Community Diagnosis:: Community Health Nursing Process
Community Diagnosis:: Community Health Nursing Process
• The community health nursing process, like the nursing process in general, is
   composed of Assessment, Diagnosis, Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation.
   However, for purposes of tradition, community assessment is already integrated into
   the process of community diagnosis.
• COMMUNITY DIAGNOSIS:
                   TRADITIONAL                                      PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH
 Research for purpose of identifying and meeting Research seeks social transformation.
  individual needs with existing social systems.
 Community problems or needs are defined by         2.The research problems are defined bybthecommunity members themselves
  experts or external researchers                   who are considered/viewed as “experts of their own reality.”
 The research problem is studies by the researchers 3.The community group undertake the investigation or research from data
  who control the research process.                 collection to analysis. External researchers work alongside the community
                                                    group.
 Recommendations for the community are based on 4.The community formulates recommendations and an action plan based on
  the researcher’s findings and analysis.           research outcome.
▪ Decide on the depth and scope of the data to be gathered; regardless of the type of
  community diagnosis to be conducted.
▪ The nurse must determine the occurrence and distribution of selected environmental,
  socio-economic, and behavioral conditions important to disease prevention and
  wellness promotion.
▪ Identify the population group, based on the objectives of the study; the study
   population maybe the entire community population or be focused on a population
   group, such as women in the reproductive age group or the infants.
c. Prepare the Community
▪ Meet with community leaders to enable the nurse to formulate the community
  diagnosis objectives .
▪ Initial data are gathered through the key leaders are as follows:
• Spot map of the entire community
• Initial secondary data ( total number of households per area, total population per area,
   list of traditional healers, list of CHWs)
d. Choose the Methodology and Instrument of Community Diagnosis
2. Implementation
a. Actual data Gathering
▪ During the actual data gathering, the nurse supervises the data collectors by checking
  the filled-out instruments for completeness, accuracy, and reliability of the
  information collected.
▪ Demographic data
▪ Economic characteristics
▪ Social indicators
▪ Political characteristics
▪ Cultural characteristics
▪ Environmental indicators
o Community dimensions directly related to health
▪ Maternal and child health care – family planning, midwifery services, child care
▪ Food and nutrition – daily food budget, daily food intake, knowledge on basic food
  groups
▪ Illness and injury- type of sickness, medical personnel attending to the sick, where the
  sick go for consultation and treatment, types and sources of medicines, dental care,
  mental health, accidents, causes of death.
▪ Water and environment – water supply and storage, food storage, sanitation (excreta,
  garbage, waste water disposal, pets and vermin control)
▪ Endemic diseases
▪ Health education
c. Presentation/Organization of Data:
• Data collected may be presented as:
o Statistical tables
o Graphs
o Descriptive data
Line Graph:
Pie Chart:
Bar Graph:
d. Analysis of Data:
• Aims to establish trends and patterns in terms of health needs and problems of the
   community.
• It allows comparison of obtained data with standard values.
e. Identification of Community Health Nursing Problems
• Make a list of the health problems and categorize them as:
o Health Status Problems
▪ The problems are classified by the nurse as health status, health resources, or health
  related problems.
o Magnitude of the Problem
▪ Refers to the severity of the problem, which can be measured in terms of the
  proportion of the population affected by the problem.
o Modifiability of the Problem
▪ Refers to the probability of controlling or reducing the effects posed by the problem
o Social Concern
▪ Refers to the perception of the population or the community as they are affected by
   the problem.
• Steps in Prioritizing Problems
1. Score each problem according to each criteria.
2. Divide the score by the highest possible score.
3. Multiply the answer by the weight of the criteria
4. Add the final score for each criterion to get the total score for the problem. The
   highest possible score is 10, while the lowest possible score is 1 /
                                                                     5
                                                                         12.
5. The problem with the highest total score is given high priority by the nurse.
• SCORING SYSTEM IN PRIORITIZING HEALTH PROBLEMS
                          CRITERIA                             Highest Possible Score WEIGH
                                                                                        T
  NATURE OF THE PROBLEM
    Health Status                                                       3
    Health Resources                                                    2             1
    Health-Related                                                      1
  MAGNITUDE OF THE PROBLEM
    75% - 100% Affected                                                 4
    50% - 74% Affected                                                  3             3
    25% - 49% Affected                                                  2
    < 25% Affected                                                      1
  MODIFIABILITY OF THE PROBLEM
    High                                                                3
    Moderate                                                            2             4
    Low                                                                 1
    Not Modifiable                                                      0
  PREVENTIVE POTENTIAL
    High                                                                3
    Moderate                                                            2             1
    Low                                                                 1
  SOCIAL CONCERN
    Urgent community concern                                            2
    Recognized as a problem but not needing urgent attention            1             1
    Not a community concern                                             0
  TOTAL SCORE:
   PLANNING:
• Refersto the process of constructing a program, formula, or alternative model that will be used
   as basis for a course of action or decision in order to achieve a desired end.
• Participatory
             planning is a process by which a community undertakes to reach a given socio-
   economic goal by continuously diagnosing its problems and charting a course of action to
    resolve those problems. Experts are needed, but only as facilitators. Moreover, no one likes to
    participate in something which is not of his/her own creation.
• TYPES   OF PLAN:
1. Strategic plan - a long range of plan that extends from 3-5 years
2. Operational plan - short-range plan (less than 3 years) that deals with the routine activities of an
    organization.
3. Program plan – courses of action for the solution or improvement of a particular health problem,
    and deals with formulation of strategies.
b. Mission  statement :
➢ Defines what an organization does and includes tangible goals which the organization strives to
   accomplish.
➢ It is a short summary of an organization’s core purpose, focus, and aims. This usually includes
   a brief description of what the organization does and its key objective
                       GOALS
➢   broad and not constrained by time and resources; states the ultimate desired end point of all
    activities; it is directed towards solving health status problems
             Example: To reduce the incidence of tuberculosis among children in Atok, Benguet.
                       OBJECTIVES
➢   stated in specific and measurable terms, client-centered, and outcome-focused; concerned with
    the resolution of the health problem itself. It is stated SMART
                      Formulation of the objectives:
➢ An important step in participatory local planning is to define precisely what specific objectives
  are to be achieved, which should be stated in concrete terms, e.g. increasing i) incomes of
  identified households, ii) production of certain crops and iii) literacy among locally elected
  women officials.
➢ The objective may not always be quantifiable, particularly when it involves attitudinal changes.
  It’s still helps to be as specific as possible so that people can see how much change has taken
  place.
                             Long-Term Objective: Example: By the year 2025, the incidence of
                             tuberculosis among children in Atok, Benguet will be reduced by 15%
                            Short-term objective: At the end of 2020, 80% of infants in Atok,
                            Benguet will be immunized with BCG.
                            80% of households will have access to safe and adequate water supply
                            within six months.
   mobilizing needed resources and choosing the planning methods. It is important to specify: a)
   resources that are locally available and those needed from outside. (people with skills, funds,
   raw material inputs, etc.); b) if resources are available when needed; and c) who should be
   approached, who will approach and with whose help to secure these.
▪ Consider alternative local planning methods and approaches such as (i) whether to contract a
   job to private individuals or to do it on a cooperative basis; ii) whether to focus on several small
   household-based units or one big unit; and iii) whether to train local people as trainers for the
   jobs or to hire trained personnel from outside.
▪ Once a course of action is chosen, it should be explained and specified in clear terms to avoid
                Ensuring feasibility
▪ The working groups at this point should consider whether the objectives are realistic. It is
   important to ensure that: i) assumptions and stipulations regarding the availability of resources,
   managerial competence and technical expertise are realistic; ii) proposed activities are
   economically viable; and iii) local market can absorb the expected outputs.
▪ It is important to identify potential project beneficiaries and check how the benefits would flow to
them.
Program Planning:
o   A type of plan concerned with courses of action for the solution or improvement of a particular
    health problem;
o It deals with formulation of a strategy for the achievement of a given health policy objective;
o Also referred to as “very big projects or the composite of more than one big project.”
o Types of programs:
• Refer to programs to formulate policies, programs, and projects; to direct coordinate and control
    activities; and to provide informational and administrative support (including personnel, finance
    and logistics, and legal services)
▪ Programs for health system infrastructure
• Include programs for planning and development of a basic health facility network, health
    manpower policies and training, health education and public information
▪ Technology program
    Example:
          Health Problem: 40% of school-age children have ascariasis
   1. Community ownership
▪ Community ownership is the act or degree of ownership and responsibility taken by the
   can only come with their full participation in the decisions regarding planning as well as their
   assuming some responsibility for implementation.
▪  Community ownership in health means community participation in health through legal or
   authorized right to focus on:
▪ Local health issues
   people
▪ Promotes co-operation, coordination and collaboration between the stakeholders and the
   community people
▪ Raise community leadership and empowerment
    implementation
▪ Community awareness on various diseases prevention and control
▪ Lack of coordination and collaboration among community members causing huge gap between
    3. Partnership and collaboration – the aim of partnership and collaboration is to get people to
    work together to address problems or concerns that affect them. It gives the people the
    opportunity to learn skills in group relationship, interpersonal relations, critical analysis, and
    most important of all, decision-making process in the context of democratic leadership. At this
    point, people become partners, NOT competitors.
   Types of Evaluation:
• Impact Evaluation – estimates the impact of care or of a program on a client by comparing the
   conditions of the affected groups after it has taken place with what they would have been.
• Cost effectiveness analysis – done to compare alternative care interventions in terms of the cost
   of producing a given output.
• Both monitoring and evaluation are vital elements of care.
• Both are interrelated processes and require baseline information and documentation during
   implementation.
    Reminder: Participatory monitoring and evaluation is an integral part of the participatory project
    design and implementation process. It works best when the entire project process, from
    planning to the final evaluation, is conducted in a participatory manner.
    Participatory monitoring enables project participants to generate, analyse, and use information
    for their day-to-day decision making as well as for long-term planning.
    Participatory M&E encourages dialogue at the grassroots level and moves the community from
    the position of passive beneficiaries to active participants with the opportunity to influence the
    project activities based on their needs and their analysis. In addition, information is shared both
    horizontally and vertically within the implementing organization. It is generated by the
    community group and shared first with the larger community, and then with the donor. In
    contrast to conventional monitoring where information moves vertically – from the CBO to the
    donor – in participatory monitoring, information is much more widely shared, particularly at its
    source, which is the community.
  The examples below illustrate the two approaches to monitoring and evaluation.
   Organization A                                                           Organization B
   Every month, field staff collect the number of condoms distributed in Every month, field staff collect the number of condoms distributed in
   health centers and report those figures to their project manager.        health centers. Community representatives, health center staff, and
   Every month, the project manager adds up the distribution numbers project field staff discuss this information during their monthly review
   and sends the report to the donor. The donor enters the figures into a meetings. These data are then sent to project headquarters for
   computer, and generates a report for the Ministry of Foreign             forwarding to the donor. When the number of condoms distributed
   Assistance. Very few people actually look at the data to see what it is decreased, the local stakeholders tried to figure out why by asking
   saying. Is condom distribution increasing or decreasing? Will the        clients. With a simple change in strategy, they were able to once again
   project reach its objective of reducing sexually transmitted infections? increase the number of condoms distributed. Monitoring information was
   How can field staff, health center staff, and community members          used within the organization to improve the program and to report to the
   work together to make the project a success?                             donor
  Indicators are signals: they indicate the status of, or change in, something. They work as
  markers like milestones on the roadside which indicate the distance travelled, or the location at
  a given point.
  When implementing projects, indicators are used to check project progress and results.
  Indicators are ‘measures’ that demonstrate progress and results to project staff and volunteers,
  to the beneficiary community, and to the donors.
Types of Indicators:
1. Process   indicator – this indicates the project’s stage of implementation – the progress in
    completing planned activities
2. Change indicator - describes the level of change achieved through the activities. They are also
    referred to as results indicators since they indicate the results that are achieved through the
    project’s intervention
  Good indicators should be useful in the establishment of “trigger points” for action. Good
  indicators are sometimes referred to as CREAM indicators:
➢ Clear - precise and unambiguous
➢ Relevant - appropriate to the subject at hand
➢ Economical - available at reasonable cost
➢ Adequate - provides a sufficient basis to assess performance
➢ Monitorable - amenable to independent validation
  Qualitative indicators describe the state of something using words rather than numbers.
  Examples include:
➢ BHWs are able to get vital signs correctly
➢ Mothers were able to discuss the causes and prevention of ascariasis
    Objectives                                                                                                Indicators
    Conduct a 3-day training for 10 community leaders from each of the 3 villages on discrimination against   • No. of training workshops
    people living with HIV/AIDS and affected families by the 3rd month.                                       conducted ____
                                                                                                              • Number of community leaders
                                                                                                              trained ___
                                                                                                                Male___ Female___
    Conduct a 5-day basic health skills training for BHWs                                                     • Number of training sessions
                                                                                                              conducted ___
                                                                                                              • Total number of BHW
                                                                                                              trained__
                                                                                                              Male____ Female____
Easter College | Dept. of Nursing | Community Health Nursing | Prepared
by Bertha PadallaAlibcagPage 12
I. INTRODUCTION:
B. COMMUNITY AS CLIENT
  a. COLONIAL       PERIOD (15 Century- WWII): Development was defined as relief and
                                              th
      rehabilitation work just to patch up the damages brought about by the war.
• It was indeed a social work but it was a temporary nature of development.
  E. COMPONENTS        OF DEVELOPMENT:
  1. Social development
  2. Political development
3. Economic development.
  4. Cultural   development
5. Ecological,   Environmental/ Physical development
1. CD    is concerned with all the people of the community, rather than any particular or
    segment of the population.
2. CD is concerned with the whole of community life instead of any one specialized
    aspect.
3. CD is concerned with bringing about social change in the community
4. CD is concerned with the problem solving of social issues and conflicts.
5. CD is based upon the philosophy of self-help and participation by as many member of
    the community as possible
6. CD usually involves technical assistance, personnel, equipment, supplies, money or
    consultation from the government or voluntary private organizations, both domestic
    and foreign
7. CD is essentially interdisciplinary
8. CD is both a concern task goals and process goals
9. CD involves educational process. It is always concernedwith “teaching and learning”
    from the people.
10. CD continues over a substantial period of time. It is not a CRASH program, but rather
    it is a process.
11. CD program should be based on felt needs, and desires, as well as aspirations of the
    people in the community.
12. CD directs participation is open to any resident who wishes to participate.
G. GOALS OF DEVELOPMENT:
H. OBSTACLES        OF DEVELOPMENT:
       1. Man  himself (ex. Greediness, selfishness, dishonesty,etc)
       2. Conditions that are less humane brought about by a number of causes like poverty,
           ignorance, ill health
       3. Unjust oppressive structures and situations which serves to dehumanize man.
                    Examples: social injustice and human exploitation
                                 Non-participatory approaches utilized in trying to bring about
                             change.
ASSUMPTIONS PRINCIPLE
         1. Issue that threaten people’s lives move them to action, therefore;   1. Do not ignore a highly pressing issue that is identified
                                                                                 by the majority.
         2. Any person is afraid to go against many, strong and organized        2. Mass-based leadership is imperative
         people, therefore;
         3. People are open to change, have the capacity to change and are able 3. Provide opportunity to change and capability to
         to bring about change, if given the chance to do so, therefore;        change
                                                                                4. Provide them the chance to make development happen
                                                                                that should lead to a just and self-reliant community
         4. Learning happens fast when one experiences something successful, 5. Provide practical true-to-life activities where people
         concrete and practical, therefore;                                  will likely succeed. (experiential learning)
         5. Any person is an image of God, full of worth and dignity so he/she is 6. Let the people decide or allow for consensus building,
         responsible for his own life, therefore;                                 instead of making decisions for them
         6. Development is not offered in a silver platter, therefore;           7. People who want development to happen should
                                                                                 strive for it.
         7. People who develop the attitude or practice of self-evaluation every 8. Always conduct ARAS with the people
         after an activity is able to identify areas for improvement, therefore;
1. It
    is an investigation of problems and issues concerning the life and environment of the
   underprivileged by way of collaboration with them as equal partners.
2. It
    is a strategy of development where in community needs, conditions and problem are
   identified, solutions are planned and priorities are implemented through a partnership
   with the community and with the otherconcerned agencies.
1. Conscientization  / Arousal
2. Participation / Organize
3. Action / Mobilization
A. IMPORTANCE OF COPAR:
1. COPARrecognizes that individuals and small group with varying interests compose a
  community.
C. GOALS OF COPAR:
1. People  empowerment.
2. Social restructuring which means:
a. Equitable distribution of wealth, power in health and resources.
b. Organize the silent PDOES to speak up
c. Decision making that is now coming from the majority instead of the elite.
3. Alliance building
4. Genuine democracy
5. Improved quality of life.
1. AS  FACILITATOR:
a. Helps enhance individual and group strengths and helps maximize weakness and
    conflicts.
b. Heightens group unity.
c. Assists individuals and group respond to common interests.
2. AS   TRAINOR:
a. Assesses training needs of local leaders.
b. Helps  plan and conduct educational programs to strengthen individual and group
    capabilities.
c. Assists key leaders in training others.
d. Engages in continuous dialogues with people.
e. Helps in remolding the leaders and members in terms of skill and attitudes towards
    self-determination.
3. AS ADVOCATES:
a. Helps analyze and articulate critical issues.
b. Assists others to understand and reflect upon these issues.
c. Evokes and provokes meaningful discussions and actions.
4. AS  RESEARCHER:
a. Conducts social analysis
b. Engages in participatory research wherein people become co-investigator.
c. Simplifies/enriches appropriate research concepts and skills in order to make these
    functional for the people interests.
d. Engages in social integration to understand social phenomena from the people’s point
    of view.
5. AS  PLANNER:
a. Conducts initial analysis of area resources and potentials
b. Assists local groups in planning for their common good, including appropriate
    strategies and alternative actions.
c. Helps systematize groups’ actions to attain desired goals.
6. AS   A CATALYST:
a. Initiates debates and actions regarding critical problems.
b. Monitors and nurtures growth of individuals and groups to facilitate long term
    structural transformation for people’s welfare.
E. QUALITIES OF AN ORGANIZER:
1. Irreverence
2. Sense  of Humor
3. Visionary
4. Tenacity
5. Flexibility
6. Genuine Love for People
7. Critical Thinker
F. THE   DO’S AND DON’TS OF COMMUNITYORGANIZING
DO’s:
         1. Be  one and be familiar with the people you are working with.
         2. Have an orientation or faith in the power of people to transform. Have trust in the
             people’s capability to change.
         3. Be conscious of balancing local and national issues. The entire CO revolves around
             concrete local issues as the best starting point for training consciousness and
             motivation for action. CO ought not to be limited to local issues because the roots of
             the local problems are to found in larger national structures.
         4. Assess action on the basis whether they are consensus oriented. CO is democratic and
             participatory in all aspects.
         5. Anticipate the responses of outside forces and be prepared for this. This is to prepare
             both the people and the organizer on what actions to be undertaken. Always prepare
             with the people to the incoming problems.
         6. If there is conflict between authority and the people, go with the people. This is the
             general rule that governs CO.
         7. Should there be economic projects as entry point, it must be undertaken within the
             context of supporting and sustaining the struggle towards people’s goals, elevating
             their awareness and consciousness by inculcating values and a concrete expressions of
             the alternative system we are working for.
DON’T’S:
         1. Don’t romanticize
         2. Don’t be an empiricist.
         3. Don’t protect people from hardships.
         4. Don’t be dogmatic
          1.2. Initial consultation with the LGU’s, existing PO’s and other relevant
          agencies.
    Thus facilitates the CO in:
a. identifying the communities that fit the criteria
b. Initially introducing the importance and goals of community health development work.
   PURPOSES OF PSI
   For the CO to get to know the community he or she is going to immerse and work
   with and identify potential issues which might motivate people to action. It must be an
   issue that:
A. Affect a large number of community folks
B. People affected strongly feel that it is an urgent and important concern
C. Preferably winnable or the people should be able to get what they want.
   HOW TO DO PSI:
A. Study the existing documents or reports (secondary data) at the municipal, barangay
   health offices and related agencies. Data would include the following:
B. Observe  and engage in actual dialogues and informal interviews with key informants
   of the community.
• Current needs/problems or issues that highly affect them at the moment and may
   galvanize action from them
• Important data needed in a health program but which are not found in the existing
   secondary data
• Stage of health development of the community and its health programs and activities
   being implemented and the approach being utilized.
• Constraints and problems encountered by other agencies while working in the area.
D. Write-upanalysis and formulation of an initial plan which will later serve as a guide
   for the CO when he/she facilitates the community in formulating their own
   development action plan.
a. Pay respect to the leaders of the community as a form of initially establishing rapport.
e. To   know the other municipal and barangay officials, especially the heads of
          Offices and other health/non health related agencies based inthe same
          community.
f. To   level off expectations with the municipal officials in terms of support, roles etc.
g. Initial
         discussions planning of some immediate activities upon entry of the program
   with the key persons.
c. Conduct  initial dialogues with the community residents available and obtain ideas,
   feelings and reactions about possible entry of a health agency and about their
   experiences with previous agencies.
   B ENTRY PHASE
• This signals the actual entry and immersion of the CO in the selected community
• Also termed as the social preparation and critical awareness building phase and it is
   considered as the most crucial phase because it includes major activities on
   sensitizations of the people on the critical events on their lives.
CRITICAL ACTIVITIES
C. Respected   the people and recognize the positive aspects of their culture
               that give them the strength to struggle.
E. Modify their own values and lifestyle in keeping with that of the community
1. The health worker’s appearance, speech, behavior and lifestyle should be keeping with
   those of the community residents, without disregard of his/her being a model
2. Avoid   raising the expectation of the community residents by adopting a low key
    profile and approach
3. Live with the poor sectors of the community for at least three months
4. Visit
       as many people as possible in the community through house to house visits
   answering house calls to avoid creating jealousies and factions
5. Participate   in direct production and social activities of the people as well as household
  chores
6. Seek
      out and converse with people where they usually congregate such as in the stores,
  wells, washing streams, church or house yards
             a. Share high level of interest and needs and are open/willing to share
                needs and interests with others on a collective basis.
f. Share similar vision, goals and values with that of the people
5. Helps   in laying out plans and tasks for the formation and maintenance
                  community wide organization
• KEY  PERSON – star in the sociogram. The person who is most approach by many
  people. An obvious leader, a person/ people from whom the CO has to win support
  and train the local CO or the alter ego.
b. Getthe identified indigenous leaders to express their support to the COPAR approach,
  its phases and activities.
                         *In areas where there are no volunteers, home visit will be done by the CO
                         himself/herself.
                         *In areas where there are trained community health volunteers, the CO
                         plans with them regarding shared home visit, where the community
                         volunteer health worker act as the frontline and the CO helps to enhance
                         skills of the volunteer worker.
           E. GROUNDWORKING
           •A   basic tactic used in community organizing work where the CO goes around and
              motivate peoples and identified leaders on a one to one basis to do something about an
              issue at hand or to raise a particular issue during a barangay meeting.
           • To mind set community leaders and residents about a particular issue.
           F. COMMUNITY MEETING/CONSULTATION
                         The first of a series of community meetings that will be held during this
                         phase with the following objectives:
          A. To get the people’s collective ideas and feelings about the entry of the agency to their
              community in terms of acceptability or unacceptability.
          D. To evoke from the community residents about their vision of a happy family and
              developed community in the light of their analyzed situation.
• As  a process, the CDx is a continuous learning experience for both the agency and the
    community.
- For  the agency- it learns to alter its initially drafted plans and programs in order to
    adapt to the results of the community analysis.
- For   the community- it allows them the opportunity to gradually understand their own
    situation and the potential advantages that change can bring about.
- As   a continuous activity in all the phases of COPAR, social investigation goes on even
    if there is already an existing CDx
1. This  activity can be well facilitated if the CO has well integrated with and has acquired
    the trust of the people.
o   Dishonesty of data that will be given especially if the worker has not yet fully
    integrated with the people.
o   Difficulty of the community folks and leaders inreading and answering usually very
    long questionnaires.
o   Previous experience of community folks with traditional researchers that leave them a
    feeling of being subjects of study instead of being active participants of the study
o   Data can be more effectively gathered through information methods like casual
    conversation and the use of participatory appraisal tools
    4. Validation   of community data should be done regularly.
CRITICAL ACTIVITIES:
   ACTIVITIES
   1. Organization and training of the different committees
   2. Project implementation, monitoring and evaluation based on CDAP
   3. Action-Reflection-Action-Session
• A regular cycle of evaluation which largely focuses on self reflection about one’s
   contribution to the success and failure of an activity and what one can do to enhance
   or improve future similar activity/actions.
                    Objectives:
a. For  an individual or group to identify and celebrate their own strengths related to an
    activity just completed
b. For them to critically analyze the cause of mistakes and failures in that particular
    activity, so that consequent suggestion can be done, thus, they will be more capable of
    effectively transforming the next activity and their daily errors in life.
c. To relieve the pains experienced due to errors or mistakes due to behaviors of others in
    the community.
d. To reconcile hurt feelings among the members of the group.
1. Networking/Linkage     Building
a. It  involves establishing of working relationship with different agencies other
    organization/sectors
b. Community based organization can form network or federation to enhance their
    organization capabilities and widen their support base.
c. It is in phase that when the organization has attained unity and ability for collective
    decision-making, consolidation and expansion activities can be pursued.
2. Consolidation/Expansion
          Consolidation means more advanced skills training, higher form of mobilization,
          integrated and long term program/projects, additional committees and tasks.
        **The relationship between the CO and the people is temporary. If the goal of
        empowering the community is achieved, then roles of the outside organizer end and
        shift to a supportive role.