Quantity Theory of Money
Quantity Theory of Money
Quantity Theory of Money
The quantity theory of money states that the general price level of goods and services
is directly proportional to the amount of money in circulation, or money supply. For example, if the
amount of money in an economy doubles, the theory predicts that price levels will also be double.
The above figure depicts the money market in a sample economy. The money supply
curve is vertical because the monetary authority (Example, RBI) sets the amount of money
available without consideration for the value of money. The money demand curve slopes
downward because as the value of money decreases, consumers are forced to carry more
money to make purchases because goods and services cost more money. Similarly, when the
value of money is high, consumers demand little money because goods and services can be
purchased for low prices. The intersection of the money supply curve and the money demand
curve shows both the equilibrium value of money as well as the equilibrium price level.
Versions of Quantity Theory of Money
Irving Fisher suggests that there is a mechanical and fixed proportional relationship between changes in the money supply and the general
price level. According to Irving Fisher, like the price of a commodity, value of money is determined by the supply of money
and demand for money. In his theory of demand for money, Fisher attached emphasis on the use of money as a
M×V=P×T ---------------------(1)
where:
M=money supply
V=velocity of money
P=average price level
T=volume of transactions in the economy
Generally speaking, the quantity theory of money explains how increases in the quantity of money tends to create inflation, and
vice versa. In the original theory, V was assumed to be constant and T is assumed to be stable with respect to M, so that a change in M
directly impacts P. In other words, if the money supply increases then the average price level will tend to rise in proportion (and vice versa),
with little effect on real economic activity. The same argument can be shown with the following numerical example.
Fisher’s cash transaction version can be extended by including bank deposits in the definition of money
supply. Now money supply comprises not only legal tender money, M but also bank money, M’. This bank money has
It is, however, not easier to measure the number of transactions T. Let us replace T by Y. Thus P. Y is the
nominal income or output where Y is the total income. Now the quantity theory equation becomes: PY = MV. This is
like Pigou, Marshall, Robertson and Keynes in the early 1900s. These economists argue that money acts both as a
store of wealth and a medium of exchange. Here, by cash balance and money balance we mean the amount of money
According to Cambridge economists, people wish to hold cash to finance transactions and for security
against unforeseen needs. They also suggested that an individual’s demand for cash or money balances is
proportional to his income. Obviously, larger the incomes of the individual, greater is the demand for cash or money
balances.
Md = kPY -------(1)
where
Let us assume that the supply of money, MS’ is determined by the monetary authority, i.e.,
MS = M-------(2)
Equilibrium requires that the supply of money must equal the demand for money, or
k and Y are determined independently of the money supply. With k constant given by the transaction
demand for money and Y constant because of full employment, increase or decrease in money supply leads to a
proportional increase and decrease in price level. This conclusion holds for Fisherian version also. Note that
Cambridge ‘k’ and Fisherian V are reciprocals of one another, that is, 1/k is the same as V in Fisher’s equation.