Some Basic Problems in Criminology
Some Basic Problems in Criminology
Some Basic Problems in Criminology
1933
Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons
Recommended Citation
Hall, Jerome, "Some Basic Problems in Criminology" (1933). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 1467.
https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1467
THE enormous literature on method- our frames of reference have been con-
ology which has appeared in the structed for us.
last decade has, despite criticism and All of the above applies to crimi-
admonitions from certain quarters,' re- nology more forcibly than to most
sulted in a much clearer appreciation of social disciplines. For purposes of sim-
the limitations of contemporary social plifying this discussion and keeping it
science. Thus, for example, there is within the set boundary, we shall pre-
now considerable understanding of the sent very briefly three principal ap-
huge proportions and significance of proaches which for convenience may be
linguistic difficulties. If, as Sapir and termed the "rigorous scientific," the
others tell us, language is the vehicle of "scientific method," and the "unique
thought, then the difficulties are by no data" interpretations, respectively.
means purely philological; much more, The knowledge found in criminology
they require an infinitely more thor- may be subsumed under different
oughgoing analysis than has heretofore categories described in the various in-
been attempted. This means that for terpretations set forth. From such a
an indefinite period to come, the lan- demonstration of the relationship of
guage problem and all that it involves criminology to these three interpreta-
will be a chief concern of social scien- tions of social science, and of the rela-
tists. tionship of these interpretations to each
There are other valuable lessons to other, it is hoped that something will be
be learned from this literature, for added to our understanding of some of
these discussions have been pushed the major problems presented by the
sufficiently far to permit a more so- contemporary literature of criminology.
phisticated reading and evaluation of
THE RIGOROUS SCIENTIFIC
sociological writing than was previously
POSITION
possible. We are able to see many
interrelationships among the problems Very happily for our present under-
investigated. And we are beginning to taking, we may set forth the "rigorous
understand how much of social "sci- scientific" position by reference to the
ence" is really social policy more or recent publication of the most thor-
less disguised; in short, how much of oughgoing critique on criminology and
sociological writing consists of expres- criminal law and its administration
sions of approbation or displeasure. that has yet appeared.2 This analysis
And in the rare instances where a high of the field is the product both of a logi-
degree of objectivity exists, we are in a cian and philosopher and of a law
better position to understand and teacher who has had many years of
evaluate the particular job by our practice at the bar. After a compre-
greater appreciation of the various hensive survey of the field, they arrive
fundamental approaches to and inter- at the following conclusions:
pretations of social science. In short, 2Michael, J., and M. J. Adler, Crime, Law and
1
Ellwood, C. A., "Scientific Method in Social Science, Harcourt, Brace and Company,
Sociology" (1931), 10 Social Forces 15-21. 1933.
119
I. There is no scientific knowledge in the these fields, and this, in turn, de-
field of criminology. pends upon the correction of the
A. We have no knowledge of the causes misconception or inadequate con-
of criminal behavior or of the ef- ception of empirical science and
fects of different modes and varie- scientific method which is now
ties of treatment upon actual or prevalent in these fields and which
potential offenders, or of the we have characterized as raw
efficacy of programs and measures empiricism.3
of prevention.
1. In the absence of such knowledge Without attempting a systematic
we are and will continue to summarization of this book, which is
be impotent to control crim- impossible within the limits of this
inal behavior. paper, we shall very briefly present the
B. The knowledge which has resulted general thesis maintained, which led to
from criminological research is the above conclusions, namely:
knowledge descriptive of the Problems are either theoretical or
characteristics of criminals and of
their environments.
practical. Practical problems concern
C. This descriptive knowledge has lit- affairs, procedure, or action; they in-
tle utility in the solution of the
volve the fixing of an end which it is
desired to achieve, and the determina-
practical problem of controlling
criminal behavior, either through tion of meansto accomplishit. Onthe
programs of prevention or through other hand, theoretical problems are
the official treatment of offenders. questions as to knowledge-never as to
1. It can be employed only in decisions. When we answer theoreti-
trial and error attempts to cal problems our conclusions are either
control criminal behavior, true, false, or probable; whereas the
and therefore has little prac- answers to a practical problem are wise
tical value.
2. Such attempts cannot now be 3 Ibid., pp. 390-391; and in connection with the
made the basis of experi- last statement above, note: ". . . the scientific
mental programs and, there- method . . . is hardly more than the native
method of solving problems, a little clarified from
fore, have little theoretical prejudice and a little cultivated by training. A
significance. detective with his murder mystery, a chemist
II. Empirical scientific research in crimi- seeking the structure of a new compound, use
nology cannot be undertaken at the little of the formal and logical modes of reasoning.
present time. Through a series of intuitions, surmises, fancies
A. The subject matter of criminology is they stumble upon the right explanation, and
criminal behavior, andcriminology have a knack of seizing it when it once comes
within reach. I have no patience with attempts
is, therefore, a dependent science.
to identify science with measurement which is
B. Criminology depends in large part
but one of its tools, or with any definition of the
upon the subject matter of psy- scientist which would exclude a Darwin, a Pas-
chology and sociology, and these teur or a Kekule." Gilbert Lewis, The Anatomy
subject matters have not yet been of Science, p. 6.
developed as empirical sciences. Cf. also, "The principle of the scientific
C. Since no theory or analysis has been method, in fact, is only a refinement, by analysis
developed in the fields of psychol- and controls, of the universal process of learning
ogy and sociology, scientific re- by experience. This is usually called common
search is not yet possible in these sense. The scientific addition to common sense
is merely a more penetrating analysis of the com-
fields.
plex factors involved, even in seemingly simple
D. The possibility of scientific research
events, and the necessity of numerous repetitions
in psychology and sociology de- and controls before conclusions are established."
pends upon radical changes in the A. J. Carlson, "Science and the Supernatural"
methodology of investigation in (1931), 73 Science, 218.
settled absolutely; and the only clue The desiderata of definiteness of deno-
that can be suggested is that all classi- tation, comprehensiveness, and ab-
fications are constructed to meet par- sence of affective associations suggest
ticular needs (and for some, we want themselves. Many of the principles
to emphasize the results of our thinking applied by the philologists who are
rather than our process). It depends, concerning themselves with the con-
in short, very largely upon the purpose struction of an international language
in hand. have some application. And the fact
Under the circumstances and within that a particular usage is customary
the above limitations, all that can be may have greater disadvantages than
stated is that it is possible to detect benefits.
differentiae which are significant for a Finally, the experience of the older
great many purposes. And it seems sciences may be utilized. The termi-
to the writer (which may be purely a nology adopted by Professors Michael
personal predilection) that there is a and Adler has this distinct advantage:
broad basis for differentiating social science, rigorously defined, becomes
science both from common sense and relatively definite. Other types of
from empirical science as defined; from knowledge may be very valuable, but
the latter because it is not exact, and will not be subsumed under the rubric
from the former because it is not com- "science." In addition to the defi-
mon but confined to persons who have niteness thus attained in one direction
had specialized experience in a particu- at least, there is also the advantage of
lar field which qualifies them for an having direct attention called to the
efficient behavior which cannot be relatively smaller degree of validity of
expected of laymen however intelligent other types of knowledge, with the very
they may be. salutary effect of fostering a skeptical,
To this distinctive content of the critical attitude and of dispelling the
social disciplines must be added an- smugness that frequently results when
other difference (from common sense) terms and definitions are expanded to
which they possess, namely, an orderly allow everyone from the professional
method which operates through the prize fighter to the experimental physi-
agency of various more or less elaborate cist to rest under the coveted aegis of
techniques, a method which is care- Science.
fully designed to eliminate bias, to
make possible the detection of all "UNIQUE DATA" INTERPRETATION
relevant data, to make use of all veri- Even if it is impossible to secure
fiable data, and to record the results so considerable agreement on present
that they may be checked by other
or a difference. Thus, we employ the phrase
investigators. Of course there remains, 'empirical science' in a restricted meaning which
among others, the difficulty that una- differentiates physics from criminology; we might
nimity is not quite so readily deter- have used it in a less restricted meaning in order
mined as in the physical sciences; nor to indicate the similarity of physics and crimi-
is it so widespread, which is to be nology as bodies of knowledge somehow based
upon experience. The analysis would not be
expected. changed by this arbitrary change in usage, be-
We know no way of determining the cause physics and criminology are clearly differ-
question regarding an adequate termi- entiable as bodies of knowledge, and hence some
other word could be used arbitrarily to express
nology except by reference to utility.17 this differentiation. Verbal usage may be
1' Cf. "It is entirely arbitrary whether a arbitrary, but analysis is not." Michael and
given word shall be used to indicate a similarity Adler, op. cit., Preface, p. xix.
but also the new one of "control." any sense, we may merely note diverse
Certainly "control" in human society answers which cannot now be under-
is not significantly limited to the direct, stood. The authors of the survey
immediate behavior to which we refer referred to insist that etiological knowl-
when we speak of driving an automo- edge is scientific (as rigorously defined)
bile or throwing a ball. More than and that only such knowledge can as-
that, while men control physical ob- sist in controlling criminal behavior.
jects in this simple, direct manner, it is At the opposite extreme, Dr. Frank
clear that they do not control natural Knight, who takes an extremely criti-
phenomena in the same sense at all. cal, skeptical position,22states that:
They do make certain adjustments to Common sense does predict and control,
them, and they can predict some of and can be trained to predict and control
them. We can fairly well predict the better; but that does not prove that science
number of deaths which will occur in can predict and control better than common
the United States during the next ten sense. And it seems very doubtful whether
years, but we can do little about con- in the majority of social problems the ap-
trolling their occurrence. If we know plication of logical methods and canons will
that unemployment, poverty, and sub- give as good results as the informal, intui-
tive process of judgment which, when re-
normality increase criminal behavior, fined and developed, becomes art. Art is
we cannot as a result of that knowledge not science, and only within narrow limits
lessen that behavior. can it be reduced to science (in which case
Commonsense and control- of course it ceases to be art). It seems to
us that science is a special technique de-
Control has been defined loosely, veloped for and applicable to the control of
where it has not been entirely assumed physical nature, but that the ideal so con-
without any attempt at definition, and stantly preached and reiterated, of carrying
it is impossible within the limits of this its procedure over into the field of the social
paper to discuss the question in any phenomena rests on a serious misapprehen-
detail.21 If we ask does common sense Sion.23
dwelling upon this angle of the prob- behaviorism frequently direct their at-
lem, it is obvious that we have also tack with reference to a very narrow
a linguistic problem here which has definition of the term (made possible
only recently been recognized with by the existence of many varieties), and
reference to the idea of control. Sig- assume also the continued existence of a
nificantly enough, the recognition of mechanics which has all but disap-
the linguistic problem at this point has peared from contemporary physics.
developed with and from analysis of Many of the ablest advocates of be-
this concept. havioristic approaches and interpreta-
tions deny that their position calls
BEHAVIORISM for the reduction of social phenomena
Underlying the third position de- to the simplest physical phenomena.
scribed above is the suggestion that the Along with these various developments
social disciplines are more closely which have accompanied analysis and
related to art than they are to science.25 research, we find, accordingly, concomi-
Without attempting to decide this tant changes in definition and termi-
issue, we may note the significance of nology.
this view with reference to behavior-
ism. The literature of psychology RELIANCE UPON INTUITIVE PROCESSES
during the past decade has been de- Whether it is merely a temporary
voted so abundantly to a considera- difficulty arising from a limited use of
tion of behavioristic approaches that objective methods, or a permanent
lengthy summarization is unnecessary. limitation which results from essential
Furthermore, in view of the recent differences of social data, it seems clear
revolutionary changes regarding many that in the solution of problems which
fundamental theories in physics on the are dealt with in the administration of
one hand, and of the newer meanings the law, we are compelled to utilize in-
that have been assigned to "behavior- tuitive processes. Intention, planning,
ism" on the other (by L. L. Bernard, and motivation (though they may be
A. P. Weiss, R. Bain, et al), it is im- merely general terms which represent
possible to arrive at any but the most a large number of acts) are necessary
tentative conclusions. Opponents of concepts. Nor does it seem possible
are aspects of a total non-mechanical consciously
at present to make a sufficiently de-
upheld system of relationships. . ... Behind
tailed analysis of behavior to enable us
every social relationship lie social attitudes and to dispense with these concepts. With-
interests, which are not separable forces but out asserting that a highly developed
type-phases of dynamic personality." R. M. behaviorism may not offer a more
MacIver, Society, Its Structure and Changes
(1951) p. 520.
satisfactory explanation of the phe-
25 Cf. Gilbert Lewis, TheAnatomyof Science: nomena associated with motivation,
"The method of the chemist . . . [and] his data sentiments, emotions, and so forth
are far less exact [than the physicist's] .... than is now derived by the use of the
Some are rough measurements, but the greater
intuitive processes alone, it is necessary,
part are not even metrical in character. They
are based upon the observations of thousands of at least in the administration of the
different substances and from these observations law, to rely chiefly upon insight and
come rough generalizations like the law of Men- imagination. Accordingly, if atten-
del6eff." P. 169. tion be centered upon present tech-
"So, as the organic chemist acquires profi-
ciency in this art, for indeed it is almost an art, he niques
and upon explanations of
acquires an intimate acquaintance with his behavior hitherto adduced by objective
material." P. 174. methods, it seems clear that it is neces-
sary not only to employ physical and merely suggests that for an indefinite
biological explanations to the fullest future, we must not expect compendent
extent, but also to supplement these propositions whose validity may be
by explanations on a purely social determined in part by reference to
level. scale, galvanometer, or test tube; but
Nor do we need to adopt the view rather, we must continue indefinitely
that social data are essentially different to use our most subtle imaginations not
from any other data. The question, only in detecting small relationships in
in any event, is How can social the vast mass of data that we collect,
phenomena be best understood? If we but, moreover, in interpreting, evaluat-
confine ourselves to present problems ing, and using these small truths to-
and to available explanations, certain gether with the whole body of our
conclusions are unavoidable. Thus, experience in understanding the social
in criminology, the method of Dosto- life about us, including criminal be-
ievsky, for example, is more valuable havior. And of equal importance is
in understanding some types of crimi- the recognition of the fact that the
nal behavior than any scientific tech- methods employed in the social sciences
niques that have been developed thus provide, at the minimum, a large body
far. Yet it is very frequently assumed of relatively detailed, reliable informa-
(by simply ignoring it) that we must tion upon which insight, imagination,
take imagination or insight as given, and judgment can operate more effec-
that we need not study, train, or tively.
cultivate it, and moreover, by placing
entire emphasis upon objective meth- DEGREE OF PRECISION REQUIRED
ods, that these latter are paramount. Finally, it may be said that while
The best work in the social sciences researches in the social sciences, includ-
is a combination of orderly method and ing criminology, do not result in prop-
trained imagination; and while we do ositions which are as exact as those
not find this anywhere deliberately found in physics, it is necessary to
denied, and indeed the reverse is true, note that such precision is not required
nevertheless we believe it may fairly in the administration of the criminal
be stated that a serious limitation of law. Precision itself is purely relative,
contemporary criminology is the failure and the need for any particular degree
to train and utilize the processes of of precision is determined by the
insight and imagination.26 purpose in hand. This certainly is
This observation is entirely con- true in law. Thus the adoption of a
sistent with further empirical investiga- wise policy by a legislature would not
tion in the social sciences, with necessarily be in the least affected by
experimentation of every sort. It the most precise data imaginable.
26Case studies are only a small beginning; the Professor Herman Oliphant illus-
most detailed life histories, which have for the trates the point very neatly as follows:
most part been best developed hitherto by the
A recent study of the labor injunction
psychoanalysts, should be compiled without
necessarily adopting the psychoanalytic ideology. in New York shows that in about 60
Interpretations made by intuitive processes can per cent of the cases, the temporary
be supplemented by further observation. And a injunction was the only relief sought
communication (objectification) of their intuitive and granted. If the legislature should
processes by judges, juries, etc. would be valu-
able. Novelists and biographers who make no
consider regulation of this type of
attempt to ape psychologists provide valuable remedy, it would not make the least
material. difference whether the temporary in-
junction was the only relief granted in the necessity to make the attempt
60 per cent of the cases or in 60 per for any one who wishes merely (!) to
cent plus or minus a fraction. As Pro- understand. It would be appalling not
fessor Oliphant says: to believe that a great deal of the
How exact a particularobservationor confusion in contemporary criminology
measurementin any scienceneedsto be de- would disappear, and we have indicated
pends upon the academicor applieduse to some of the steps necessary to accom-
whichit is to be put. The degreeof exacti- plish this. Yet the writer, for one,
tude needed varies with the subject, with remains skeptical about the appearance
the problemof that subject and with the of a set of symbols which will eliminate
aspect of the problemwith which one is misunderstanding. For one comes
called upon to deal. . . . away from these discussions with the
The example cited illustratesa further conviction that whether the data are
fact whichstudentsof the law in particular
shouldkeep in mind when they despairof unique or not, we will for an indefinite
scientificmethodsof study. It is that the future be handicapped by our inability
discriminatingcapacityof the socialagency to identify social data with sufficient
availablefor effectuatingchangesindicated particularity.28
by their studies (e. g., the legislature)will Reference to any of the data dealt
constitute the upper limit of exactitude with in the various social disciplines
which the methods they employ in their supports this opinion. The existence
study need, for many practicalpurposes,to of physical objects which can be
be capableof producing.27 universally and sufflciently identified
NEED FOR STANDARD TERMINOLOGY
and discussed, which can literally be
pointed to anywhere and everywhere,
We have tried, by placing in juxta- facilitates research in the natural
position three leading interpretations of sciences. What social data exist which
social science and results that follow everybody everywhere will identify
from them, to demonstrate the utter uniformly? It may be granted that
futility of attempting to understand the processes of perception are one and
sociological literature without a delib- the same, but this does not alter the
erate, thorough attempt to understand results nor eliminate existing diffi-
the terminology employed; that after culties.
allowances are made for differences in Moreover, one of the most difficult
terminology, conflicts disappear in things imaginable in dealing with social
large measure; and that the necessity phenomena is to find words which do
to make such an analysis and to allow
for differences in terminology is pecu- 28 "The
great PoincarT once remarked that
liarly necessary in the social sciences. while physicists had a subject matter, sociologists
All of these observations apply equally were engaged almost entirely in considering their
methods . . . there is still in this remark a just
to attempts to evaluate criminological rebuke . . to those romantic souls who cherish
research. the persistent illusion that by some new trick of
We should be rare optimists, how- method the social sciences can readily be put on a
ever, if we imagined that the conflicting par with the physical sciences in regard to defi-
niteness and universal demonstrability. The
positions indicated in the above dis- maximum logical accuracy can be attained only
cussion could be removed by a con- by recognizing the exact degree of probability
ference on the adoption of a standard that our subject matter will allow." M. R.
terminology. We have emphasized Cohen, "The Social Sciences and The Natural
Sciences," in Ogburn and Goldenweiser, Social
27Oliphant, H., "Facts, Opinions, and Value- Sciences and Their Interrelations,p. 454; included
Judgments" (1932), 10 Tex, L. Rev., p. 130. also in Cohen's Reason and Nature,
The repeal of the Volstead law will We pass over the dominance of tra-
mean an enormous quantitative limi- ditional techniques, the necessity to
tation of the field. What can be done follow precedent, and the reverence
with reference to studying types of for authority, all of which make the
criminals, i. e., of persons who violate adoption of a scientific attitude all but
penal laws, or regarding the causes of impossible. Related in varying de-
such violations, under these circum- grees to all of these is the very im-
stances? portant consideration that problems
As a matter of fact, criminologists in the administration of law almost
are really influenced by the older always depend upon social policy
sociological definition of crime and by rather than upon social science. A
other considerations. However, they serious difficulty which students of the
have thus far been unable to analyze law encounter when they look to the
their problems and their interests social sciences for assistance in their
sufficiently to define their field; or else own discipline has been pointed out by
criminology is composed of several Professor K. N. Llewellyn as follows:
fields which overlap and intersect at In short, then, as to the data already
so many points that it is impossible to availablefrom the social sciences,one can
detect any common characteristics. say this: all of their materialis suggestive
In either event, this is a serious limita- for us; little of it is more. They have not
tion. gatheredtheir data for our purposes,and
most of what we want to know we shall
USE OF OTHERSOCIALSCIENCES have to find out for ourselves. Not only
IN LAW are hypotheseslikely to be limited to the
There remain a number of addi-
data on which they rest, but data also are
tional special difficulties which con-
selected,recordedand classifiedfor the pur-
front students of the criminal law.29 pose in hand; and data selected, recorded
and classifiedfor one purposeare exceed-
29 ,. .. a science of law cannot be built on ingly likely to be blind or misleadingwhen
experimentation. Like geology its rational approachedforanotherpurpose. The social
branch must rest on testing by observation." scientist has repeatedly left out of con-
H. Oliphant,"A Returnto StareDecisis" (1927), siderationpreciselythe portionsof the situ-
14 A. B. A. Jour. 76. ation which for us are most relevant or
The doctorshave to a degreeintroducedex- puzzling.30
perimentationinto medicine. Thus Dr. F. S. While systematic correlation of law
Lee writes:"The modernphysiciandoesnot rely
on a philosophicalsystem . . . he alters the and other social science is still for the
conditionsandthushe obtainsanalterationof the most part confined to devout exhorta-
phenomenaand a new standpointfromwhichto tion, knowledge from other fields has
view them. He may apply to the diseasepast always seeped into the law."* In the
experience,it is true, but it is past experience
that has been put to the test of modernexperi- seem to be room for experimentation. It would
ment. Moreoverby the aidof furtherexperiment undoubtedly be limited and would require an
he pushes out into the unknown, sees dis- attitude on the part of officials which cannot at
ease from unusualstandpoints,and devisesnew present be expected; but the problem certainly
and hitherto unsuspectedmethods of dealing seems worthy of consideration.
with it." Scientific Features of Modern Medicine 30"The Conditions for and the Aims and
(1911). Methods of Legal Research" (1930), 6 The Am.
It may be questionedwhetherexperimentation Law School Rev. 677.
must be foreverbarredfrom law. In Sweden, 31It is a long stretch from the days when only
legislationis adopted for a limited periodafter those who were as "mad as a wild beast" escaped
studyby a boardof experts. Duringthe ensuing liability to, the recognition by courts in their
period the operationof the statute is studied. actual practices, of borderline cases of abnormal-
Again,in the treatmentof offenderstherewould ity which are not as yet expressly provided for in
present century only, has the attempt countries, we have taken hardly any
been made by a few legal scholars to deliberate steps to develop the neces-
become thoroughly familiar with at sary technology. In Italy and Ger-
least one social discipline in addition many, for example, the teachers of
to their own. This has been directed criminal law are very frequently com-
by a deeply felt necessity, for, as petent criminologists who direct insti-
Professor Llewellyn has stated, the tutes and carry on research.32
legal scholar cannot bodily take over It should be reasonably clear at this
very much of the work of the social time that a criminology constructed in
scientists in its present form. ignorance of legal problems is all but
impotent to improve the administra-
NEED FOR LAWYER-CRIMINOLOGISTS tion of criminal law. The most strik-
This is unfortunate, and its signifi- ing example of the failure to understand
cance for criminal law cannot be legal purposes and problems and of
exaggerated. Indeed, in a sense, the consequent ineffectuality is provided
whole cause of the inadequacy of by criminal psychiatry, which is gen-
criminology for the criminal law (in erally selected as the high mark of
addition to the limitations of crim- accomplishment in the field. Passing
inology in itself) may be epitomized as over the dogmatismthat arises from
follows: The criminologists are not 32 "Outside of the
English-speaking world
lawyers, and the lawyers are not these things have been understood for a long
criminologists. More specifically, we time. The nineteenth century jurists and law
do not have technologists who are teachers of continental Europe carried scientific
equipped to apply criminology to the study and development of the criminal law a long
administration of the law. In con- way. On the Continent, every land has con-
spicuous leaders in the scientific treatment of
trast with a number of European criminal law. In every land strong teachers and
creative writers and investigators may be found,
most criminal codes. (The Briggs Law in Massa- in criminal law no less than in public law and
chusetts is still the outstanding exception.) private law. Indeed, in the universities of con-
Contributions of chemistry, bacteriology, and tinental Europe specialists in criminal law have
ballistics have been utilized by the courts very known or have learned how to work with
generally. The juvenile court is perhaps the out- specialists in all the sciences that bear on criminal
standing example of an administration of the investigation and penal legislation and adminis-
criminal law which has been influenced con- tration. We, on the other hand, have all but left
siderably by social science. It follows from the the field to enthusiasts and cranks and char-
position taken in this paper that efficient utiliza- latans." R. Pound, " What Can Law Schools
tion of the data and research in the social sciences Do For Criminal Justice?" (1927) 12 Iowa L.
is inevitably dependent upon personnel. The Rev. 112.
recent ecological studies of Park, Shaw, and An example is given by Dr. R. Grassberger,
Sutherland objectify conclusions of experience who writes: "In the spring of 1923 the Austrian
previously held and, moreover, provide a tech- Department of Education ... founded the
nique for a more discriminate utilization of the .. Institute. Incorporated as part of the
knowledge. Other important studies which university Law School. . . . The work of the
command attention are those on parole predic- Institute is divided into three branches . . . I.
tion, especially by Burgess, Glueck, and Vold. Instruction to law students in the criminological
It seems reasonable to expect that with the aid of sciences. . . . The purpose of instruction at the
psychiatry these tables may shortly be utilized Institute is to supplement the legal training af-
not only by parole boards but also by judges in forded the student through the chief lecture
helping to decide doubtful cases of application courses by a varied knowledge which will serve
for probation, and even farther back than that, him later in his capacity as judge, prosecuting
by prosecutors in helping them to decide whether attorney, defense attorney or public official."
to proceed or to nolle prosequi in doubtful cases. "The University Institute of the Criminologic
Here would seem to be a unique opportunity for Sciences and Criminalistics in Vienna" (1932), 23
experimentation. Jour. of Cr. Law and Criminol. 395-6.