be used for construction projects.
Ó 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.210
0950-0618/Ó 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
242 I. Rahmouni et al. / Construction and Building Materials 197 (2019) 241–250
neering materials, natural deposits are preserved for longer on the surface of the grains and progressively fill the capillary voids. Carbonation
has many advantages such as agglomeration of particles for the formation of solid
periods.
aggregates (hardening of the matrix makes it possible to obtain resistant finished
In order to respond simultaneously to the vital need for con- materials) and physical (pollutants) and chemical (formation of insoluble metal car-
struction and the universal necessity to conserve resources and bonates and decrease of PH) stabilization. For all these reasons, the recovery of
protect the environment against pollution and the release of CO2, waste from heat treatments (rich in CaO) is particularly suitable for the carbonation
it is essential to reuse waste and industrial by-products, which process. Based on this observation, the University of Greenwich has developed the
ACT [18,19] that allows thermal residues of minerals to react with carbon dioxide.
when combined with CO2, can be transformed into aggregates.
The precipitation of carbonates (limestone) generates a permanent fixation of CO2
These artificial aggregates could be used in many construction and the formation of inert aggregates. This process aims to carbonate incinerator
applications such as the substitution of natural aggregates in the waste in an atmosphere enriched with carbon dioxide to generate aggregates. After
production of concrete if they do not alter its properties. This dual being transported and stored at the production centre, the waste is pre-treated by
carbonation and then mixed with cement, sand and water to form a binder paste.
benefit of reducing carbon dioxide emissions and recycling waste
The materials are then carbonated in a rotating reactor thus forming negative car-
is an interesting alternative. Thus, the University of Greenwich bon lightweight aggregates. The carbon dioxide is transformed into carbonic acid,
and Carbon8systems developed a new technology, known as the which will then be able to initiate reactions with calcium hydroxide to form cal-
accelerated carbonation technology (ACT). ACT process has been cium carbonates [20–22].
shown to be effective in making incineration residues inert. The
process is currently directed to category 1 landfills (hazardous 2.2. Characterization of carbonated aggregates
waste). In addition to limiting the quantities of buried materials,
ACT would make it possible to recycle carbon dioxide present in Three different waste sources have been selected from southeast England and
northwest France. Aggregates, labelled as C8 AGG (Fig. 1-a), were produced from
the incineration fumes because of the carbonation reaction that residues of air-pollution control residues (APCr) [18] with cement used as binder.
consumes a lot of CO2. Thus, this new type of aggregates can par- The second waste used to produce aggregates, labelled as PA (Fig. 1-b), is paper
tially or fully replace natural aggregates, which preserves natural ash [19]. These aggregates were produced without the addition of a binder but with
deposits. These eco-aggregates have bulk densities less than addition of quarry fines, rich in calcium oxide CaO [20,21]. The last tested aggre-
gates, labelled as BAk (Fig. 1-c) were manufactured using waste from a French bio-
2000 kg/m3, which classify them as lightweight aggregates.
mass centre [23].
In order to promote these eco-aggregates within the building In addition to the three types of eco-aggregates presented above, expanded clay
and public works sector, it is necessary to characterize their prop- (labelled as EC) and typical natural aggregates (labelled as O) were tested in this
erties as well as those of the products they make part of their com- study and served as control materials.
position (concretes based on carbonated aggregates). For this Physical tests such as gradation analysis, specific gravities (SG), water absorp-
tion and porosity were performed on all tested aggregates. In addition, mechanical
purpose, morphological, physical, mechanical and thermal charac- characteristics (crushing resistance and LA abrasion) and thermal conductivities
teristics of these materials were studied in this research. The paper were also determined.
starts by presenting the industrial process for manufacturing eco- Gradation testing was performed using the dry sieving method according to EN
aggregates. Then, characteristics of all tested aggregates, sample 933-1 standard [24]. The obtained gradation curves for all tested aggregates as well
as that of natural sand (used for the concrete production in this study) are shown in
preparation and concrete formulation are described. Afterwards,
Fig. 2. The particle size analysis shows that the dimensional distribution of aggre-
the mechanical properties and thermal conductivity results for gates produced by the accelerated carbonation process is similar to that of EC
all prepared eco-concretes are introduced. In order to situate the and O control aggregates. The uniformly and curvature coefficients (Cu and Cc,
characterization results for these new sustainable materials with respectively) show that all tested aggregates are uniformly graded (Cu < 4 and
respect to those of traditional building materials a comparative 1 < Cc < 3). The gradation analysis for all tested eco-aggregates confirms their suit-
ability for usage as coarse aggregates in producing concrete.
study is proposed. This comparison was performed in order to
Results of the physical and mechanical tests are summarized in Table 1. The
study the effects of carbonated aggregates on mechanical and ther- specific gravities were determined according to EN 1097-6 standard [25,26]. Car-
mal properties of concretes. This would allow the development of a bonated aggregates have low bulk specific gravity as compared to ordinary aggre-
concrete formulation method based on lightweight aggregates’ gates, which classify them as lightweight aggregates. Their porosity is higher
than that of ordinary aggregates. Carbonated aggregates present moderate abrasion
characteristics.
resistance (high LA coefficients). Crushing resistance was determined according to
standard NF 13055-1 [27]. The results show that the crushing resistance of the dif-
2. Materials and method ferent tested eco-aggregates is smaller than that of ordinary aggregates.
High porosity of carbonated aggregates presents a problem during their mixing
2.1. Aggregate production to produce concrete. Therefore, an important correction for the needed mixing water
should be taken into account when formulating concrete with these eco-aggregates.
Aggregates are produced by accelerated carbonation process, patented by Car- For this reason, measurement of water absorption capacity for the different aggre-
bon8 System industry, an entity of the University of Greenwich [16,17]. Accelerated gates was done on three 400-g-samples immersed in water. The water absorption
carbonation is a rapid and accelerated version of natural carbonation, which coefficient is determined by continuous weight measurements for a period of 7 days.
exposes materials to high concentrations of carbon dioxide. Many wastes are reac- As shown by Fig. 3, an immediate absorption of 22% was measured for PA aggregates.
tive to carbon dioxide especially industrial waste resulting from heat treatment. After 7 days, the EC aggregates reached about 20% water absorption. Concerning C8
Carbonation is a very slow reaction of carbon dioxide in humid environment that aggregates and BAk, an atypical behaviour was noticed, with fast water absorption of
produces carbonic acid as shown by Eq. (1). the order of 5% then a loss of mass related to the disintegration of these aggregates in
water. Compared to natural aggregates, the carbonated aggregates have higher val-
CO2 + H2 O ! H2 CO3 ð1Þ ues of water absorption coefficient, which is due to their internal porosity.
Subsequently, carbonic acid reacts with lime to form limestone as shown by Eq. Fig. 4 shows the variation of water absorption index, defined as iw ð%Þ ¼ WWA24
At
(2). [28], with respect to time. The figure shows that water absorption after 24 h of
immersion is not sufficient for determining the water absorption coefficient of
CaO + H2 CO3 ! CaCO3 + H2 O ð2Þ aggregates. In fact, some aggregates continued to absorb water for a period of three
days before stabilisation.
In case of carbonation of cement matrix, calcium silicates C3S and C2S will inter-
Based on experimental results, a linear relationship, with a coefficient of deter-
act with carbon dioxide and water because of their hydraulic nature. The reaction
mination R2 = 0.96, was found between the 24 h water absorption WA24 and the
produces calcium carbonates CaCO3, which crystallizes into calcite stable poly-
density of aggregates (see Fig. 5). The relationship can be expressed by Eq. (4):
morph and hydrated calcium silicates CSH (non-crystalline compound) as shown
by Eq. (3).
d kg=m3 ¼ 2600 51 W A24 ð%Þ ð4Þ
Table 1
Aggregates characteristics.
kU þ kL
keff ¼ ð6Þ
2
ity and the calculated real thermal conductivity. Good thermal performance was
For k U kL, the Hashin-Shtrikman lower kL and upper kU bounds for thermal found for paper ash aggregates PA with a thermal conductivity of 0.15 W/mK, which
conductivity of a two phase composite can be written as follows: is similar to that of expanded clay. C8 and BAk aggregates have a higher thermal con-
ductivity of 0.2 W/mK, but still lower than that of ordinary aggregates with a ther-
e 1e mal conductivity of 0.24 W/mK. Results of aggregates’ thermal conductivity kagg
kU ¼ ks þ and kL ¼ ka þ ð7Þ
1
ka ks
þ 1
3ks
e 1
þ 3ke a
ks ka show that carbonated aggregates have lower thermal conductivity than ordinary
aggregates but higher than EC. Thermal conductivity of the solid phase of aggregates
where ks, keff and ka are respectively the thermal conductivity of aggregate of solid shows that C8, BAk and PA aggregates and ordinary aggregates have similar conduc-
phase, bulk aggregate and air. e is the volume fraction of air. The thermal conductiv- tivity values. These carbonated aggregates produced by recycling waste containing
ity of the aggregates was calculated using the volume fraction of inter and intra- metals and minerals that have high thermal conductivities. Eco-aggregates have
particular air. Table 2 shows the measured results for the bulk aggregate conductiv- low thermal conductivities due to their porosity.
244 I. Rahmouni et al. / Construction and Building Materials 197 (2019) 241–250
a constant w/c ratio of 0.5. In total, Seventeen mixtures were formulated in this
study using different proportions of lightweight eco-aggregates. In fact, ordinary
aggregates were replaced by 25, 50, 75 and 100% of eco-aggregates.
Table 3 summarizes the formulations of the various eco-concretes. All produced
eco-concretes in this study have a dry density less than 2000 kg/m3, which classify
them as lightweight concretes according to RILEM’s classification [35]. The density
was determined on samples at 28 days by dividing their dry masses with their vol-
ume. The consistence of the different mixes was measured using the slump test. The
slump values obtained for the different mixes classify them as class S2 according to
European standard NF EN 206-1 standard [36].
For all studied mixes, several specimens were prepared for different tests:
It is to note that all tests were carried out on air-dry specimens at the ages of 7,
Fig. 5. Relationship between density and water absorption. 28, 90 and 365 days.
Table 3
Mix proportions for all studied concretes.
Concrete’s Cement Eco-aggregate Ordinary Sand Water Effective W/C Slump (mm)
composition (kg/m3) aggregates
% C8 100 350 1007 – 639 175 0.5 80
75 350 755 252 639 175 0.5 70
50 350 503 503 639 175 0.5 70
25 350 252 755 639 175 0.5 80
% PA 100 350 869 – 658 175 0.5 70
75 350 652 217 658 175 0.5 80
50 350 435 435 658 175 0.5 70
25 350 217 652 658 175 0.5 80
% BAK 100 350 1069 – 639 175 0.5 80
75 350 817 267 649 175 0.5 70
50 350 534 534 639 175 0.5 70
25 350 267 817 639 175 0.5 80
% EC 100 350 475 – 551 175 0.5 90
75 350 356 119 532 175 0.5 90
50 350 238 238 532 175 0.5 80
25 350 119 356 570 175 0.5 80
%O 100 350 – 1103 755 175 0.5 70
0:3
f
Ec ¼ 22 cm ð9Þ
10
Where Ec is the modulus of elasticity in GPa and fcm is the compres-
sive strength in MPa. Fig. 14 shows that the EC2 equation did not
predict well the measured values. A nonlinear regression of the
measured values using the same form as the EC2 expression
resulted in Equation (10) with an R2 value of 0.57.
0:6684
f cm
Ec ¼ 17:54 ð10Þ
10
The American Concrete Institute ACI [44] predicts the modulus
of elasticity of concrete through the use of Eq. (11):
qffiffiffiffi
Ec ¼ wc 1:5 0:043 f c for 2:5 f c 40 MPa and 1440
kg
wc 2500 ð11Þ
m3
Fig. 7. Effect of eco-aggregates content on dry density of concrete.
Where wc is the unit weight of the concrete (kg/m3) and fc and Ec
Table 4 presents the results of the compressive strength for all are the compressive strength and the modulus of elasticity (MPa),
testing ages. As expected, for all tested mixes, as the age increases respectively.
so does the compressive strength [3,42]. The strength development ACI prediction equation was found to underestimate the modu-
is slow after the seven first days. lus of elasticity of concrete incorporating eco-aggregates.
The flexural strength was determined by 3-points flexural test The carbonated aggregates are porous and have lower crushing
on 7 7 28 cm3 specimens at the age of 7, 28, 90 and 365 days. resistance so lower modulus of elasticity. Concrete’s modulus of
Fig. 11 presents the 28-days-flexural strength of the studied con- elasticity is proportional to the aggregate’s modulus of elasticity.
cretes and shows good values for eco-concretes compared to ordi- In micro structural point of view, bond cracks penetrate into aggre-
nary one. gates [39]. In addition, cement paste penetrate into open pores of
As shown by Fig. 12, a brittle type of fracture is obtained for the the lightweight aggregates providing a good paste-aggregate bond-
tested specimens either in compression or in flexural tension. The ing (Fig. 8).
aggregate’s shell remains intact and integral with the matrix while
the interior of the aggregates is detached from the matrix. 3.4. Thermal conductivity
3.3. Modulus of elasticity The guarded hot plate method in steady state [29] was used to
measure the thermal conductivity of all studied concretes [23]. The
As presented by Fig. 13, when the percentage of eco-aggregates tested specimens are 25 25 6 cm3 dried at 70 °C until constant
increases, the modulus of elasticity of concrete decreases. For weight. Thermal conductivities are obtained for four temperatures
example, the modulus of elasticity of the control mix was 10°, 20°, 30° and 40 °C. Fig. 15 shows the measured thermal con-
37.4 GPa, which is a typical value for conventional concrete, while ductivity of all studied concretes as a function of temperature.
that of the mix prepared using 100% PA aggregates was 23.6 – a We can see that temperature has a negligible effect on thermal
reduction of about 36%. conductivity. Concrete incorporating C8 aggregates has a thermal
To predict the modulus of elasticity of concrete from its com- conductivity of 0.7 W/mK at 10 °C, which is almost similar to that
pressive strength, Eurocode EC2 proposes the expression shown of EC concrete. Ordinary concrete has a thermal conductivity of
by Eq. (9) [43]. 1.23 W/mK. Thermal conductivities of eco-concretes as a function
246 I. Rahmouni et al. / Construction and Building Materials 197 (2019) 241–250
Fig. 8. SEM-images for concretes (a) EC, (b) PA and (c) BAk.
of eco-aggregates percentage are presented in Fig. 16. Replacing by Arnoud et al. [46] for heterogeneous materials of hemp in bulk,
ordinary aggregates with carbonated ones reduces the thermal hemp concrete and hemp wools. The heterogeneous material is
conductivity due to the porous structure of carbonated aggregates assimilated to an equivalent homogeneous material composed by
[45]. For example, the thermal conductivity of the mixture contain- an assembly of spherical inclusions. This material could be consti-
ing 75% C8 AGG is 45% lower than that of the control mix, and 21% tuted by two or three inclusions. Concretes based on carbonated
smaller than that of the mix incorporating 50% C8 AGG. aggregates are assimilated to an assembly of 3 inclusions. The
To estimate the thermal conductivity of the eco-concretes, the model is then a tri-composite model with an internal sphere of
auto-coherent homogenization model was used. This model esti- air (ka, ra) surrounded by a spherical inclusion of carbonated aggre-
mates thermal conductivity of heterogeneous materials knowing gates (kpG, rpG) and moreover surrounded by an inclusion of
the conductivity of each component and its volume fraction. This cement matrix (ksl, rsl) (Fig. 17). The equivalent thermal conductiv-
model was developed for mechanical characterization and used ity of the concrete is given by Eq. (12).
I. Rahmouni et al. / Construction and Building Materials 197 (2019) 241–250 247
Table 4
Compressive strength results for all testing ages.
Concrete 7 days Compressive 28 days Compressive 90 days Compressive 365 days Compressive
strength (MPa) strength (MPa) strength (MPa) strength (MPa)
% C8 100 7.7 17.8 19.9 23.8
75 8.4 20.1 21.7 25.4
50 10.9 20.8 22 26.1
25 19.1 23.6 23.4 26.2
% PA 100 15.2 16.6 17.1 19.8
75 15.3 16.8 17.2 18.0
50 15.4 16.8 17.9 20.3
25 18.5 21.8 24.8 25.3
% BAK 100 10.3 14 17.6 20.6
75 11.9 15.6 18.2 22.6
50 12.3 16 19.6 21
25 12.7 16.3 19.8 21.1
% EC 100 13.2 14.2 16.1 19.6
75 14.3 15.2 16.2 20.3
50 14.4 16.1 16.8 18.8
25 17.2 18.9 20.8 21.4
%O 100 26.9 33.2 38.5 42.2
Fig. 11. Effect of eco-aggregates content on concrete 28-day flexural strength. Fig. 13. Effect of type and quantity of eco-aggregates on the modulus of elasticity of
concretes at 28 days.
Fig. 12. Surface failures of the eco-concretes PA and C8 under flexural test.
keq h
¼1þ ð12Þ
ksl ka
3þ kpG 1 d
1h
3
þ
2kpG
ka ka
3 ksl 1 d kpG 1 ksl þ1
Fig. 18. Predicted and measured values of thermal conductivity for all studied eco-
Fig. 15. Thermal conductivity of all studied concretes as a function of temperature.
concrete mixes.
Fig. 17. Modelling by auto-coherent homogenization of three-phases. Fig. 20. Effect of eco-aggregates on sorptivity coefficient of all studied concretes.
I. Rahmouni et al. / Construction and Building Materials 197 (2019) 241–250 249
[30] A. Benazzouk, O. Douzane, K. Mezreb, B. Laidoudi, M. Quéneudec, Thermal [40] H. Oktay, R. Yumrutas, A. Akpolat, Mechanical and thermophysical properties
conductivity of cement composites containing rubber waste particles: of lightweight aggregate concretes, Construct. Build. Mater. 96 (2015) 217–
experimental study and modelling, Construct. Build. Mater. 22 (2008) 573– 255.
579. [41] T.Y. Lo, W.C. Tang, H.Z. Cui, The effects of aggregate properties on lightweight
[31] EN 197-1, Cement-Part1: composition, specifications and conformity criteria concrete, Build. Environ. 42 (2007) 3025–3029.
for common cements, 2001. [42] K. GaneshBabu, D. SaradhiBabu, Behaviour of lightweight expanded
[32] M. Arnould, M. Virlogeux, Aggregates and Lightweight Concretes, Presse de polystyrene concrete containing silica fume, Cem. Concr. Res. 33 (2003)
l’ENPC, 1986. 755–762.
[33] T. Holm, J. Ries, High-performance Structural Lightweight Concrete, American [43] Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures part 1-1: General rules and rules for
Concrete Institute, 2004, p. 202. buildings, EN 1992-1-1, Nederlands Normalisatie institute, 2007.
[34] J. Baron, J.P. Olivier, La Durabilité des bétons, Presses de l’École Nationale des [44] ACI-318-08, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, American
Ponts et Chaussées-Paris, 1992, p. 453. Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills MI, 2008.
[35] RILEM, Functional classification of lightweight concrete, Mater. Struct. 5 (27) [45] L.H. Nguyen, A.L. Beaucour, S. Ortola, A. Noumowé, Influence of the volume
(1972) 173–175. fraction and the nature of fine lightweight aggregates on the thermal and
[36] EN 206-1, Concrete-Part1: specification, performance, production and mechanical properties of structural concrete, Construct. Build. Mater. 51
conformity, 2000. (2014) 121–132.
[37] AFNOR NF EN 12390, Testing Hardened Concrete, 2012. [46] L. Arnaud, H. Monnet, C. Cordier, F. Sallet, Modélisation par homogénéisation
[38] Safiullah Omary, Elhem Ghorbel, George Wardeh, Minh Duc Nguyen, Mix auto cohérente de la conductivité thermique du béton et laines de chanvre, in:
design and recycled aggregates effects on the concrete’s properties, Int. J. Civ. A. Lallemand, J.F. Leone (Eds.), Proceedings of the Congrès français de
Eng. (2017). thermique, 15–17 Mai 2000, Elsevier, 2000, pp. 543–548.
[39] M.H. Zhang, O.E. Gjorv, Mechanical properties of high strength lightweight
concrete, ACI Mater. J. 88 (3) (1991) 240–247.