Chapter 2
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
This chapter of the paper presents the review of related literature, the
conceptual framework, the research hypotheses, and the definition of terms.
Related Literature
According to the website Study (2021) the term "K-12 curriculum" refers
broadly to the subject matter standards utilized from kindergarten through grade 12.
Discover the details of K–12 curriculum by examining it from the perspectives of the
courses or disciplines covered, the learning objectives, and the Common Core State
Standards. K-12 curriculum is for the preparation and eligibility of the students in a
country (Masayoshi, 2013). In order to hasten the mutual recognition of Filipino
graduates and professionals around the world, it also helps to improve the
educational system of the nation (Dizon, 2019). The program intends to foster
lifelong learners, provide students enough time to understand concepts and skills,
and get them ready for postsecondary education, middle-level skill development,
employment, and entrepreneurship (K12 Philippines, 2015).
The K–12 Program includes Kindergarten and 12 years of elementary school
(six years of primary education, four years of Junior High School, and two years of
Senior High School [SHS] (“The K to 12 Basic Education Program | GOVPH”).
According to Enderun Colleges (2022), K-to-12 system aims to improve students'
math, science and linguistics skills to further demonstrate their competence in the
global job market. According to the CIIT College of Arts and Technology (2017)
likewise the statement of Mark Anthony Llego (2022) there are four tracks in the K-
12 Curriculum with their different strands, the Academic Track which includes
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM),Accountancy,
Business, and Management(ABM), Humanities, and Social Science (HUMSS), and
General Academic Strand (GAS), Technology-Vocational-Livelihood Track (TVL) that
includes Home Economics Strand (HE), Information and Communication Technology
Strand (ICT), Industrial Art Strand (IA). Also the Art and Design Track and Sport
Track. In particular, if the student plans to start working right after graduating from
SHS, track is essential for developing a student's high level of proficiency in the field
to which his or her selected track is associated (“AMA Senior High, n.d.).
History of K to 12 and Implementation of K to 12 Curriculum in the Philippines
It was 150 years ago when the compulsory or the K-12 education curriculum
started in Massachusetts, United States (Beam, 2022). Prior to K–12, the Philippines
was one of just three countries left in the world (the other two being Djibouti and
Angola) with a basic education cycle of 10 years. The majority of the world's nations
follow a 12-year basic education cycle (“A Historical Perspective”, 2015; Oxford
Business Group, 2015). On May 15, 2013, President Benigno Aquino III signed
Republic Act, 10533 “AN ACT ENHANCING THE PHILIPPINE BASIC EDUCATION
SYSTEM BY STRENGTHENING ITS CURRICULUM AND INCREASING THE
NUMBER OF YEARS FOR BASIC EDUCATION, APPROPRIATING FUNDS
THEREFOR AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES” (GOVPH, 2013) into law, marking a
watershed moment for proponents of educational parity (Teach for the Philippines,
2013).
Popular Senior High School Strand
Different Strands are included in the Strands Preferred by the Respondents
K–12 before enrolling, the Senior High School candidate should choose a Strand
that matches his or her interests. The respondents prioritized the following strands,
in that order: 24.38 percent selected STEM, 16 percent preferred ABM, and 15.57
percent picked GAS (Robles, R.J., 2018).
Factors influencing the decision making of SHS strand.
Many factors can influence come into play when grade 10 students choice of
career path. Students will typically take into account the quality of life they want
when they are older. Factors such as gender/sex, family, peer influence, personal
interest, opportunities, economic status, and parent’s occupation.
Gender/ Sex
The workplace has historically had unfair and discriminatory gender roles
(Stamarski & Son Hing, 2015). Women typically had lower-paying occupations than
men (Jagani & Bandookwala, 2021). The playing field between the two is more even
at the moment. However, a closer look reveals that both men and women continue to
work in fields that are associated with stereotypes (Harvey, 2021). Young men and
women have distinct buying preferences depending on their employment, according
to studies (Serra, Soler, Camacho-Miano, Rey-Cao, & Vilanova, 2019). Men typically
have more liberal and progressive thought patterns. According to the W&M School of
Education (n.d.), women favor careers that place a strong emphasis on hierarchy.
Academic Experiences
Perceptions and Academic experiences can affect the students decion
making of their career choice (Abe & Chikoko, 2020). According to Lukman (2021),
academic success in an individual's environment influences career choice. If chosen
wrong, it can lead to failure and disappointment. Academic success and
performance of students in a particular course at higher education institutions
influence how successful a student will be in his or her studies (Sharma, 2012; Bell,
2013; Aminu & Timothy 2014). This means that a student's achievement in a
particular course of study determines how well they function in an academic setting.
According to Abiola (2012), academic performance is the best predictor of future
success since it reflects one's aptitude and the traits necessary to achieve academic
greatness in life. Consistency, tenacity, and concentration are these. Sharma (2012)
also noted that a student's academic performance is influenced by their grade,
attendance, performance on tests, and extracurricular activities (Aminu & Timothy,
2014).
Family Influence
Workman (2015) found that the most typical theme in learner decision-making
processes was parental engagement. Many other academics have backed up same
claim (Nugent, G., Barker, B., Welch, G., Grandgenett, N., Wu, C., & Nelson, C.,
2015). Nowadays, parents are much more conscious of how important it is to give
their children an affordable but high-quality education. The widely held belief that
educating family members will liberate and empower them for better lives serves as
the foundation for this (Ajani, O.A., Dusunmus, S., 2018). According to Kocak
(2021), family has a positive influence on one's self-efficacy in making career
decisions. His findings show that families have a big influence on people's self-
efficacy in choosing a vocation. In spite of the fact that families selected the school
for its small class sizes and close proximity to their homes, as families interacted
with the school and other families in the school, their perceptions of what they
wanted from their education shifted to a more academic focus. Enrolling in a school
of choice had an impact on family on-campus engagement (Curry, K. A, 2018).
Peer Influence
The influence of close friends on scholastic aspirations and outcomes varies
based on the racial and gender composition of the friendship, and interracial
connections are beneficial for students' goals (Martin, Tobin, & Spenner, 2014). The
quantification of the causal effect of peer influence is technically challenging because
of social interference, complex response functions, and network uncertainty (Toulis,
P. & Kao, E., 2013). When students are already friends, they assist one another
more frequently, and those who assist one another academically are more likely to
become friends (Brouwer, J., de Matos Fernandes, C. A., Steglich, C. E., Jansen, E.
P., Hofman, W.A., & Flache, A. (2022). The effect of friends was more likely to affect
socially desirable students (Palacios & Berger, 2022).
Personal Interest
According to Holland’s theory of “Career Typology,” individuals choose career
environments that best fit their personality and interest (Holland, 1966). According to
Ahmed (2014) state in his research article there is a great importance to student
interests when choosing a career. He noticed that career interests depend on the
student's likes and dislikes patterns. Indifference predict student career choices in
work-related activities. Having prior knowledge about a career is important to
developing and nurturing interest in the career. Every person should be encouraged
to choose a job in areas they possess or are capable of acquiring knowledge,
abilities, and interests, which is likely to increase production when a person is
engaging in what they enjoy (Nyamwange, 2016).
Opportunity
Opportunity, according to Eremie and Chiamaka (2019), may have an effect
on how students evaluate their future in terms of the realistic likelihood of a potential
future in a particular field of work. The prospects available to everyone have been
significantly impacted by the issue of poverty. The kid must have access to the
support system right away and it must be in place. To help the student through times
of financial, emotional, and educational need, support organizations such school
guidance and counseling departments will need to be established (Supporting child
and student social, emotional, behavioral, and mental ... 2021). The National
Commission on Cooperative Education (2012) stated that cooperative education
integrated chances for education, financial security, and career development.
Cooperative education is one opportunity that high school students (and their
parents) should be aware of, according to "What Is Cooperative Education?" (n.d.).
Opportunities may therefore have an impact on how many students decide on their
SHS stream.
Economic status
According to, Navarro-Carillo, G., Alonso-Ferres, M., Moya, M., & Valor-
Segura I. (2020), that the concept of socioeconomic status (SES) is intricate and
multifaceted; it includes both independent, objective qualities and the subjective
assessments of individuals regarding where they fall on the socioeconomic scale.
Rusell, A.E., Ford, T., Williams, R., et. al. (2016) also states that parental income,
education, occupation, and marital status were used to determine Socio-Economic
Status (SES). Socioeconomic position has an impact on students' ability to pursue
their ideal courses or careers in the near future. The socioeconomic condition of the
kids is what drives them to work hard and have a promising future (Narisma, 2019)
Parent’s Occupation
According to the study of Shah, S., & Hussain, D. (2021) that socioeconomic
inequality was the root cause of educational inequality. Children from low
socioeconomic backgrounds were unable to access good schools, pricey tuition,
recreational facilities, or a room of their own where they could study in solitude. A
strong socioeconomic foundation meant that kids with parents in high-profile jobs
never experienced a lack of fees, textbooks, uniforms, pocket money, or a home
library, according to 200 (80%) respondents. 34 respondents, or 13.6% of the total,
stated that pupils from well-off socioeconomic households had access to pocket
money, while this was not the case for students from lower socioeconomic strata.
Academic performance is higher among students with working parents than among
children without working parents (Atolagbe, A., Oparinde, O., & Umaru, H., 2019).
Additionally, pupils who have parents who work in offices and in educational
environments perform better than students whose parents work outside of offices
(Atolagbe, A., et.,al.). Students who have parents who often leave for work early and
come home to assist them with academics are better than students whose parents
leave for work later, require frequent travel away from home do worse than students
who do not have parents with such employment, who work in government are not
good examples of entrepreneurs. Students' perceptions of how appealing these two
career paths are are influenced by their parents' professions (Tillman, 2015),
Students whose parents are self-employed place a higher emphasis on money than
do offspring of civil workers (Spaulding, Derrick-Mills, & Callan, 2016). The study’s
demonstrates how parental career affects children's values and professional choices
(Pablo-Lerchundi, I., Morales-Alonso, G., & González-Tirados, R., 2015)