Republic of the Philippines
TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Provincial Training Center-Cagayan
PROGRAM EVALUATION
OBJECTIVE:
This evaluation instrument aims to gather remarks and comments of the participants
related to the conduct of Trainers Methodology I (TM1). This will serve as a tool in the
improvement and strengthening the program.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Please rate the following program components in terms of the indicators provided below by
ticking (√) the column that best describes your evaluation of each program component. Your rating
will be treated confidentially.
Adjectival Rating Numerical
Rating
Outstanding 5
Very Good/Very Adequate 4
Good/Adequate 3
Fair/Satisfactory/Average 2
Inadequate/Unsatisfactory/Poor 1
Name (Optional): __________________________________________________________________
Address: __________________________________________________________________________
Duration: ___________________________
RATING
PROGRAM COMPONENT INDICATORS
5 4 3 2 1
A. Program Design and Organization
1. Clarity of program objectives
2. Organization of course activities
3. Scheduling of activities and time allotment
4. Attainment of program objectives
B. Course Content
1. Course content vis-a-vis the program objectives
2. Sequencing of the course contents
3. Sufficiency of information
4. Relevance of course content vis-à-vis need
C. Training Methodology
1. Effectiveness of selected method
2. Appropriateness to the course activities
1
Republic of the Philippines
TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Provincial Training Center-Cagayan
RATING
PROGRAM COMPONENT INDICATORS
5 4 3 2 1
D. Program Administration and Management
1. Adequacy of provided supplies and materials
2. Timeliness of provision of supplies and materials
3. Availability of training equipment and materials
4. Conduciveness of the training venue to learning
5. Appropriateness of the physical layout of the venue
6. Courteousness of PTC Staff
7. Secretariat service
E. Facilitator/Trainer
Instructions:
GRACE F. GUIYAB
REGIE R. DURUIN
Write the corresponding number to rate each Facilitator/Trainer:
ROBINSON M.
ROVIE V. VEN
CONCORDIA
5 Outstanding 4 Very Good 3 Good
2 Average 1 Poor NA Not
applicable
1. Knowledge of the subject matter
2. Ability to communicate ideas
3. Ability to arouse interest
4. Ability to encourage participation
5. Ability to organize lecture and activities
6. Ability to answer questions
7. Openness to suggestions and comments
8. Ability to encourage critical and/or creative thinking
9. Readiness to response on the need of the trainees
10. Use of training equipment
11. Comprehensiveness of activities / workshop
12. Ability to provide adequate feedback
13. Ability to provide practical exercises
G. Comments and Suggestions
THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION
