NIS-HGP-Teachers'-Orientation-SY 21-22
NIS-HGP-Teachers'-Orientation-SY 21-22
NIS-HGP-Teachers'-Orientation-SY 21-22
Department of Education
Region III-Central Luzon
Schools Division of Pampanga
In 1998, Revitalized Homeroom Guidance (RHG) for secondary learners was created to answer the
learners’ needs. However, certain considerations to make it more comprehensive, developmental, and
proactive are deemed necessary.
These provisions were formulated based on relevant current literature, and in consultation with teachers,
School Heads, and Guidance and Counseling experts. This will provide clear and functional
understanding about the important processes in the implementation and the proper monitoring and
evaluation of the program, which is an important component for its sustainability and continual
improvement.
Based on the relevant literature and the practice in other countries, Homeroom Guidance is equivalent
to Guidance Class, which is just a part of the Information Services of Guidance and Counseling Office
(Villar, 2007; Mendoza, 2003). Aquino and Razon (1993) defined Homeroom Guidance as “an
organized segment of the school's guidance services, which is given to a homeroom group usually a
section or a class with a teacher-adviser as facilitator.” Hence, the term Guidance Class Curriculum or
Guidance Class is the most common nomenclature.
Homeroom Guidance is a responsive program that equips learners with competencies to address issues
not included in the formal learning areas but is very essential to their development. Learners who go
through Homeroom Guidance have been found to have significantly decreased inappropriate behaviors
and demonstrated positive attitudes toward school as compared to those learners who were not part of
the School Counseling Program (Baker and Gerler, 2001). The study of Brigman and Campbell (2003)
also showed that elementary and middle school learners who were part of the school counseling
curriculum and group interventions that emphasized cognitive, social and self-management skills have
consistently exhibited good performance in Mathematics and Reading. Furthermore, the study of
Schlossberg et.al (2001) supported the effectiveness of Homeroom Guidance. They showed that there
is a significant improvement in terms of learners’ behavior, attitude and knowledge in the areas of goal-
setting, problem-solving, career exploration, and school resources.
Further, the study of Carey and Dimmitt (2012) found that student’s success in school, academically
and behaviorally, can be attributed to the student’s access to school counselor and comprehensive
guidance programs and this is particularly true for students in high poverty schools.
Based on the consultations conducted with the regional representatives and Guidance and Counseling
experts, there is a great need for a program that advocates the development of skills along academic,
personal and social, and career aspects. At present, Homeroom period is part of the class program,
however, there is a need to update and improve its implementation.
Some schools reported that Homeroom period is being used for classroom cleaning, extension of breaks,
collection of reply slips, and the like. Clearly, the current practices do not aid the realization of the
program objectives. More so, the consultation with different stakeholders, reiterated the significance of
collaboration among home, school, and community to ensure the holistic development of learners. It
has been raised that there should be a systematic and consistent monitoring and evaluation of the
program to achieve its proper implementation.
To obtain the vision of the Homeroom Guidance, this document serves to guide the schools in:
a. implementing the program properly to support the learners’ development;
b. providing systematic process in the overall conduct of Homeroom Guidance;
c. organizing resources needed in the program such as budget, manpower,
facilities, learning materials, and other logistical needs; and
d. articulating the scope and limits of the program including its monitoring and
evaluation.
Objectives:
• To orient the teachers in the implementation of Homeroom Guidance Program through
Modular Approach;
• To discuss the process of distribution and retrieval of Homeroom Guidance Modules;
• To inform teachers about the Learners’ Homeroom Guidance Program Assessment Tool;
• To inform teachers about the Quarterly Homeroom Guidance Program Classroom
Observation;
• To discuss clear plan on the giving of learning feedback.
Meeting Proper:
The orientation started at 8:00 AM with a short program headed by the emcee, Ms. Lady
Twinkle B. Bonga. Ma’am April Gail P. Gonzales led the singing of National Anthem followed by the
Opening Prayer. After that, Sir Russel John M. Ronquillo, school head of Nabuclod Integrated School
gave his Welcome Remarks & Inspirational Message while Ma’am Ruth R. Gonzales shared her Food
for Thought. Then Sir Napoleon V. Sundiam Jr. was asked to do the Roll Call.
After the preliminaries, the following topics were discussed during the orientation by the two Guidance
Designates of Nabuclod Integrated School: (Ma’am Monette T. Larase – Elementary Department &
Ma’am Mariel Lyka D. Tambut – Junior HS Department)
The morning session ended at 12 noon and resumed at exactly 1 in the afternoon.
The following topics were discussed during the afternoon session:
✓ Monitoring & Evaluation (Part 2)
✓ Annexes 1-5
✓ Presentation of Teaching Demonstration
✓ Making of Output (Weekly Home Learning Plan)
The session ended at exactly 5 in the afternoon.
PROGRAM
TIME ACTIVITIES
8:45 - 9:00 am Attendance Time
9:00 – 9:20 Preliminaries:
➢ National Anthem
➢ Opening Prayer
➢ Welcome Remarks & Inspirational Messages
➢ Food for Thought
➢ Roll Call
LECTURE/ DISCUSSION PROPER
9:20 – 9:40 ▪ Context of Homeroom Guidance (Rationale & History)
(Mariel Lyka D. Tambut – JHS/Guidance Designate)
Prepared by:
Attendance:
Prepared by:
Approved by: