JMJ Marist Brothers
NOTRE DAME OF MARBEL UNIVERSITY
College of Arts and Sciences
Alunan Ave., City of Koronadal, South Cotabato 9506
Rex Bryann C. Zambra PHSC 104 Seminar on Plato/Aristotle
AB-PHILO 4
Plato’s Gorgias
A Reaction Paper
In Plato's Gorgias, a philosophical dialogue, Socrates debates the nature of
rhetoric, justice, and morality with a variety of characters. Because Plato frequently
employs the dialogue format to present multiple perspectives and leave the reader's
interpretation of the text up to them, the truth in the Gorgias is not always
straightforward or simple to determine. Consider Socrates' and the other characters'
arguments and evaluate them based on their logical consistency, coherence, and
persuasiveness as one approach to determining the Gorgias' truth. Socrates, for
instance, argues that true wisdom and knowledge can only be obtained through
philosophical inquiry and that improper use of rhetoric can result in harm and injustice.
These arguments can be evaluated based on whether they are supported by evidence
or reasoning and whether they are logically sound.
Consider the dialogue's larger philosophical themes, such as the connection
between rhetoric and morality, the nature of justice, and the role of the individual in
society, when addressing the question of truth in the Gorgias. These themes can be
interpreted in a variety of ways, and different readers may have varying perspectives on
the meaning of the text or the truths it reveals. In the end, understanding the
philosophical concepts and arguments presented in Plato's Gorgias is necessary in
JMJ Marist Brothers
NOTRE DAME OF MARBEL UNIVERSITY
College of Arts and Sciences
Alunan Ave., City of Koronadal, South Cotabato 9506
order to determine the truth of the work. Understanding the cultural and historical
context in which the text was written is also essential because it can shed light on the
author's intentions and the larger philosophical debates of the time.
Socrates talks to Gorgias, a well-known sophist, and Polus, his student, as well
as Protagoras, a philosopher and sophist. The nature of rhetoric and its relationship to
truth are at the heart of the conversation. Rhetoric, according to Gorgias and Polus, is a
potent tool for persuasion regardless of the validity of the arguments. They assert that
rather than arriving at the truth, the purpose of rhetoric is to sway an audience. Rhetoric,
in Socrates' view, is only beneficial if it leads to knowledge and truth, he argues. He
contends that the genuine reason for manner of speaking isn't to convince, however to
help individuals comprehend and seek after the upside. On the other hand, Protagoras
takes a more nuanced approach to rhetoric. He argues that knowledge varies
depending on the person who holds it and that there are no absolute truths. He asserts
that, when used responsibly, rhetoric can influence people's beliefs and opinions and be
a force for good.
As a result, significant questions about the nature of truth, the function of
persuasion in public discourse, and the accountability of those who wield rhetorical
power are raised in the conversation. In the end, the conversation emphasizes the
significance of critical thinking and the pursuit of truth in any intellectual exchange that is
meaningful.
JMJ Marist Brothers
NOTRE DAME OF MARBEL UNIVERSITY
College of Arts and Sciences
Alunan Ave., City of Koronadal, South Cotabato 9506