This document provides a rubric for evaluating presentations with five criteria: use of evidence, content organization, language and style, and time management. It establishes a scale from insufficient to excellent for assessing the degree to which a presentation supports its content with research evidence, organizes ideas in a logical flow, uses clear language and sentence structure, and manages time effectively.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating presentations with five criteria: use of evidence, content organization, language and style, and time management. It establishes a scale from insufficient to excellent for assessing the degree to which a presentation supports its content with research evidence, organizes ideas in a logical flow, uses clear language and sentence structure, and manages time effectively.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating presentations with five criteria: use of evidence, content organization, language and style, and time management. It establishes a scale from insufficient to excellent for assessing the degree to which a presentation supports its content with research evidence, organizes ideas in a logical flow, uses clear language and sentence structure, and manages time effectively.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating presentations with five criteria: use of evidence, content organization, language and style, and time management. It establishes a scale from insufficient to excellent for assessing the degree to which a presentation supports its content with research evidence, organizes ideas in a logical flow, uses clear language and sentence structure, and manages time effectively.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 1
NWO & I – The futuristic Paradigm
Rubric - Presentation
Insufficient Fair Good Very Good Excellent
Use of Evidence No evidence or One piece of Three pieces Five or more pieces to Support data is used to evidence is of evidence of evidence are support your used to are used to used to support Two pieces of evidence work. support your support your your work. are used to support your work. One or work. Exceptional data work. Some data is used two data Significant and research points are data points used are used
Content Organization is Structure is Structure is Structure of Structure of the
Organization not logical or not well- disorganized but the response response is well- discernable. organized. engaging. Ideas do not is organized organized. Ideas Sequence of always flow in logical and clear. flow in a logical ideas is sequence. Concepts are Ideas flow in sequence. Concepts Does not relate random or not a logical are cohesive. to your report confusing. always cohesive, and sequence, for Concepts are arrangement is the most part. disjointed and confusing. Concepts are Perfectly related to presentation is generally your report. unclear. cohesive. Barely related Some relation to your to your report Significant report relation to your report
Language and Response is Sentences are Sentences are confusing Sentences are Sentences are fluent style not complete not well-built. occasionally. Often, clear with and well-built. and language Overall, word word choice does not minimal Word choice is not choice does reflect content. confusion. reflects the content appropriate. not reflect Word choice effectively. content. reflects content adequately.
Time Less than 1 Less than 2 Less than 3 minutes or Between the Between the time management minute or minutes or more than 5 minutes (30 time limit limit more than 7 more than 6 seconds +-) minutes minutes
Dialectical Behavioral Therapy for DID--The Workbook: System-Affirming Skills, Mindfulness Practices, and Emotional Regulation Exercises for People with Dissociative Identities
